Please Support AMWFT Efforts with Your Secure Paypal Sponsorship Donation

Sponsorship of a Benefit!

Clients & Friends: MJ and Hammer

Hammer- GOD sent me an Angel

"hammer-grammysGOD sent me an ANGEL" - Hammer speaking about Abdul-Jalil

Man Who Turn$ HIt$ Into Million$

Ed Snowden PRISM Whistleblower Part 1

Ed Snowden PRISM Whistleblower Part 1

Shop AMAZON and Help US Help OTHERS

BORP Sponsor Poster

Jalil & AMWFT Sponsor Wheelchair Basketball Tournament

Ed Snowden PRISM Whistleblower Part 2

Ed Snowden PRISM Whistleblower Part 2

Distribution of Wealth in America

Distribution of Wealth in America

KGO Radio Conversation On "OUT. The Glenn Burke Story"

KGO Radio Conversation On "OUT. The Glenn Burke Story"

Oink’Malley & Carson Coontoon

Occupiers Redeem Kings Dream While Keith Carson and His Poverty Pimps are Killers of Kings Dream- Sell It Out

Jalil on ESPN/KNBR Sports Radio

Jalil on ESPN/KNBR Sports Radio

Oakland City Attorney John Russo's Political Suicide

Jalil Enshrined in “Who’s Who”

“Reppin Superstar Pro Athletes & Entertainers”

Superstar Managements Lecture Series "Reppin Superstar Pro Athletes & Entertainers"

Purchase SUPERSTAR MANAGEMENT Lecture Series

Lecture Series Purchase Prices

Adeel Malik Testimonial on Jalil

“"In some religions they honor people who serve like you with SAINTHOOD!”"

Adeel

-Economics Professor Adeel Malik, Oxford University, England-

Speaking about Abdul-Jalil and the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation

 

Oscar Grant's "Fruitvale Station"

Oscar Grant's "Fruitvale Station"

Portrait of Abdul-Jalil by Artist Buford Delaney in Paris, France

Portrait of Abdul-Jalil by Artist Buford Delaney in Paris, France

Santa Fe Elementary School's Peace March with Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation

Santa Fe Elementary School's Peace March with Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation

1995 Pizza Hut Commercial with Deion Sanders and Jerry Jones

1995 Pizza Hut Commercial with Deion Sanders and Jerry Jones

Black Sports Leaders Summitt on Civil Rights

Black Sports Leaders Summitt on Civil Rights

Drug Agents Use Vast Phone Trove of AT&T and DEA Surveillance Records

Drug Agents Use Vast Phone Trove of AT&T and DEA Surveillance Records

Previous Posts

Nowtruth Pages

Nowtruth Documents Box

City Attorney John Russo Threathens Reporter, Censors Show on Corruption!

EMAIL: nowtruth@nowtruth.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/nowtruth , http://twitter.com/griotz

You can click on any highlighted word to view or download that item
City Attorney John Russo Threathens Reporter, Censors Show on His and AG Jerry Brown Corruption!!


miss gabrielleSJJF 1

On or about August 15, 2009 show Co-Host, Producer, and Lawyer Gabrielle Wilson informed KPFA listeners of an intriguing case she discovered in the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, the matter of Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim v CSAA, et. al.

In preparation for the show that was scheduled to air on The Gospel Experience Program- Saturday, September 5, 2009 at 8:30 A.M. on Radio Station KPFA 94.1 FM, in Berkeley CA. Miss Wilson invited three guests to participate in a legal roundtable broadcast to discuss corruption in the Alameda County Superior Court in the above referenced case. Her invited guests were the Attorney General of California Jerry Brown, Oakland City Attorney John Russo and Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, the plaintiff in the case.

California Attorney General Jerry Brown, responsible for carrying out the investigation of Alameda

Attorney General Jerry Brown with Mass Murderer Jim Jones

County Superior Court and State Appeals Court judges, District Attorney Tom Orloff, Oakland City Attorney John Russo and various corporate defendants in this case is himself defending some of the criminals and covering up the very same corruption he is supposed to be investigating and prosecuting! Full Story with Videos and Documents at visit page Attorney General Jerry Brown Defending and Covering Up for Criminals He’s To Investigate and Prosecute http://nowtruth.org/?page_id=263

Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, the Uber-successful sports and entertainment manager/agent with Superstar Management, filed a federal complaint with the United States Attorney General, Department of Justice, of a hate crime of Islamophobia and Xenophobia committed against him during a trial in Superior Court of Alameda County, California. More on al-Hakim at http://SuperstarManagement.com/

This case is the subject of an ongoing investigation into the actions of various Judges, court administration, State Attorney General, Alameda County District Attorney, Oakland City Attorney, various attorneys, defendants and their employees, agents, contractors, experts, and witnesses. This case is returning back to the United States Attorney General, Department of Justice, the local and Federal Courts.

Presiding Court Judge Yolanda Northridge Conceals Corruption

The Program was to air live over the internet on http://www.kpfa.org/ and KPFB 89.3 FM; KFCF- Fresno, CA- 88.1 FM;  KCSB – Santa Barbara, CA – 91.9 FM; KDRT-LP – Davis, CA – 101.5 FM; KDVS – Davis, CA – 90.3 FM; KHSU in Arcata, CA- 90.5 FM; KIDE – Hoopa, CA – 91.3 FM; KMUD – Redway, CA – 88.3 & 91.1 FM; KMEC-LP – Ukiah, CA – 105.1 FM; KNFS-LP – Tulare, CA – 98.1 FM; KUSP – Santa Cruz, CA – 88.9 FM; KVMR – Nevada City, CA – 89.5 &105.1 FM; KZFR – Chico, CA – 90.1 FM

During the week of August 23, 2009 Miss Wilson received a phone call from Evan Westrep from Brown’s office. He left a voice mail message for her at radio station KPFA stating he would pass her interview request along to Brown’s schedulers.

During that same week, Miss Wilson received emails and phone calls from Oakland City Attorney Russo’s press director Alex Katz. One email Katz sent to her and Sasha Lilley, interim Program Director at KPFA, with a cc: to Mark Moromodi, Supervising Deputy for the Oakland City Attorney, proclaiming that City Attorney John Russo was not involved in the case, yet he wanted her to answer questions as to why she wanted to provide a forum for the plaintiff, al-Hakim whom he alleged had posted threatening videos about John Russo. Heres an copy of that email that was a twitpic sent to our followers:

OfcOakCityAtty

Katz followed up that email with a voicemail message he left for Miss Wilson after the close of business just hours before the scheduled broadcast was to occur threatening her and warned Miss Wilson not to broadcast the interview and demanded she speak with him before she aired the scheduled program. He did this though he wanted Miss Wilson and KPFA to believe that John Russo and the City Attorney’s office was not involved in the case and had nothing to hide! You can listen to that voicemail message here.

Download now or listen on posterous

Gabby-Katz 2nd Call.m4a (1821 KB)

Download now or listen on posterous

Gabby-Katz 2nd Call.mp3 (1821 KB)

Luis Medina, a manager in the music director’s office at KPFA then calls Miss Wilson just hours prior to the scheduled broadcast and leaves a voicemail message warning her that it was very important for the broadcast not to occur. He also stated that there might be very serious repercussions taken if she were to proceed as planned. She even received a phone call from the long-time regular show host, Emmitt Powell whom was contacted by the station in response to Russo’s effort to censor the show.

Miss Wilson proceeded to host the program all alone to comply with the City Attorney and KPFA’s censorship directive…without any of her invited guests. You can listen to that voicemail message here.

Miss Wilson was forced to make at least three announcements to inform the public whom had tuned in to hear this intriguing panel examine this critical civil rights and corruption case in an important election year, that this incredible show had been canceled due to KPFA’s censorship by Oakland City Attorney John Russo! You can listen to those announcements here.

First Announcement:

Second Announcement:

Third Announcement:

Russo proceeded to engage in censorship by forcing the cancellation of the show and trying to conceal it from the public. Russo and Brown claim that they are not involved in the case yet irrefutable evidence prove otherwise! If they are not involved and have nothing to hide, why censor the show? Those actions are public now as Wilson released a statement on their crimes of which this is merely another instance of.

Miss Wilson, whom has been a programmer on Ear Thyme, Jazz Passages and The Gospel Experience, among other programs, for ten years at KPFA, was all alone in the studio that holiday weekend from 6:00 am was terrified and frightened by all the threatening emails and voicemails from KPFA’s management and Oakland City Attorney Russo she had received. She did not know what to expect during every second and at every turn of the show. (for more visit page KPFA Show Host Combats Censorship By Oakland City Attorney John Russo http://nowtruth.org/?page_id=417 )

In Katz’s email above, with the approval Mark Moromodi, Russo requests Wilson and Program Director Lilley to answer questions as to why Wilson wanted Russo on the show and proclaimed that Russo was not involved in the case. He further directs them to host a show on the great work that Russo is doing with tenants in foreclosure. Yet he expressed his desire to censor the show with the comment that he was “concerned” because he alleged al-Hakim “had posted weird and threatening videos about John Russo on YouTube” so he wanted to know why they “was giving this guy a forum”.

Russo Entrapped In Extrinsic Fraud, Planted Evidence!!!

Russo never declined the invitation to appear on the show and arrangements were made for him or any of the invited guests to appear via remote-phone broadcast from any location he chose. There was no issue regarding his security and therefore no reason to fear anyone.

al-Hakim’s alleged “weird and threatening videos about John Russo on YouTube” certainly are not weird, he has over 100 videos posted on his YouTube Channel as a resource for the collaborators on two film, music and documentaries that he is working on, including one on this corruption case. The videos range from slavery to “Jim Crow”, the Civil Rights/social unrest of the 1950’s and the Free Love/Anti-War Movements, to the current Hip-Hop culture. There are videos of many of his clients heavyweight Championships bouts to Grammy Award winners performances, concerts from Russia and Romania to commercials with children, from his own appearances at the ESPN ESPY Awards to news broadcast on National TV. The videos feature Superstar clients including Evander Holyfield, Deion Sanders, M.C. Hammer, H. Rap Brown, Mohammed Ali, Lennox Lewis, Julio Cesar Chavez, Bobby Brown, the National Football League, Lyman Bostock, among others, they have never been censored by YouTube, have had tens of thousands of views, with mostly “Five-Star” ratings and comments that cover the gamut! They are only threatening to Russo because of their deadly TRUTH!!! The same TRUTH that Russo can not afford for the public to know! This is the same reason why he threatened Wilson, then forced the cancelation and censorship of the show.

If Russo is truly not involved in the case, what does he have to fear from such a harmless broadcast that does not concern him? Why would he care what was aired on KPFA? Does he get involved in censoring any other programs on air? Is he such a “vigilante” on any other programs that he is NOT involved in?

Russo was certainly prepared to appear on a show to boast about his racist enforcement of the foreclosure laws. So why was he so adamant about censoring the show and not allowing this broadcast on his corruption? What does Mr. Whistle Blower, Transparency, Accountability, and Civic Reform in cleaning up Government and Law Enforcement aimed at restoring public confidence in government while maintaining the Highest Ethical Standards have to hide from the public?

JOHN RUSSO IS GUILTY OF CORRUPTION AND HAS UNCLEAN HANDS!!!

Unfortunately this is not the first time that Russo has engaged in censorship, intimidation, coercion, fraud and varied illegal tactics, quite the contrary, they have been his trademark in this case.

Russo “We’ll Shut You Down!!!”

In a Neighborhood Law Corp promotional video regarding another widely media exposed lawsuit against alleged slumlords, Oakland City Attorney John Russo boasts that certain landlords were being “intransigent” in cooperating with the City so “he attacked them with an army of law enforcement and City Officials”.

Russo and City Auditor Cortney Ruby stateded  they truly believe “that we want citizens to do as the City choses voluntarily, and if not, we will compel citizens to do it and if they fail- we will shut them down!”

As this “kick the minorities and stomp them when you get them down” tactic employed by Russo and the City Attorneys, shouldn’t they be shut down for their continued failure and refusal to provide answers why Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold, Michele Abney, Eliada Perez, and former City Attorney Jayne Williams and former employee Pat Smith provided the case file to defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook for nearly a year and failed to notify the court of this unpardonable illegal breach in the chain of custody of the file!? They have all failed and refused to provide the information sought by al-Hakim, and further failed and refused to appear under court ordered subpoena for deposition testimony twice and under court ordered subpoena for trial testimony and have caused al-Hakim and family to be forced from their $1 million plus home and office, foreclosed from an over $20 million law suit, and multi million business for 12 years thru the City Attorneys violation of the business and professional codes, extrinsic fraud, subornation of perjurious testimony, committing these acts under the color of law with unclean hands, and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. He did this with the aid of this same army of City Officials!

Demetruis Shelton, current President of the National Bar Association and City Attorney employee’s Voicemail “Russo Received Trial Subpoenas!!!”

Download now or listen on posterous

DShelton-CityOakSubp.mp3 (9044 KB)

http://www.box.net/shared/88g62hzaky

Twitter Engaged In Censorship Regarding the Corruption on Behalf of Attorney General Jerry Brown, Oakland City Attorney John Russo and Alameda County D.A. Tom Orloff

(for more visit page Twitter Engages In Censorship http://nowtruth.org/?page_id=414)

Shortly after Russo forced censorship of the KPFA broadcast of the show on his corruption, NowTruth.org sent out a Twitter message to their followers with a copy of the email from Alex Katz clearly exposing his hand in the censoring of the show. The next day the twitter account was “suspended” for allegedly replying to tweets and “suspicious activity”!.

There is NOTHING suspicious about this activity and the tweets established their validity. Nowtruth has received several @mentions from people sympathetic to Brown, Russo and Orloff whom have tried tirelessly to silence this case and the information about it from getting out to the masses in an effort to protect them.

Just as Russo proceeded to engage in censorship by forcing the cancellation of the show and trying to conceal it from the public, those actions are public now as the reporter released a statement on their crimes of which this is merely another instance of. Now Twitter has joined them by engaging in censorship.

Twitter has failed and refused to respond to just what the alleged “suspicious activity” was, if and how it was investigated, what were the findings of that investigation, AND they have failed and refused to answer the burning question of whether they had been contacted by any of these parties, their agents, employees or their representatives, including Alex Katz, Joe Trippi, Jeremy D. Thompson, or anyone else regarding the “suspension” for the alleged “suspicious activity”

One certainly knows that if you were investigating suspicious activity in this case, you need to take a look at the actions of those that got Twitter to comply with their desire to censor this case and their continuing crimes for which Twitter founder Evan Williams, co-founder Biz Stone, and Twitter are now involved. al-Hakim and Nowtruth.org will not stop their civil and criminal investigation in this matter as they proceed, it only widens and deepens in it’s breadth and depth.

There’s nothing even remotely suspicious about the tweet, we will not be censored, and we are continuing to investigate ALL of these parties and their representatives, including Alex Katz, Joe Trippi, Jeremy D. Thompson, Twitter, Evan Williams, Biz Stone and their suspicious activity and to prosecute those involved in these continuing crimes.

NowTruth.org Website Hacked After Twitter Message On Corruption

On December 1, 2009 al-Hakim sent out another twitter message to his following regarding the censorship of the show with a link to the stories on NowTruth.org and that evening, the NowTruth.org website was hacked and sabotaged. Out of over 20 pages on the site, only 4 that address the corruption of Judge Jon Tigar, Brown, Orloff and Russo were damaged such that the public could not view them at all rendering the tweet and link useless. Is this not another example of their censorship?

Is Oakland City Attorney John Russo Above The Law?

Oakland City Attorney John Russo

Oakland City Attorney John Russo, the quintesential mayorial want to be, has committed political suicide by a self inflicted corruption wound to the temple and can never win an elected posistion with the revelation of undeniable evidence of criminal wrong doing as protest and demands for his resignation and payment of damages are insurmountable and gaining meteoric momentum!

Oakland City Attorney John Russo Must Be Prosecuted!

John Russo and the City Attorney’s office should be prosecuted for clearly constructing fraudulent fabricated evidence in 1999 and planting that evidence favorable to the defendants in the case files SIX years AFTER the case was closed, engaged in spoliation of the remainning evidence in the court files from 1991; provided the entire case files to defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook whom absconded with the files for nearly a year, after this unpardonable breach of the chain of custody of the evidence, allowed the court to subpeona the case files to make the tainted files a part of the official trial record, presented the spoliated evidence subjected to testimony at trial and engaged in acts to coverup these criminal litigation tactics.

For eight (8) years CSAA defense counsel Stephan Barber has denied that he had anything to do with the handling, disappearance, transportation, having possession, copying or returning of the City of Oakland case file in the al-Hakim matter from the 1991 backup. He has repeatedly stated that he “never touched the file” and “knew nothing about it”.

On January 28, 2000, defendant Cook advised Plaintiff by letter that CSAA-IIB was canceling the policy alleging fraud by al-Hakim and seeking the return of all benefits paid and refers to information he has from the City of Oakland litigation file that was not provided by al-Hakim. On March 30 , 2000 Cook reiterates those statements of having this information in letters to al-Hakim’s attorney, Michael Michel. On March 30 ,2000 in letter to the umpire of the appraisal panel, Ron Magin, COOK makes the statement of having the entire City of Oakland Litigation file in the backup matter against al-Hakim but will only produce part of the information as needed.(See letters under Exhibit D) Cook follows that statement with producing the City of Oakland files during the appraisal hearing(See appraisal transcripts from Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim Appraisal Hearing V.2 4/6/00 page 74L14-17 under Exhibit D), the appraisal panel admits the file and photos into evidence(See appraisal transcripts from Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim Appraisal Hearing V.5 4/11/00 page 205L13-24 under Exhibit D) and throughout the appraisal hearing questions al-Hakim, and his experts Robert Gils and Chris Kirschenheuter on the documents.

During the recent CSAA trial Ron Cook admitted on the witness stand that he received the City file from Barber before October 1999. Barber then admitted during the next break that he got the file from the City and arranged to have it copied by AKON Copying Service and that he had said file until June 2000. It was not stolen, misplaced, nor had he absconded with it, it was given to him by the City Attorneys office!!!

al-Hakim and his attorneys Michael Michel and Jeff Fackler, had attempted at least six  times to obtain copies of the City litigation file from November 1999 to June of 2000 and was told by the City Attorney’s Office, specifically, Jannie Wong and Anita Hong that the file was “missing” and was last requested by Ron Cook.(See appraisal transcripts from Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim Appraisal Hearing V.4 4/10/00 page 169L6-9 and V.6 4/12/00 page 106L12-21 under Exhibit E) Finally, after six months, in June 2000, Anita Hong called to notify Mr. Michel that the file had been returned and was available for viewing. At that time Mr. Michel was told that the file had been returned by  CSAA’s attorney. (See Michel letter dated July 5, 2005 under Exhibit E) al-Hakim called Ms. Hong and was told the file was back and available for viewing, and when asked who returned the file, she responded “it was returned by Steve Barber of Ropers Majeski”.

Barber’s admission now corroborates the story that was told to al-Hakim and his attorneys Mike Michel and Jeff Fackler in July 2000 by Oakland City Attorney’s Janie Wong and Anita Hong. However, since 1999 Janie Wong, Anita Hong and Russo have always mainitained that the files were missing and were last requested for viewing by defendant Ron Cook is also perjurious and deceitful. We now know that the December 1, 2005 written statement by Oakland City Attorney John Russo about Anita Hong leaving the case files at the office counter and no one coming to review them is willfully and intentionally perjurious, deceitful and fraudulent.

As a protective measure for his co-defendants, Judge Jon Tigar had ruled that Barber would have to testify and answer al-Hakim’s charges of spoliation of evidence and subornation of perjurious testimony stemming from his handling of the City file if there was more than one case file.

City Case Correspondance

***All Correspondance can be found in Documents Box***

In November 1999 al-Hakim contacted Janie Wong and Juanita Hong to get access to the City file and was informed that the file had been provided to CSAA’s attorney and could not be located. He contacted the City latter in June 2000 and informed that the file had been returned and when asked by whom he was told “Stephan Barber of Ropers Majeski”.

Herein is a letter from al-Hakim’s attorney Michael Michel stating that he contacted Janie Wong and tried to get access to the City file in March 2000 and was informed by Juanita Hong that the file had been produced to CSAA’s attorney earlier and could not be located. He was contacted latter in June 2000 and informed that the file had been found.

On September 2, 2005 al-Hakim called Randolph Hall regarding the handling of the City file and he was referred to Eliada Perez. al-Hakim called and left a voicemail for Perez but never received a return call.

After al-Hakim did not receive a return phone call from Perez, on September 20, 2005 al-Hakim sent a letter to Randolph Hall in regards to his response thru Sophia Lee to a voicemail al-Hakim left for him on September 16, 2005 regarding the handling of the City file.

On October 6, 2005 al-Hakim sent another letter via certified mail to Randolph Hall in regards to his nonresponse and that of Eliada Perez to the voicemail al-Hakim left for them on September 16, 2005 and the September 20, 2005 letter regarding the handling of the City file.

On October 7, 2005 al-Hakim received a fax from Hall sent by Sophia Li referring the matter to Anita Hong, suggesting that she has responded and he has no additional information.

On October 18, 2005 al-Hakim sent another letter via certified mail to Randolph Hall acknowledging his receipt of the certified mail of the October 6, 2005 letter in regards to his nonresponse to the voicemail al-Hakim left for Eliada Perez and him on September 16, 2005 and the September 20, 2005 letter regarding the handling of the City file.

On October 19, 2005 al-Hakim sent another letter via certified mail to John Russo expressing his concern for the lack of a response from Randolph Hall, Janie Wong and

Anita Hong and acknowledging Hall’s receipt of the certified mail of the October 6, 2005 letter in

Abdul-Jalil 10-05 letter to Russo

regards to his nonresponse to the voicemail al-Hakim left for Eliada Perez and him on September 16, 2005 and the September 20, 2005 and October 18, 2005 certified letter regarding the handling of the City file.

On October 26, 2005 al-Hakim then called Michelle Abney to verify the chain of custody of the City files and discussed this very serious legal matter of breaking that chain of custody and spoliating the files, wherein she expressed her concern that the problems in the handling of the file was very serious and could only be answered by the parties involved. She said she would pass along the concerns and have the appropriate parties to address the issues. al-Hakim never received any response from anyone.

On November 28, 2005 al-Hakim received a letter from Mark Morodomi signed by

Michelle Abney stating the office has no records that are responsive to al-Hakim’s inquires and

Russo-Abney-Morodomi Letter

“Specifically, no “chain of custody” record exists”.

On December 1, 2005 al-Hakim sent another letter via certified mail to John Russo expressing his concern for the disingenuous response from Mark Morodomi signed by Michelle Abney stating the office has no records that are responsive to al-Hakim’s inquires and “Specifically, no “chain of custody” record exists”. This was a continuation of the evasive pattern of not answering by Randolph Hall, Eliada Perez, Janie Wong and Anita Hong in acknowledging Russo and Hall’s receipt of the certified mail of the October 6, 2005 letter in regards to his nonresponse to the voicemail al-Hakim left for Eliada Perez and him on September 16, 2005 and the September 20, 2005; October 18, 2005; and October 19, 2005 certified letters and al-Hakim’s October 26, 2005 call with Michelle Abney regarding the handling of the City file.

al-Hakim states he called Michelle Abney whom confirmed that there was in fact a process in place to verify the chain of custody of the City files and discussed this very serious legal matter of breaking that chain of custody and spoliating the files, wherein she expressed her concern that the problems in the handling of the file was very serious and could only be answered by the parties involved. She said she would pass along the concerns and have the appropriate parties to address the issues. al-Hakim never received any response from anyone.

al-Hakim further states that there could be no way the City could be in the business of litigating case if it had no process for the chain of custody for evidence in it’s cases and again asks that Russo respond to the issues raised in the certified letters received by him.

Russo 12-05 letter to Abdul-Jalil

On December 2, 2005 al-Hakim received a letter from Russo stating the office has timely and thoroughly responded to al-Hakim’s requests, that the files were destroyed between February and August 2005, and Anita Hong recalls that a request was made to review the file, it was retrieved from off-site storage and made available for viewing but no one appeared to review them so they were returned to storage. Russo further states that Mark Morodomi infromed al-Hakim that there are no records that are responsive to al-Hakim’s inquires and “Specifically, no “chain of custody” record exists” applicable to their document retention policy and are destroyed seven years after closing the file.

On May 17, 2006 al-Hakim sent another letter via certified mail to John Russo expressing his concern for the lack of a response from Russo, Mark Morodomi, Michelle Abney, Randolph Hall, Janie Wong and Anita Hong and acknowledging Russo and Hall’s receipt of certified mail of the October 6, 2005 letter in regards to his nonresponse to the voicemail al-Hakim left for Eliada Perez and him on September 16, 2005 and the September 20, 2005; October 18, 2005; October 19, 2005 and December 1, 2005 certified letters and al-Hakim’s October 26, 2005 call with Michelle Abney regarding the handling of the City file and asking that they submit to depositions.

Russo-Harrold Letter to Abdul-Jalil

On June 1, 2006 al-Hakim received a letter from Erica Harrold for John Russo stating the office is not aware of any authority pursuant to which Russo and the other City employees deposition can be taken and ask that specific statutes and/or case law be provided to confer the authority and she may respond.

On June 29, 2006 al-Hakim sent another letter via certified mail to John Russo to notify him of his intent to have the court issued deposition subpoenas served on John Russo, Janie Wong and Anita Hong to submit to depositions on August 1, 2006 regarding the handling of the City file.

In July 2, 2006 al-Hakim file an ex-parte motion for the issuance of deposition subpoenas and served notice on John Russo, Janie Wong and Anita Hong to submit to depositions on August 1, 2006 regarding the handling of the City file.

Russo Trial Subpeona

On March 29, 2007 al-Hakim sent another letter via certified mail to John Russo expressing his concern for the lack of a response from Russo, Mark Morodomi, Michelle Abney, Randolph Hall, Janie Wong and Anita Hong and acknowledging Russo and Hall’s receipt of certified mail of the October 6, 2005 letter in regards to his non response to the voicemail al-Hakim left for Eliada Perez and him on September 16, 2005 and the September 20, 2005; October 18, 2005; October 19, 2005; December 1, 2005, and May 17, 2006 certified letters and al-Hakim’s October 26, 2005 call with Michelle Abney regarding the handling of the City file and again asking that they submit to depositions.

In August 1, 2007 al-Hakim had the court issuance of trial subpoenas served on John Russo, Janie Wong and Anita Hong to submit to trial testimony beginning September 7, 2007 regarding the handling of the City file. Demetrius Shelton called al-Hakim acknowledging Russo’s receipt of the subpoenas.

Russo’s Media Presence

John Russo.com

As the byline on his website John Russo.com, in his brassy, self-touting manner, Oakland City Attorney John Russo refers to himself as “The Leader for Government Transparency and Civic Reform!” – and the standard bearer of – “Pragmatic Progressive Leadership!”

Russo further describes himself as “passionate that all Oakland citizens have a right to a safe community, good job opportunities, a thriving economy, and a responsible and transparent government.”

John Russo sells himself as “The Leader for Government Transparency and Civic Reform”, yet al-Hakim has contacted Russo and the Oakland City Attorney’s office several times by registered mail, phone and fax, while having previously served multiple deposition and trial subpoenas on John Russo and ALL the parties named above and they have ALL failed and refused to answer any request for information or appear to testify EVERY time.

Russo has engaged in acts to coverup his criminal litigation tactics, failed and refused to disclose to the court, nor inform the Judge of the City Attorney’s improper and illegal transgressions regarding the fact the defendants alleged absconding with and taking custody of the City of Oakland case files for nearly a year and allowed the trial to proceed knowing their liability and the legal impact of their fraudulent fabricated evidence in 1999 and planted that evidence favorable to the defendants in the case files SIX years AFTER the case was closed, engaged in spoliation of remainning evidence in the court files from 1991 where during the trial, testimony revealed that there were numerous documents and photos of a very damning nature to the defense that were missing, altered, or incomplete, and their unpardonable breach in the chain of custody of the City files.

Russo’s “Oakland Open Government” Public Service Announcement

In his Public Service Announcement entitled “Oakland Open Government” Russo touts his staff and points out Mark Morodomi and Michelle Abney, self-described as “The Advocate for the Public”. Morodomi states “Citizens have a right to see documents”. Russo explains the City motto is “Jus Por Popolo” meaning “Law in the Service of the Public” to give you the tools and the resources to compete fully in our local democracy.”

Russo proclaims he is passionate about his belief that “it is the government’s job to conduct the peoples business on behalf of the peolpe, accountable to the people, and in full viewof the people. That’s why I created Oakland’s first “Open Government” program.”

If City attorney John Russo and his proud personal appointee Mark Morodomi honestly believe“Jus Pro Populo-translated to Law in the service of the public”; that they truly are employees of and work for the Public as shareholders of the corporation called the City of Oakland; that the public is entitled to City records; they truly beleive in government accountability, transparency, and full disclosure in the publics right to know; that Russo wants to restore the publics faith in Government; why did Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Eliada Perez, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold, Demetruis Shelton and Michele Abney provide the case file to the defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook for nearly a year and then failed and refused to notify the court of this unpardonable illegal breach in the chain of custody of the file; while Russo and all the City Attorney’s employees has failed and refused to provide the information sought by al-Hakim, and further all have failed and refused to appear under court ordered subpeona for deposition testimony on two occassions and under court ordered subpeona for trial testimony?

John Russo “My Word- OpEd”,

“Police’s lawsuit against Oakland is shameful”

Also on his website is an “opEd- My Word” article as it ran printed in the Oakland Tribune newspaper October 21, 2008 by John Russo entitled “Police’s lawsuit against Oakland is shameful”, in which Russo laments the hard fact that a class action lawsuit, “instigated” by Mike Rains alleges “the lawsuit amounts to little more than a shakedown” and “if the lawsuit is successful, Oakland taxpayers will be on the hook for untold millions of dollars” in overtime to cops. Russo described it as “a particularly costly and brazen” lawsuit against the City of Oakland by Oakland Police Officers then complains “Incredibly, three of the lead plaintiffs were fired for cause: One for threatening an elderly couple with his service handgun, one for watching pornography while on duty and one for providing police investigation information to the criminals under investigation.” He further states it is ” a shameless move, a nickel and dime limesuit that Oakland has spent $317,000 defending and pleads with the public ” Please don’t hesitate to contact me about this or any other issue”.

If Russo feels that it was proper to fire a police officer for giving police information to criminals under investigation, he should resign and pay punitive damages, restitution/sanctions and/or be fired for giving the entire case file to defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook for nearly a year and has engaged in acts to coverup these criminal litigation tactics, failed and refused to disclose to the court, nor inform the Judge of their improper and illegal transgressions regarding the fact the defendants alleged absconding with and taking custody of the City of Oakland files for nearly a year and allowed the trial to proceed knowing their liability and the legal impact of their fraudulent fabricated evidence in 1999 and planted that evidence favorable to the defendants in the files SIX years AFTER the case was closed, engaged in spoliation of remainning evidence in the court files from 1991 where during the trial, testimony revealed that there were numerous documents and photos of a very damning nature to the defense that were missing, altered, or incomplete, with their unpardonable breach in the chain of custody of the City files and as a direct and proximate result have caused al-Hakim and family to be forced from their $1+ million home, office, foreclosed from an over $20 million law suit, and multi million business for 12 years.

Russo’s Article “Stepping in to fill Oakland’s Power Vacuum”

by Byron Williams, Oakland Tribune

In an article printed in the Oakland Tribune July 12, 2008 by columnist Byron Williams entitled “Stepping in to fill Oakland’s Power Vacuum” he discusses Oakland City Attorney John Russo and City Auditor Courtney Ruby press conference unveiling their five-point reform package aimed at restoring public confidence in local government in the wake of allegations of nepotism and interfering with an ongoing police investigation by the former city administrator.

Russo’s “Real Oakland Administrative Reform” (ROAR)

According to Russo’s Web site, Real Oakland Administrative Reform (ROAR) is designed to“make city government more accountable, more transparent and more effective for the taxpayers of Oakland.”

ROAR includes:

1. A whistleblower protection ordinance.

2. A strong anti-nepotism ordinance.

3. Reform of flawed personnel department procedures to reduce taxpayer liability.

4. Reform of the city’s inadequate records management practices.

5. A new employee ethics program that includes mandatory ethics training for all supervisors.

Nothing like a few charges of ethics violations by a top city official splattered onto the front pages to get elected officials in a good-government frame of mind.

Though Russo, Ruby and Councilwoman Patricia Kernighan made it painstakingly clear the unspoken subtext of the press conference was to answer the question: Who is leading Oakland?

It was one of those nonverbal mutually agreed upon moments in a press conference when the journalist asks a question knowing in advance he or she will not get a straight answer and the elected official does not feel any obligation to step out of character by responding forthrightly.

Citing his role as an elected official, along with the city auditor, Russo sees both offices as independent watchdogs for the City. Russo reiterated that the reforms he and Ruby are proposing have been issues plaguing the city for years.

Ethics reform is not sexy stuff. It is only in the midst of ethics violations that it becomes an above-the-fold news item. In a city where frustration is trumping hope, Oakland is willing to grasp onto leadership wherever it can find it, even if it surrounds such mundane issues as ethics reform.

Real Oakland Administrative Reform Video Part 1

Real Oakland Administrative Reform Video Part 2

** Complaint and Evidence Against

Oakland City Attorney John Russo & Staff **

If Oakland City Attorney John Russo truly beleives “they are the grease between City Hall and the community”, why did he, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Eliada Perez, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold and Michele Abney provided the al-Hakim case file to defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook for nearly a year and failed to notify the court of this unpardonable illegal breach in the chain of custody of the file. They cause al-Hakim and family to be forced from their $1million plus home and office, foreclosed from an over $20 million law suit, and multi million business for 12 years thru the Oakland City Attorneys violation of the business and professional codes, extrinsic fraud, subornation of perjurious testimony, while committing these acts under the color of law with unclean hands, and should not be prosecuted to the full extent of the law! Why have they all failed and refused to provide the information sought by al-Hakim, and further failed and refused to appear under court ordered subpeona for deposition testimony twice and under court ordered subpeona for trial testimony?

If John Russo and the City can complain to a judge that “it is unconscioable to allow a tenant to go a single winter without heat, that their conscienioius would not allow them to do so”, how can he, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Eliada Perez, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold and Michele Abney cause al-Hakim and family to be forced from their $1million plus home and office, foreclosed from an over $20 million law suit, and multi million business for 12 years thru the Oakland City Attorneys violation of the business and professional codes, extrinsic fraud, subornation of perjurious testimony, while committing these acts under the color of law with unclean hands, and should not be prosecuted to the full extent of the law! They provide the case file to the defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook for nearly a year and fail and refuse to notify the court of this unpardonable illegal breach in the chain of custody of the file. Why have they all failed and refused to provide the information sought by al-Hakim, and all fail and refuse to appear under court ordered subpeona for deposition testimony on two occassions and under court ordered subpeona for trial testimony?

Oakland City Attorney John Russo complains that he “doesn’t want a Katrina like castrophe here” yet he has cause al-Hakim and his family to be forced to live like Katrina victims imprisoned from their $1million plus home and office, foreclosed from an over $20 million law suit, and multi million business for 12 years thru the Oakland City Attorney’s violation of the business and professional codes, extrinsic fraud, subornation of perjurious testimony, committing these acts under the color of law with unclean hands, and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law!

If Oakland City Attorney John Russo and the City believe that “tenants are entitled to a habitable place to live”, how can they cause al-Hakim and family to be forced from their $1million plus home and office, foreclosed from an over $20 million law suit, and multi million business for 12 years thru the Oakland City Attorney’s violation of the business and professional codes, extrinsic fraud, subornation of perjurious testimony, committing these acts under the color of law with unclean hands, and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law!

Oakland City Attorney John Russo complains about landloards being “intransigent” in cooperating with the City so “he attacked them with an army of law enforcement and City Officials”, yet he, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Eliada Perez, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold and Michele Abney provided the case file to the defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook for nearly a year and failed to notify the court of this unpardonable illegal breach in the chain of custody of the file; all failed and refused to provide the information sought by al-Hakim, and further failed and refused to appear under court ordered subpeona for deposition testimony twice and under court ordered subpeona for trial testimony and have caused al-Hakim and family to be forced from their $1million plus home and office, foreclosed from an over $20 million law suit, and multi million business for 12 years thru the Oakland City Attorneys violation of the business and professional codes, extrinsic fraud, subornation of perjurious testimony, committing these acts under the color of law with unclean hands, and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. He did this while this same army of law enforcement and City Officials have sat by quitely!

If Oakland City Attorney John Russo truly wants “the public to know that the City Government is operating on the level”, why has he, Oakland City Attorneys Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Eliada Perez, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold and Michele Abney all failed and refused to provide the information sought by al-Hakim, and further all failed and refused to appear under court ordered subpeona for deposition testimony twice and under court ordered subpeona for trial testimony regarding their providing the case file to the defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook for nearly a year and failed to notify the court of this unpardonable illegal breach in the chain of custody of the file, causing al-Hakim and family to be forced from their $1million plus home and office, foreclosed from an over $20 million law suit, and multi million business for 12 years thru the City Attorneys violation of the business and professional codes, extrinsic fraud, subornation of perjurious testimony, committing these acts under the color of law with unclean hands, and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law!

If Oakland City Attorney John Russo and City Auditor Cortney Ruby truly want “to enact, and enforce their own Whistleblower program” and they want the public to truly believe that “the City Government is operating on the level”, they should start with this complaint to investigate themselves and provide answers to why has Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Eliada Perez, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold and Michele Abney provided the case file to defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook for nearly a year and failed to notify the court of this unpardonable illegal breach in the chain of custody of the file, all failed and refused to provide the information sought by al-Hakim, all failed and refused to appear under court ordered subpeona for deposition testimony twice and under court ordered subpeona for trial testimony as well; have caused al-Hakim and family to be forced from their $1million plus home and office, foreclosed from an over $20 million law suit, and multi million business for 12 years thru the City Attorneys violation of the business and professional codes, extrinsic fraud, subornation of perjurious testimony, committing these acts under the color of law with unclean hands, and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. He did this with the aid of this same army of City Officials!

If Oakland City Attorney John Russo and City Auditor Cortney Ruby truly believe “there is a crisis of lack of public confidence in Oakland City Government, that people are fatally mad about the unethicial behavior, and abuse of power rampant in the City Government; that Oakland truly deserves a new day”; if Russo is honestly “mad about it; that it is truly time for Oakland in quoting Russo “To Get On With It!” to clean up corruption”; that Russo and Ruby “truly wants to enact, and enforce their self authored Whistleblower program”; and they sincerely“want the public to believe that the City Government is operating on the level”, then they should start with this complaint to investigate themselves and provide answers to why has Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Eliada Perez, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold and Michele Abney provided the case file to defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook for nearly a year and failed to notify the court of this unpardonable illegal breach in the chain of custody of the file; all failed and refused to provide the information sought by al-Hakim, and further failed and refused to appear under court ordered subpeona for deposition testimony twice and under court ordered subpeona for trial testimony and have caused al-Hakim and family to be forced from their $1million plus home and office, foreclosed from an over $20 million law suit, and multi million business for 12 years thru the City Attorneys violation of the business and professional codes, extrinsic fraud, subornation of perjurious testimony, committing these acts under the color of law with unclean hands, and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. He did this with the aid of this same army of City Officials!

If Oakland City Attorney John Russo and City Auditor Cortney Ruby truly believe “that City employees should be held to the highest ethical standards; that there is a formidible crisis of lack of public confidence in Oakland City Government”, then they should start with this complaint to investigate themselves and provide answers to why has Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Eliada Perez, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold, and Michele Abney provided the case file to defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook for nearly a year and failed to notify the court of this unpardonable illegal breach in the chain of custody of the file; all failed and refused to provide the information sought by al-Hakim, and further failed and refused to appear under court ordered subpeona for deposition testimony twice and under court ordered subpeona for trial testimony and have caused al-Hakim and family to be forced from their $1million plus home and office, foreclosed from an over $20 million law suit, and multi million business for 12 years thru the City Attorneys violation of the business and professional codes, extrinsic fraud, subornation of perjurious testimony, committing these acts under the color of law with unclean hands, and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. He did this with the aid of this same army of City Officials!

If Oakland City Attorney John Russo and City Auditor Cortney Ruby are truly “for honest, transparent government” and truly opposed to in Russo’s words “more politicians simply keeping the game going as long as they can”; then they should start with this complaint to investigate themselves and provide answers to why has Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Eliada Perez, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold and Michele Abney provided the case file to defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook for nearly a year and failed to notify the court of this unpardonable illegal breach in the chain of custody of the file; all failed and refused to provide the information sought by al-Hakim, and further failed and refused to appear under court ordered subpeona for deposition testimony twice and under court ordered subpeona for trial testimony and have caused al-Hakim and family to be forced from their $1million plus home and office, foreclosed from an over $20 million law suit, and multi million business for 12 years thru the City Attorneys violation of the business and professional codes, extrinsic fraud, subornation of perjurious testimony, committing these acts under the color of law with unclean hands, and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. He did this with the aid of this same army of City Officials!

If Oakland City Attorney John Russo and City Auditor Cortney Ruby truly believe “that we want citizens to do as the City choses voluntarily, and if not, we will compel citizens to do it and if they fail- we will shut you down!”must Russo and the City Attorneys be shut downfor their continued failure and refusal to provide answers why Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Eliada Perez, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold and Michele Abney provided the case file to defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook for nearly a year and failed to notify the court of this unpardonable illegal breach in the chain of custody of the file!? They have all failed and refused to provide the information sought by al-Hakim, and further failed and refused to appear under court ordered subpeona for deposition testimony twice and under court ordered subpeona for trial testimony and have caused al-Hakim and family to be forced from their $1million plus home and office, foreclosed from an over $20 million law suit, and multi million business for 12 years thru the City Attorneys violation of the business and professional codes, extrinsic fraud, subornation of perjurious testimony, committing these acts under the color of law with unclean hands, and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. He did this with the aid of this same army of City Officials!

Oakland City Attorney John Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Eliada Perez, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetrius Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold and Michele Abney provided the case file to defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook for nearly a year and failed to notify the court of this unpardonable illegal breach in the chain of custody of the file in full participation and complicity in the defense’s litigation strategy as part of Russo’s self touted tactic of “lending the muscle and support of the city municipality to their case” in an effort to defeat al-Hakim; they all failed and refused to provide the information sought by al-Hakim, and further failed and refused to appear under court ordered subpeona for deposition testimony twice and under court ordered subpeona for trial testimony and have caused al-Hakim and family to be forced from their $1million plus home and office, foreclosed from an over $20 million law suit, and multi million business for 12 years thru the City Attorneys violation of the business and professional codes, extrinsic fraud, subornation of perjurious testimony, committing these acts under the color of law with unclean hands, and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. He did this with the aid of this same army of City Officials!

If Oakland City Attorney John Russo sincerely feels “litigants should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law!”, should he, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Eliada Perez, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetrius Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold and Michele Abney not be prosecuted for their providing the case file to defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook for nearly a year and failed to notify the court of this unpardonable illegal breach in the chain of custody of the file; evading the many court ordered subpeonas to testify regarding their providing the case file to the defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook and failed to notify the court of this unpardonable illegal breach in the chain of custody; failing and refusing to provide the information sought by al-Hakim, and further failing and refusing to appear under court ordered subpeona for deposition testimony twice and under court ordered subpeona for trial testimony and have caused al-Hakim and family to be forced from their $1million plus home and office, foreclosed from an over $20 million law suit, and multi million business for 12 years thru the City Attorneys violation of the business and professional codes, extrinsic fraud, subornation of perjurious testimony, committing these acts under the color of law with unclean hands, and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. He did this with the aid of this same army of City Officials!

As one can easily tell from the evidence provided herein Oakland City Attorneys John Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Eliada Perez, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetrius Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold and Michele Abney has, as Russo put, “stayed on script”regarding their evading the many court ordered subpeonas to testify regarding their providing the case file to the defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook for nearly a year and failing and refusing to notify the court of this unpardonable illegal breach in the chain of custody of the file and avoid prosecution for violation of the business and professional codes, extrinsic fraud, subornation of perjurious testimony, while committing these acts under the color of law with unclean hands, and as a direct and proximate result have caused al-Hakim and family to be forced from their $1million plus home and office, foreclosed from an over $20 million law suit, and multi million business for 12 years thru the City Attorneys violation of the business and professional codes, extrinsic fraud, subornation of perjurious testimony, committing these acts under the color of law with unclean hands, and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. He did this with the aid of this same army of City Officials!

If Oakland City Attorney John Russo truly believes “people are interseted in whats happening at City hall!” and Russo was “tharted from enacting change by the previous administration”, why didn’t he simply comply with the many written requests for information from al-Hakim or the demands of the three court ordered subpeonas for John Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Eliada Perez, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetrius Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold and Michele Abney to testify at deposistion and trial regarding their providing the case file to defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook for nearly a year and failed to notify the court of this unpardonable illegal breach in the chain of custody of the file in full participation and complicity in the defense’s litigation startegy lending the muscle and support of the city municipality to their case in an effort to defeat al-Hakim; all failing and refusing to provide the information sought by al-Hakim, and as a direct and proximate result, have caused al-Hakim and family to be forced from their $1million plus home and office, foreclosed from an over $20 million law suit, and multi million business for 12 years thru the City Attorneys violation of the business and professional codes, extrinsic fraud, subornation of perjurious testimony, committing these acts under the color of law with unclean hands, and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. He did this with the aid of this same army of City Officials! This would not have required any change from the previous administration and certainly was of interest to the public and al-Hakim.

if If Oakland City Attorney John Russo can claim “as licensed professionals in their field the Oak City attys can not claim ignorance”, that “they were warned and aware their behavior was illegal by al-Hakim, everybody knows that committing crimes and throwing a family out of their home for no reason is wrong”why didn’t they simply comply with the many written requests for information from al-Hakim? How does he justify his, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Eliada Perez, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetrius Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold and Michele Abney evading the many court ordered subpeonas to testify regarding their providing the case file to the defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook for nearly a year and failing and refusing to notify the court of this unpardonable illegal breach in the chain of custody of the file and avoid prosecution for violation of the business and professional codes, extrinsic fraud, subornation of perjurious testimony, committing these acts under the color of law with unclean hands, and as a direct and proximate result have caused al-Hakim and family to be forced from their $1million plus home and office, foreclosed from an over $20 million law suit, and multi million business for 12 years thru the City Attorneys violation of the business and professional codes, extrinsic fraud, subornation of perjurious testimony, committing these acts under the color of law with unclean hands, and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. He did this with the aid of this same army of City Officials!

Russo’s incredulous display of Racism, Bigotry, Hate, Islamophobia and self-annointed White Male Socio-Economic Class and Priviledge

Now lets view this video and disect Russo’s egreious display of extreme rascim and inhumanity; his repulsive display of cruel horrifying bigotry, hatred, and islamophobia; and regurgitate Russo’s incredulous display of self-percieved, self-annointed White Male Socio-Economic Class and Priviledge. Russo verbally exercises these demons as:

1) Russo feels that if he, as a white male City Attorney wrongs a black man, all Russo has to do is apologize, he tells the blackman to move on with his life, the matters forgotten and Russo goes on unscathed to harm others with his racist ways;

2) but Russo feels if the blackman is wrong, he will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. How more blantantly racist can Russo be!? Shouldn’t Russo also be prosecuted to the full extent of the law for his crimes? Why can’t the blackman simply apologize like Russo feels he can if he’s wrong? Russo was elected to enfocer equal justice under the law, not to evade and obstruct investigation nor offer apologies when he gets caught breaking the law. Russo is verbally excercising his perceived white male upper class priviledge and social economic status while engaging in selective prosecution and feels he’s above and immune to the law!

3) John Russo takes a blatant bigoted swipe at Muslims and Islam with a well known referrence of terrosist rethoric as Russo laughs while mocking muslims with this common referrence at a time when many feel it’s patriotic to slaughter Muslims around the world. This is a great display of John Russo’s bigotry, insensitivty, and true feelings of inhumanity toward man.

These revealing examples of the real John Russo that clearly exhibit his true beliefs as they pretain to blacks, minorities and racism; his being above the law with his self-percieved White Male Upper Class and Socio-Economic Priviledge; Bigotry and inciting Islamophobia in feeding fear and hatred of Islam and Muslims.

(510) 394-4701

Be Sociable, Share!