NOWTRUTH!!! BECAUSE WE NEED TRUTH AND JUSTICE FROM THE COURTS MORE NOW THAN EVER, NOT HYPERPOLITICIZED, NUANCED LAW COMPLETE WITH THE REQUISITE NARRATIVE!! (LAW= Politically manufactured, orchestrated, strategic opinions, rulings, and orders for injustice to hide behind!)
Chad Finke Judge Lesley Holland
Executive Officer Superior Court of San Joaquin County
Superior Court of California Departments 31and 12
County of Alameda Stockton Courthouse
1225 Fallon Street Room 209 222 E. Weber Avenue
Oakland, CA 94612 Stockton, California 95202
Fax: 510-891-6276 Fax: (209) 992-5667 email@example.com
Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye
Chair, Judicial Council of California Supreme Court of California
Comm. Judicial Appointments 350 McAllister Street, Room 1295
455 Golden Gate Ave. San Francisco, CA 94102-4797
San Francisco, CA 94102 Fax: (415) 865-7181
Fax: 415-865-4200,415-865-4205 Tani.Cantil-Sakauye@jud.ca.gov
FROM: Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim
DATE: April 2, 2018
NO PAGES: 3 + 4 page Filed stamped copy of Designation of Record on Appeal Form
RE: Appellant al-Hakim’s Letter regarding Chad Finke’s Illegal Appeal’s Court Dismissal for Failure to Complete Designation of Record on Appeal, Rule of Court 8.130, al-HAKIM VS CSAA- Wellpoint, Alameda County Superior Court Case: #C811337, California Appeals Court Case# 153640, California Supreme Court Case# S-247169
In the Dred Scott decision Chief Justice Taney wrote, blacks had been “regarded as beings of an inferior order” with “no rights which the white man was bound to respect.” This fact is live and well in this complaint as practiced by those who’s conduct demonstrate it unmercifully!
Dear Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye, Judges Jacobson, Rolefson, Carvill, Colwell, Krashna, Clay, Lee, Murphy, Smith, Patton, Pulido, Grillo, Markman and Carvill, Alex Tse, Phyllis Hamilton, Ms. Henley, Mr. Finke, Mr. Hoshino and OTHERS:
On Saturday, March 31, 2018, I received a letter from the Appeals Court dated March 27, 2018, stating that my appeal in the above case is dismissed for failure to cure the default of not filing the designation of record on appeal form.
The letter states that on February 22, 2018, the court notified me of the default and the case could be dismissed if it was not cured. It also states that on March 12, 2018 Chad Finke of the superior court issued a certificate opining that I had failed to remedy the default within the time allowed by law.
The document requested was provided to the appeals clerk in the Oakland office when I filed the appeal on February 12, 2018, including an additional, more exhaustive designation of the record filed on pleading paper.The clerk returned the designation of record form because it was on the form for “limited” cases. Later that day I sent the correct form to her and three others in the appeals office via email as she requested.
I went to the Oakland appeals office to get a filed stamped copy of the document and the same clerk (can’t discern what her name is from her signature) informed me then that she had received the completed designation of record form but could not file it because it was emailed. She had no answer when I asked her why she requested me to email it if she wasn’t going to file it. She said that she had the filed stamped written version of the designation of record and printed out a copy for me.
I returned to the Oakland office and filed the completed designation of record form and received a filed stamped copy on March 8, 2018, a copy of which is attached that I sent to Ms. Annie Reasoner and Mr. Charles Johnson of the Appeals court via fax email (firstname.lastname@example.org, (Charles.Johnson@jud.ca.gov).
I have no idea why this case has been dismissed when I submitted the document requested and would like the default cured, and an answer to that question.
It seems that this is just another example of the continuing fraud at the hand of Chad Finke whom has been served at least 3 subpoenas and request for production of documents, and 7 other request that has been made of the Court to respond under California Rules of Court 10.500, FOIA, Brown Act- California Public Records Act Request (PRA), and Ethics Complaints with NO RESPONSE from the court nor the court administration, as well as the Judicial Council and Commission on Judicial Performance with the same non response.
Given that we have had no response from these authorities refusing to comply with the subpoenas and administrative requests, I have no choice but to file actions with the responsible agencies to discover this information and resolve the legal concerns expressed for years.
Call if you have any questions, and “Thank you” for your consideration.