Defendant’s Opposition to Tentative Ruling Issued July 11, 2016 by Judge Scott Patton

ABDUL-JALIL al-HAKIM
7633 Sunkist Drive
Oakland, CA  94605
Tel: (510) 394-4501
Plaintiff

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

Alliance Credit/Bank One, T. Miller, Plaintiff,
vs.
Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, Defendant

Case No.:OCV0574030
Defendant’s Opposition to Tentative Ruling Issued September 6, 2016 allegedly by Judge Scott Patton on DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO VACATE AND SET ASIDE AMENDED JUDGMENT AND ORDER UNDER C.C.P. §473 et. seq.; FEES AND COSTS; AND SANCTIONS IN THE ALTERNATE Under C.C.P. § 2023; §594 and Common Law
Reservation Number:1771930
Hearing Date: September 7, 2016
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Location: Hayward Hall of Justice
24405 Amador Street
Hayward, CA 94544
Department 511

Defendant’s Opposition to Tentative Ruling Issued September 6, 2016 allegedly by Judge Scott Patton On Case Management Conference and Demurrer Hearing set for September 7, 2016, 10:00 a.m., in Department 511.

I, ABDUL-JALIL al- HAKIM, hereby declare as follows:

1. I am the Defendant in the above-entitled action and this notice is submitted in opposition the tentative ruling referenced above. I have personal knowledge of the contents of this notice and, if called as a witness, could and would testify competently to them.
2. This Tentative Ruling was made on September 6, 2016 allegedly by Judge Scott Patton on Defendant’s MOTION TO VACATE AND SET ASIDE AMENDED JUDGMENT AND ORDER UNDER C.C.P. §473 et. seq.; FEES AND COSTS; AND SANCTIONS IN THE ALTERNATE Under C.C.P. § 2023; §594 and Common Law. It DOES NOT state the above tentative ruling will be issued as the court’s order, and no hearing will be held, unless the contesting party contacts the opposing party or parties and the Clerk of Department 511 by 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing to state an intent to appear at the hearing to contest the tentative ruling. The Clerk of Department 20 may be contacted by email to dept.511@alameda.courts.ca.gov.
3. It is September 6, 2016 at 3:44 am and I am herewith opposing the tentative ruling and further reiterate that I oppose any and every ruling issued by tainted judge Kim Colwell and have a standing objection to his continued obstruction of justice by remaining in this case prohibiting justice as “Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied!”.
4. In compliance with the courts order I have sent this notice via email to the following parties: dept.511@alameda.courts.ca.gov, KColwell@alameda.courts.ca.gov, SPatton@alameda.courts.ca.gov, dept.507@alameda.courts.ca.gov., Irwin@essventures.com, myrna@theacsinc.com

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct, based on my direct first hand personal knowledge.

Date: September 6, 2016

Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *