LEGISLATIVE ADVISORY
June 28, 2024, Oakland, CA:
Contact:
Toussaint LeToure, Editor
Martin Silverman, Chief Correspondent
AJ
legal@amwftrust.org
(510) 394-4501 (510) 394-4701
nowtruth@nowtruth.org;
FROM: Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation, Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim
DATE: June 28, 2024
RE: VIDEO ADMISSIONS, PROOF Sheriff’s Deputy MARKITA SAYLES FIXING THE CASE, COMMITTED FRAUD UPON THE PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA; INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES; PERJURY; FILING FALSE POLICE REPORT
“The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists”.– J. Edgar Hoover, FBI Dear Legislator,
Herein below please find a Complaint filed and served by Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim and the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation (AMWF) Exposing the State sponsored systemic ENTRAPMENT TARGETING individuals with their Hate Crimes, Terror, Civil Conspiracy, Islamophobia, Xenophobia, Hate Induced Bigotry, Vindictive Retaliation, Oppression, Harassment, Racism, Bias, Prejudice, Unfairness, Persecution, AND GRAND CORRUPTION.
These involve activities with clear fingers being pointed at the Federal and State Attorney Generals, FBI, the Alameda County District Attorney, Alameda County Superior Court Judges and Administration, Alameda County Sheriff’s, Alameda County Counsel, City of Oakland, Oakland City Attorney, among others and other law enforcement agencies colluding with them in this effort and suffering TARGETED ATTACKS in RETALIATION!
It is an INCREDIBLE look into how broken the system is as this ENTRAPMENT by Police Chiefs Tony Chaplin/Brian Matthew; Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez; Police Chief Abdul Pridgen; U. S. Attorney Ismail Ramsey; Attorney General Rob Bonta; F.B.I. Director Robert Tripp; Governor Gavin Newsom; Casey Hallinan; Ricardo Lara- DOI; Steve Gordon- DMV; Patrick Dorais- BAR; Kimberly Kirchmeyer- DCA; Grant Parks- State Auditor; Selvi Stanislaus- FTB; Senator Aisha Wahab; District Attorney Pam Price; HUD; has led to an unregulated, unrestricted, LAWLESSNESS!
This is just a small sampling of the issues we have raised and presented as this IS an EXPLOSIVE case that clearly exposes the State sponsored terror of being TARGETED and ENTRAPPED by government agencies so please take the reading to heart as it is HARSHLY the TRUTH!
Please do not hesitate to respond if you need any more information.
Respectfully, Abdul-Jalil
ajalil1234@gmail.com
(510) 394-4501
This matter of “VIDEO ADMISSIONS, PROOF Sheriff’s Deputy MARKITA SAYLES FIXING THE CASE, COMMITTED FRAUD UPON THE PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA; INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES; PERJURY; FILING FALSE POLICE REPORT” was sent to ALL below:
To: Chief Toney Chaplin Yesenia Sanchez
% Acting Chief Brian Matthews Alameda County Sheriff
Hayward Police Department 1401 Lakeside Drive, 12th Floor
300 W. Winton Ave. Oakland, CA 94612-4305
Hayward, CA 94544 Fax: (510) 272-6811
Fax: 510-293-7183
Ismail J. Ramsey-Director Rob Bonta
U. S. Attorney’s Office Attorney General of California
Federal Courthouse 1300 I Street, Suite 125
450 Golden Gate Avenue P.O. Box 944255
San Francisco, CA 94102 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Fax No.: 415-436-7234 Fax: 916-324-8835
Robert Tripp, FBI Director Casey Hallinan
Northern District of California Attorney General of California
San Francisco Field Office Attn: Public Inquiry Unit
450 Golden Gate Avenue, 13th Floor P.O. Box 944255
San Francisco, CA 94102-9523 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Fax: (916) 323-5341
Senator Aisha Wahab (SD-10) Pamela Price
California State Senate District Attorney
39510 Paseo Padre Pkwy, Ste 280 René C. Davidson Courthouse
Fremont, CA 94538 1225 Fallon Street, Room 900
Fax: 916-319-2125 Oakland CA 94612
Fax: 510-452-5625, 510-271-5157
Steve Gordon- Director Kenneth J. Pogue- Director
Department of Motor Vehicles Office of Administrative Law
2415 1st Ave., Mail Station F101 300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1250
Sacramento, CA 95818-2606 Sacramento, CA 95814-4339
Fax: Fax: 916-323-6826
Kimberly Kirchmeyer- Director Patrick Dorais- Bureau Chief
Department of Consumer Affairs Bureau of Automotive Repair
1625 North Market Blvd., Suite N 112 Complaint Intake Unit
Sacramento, CA 95834 10949 N. Mather Blvd.
Fax: (916) 574-8623 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Kimberly.Kirchmeyer@dca.ca.gov Fax: (916) 464-3405
Patrick_Dorais@dca.ca.gov
Ricardo Lara- Commissioner Alex Anneke Department of Insurance State Farm Insurance Agent 300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1700 5301 Claremont Ave Sacramento, CA 95814 Oakland, CA 94618 Fax: 916-445-5276 alex.anneker.vadygn@statefarm.com,
sent via: U. S. Mail, Fax, and email
FROM: Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation
DATE: June 17, 2024
NO. PAGES: 10
RE: VIDEO ADMISSIONS, PROOF Sheriff’s Deputy MARKITA SAYLES COMMITTED FRAUD UPON THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN FIXING THE CASE; ADMITTED SHE WAS INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES; PERJURY; FILING AN ENTIRE “FALSE POLICE REPORT”; WILLFULLY FABRICATED EVIDENCE; COMMITTED MISCONDUCT; CONCEALMENT; to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto; Continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme and Hate Crimes
Dear Sheriff Sanchez, Chief Chaplin, A. G. Ramsey, A. G. Bonta, Director Tripp, Steve Gordon- DMV, Ricardo Lara- DOI, Kimberly Kirchmeyer- DCA , Patrick Dorais- BAR, Kenneth J. Pogue- OAL, A. G. Hallinan, Senator Wahab, D. A. Price, et. al.,
The COUNTY SHERIFFS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT have been IMPLICATED BY EAST BAY AUTO as an accessory and collaborator in this case, providing them protection and cover up for them, implying GROSS MISCONDUCT as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by the Sheriff’s deputy Markita Sayles whom ADMITS she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES. Video is available on Youtube. See “ILLEGAL POLICE TARGETED ENTRAPMENT BACKFIRES! TRAPS POLICE, EXPOSES IMMORAL, UNETHICAL SCHEME!” below: https://youtu.be/kus80M56Vas.
A FORMAL COMPLAINT WILL FOLLOW UNDER SEPARATE COVER.
WE/I have had to call the County Sheriff and police several times to arrange a Civil Standby with East Bay Auto in an attempt to pick up the truck to no avail.
I am experienced in “Target, Engagement, Harassment, Provocation, Litigation” tactics as a part of the larger planned Strategy that place YOU in this evil “civil rights/litigation meat grinder” Government Special Services Division “asset”- confidential informants are authorized to engage in illegal activity that would be unlawful if performed by an actual FBI agent such as entrapment by “participating in an act that constitutes an obstruction of justice or to initiate a plan or strategy to commit a federal, state, or local offense,” they provide a number of conditions under which “an inducement to an individual to engage in crime is authorized.”
Here we have the County Sheriff covering for their “asset” East Bay Auto and co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, is proven in the video by THEIR AND POLICE ADMISSIONS and Bad Faith/Hate crime fact pattern, was ALWAYS a Scheme to take possession of the truck, provoke and frame civil/criminal legal actions by fabricating a disputed legal issue we would be subjected to knowing that the courts are inapposite to our justice.
IT IS CLEAR THAT ABDUL-JALIL, HIS FAMILY, THEIR BUSINESSES, AND NON-PROFIT, the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation, HAS BEEN TARGETED WITH SPECIOUS, TORTIOUS ILLEGAL CLANDESTINE ACTS ON THE PART OF LAW ENFORCEMENT WITH THE INTENT TO DESTROY THEIR LIVES!
However, co-conspirators East Bay Auto/State Farm are not acting alone as the ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF AND LAW ENFORCEMENT have been IMPLICATED BY EAST BAY as an accessory and collaborator in this case, providing them protection and cover implying GROSS MISCONDUCT as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by the Sheriff’s officers. Video is available on Youtube. See “ILLEGAL POLICE TARGETED ENTRAPMENT BACKFIRES! TRAPS POLICE, EXPOSES IMMORAL, UNETHICAL SCHEME!” at: https://youtu.be/kus80M56Vas.
This video PROVIDES ADMISSIONS from Sheriff’s Deputy Markita Sayles that she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES is PROOF of how POLICE FILE FALSE REPORTS, FABRICATE EVIDENCE, FIX THE CASE, COMMIT FRAUD to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto AFTER she:
1) admitted she talked with Law Enforcement Special Services resources twice to ascertain that she was proceeding in the correct manner according to their plan and her instructions. WHY WOULD SHE NEED TO CONSULT WITH AND BE INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES TO TAKE AND FILE A SIMPLE, COMMON POLICE REPORT?,
2) East Bay Auto incriminated police admitting that they worked with police, are accomplishes, collaborators, were under the protection of law enforcement covering for their asset and would NOT do anything to assist AMWF and Abdul-Jalil,
3) The vehicle was ADMITTED stolen, burglarized, vandalized, fraud, larceny and damaged, BUT, BOTH policemen said “this is NOT a criminal matter, truck was not stolen”,
4) Dep. Sayles said she can’t inspect/process nor document the truck as a crime scene for evidence, damage, theft, vandalism, missing/stolen business and personal property, nor can Jalil without the approval of their asset East Bay Auto,
5) Jalil requested a Police Report OVER 21 times,
6) Dep. Sayles said she would conduct a thorough investigation, interview shop owner, personnel and neighbors, check local cameras,
7) Dep. Sayles said Jalil didn’t answers her questions, BUT she NEVER asked basic questions as: Name, Address, City, State, Zip Code, Telephone, nothing on damage, suspects, the truck registration or VIN,
Dep. Sayles said Jalil needed to go to court in order to get a police report, REFUSING TO TAKE A REPORT!, and
9) Dep. Sayles said it’s a civil matter 8 Times! NOT a criminal matter.
THIS VIDEO PROVIDES PROOF THAT SHERIFF’S DEPT. MARKITA SAYLES LIED ABOUT THE ENTIRE “POLICE REPORT”! Sayles “event/police report” states:
“RP (Reporting Party, Abdul-Jalil) UPSET THAT HIS VEHICLE THAT UNDER THE AUTO REPAIR SHOP HAS DAMAGE. THE AUTO BODY SHOP STILL HAS CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE AND THE VEHILCE HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED TO THE RP. THE RP WAS ADVISED THE MATTER WAS CIVIL. THE RP WAS ADAMENT THE THERE IS A CRIME EVEN THOUGH DEPS TOLD HIM IT WAS CIVIL. THE RP WAS UPSET AND DEMANDED A REPORT. WHEN ASKED WHAT WE WERE INVESTIGATING THE RP SAID THAT WOULD BE UP TO US. NO REPORT TAKEN”
Abdul-Jalil requested a Police Report OVER 21 times, AND Dep. Sayles said she would conduct a thorough investigation, interview shop owner, personnel and neighbors, check local cameras! SAYLES LIED ABOUT THE ENTIRE “FALSE POLICE REPORT” and willfully committed PERJURY, FABRICATE EVIDENCE, MISCONDUCT, CONCEALMENT, COMMITTED FRAUD UPON THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN FIXING THE CASE!
This video PROVIDES ADMISSIONS from Markita Sayles she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES TWICE is PROOF there is a continuing Targeted Entrapment Scam/Sting/Scheme and Hate Crimes. The Sheriff’s office trapped themselves in CORRUPTION and SUBORNED PERJURIOUS TESTIMONY, in this State sponsored terror; with vindictive retaliation against AMWF and al-Hakim family while defending, concealing and thereby being further complicit in committing THE ADMITTED willful and intentional extrinsic fraud upon the people of the great State of California and the Court; fraud; prosecutorial misconduct; willful and malicious prosecution; willful misconduct; conflict of interest; obstruction of justice; denial of due process under the law; willful and intentional fabrication and authoring false evidence; misstating and mischaracterizing evidence; misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court’s act or reliance; harassment; intimidation on behalf of the County Sheriffs; abuse of discretion, misconduct, conduct prejudicial, illegal ex-parte communications and bias designed to result in fixing the case against AMWF and al-Hakim; appointing themselves a Real Primary Party of Interest to the litigation with their OWN agenda; weaponizing the police report and investigative process in furtherance of their agenda; engaging in the defense of opposing parties; provocation, bias, prejudice, Islamophobia, Xenophobia, hate, bigotry and racism!
The Entrapment Strategy is disable, destroy, and eliminate the TARGET- AMWF and Abdul-Jalil, the al-Hakim family, their businesses and business property, their real and personal property, their charities, their communities, and the communities they serve- personally, professionally, morally, ethically, and financially with the courts system to deny and exhaust any and all notions of civil rights, civil liberties, human rights without the God given right to undertake unbiased litigation without the deciding and controlling actions and influence of corrupt unscrupulous judicial, law enforcement, governmental and legal entities, agencies and operatives.
This East Bay action is one of AMWF and Abdul-Jalil being forced into a small claims action that is both oppressive and coercive by limiting the money awards and the depravation of ones rights as the court decision is non-appealable.
This means that as a litigant, AMWF and Abdul-Jalil waives their most basic Civil and Human Right to a fair trial without recourse to appeal an intentionally wrongful decision that may be by design! This is unlawful, offends public policy, common law and an established concept of unfairness, is immoral, unethical, oppressive or unscrupulous and causes substantial injury as a part of the larger planned “judgment peonage”, an activity to take bankrupting judgments against us, causing SEVER economic legal damages, non-economic damages, and punitive damages sentencing us to LIFE in “debtors prison”!
We have documented AND filed SEVERAL Federal and State complaints of being complicit in the illegal TARGETED ENTRAPMENT activities WITH AND AGAINST Police Chiefs Tony Chaplin/Brian Matthew; Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez; Police Chief Abdul Pridgen; U. S. Attorney Ismail Ramsey; Attorney General Rob Bonta; F.B.I. Director Robert Tripp; Governor Gavin Newsom; Casey Hallinan; Ricardo Lara- DOI; Steve Gordon- DMV; Patrick Dorais- BAR; Kimberly Kirchmeyer- DCA; Grant Parks- State Auditor; Selvi Stanislaus- FTB; Senator Aisha Wahab; District Attorney Pam Price; HUD; et. al., against co-conspirators East Bay Auto/State Farm for their active, continuing role in this Targeted Entrapment Scheme and “Bad Faith” by them, their agents, contractors, and ALL known and unknown, announced and unannounced Third Parties, the threats/demands for Payment of Storage, refusal to pay for a Rental vehicle, mitigating the continuing Loss of Use and Damages, and their illegal clandestine efforts to gain ownership of our truck WITHOUT PAYING FOR THE REPAIR NOR COMPENSATING US with the FRAUDULENT attempted East Bay Auto Lien Sale and REFUSAL to release our truck to AMWF.
Upon receiving the 7 page January 31, 2024 filed complaint, several agencies responded and stopped the unnoticed/served lien sale.
HOWEVER, as mentioned above, AMWF’s truck was “STOLEN” from East Bay Auto Center while there for the insurance repair estimate, BUT NOT stolen nor burglarized through entry from knocking out the passenger door lock! There is ONLY 16 inches from the passenger door lock to the metal fence and 24 inches from the passenger door lock to the outer metal fence. That makes it PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for someone to knock out the passenger door lock and a human body to open the door and enter the truck with less than 4 inches of clearance to enter given the design and build of the truck!! THE TRUCK WAS STOLEN THROUGH ENTRY FROM THE DRIVERS SIDE DOOR AND THERE IS NO SIGN OF ANY DAMAGE TO THE DRIVERS SIDE DOOR LOCK, THUS LEAVING THE ONLY POSSIBLE ENTRY THROUGH THAT DRIVERS SIDE DOOR WITH A KEY!
AMWF is going forward with Civil and Criminal Charges/Claims for Grand Larceny, Grand Theft Auto, Fraud, Property Theft, Burglary, Vandalism, Extortion, Phone (Terrorist) Threats, Deception, attempted Grand Theft, Costs, Damages, Mitigating the Continuing Loss of Use, and Monetary Sanctions, among others with Federal and State Complaints filed against East Bay Auto and State Farm Insurance and served them both with Preservation-of-Evidence Demand Letter.
I recently received a Small Claims suit from East Bay Auto, case #24SC067622, dated March 13, 2024 in the amount of $3,450 with a court date of July 8, 2024.
As you ALL are aware this entire action is a fraud and larceny!
As of this date, East Bay STILL has the truck and REFUSES to release it to us unless and until we indemnify them from ALL liability for their civil and criminal charges of larceny, fraud, theft, damage, if the vehicle is stolen from them, etc., so they may be able to do or have done anything they choose to the vehicle and it’s contents without any possible consequences!
The truck was supposed to have been returned to us by that same March 7, 2024 date BUT that DID NOT HAPPEN.
As of this date, East Bay STILL has the truck and REFUSES to release it to us unless and until we indemnify them from ALL liability for their civil and criminal charges of larceny, fraud, theft, damage, if the vehicle is stolen from them, etc., so they may be able to do or have done anything they choose to the vehicle and it’s contents without any possible consequences! Now, the truck has been STOLEN, was burglarized, vandalized, is damaged, and they have refused to allow us to inspect the truck for a complete analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages, UNLESS AND UNTIL WE SIGN A WAIVER OF THEIR LIABILITY FOR SAME! We will NOT ever do that. Additionally, with respect to any and all business operation regarding the AMWF insurance policy and claim, and THE FACT that State Farm, their employees, their referenced agents, sub-agents, contractors, State Farm Claims, State Farm Appraisal Team, Alacrity Solutions, LLC, Snapsheet, Up North Towing, Blue Star Towing, and ALL known and unknown Third Parties have clearly “targeted” AMWF and using recognizable government entrapment tactics the latest of which was the refusal to release the truck and “lien sale” to gain ownership of their truck WITHOUT PAYING FOR THE REPAIR NOR COMPENSATING US! As a direct and proximate result of State Farm and their co-conspirators East Bay’s continuing actions, AMWF is FORCED to make long term arrangements for the storage of the truck UNTIL STATE FARM PAYS FOR THE REPAIR AS AMWF PURSUES ALL OTHER REMEDIES!
AMWF has always maintained and is proven by East Bay/State Farm bad faith fact pattern, from AMWF’s knowledge, history, multiple conversations and actions of East Bay and State Farm insurance company, their employees, their referenced agents, sub-agents, contractors, and ALL known and unknown, announced and unannounced Third Parties, the facts, information, and belief AMWF thereupon contend this was ALWAYS a tactic of East Bay/State Farm “entrapment scam/sting/scheme” attempt, designed to steal and take possession of the truck with it’s contents, to provoke, frame and trigger civil and criminal legal actions by alleging a disputed storage issue or repair that was NEVER made, the fabricated cost of which AMWF would be liable for, and allege 3+ months storage for abandonment when East Bay/State Farm refused to give the truck back knowing that the courts are inapposite to AMWF’s justice. However, East Bay/State Farm are not acting alone as AMWF is moving beyond this entrapment scheme and bad faith to secure the repair of their truck and all other remedies! East Bay’s admitted multiple communications and FRAUDULENT DEMANDS fall under the following criminal violations:
Larceny: Theft and Others
In general, theft is considered the intentional and unlawful taking of someone else’s property. But the precise definition of this varies in every state. Some jurisdictions define this act based on the common law concept of “larceny.” Larceny is taking away another’s property to deprive the owner of the property of its possession permanently.
While some states have merged larceny with general theft statutes, others have kept it as a separate offense. States that retained larceny often codified the standard law definition within its penal code.
The offense of larceny is often defined as:
- The unlawful taking and carrying away of someone else’s property;
- The unlawful taking occurs without the owner’s consent; and
- The intent behind unlawful taking is to deprive the owner of their property permanently
Related Crimes: Robbery and Burglary
The elements of robbery.
- An individual takes another person’s property with the intent to steal;
- The individual takes the property against the owner’s will; and
- The person takes the property using violence or threatening force against someone
Unlike simple theft or larceny, using force is a necessary element of robbery. This distinction is commonly used to justify harsher punishments for those convicted of robbery.
Successful property acquisition is not a prerequisite for a robbery conviction in certain states. Essentially, these states prioritize punishment for the use or threat of force rather than stealing. Thus, regardless of whether the taking is successful, the unlawful attempt to take someone’s property by force supports the robbery charge.
Some states limit the scope of robbery charges by requiring an imminent threat of force used in the taking. In this context, “imminent” is a legal requirement for a clear and not hypothetical risk of physical danger. Likewise, a threat of imminent physical harm is one of harm likely to occur in a short period.
Penal Code § 459 PC – California Burglary LawsUnder California Penal Code § 459 PC, burglary is the act of entering a residential or commercial structure (or a locked vehicle) with the intent to commit:
- grand larceny,
- petit larceny, or
- any felony offense.
In California, burglary is divided into first- and second degrees.
The crime of burglary is complete once you enter the structure with criminal intent, even if your intended crime is never actually accomplished. Forced entry is not required.
Annoying, Harassing and Obscene Phone Calls (Terrorist Threats)
Making an annoying, obscene or harassing phone call is addressed in California’s Penal Code 653m PC, and there are two sections:
- Subdivision A (obscene or threatening phone calls or electronic communication): making a phone call using obscene language or threat;
- Subdivision B (repeated contact by phone or electronic communication): making repeated phone calls or harassing phone calls
- We can provide the prosecution the evidence to obtain a conviction and prove three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
- That you made a phone call or sent an electronic communication to the victim.
- That the message or phone call was annoying, unwanted, harassing, obscene in nature, contained threats, or was made repeatedly.
- That you did so with the willful intent to annoy the victim or harass the victim.
- ** ” Electronic communication device” includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, facsimile machines, pagers, personal digital assistants, smartphones, and any other device that transfers signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, or data. ” Electronic communication device” also includes, but is not limited to, videophones, TTY/TDD devices, and all other devices used to aid or assist communication to or from deaf or disabled persons. “Electronic communication” has the same meaning as the term defined in Subsection 12 of Section 2510 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
- Annoying, obscene or harassing phone calls are an unwelcome intrusion on ones privacy. They can ruin dinner with your family or a quiet afternoon. They can be a frightening experience. The Federal Communications Act, specifically 47 U.S. Code § 223, as well as many state laws, prohibit telephone harassment and create legal remedies and enforcement mechanisms.
California’s Criminal Threats law- (Terrorist Threats)
California Penal Code § (CPC) 422 – California’s Criminal Threats law (a crime formerly known as ‘Terrorist Threats’) applies whenever a person “threatens to commit a crime” that would “result in death or great bodily injury… with the specific intent that the statement” be taken as a threat to another person, resulting in the target of the threat feeling “sustained fear.” The law can be violated by threatening a member of a person’s family as well as threatening a particular person.[1]
CPC §422 may be punished as a Misdemeanor or a Felony. If you’re convicted of Misdemeanor Criminal Threats, you’ll face up to a year in a county jail or state prison and a fine of up to $1,000. If you’re convicted of the Felony form, you can be sentenced to three years in prison and be fined as much as $10,000. California’s “Three Strikes” law also applies to §422, meaning that a “third strike” conviction involving Criminal Threats may produce a sentence of twenty-five years in a state prison.
What Does California Penal Code §422 (Criminal Threats) Prohibit?
In sum, to be guilty of Criminal Threats under California Penal Code §422, you must:
- Threaten someone with a crime that would result in death or great bodily injury; AND,
- Produce a statement that would be, as a whole, taken as a threat; AND,
- Write or verbally communicate the threat; AND,
- Make the threat in a clear and immediate way; AND,
- Create a reasonable fear that you’ll hurt the other person or that person’s family.
Defining “Criminal Threats” Under California Penal Code §422
To convict you under §422, the prosecutor must prove the following beyond a reasonable doubt:
- Willfully: You intended on doing whatever was necessary to break the law[2]; AND,
- Threatened To Kill/Cause Great Bodily Injury[3]: You made a threat to kill or to cause another person to be severely injured[4] (or you directed another person to make the threat[5]); AND,
- Communicated In Writing, Verbally, or Electronically[6]: You used words written on paper or presented via a computer, or you used spoken words, to make the threat; AND,
- Intent To Threaten: You intended that whoever received your message believed you were threatening him or her[7]; AND,
- It Appeared You’d Act On The Threat: The threat “on its face and under the circumstances” was “so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific” that it seemed you’d act on it[8]; AND,
- Sustained/Reasonable Fear: The threat created an actual, sustained,[9] and reasonable fear that you’d hurt a person or a member of the threatened person’s immediate family.[10]
However, the violent crime of making a criminal threat (aka terrorist threat) can carry these very same consequences, despite the act resulting in no bodily injury. Defined under California Penal Code statute 422(a),
Any person who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or her immediate family’s safety, is guilty of criminal threats.
The California Penal Code contains several offenses related to Criminal Threats: Dissuading A Witness (CPC §136.1), Domestic Violence (CPC §273.5 and §243(e)(1)), Extortion (CPC §518), Stalking (CPC §646.9), and Aggravated Trespass (CPC §601).
Dissuading A Witness
California’s basic law on Dissuading A Witness (CPC §136.1(a)(1),(2)) applies when a person convinces a witness[20] or a victim[21] not to testify at a trial or another legal proceeding. The crime can occur even if you only attempt to convince someone not testify. Dissuading A Witness is related to Criminal Threats because a well-known form of convincing witnesses not to appear at trial is through violent threats.
The dissuading act must be ‘knowing and malicious.'[22] The limit on charging under the basic statute is established in §136.1(a)(3): “[E]vidence that the defendant was a family member who interceded in an effort to protect the witness or victim shall create a presumption that the act was without malice.”
Extortion
The basic form of Extortion (CPC §518), “Extortion By Threat Or Force,” occurs in California whenever a person obtains valuables or official acts[37] from another (with his or her consent[38]) through wrongful use of force, fear,[39] or under a claim of an official right.
The threat that’s the basis of the extortion “may involve harm to be inflicted by [you] or by someone else.”[40] Extortion is connected to Criminal Threats because a threat that makes up Extortion can also be a Criminal Threat, which allows the prosecution to charge you with both in the same trial.
Stalking
California’s law against Stalking (CPC §646.9) applies whenever a person follows or harasses[46] another person and makes a threat intending to place that person in fear for his or her safety or the safety of immediate family.[47] The threat must always be “credible,”[48] malicious,[49] and repeated[50] to be a crime. Stalking law is related to Criminal Threats because both require the making of a threat for a conviction.
The law only applies to someone who commits Stalking under CPC §646.9 (see above) or a person who shows or uses a firearm in a fight (CPC §417). It’s also known as “Trespass After Credible Threat.” The crime is related to Criminal Threats because Aggravated Trespass also requires making a violent threat.
We have sent over 40 emails and filed over 30 complaints against Galvan and Summerwood that are further documented by the the online reports filed with HPD!
The complaints contained in the MANY corresponding emails and TWENTY ONE (21) Hayward Police reports DOCUMENT the constant hostility, harassment, oppressive, onerous criminal corruption and persecution to our own and the detriment of those most in need with their adversarial actions appears to be more a continuing ruse to provoke us with their racial and religious biases and aggrieve us in their entrapment strategy.
East Bay admissions in the presence of the two (2) Deputies, whom are percipient eye witnesses, will be examined and presented in this ongoing case.
As I have always maintained and is proven by your/their bad faith fact pattern, this was ALWAYS an entrapment scheme designed to take possession of the truck with it’s contents and trigger civil/criminal actions knowing that the courts are inapposite to our justice. They are not acting alone!
We have been at Summerwood since June 2021, for 14 months without any incident. BUT, will now have registered over TWENTY (26) complaints about Ms. Galvan and Summerwood management ILLEGAL activity, TWENTY-ONE (21) POLICE REPORTS IN SIXTEEN (16) MONTHS since July 2022, FIVE (5) IN SEVEN DAYS, with 2 reports in the same day November 18, 2023 (Burglary in Progress, Attempted Theft and Vandalism to Vehicle), additionally 3 reports in 3 days November 7-9, 2023 (Attempted Theft/Burglary and Vandalism to Vehicle), and 8 reports in 2 weeks, THANKS TO the Summerwood Apartment manager, Ms. Galvan!! Our vehicles have been ILLEGALLY TICKETED AND TOWED THREE (3) times at a cost of $1,900, Burglarized EIGHT (8) TIMES, Vandalized TEN (10) TIMES, catalytic converter cut in an attempt to steal it ($600), had door locks punched out TWO (2) times ($800), ignitions broken out TWO (2) times ($800), cargo bay doors locks cut and removed TWO (2) times, spray painted- tagged, ALL SINCE MS. GALVAN HAS BEEN INVOLVED! However, it should be noted that we know she has NOT ACTED ALONE in these actions.
From our knowledge, history, multiple conversations and actions from the insurance company, their employees, their referenced agents, sub-agents, contractors, and ALL known and unknown, announced and unannounced Third Parties, the facts, information, and belief we thereupon contend this was their “entrapment scam/sting” attempt, along with unnamed Third Parties, to steal the truck from us, to provoke and frame civil and criminal legal actions by alleging a disputed storage issue or repair that they didn’t make, the fabricated cost of we would be liable for, and allege 3+ months storage for abandonment when they refused to give the truck back! IT IS TOTALLY INAPPROPRIATE AND ILLEGAL FOR GOVERNMENT TO USE PUBLIC FUNDS AND RESOURCES IN THIS TYPE OF CRIMINAL ENTRAPMENT SCAM!
The truck still has to be repaired and may NEVER be used again at all and filed the DMV registration fee for the non-profit owner, the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation. We are a poor, small, minority operated non-profit charitable organization.
What really reveals the blatant intent of the fraud is the fact that the diabolical use of HATE inspired Crimes, Terror, Civil Conspiracy, Islamophobia, Xenophobia, Hate Induced Bigotry, Vindictive Retaliation, Oppression, Harassment, Racism, Bias, Prejudice, Unfairness, Persecution, AND GRAND CORRUPTION; the catastrophic irreparable Harm and Damage to ALL AMWF commercial spheres on the banking and hosting platforms; ALL the various intentional criminal and civil tortious acts revealed themselves and there is a clearly defined pattern that is an essential of a government engineered operation.
We examined where “Professional Responsibility and Sworn Oath” meets reality in the realm of WILLFUL AND INTENTIONAL MISREPRESENTATION, Concealment, Deception, Fraud, Deprivation of ones Civil Rights and the “Bilities”- Responsibility, Accountability, Liability.
We have previously addressed and CONSTANTLY complained of Hayward Police Department’s willful and intentional dereliction of their duties in our Hate Crime complaint and processing the online Police Reports, failure to provide the requested forms for the filing of a Hate Crime Complaint, and the problematic online web reporting system that NEVER works, and did not even before the system wide hacking!
Hayward AND San Leandro Police Department’s Willful and Intentional Dereliction of Duties in Hate Crime Reports:
We have sent over 40 emails and filed over 30 complaints that are further documented by the the online reports filed with Hayward Police Department!
The complaints contained in the MANY corresponding emails and TWENTY ONE (21) Hayward Police reports DOCUMENT the constant hostility, harassment, oppressive, onerous criminal corruption and persecution to our own and the detriment of those most in need with their adversarial actions appears to be more a continuing ruse to provoke us with their racial and religious biases and aggrieve us in their entrapment strategy.
The parties complained of include Summerwood, their management company AMC, Abode and HACA that are “service providers” and legal parties that are Governmental and Quasi-governmental employees, agents, contractors, entities, associates, members, and contractors of their companies, the U. S. Federal Government, State of California, County, and cities, among others, have engaged in unethical and criminal means, instigated and encouraged said acts, which gives rise to fraudulent, corruption as they conspired, consorted, colluded, conceived, employed and enacted the criminal, tactical, torture inspired policy of TARGETED HATE CRIME, Terror, Civil Conspiracy, Islamophobia, Xenophobia, Hate Induced Bigotry, Vindictive Retaliation, Oppression, Harassment, Racism, Discrimination, Bias, Prejudice, Unfairness, Persecution, AND GRAND CORRUPTION, victimization, inciting acrimony, animus, in the continued persecution with calumny deceit and the attempted entrapment of us as the continuing “TARGET”.
ALL the DOCUMENTED actions alleged with cite relevant legal case authority to support arguments and assertions for a FORMAL COMPLAINT and Request for Investigation for Hate Crimes include violations of California Law including violations of the Unruh and Ralph Civil Rights Acts Civil Code section 51.7, the Tom Bane Civil Rights Acts, Civil Code section 52.1, Equal Protection under 42 U.S.C. ß 1983; California Government Code sections 11135 et seq., 12900 et seq., California Penal Code section 13023, California Penal Code section 422.55 and California Civil Code sections 51, 51.7, 52.5, and 54 et seq.; the First, Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution; California Constitution, Article VI, § 4 1/2; California Code of Civil Procedure §§ 355, 356, 473, 475, 3523, and 3528, and for Harassment, Censorship, Fraud, Negligence, Misrepresentation, Abuse of Process, Abuse of Power, Breach of Contract, Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Breach of Contract/Common Law Warranty, Deceptive Trade Practices, Intentional Misrepresentation, Negligent Misrepresentation, Fraud by Concealment, California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal Bus & Prof Code §§ 17200 et seq, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, Discrimination in Violation of the Unruh Act, Nuisance, Abuse of Process, Fraud by Concealment, Violation of California False Advertising Law, Violation of California Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), Breach of Implied Warranty, Deceit-(California Civil Code § 1710), Unfair and Deceptive Business Practices, Unconscionability (UDAP), Elder Abuse.
The Tom Bane Civil Rights Act, Civil Code section 52.1, provides protection against interference or attempts to interfere by threat, intimidation, or coercion with a person’s exercise or enjoyment of any constitutional or statutory rights. Remedies for violations of the Ralph Civil Rights Act or the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act include restraining orders, injunctive relief, equitable relief to secure constitutional and statutory rights, actual damages, exemplary or punitive damages, a civil penalty of $25,000, and attorney’s fees. An action may be brought by the Attorney General, or any district attorney or city attorney, or by the individual harmed.
California Penal Code section 13023. California Penal Code section 422.55 defines a hate crime as “a criminal act committed, in whole or in part, because of one or more of the following actual or perceived characteristics of the victim: (1) Disability, (2) Gender, (3) Nationality, (4) Race or ethnicity, (5) Religion, (6) Sexual orientation, (7) Association with a person or group with one or more of these actual or perceived characteristics.”
The California Attorney General DEMANDS an Investigation for Hate Crimes in violation of California Unruh and Ralph Civil Rights Acts; the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act, Civil Code section 52.1, Equal Protection under 42 U.S.C. ß 1983, California Penal Code sections 13519.6, Penal Code section 13023 and Penal Code 422.55 which defines a hate crime as “a criminal act committed, in whole or in part, because of one or more of the following actual or perceived characteristics of the victim: (1) Disability, (2) Gender, (3) Nationality, (4) Race or ethnicity, (5) Religion, (6) Sexual orientation, (7) Association with a person or group with one or more of these actual or perceived characteristics.” Cite relevant legal case authority to support arguments and assertions. Depending on the circumstances of each case, bias motivation may include, but is not limited to, hatred, animosity, discriminatory selection of victims, resentment, revulsion, contempt, unreasonable fear, paranoia, callousness, thrill-seeking, desire for social dominance, desire for social bonding with those of one’s “own kind,” or a perception of the vulnerability of the victim due to the victim being perceived as being weak, worthless, or fair game because of a protected characteristic, including, but not limited to, disability, gender, Age, Ancestry, Anti-Islamic, Anti-black or African American, Anti-other ethnicity/national origin, association with a person or group with one or more of these actual or perceived characteristics of a protected class, Citizenship, Color Disability (physical, intellectual/developmental, mental health/psychiatric), Medical Condition (cancer or genetic characteristic), National Origin (includes language restrictions), Political Affiliation, Race (includes hairstyle and hair texture), Religious creed (includes dress and grooming practices), and aggrieve in their entrapment strategy with the use of confidential informants, snitches, government operatives can provide a number of conditions under which “an inducement to an individual to engage in crime is authorized.” This could apply to any or all of the actions taken in and of their services agency acting in their clients name and stead.
ALL THE PARTIES HEREIN ARE DEMANDED TO LODGE AND FILE THE REQUISITE COMPLAINT AND BEGAN THE MANDATORY INVESTIGATION PROCESS!
Respectfully,
Abdul-Jalil
510-394-4501