Charges Against Oakland City Attorney John Russo and The City Attorneys Office

(510) 394-4701

The Charges Against Oakland City Attorney John Russo

and The City Attorneys Office

Oakland City Attorney John Russo’s Political Suicide- Must Resign

In documents filed in Alameda County Superior Court and the State of California in the al-Hakim v. CSAA and the underlying Rescue Rooter case, there is now irrefutable evidence that specious Oakland City Attorney John Russo and The City Attorneys Office has been charged with and committed EXTRINSIC FRAUD, FRAUD UPON THE STATE, SUBORNATION AND SOLICITATION OF PERJURIOUS TESTIMONY, PROVIDING LITIGATION CASE FILES AND EVIDENCE TO DEFENDANTS, SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE, FABRICATING EVIDENCE AND PLANTING FABRICATED EVIDENCE IN LITIGATION CASE FILES , ATTEMPTING TO DECEIVE THE PUBLIC IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS LIGITATION THEORY, CALUMNY DECEIT, HAS COMMITTED PATTERNED WILLFUL, CRIMINAL, FRAUDULENT AND CORRUPT DECEPTION; FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT, COMMITTED WILLFUL, CRIMINAL AND CORRUPT PERJURY, PERJURY BY OMISSION, MADE KNOWINGLY FALSE STATEMENTS, COLLUSION, CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT FRAUD, CONSPIRACY, CORRUPTION, CORRUPT MISCONDUCT, PREJUDICIAL MISCONDUCT, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, BAD FAITH, DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS, ABUSE OF DISCRETION, GROSS NEGLIGENCE, BIAS, PREJUDICE, INCOMPETENCE, CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

Oakland City Attorney John Russo’s Political Suicide- Planted Evidence

Stephan "Thief Robber" Barber
Stephan “Thief Robber” Barber

al-Hakim has also recently produced clear, irrefutable, established “smoking gun” evidence of the continued blatant illegal activities of Oakland City Attorney John Russo, defense counsel Stephan Barber and defendant Ron Cook in the CSAA and the underlying Rescue Rooter case that all their key evidence and testimony was clearly contrived and constructed in fraud and deceit and planted in the City of Oakland case file in August 1999 and the product of extrinsic fraud, planting fraudulent evidence, spoliation of evidence, and suborned perjurious testimony in support of their defense litigation strategy. It is further proof that the entire City of Oakland case file was purged and re-constructed to accommodate the defendants litigation strategy in both this and the underlying Rescue Rooter case.
The fraudulently fabricated and planted evidence and the witness testimony based on this planted evidence in the al-Hakim v CSAA and the underlying Rescue Rooter case was created thru EXTRINSIC FRAUD, with accompanying testimony procured thru admitted suborned and solicited perjurious acts by John Russo and others, they engaged in actions to destroy the litigation of al-Hakim’s legal case; they engaged in actions to coverup their unlawful acts; they comitted, aided and abetted this

Ron "Con Crook" Cook
Ron “Con Crook” Cook

criminal activity with the City Attorney giving the case files to defendant Stephan Barber and Ron Cook whom allegedly had absconded with the files for nearly a year was an unpardonable breach in the chain of custody of the court files, then clearly constructed fraudulent fabricated evidence in 1999 and planted that evidence favorable to the defendants in the files SIX years AFTER the case was closed, engaged in spoliation of remaining evidence in the court files from 1991. During the trial, testimony revealed that there were numerous documents and photos of a very damning nature to the defense and CSAA that were missing, altered, or incomplete.

Russo Gives Defendants Stephan Barber Case File, Doesn’t Tell Court or Plaintiff

John Russo has always maintianed in his own written documents to al-Hakim that the case files were requested for review in late 1999 and placed at the City Attorney’s front desk although no one came to review them, these court records somehow disappeared for nearly a year without the City Attorney’s investigating who, when, how, why?.

Oakland City Attorney John Russo
Oakland City Attorney John Russo

al-Hakim contacted John Russo, the City Attorney of the City of Oakland several times by registered mail, phone and fax, regarding their independent knowledge of the defendants absconding with the files from the City’s possession, and if such action was with the permission of the City Attorney. Russo has failed and refused to effectively respond and has always denied knowing who made the request to review the files or what happened to them, while al-Hakim and his attorneys Michael Michel and Jeff Fackler, had attempted several times to obtain copies of the City litigation file from October 1999 to June of 2000 and was told by the City Attorney’s Office that the file was “missing” and was last requested by defendant Ron Cook. Finally, after six months, in June 2000, Anita Hong called to notify Mr. Michel that the file had been returned and was available for viewing. At that time Mr. Fackler and Michel was told that the file had been returned by CSAA’s attorney. al-Hakim called Ms. Hong and was told the file was back and available for viewing, and when asked who returned the file, she responded “it was returned by Steve Barber of Ropers Majeski”.
John Russo’s Political Suicide-Racism, Bigotry, White Class Priviledge

John Russo and the City Attorney’s Office has engaged in acts to coverup these criminal litigation tactics, failed and refused to disclose to the court, nor inform the Judge of their improper and illegal transgressions regarding the fact the defendants alleged absconding with and taking custody of the City of Oakland files for nearly a year and allowed the trial to proceed knowing their liability and the legal impact of their fraudulent fabricated evidence in 1999 and planted that evidence favorable to the defendants in the files SIX years AFTER the case was closed, engaged in spoliation of remainning evidence in the court files from 1991 where during the trial, testimony revealed that there were numerous documents and photos of a very damning nature to the defense that were missing, altered, or incomplete, and their unpardonable breach in the chain of custody of the City files.

Janie Wong
Janie Wong
Randy Hall
Randy Hall

These activities were done in concert with Oakland City Attorneys John Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold and Michele Abney and former City Attorney Jane Williams and former employee Pat Smith; Stephan Barber and others of the law firm Ropers, Majeski; Ronald J. Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening and others of the law firm Willoughby, Stuart & Bening; William Jemmott now of the law firm Wilson Elser; Todd Jones and the law firm Archer Norris; Daniel Crowley of the law firm Daniel Crowley & Assoc.; Fletcher Alford, Joel K. Liberson and the law firm Gordon & Rees; Sean Robert O’Halloran now of the law firm Crone Rozynko; Anne Brooks Harrigan now of the law firm Grancell, Lebovitz, Stander, Barnes & Reubens; Yolanda Marnell Jackson now of the law firm Jackson Alternative Dispute Resolution; the law firm of Caven, Cleaveland, Murray; the former law firm of Jackson Harrigan; John Ratto and Dean K. Beyer, of ASU Group (formerly D. L. Glaze); defendants Rescue Rooter and Bay Area Carpet Cleaning; and retired Judges David Lee, Michael Ballachey, and Richard Hodge. Retired judges Lee, Ballachey, and Hodge, though they live in three different counties, all coincidently hired the same Oakland defense firm. There has been judiciary litigation support given by now Appellate Judges Barbara Jones, James Richman, and Henry Needham and Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch whom had disqualifications or complaints filed against them with cover and sanctuary provide by Ronald M. George of The California Supreme Court, Victoria Henley of The California Judicial Council, Ronald G. Overholt of The California Judges Association, The Alameda County Presiding Court Judge Yolanda Northridge and former Alameda County Presiding Court Judge George Hernandez that portrays corruption.
ALL OF THESE PARTIES ABOVE were aware of or should have been aware of the blatant illegal activities of defense counsels Stephan Barber and Shawn O’Halloran in this and the underlying case and that all their key evidence and testimony was the product of extrinsic fraud, planting fraudulent evidence, spoliation of evidence, and suborned perjurious testimony in support of their defense litigation strategy. al-Hakim has previously served multiple deposition and trial subpoenas on ALL the parties named above and they have ALL failed to appear every time.

California Court Corruption

(510) 394-4701

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *