PROOF A. G. Bonta, Law Enforcement Fraud, Concealment of Facts Induce Court’s Act or Reliance

Subject: PROOF A. G. Bonta, Law Enforcement Fraud, Concealment of Facts Induce Court’s Act or Reliance; Proof Judges Nixon, Caruth, Hing, Gaffey, Finke Perversion, Obstruction Defeats Course/Administration of Justice

From: “A. J.” <ajalil1234@gmail.com>

Date: 6/6/25, 4:06 PM

To: Daniel.Olsen@hayward-ca.gov, Brian.Matthews@hayward-ca.gov, YSanchez@acgov.org, Ismail.J.Ramsey@usdoj.gov, Rob.Bonta@doj.ca.gov, san.francisco@ic.fbi.gov, Bertram.Fairries@ic.fbi.gov, media.sf@fbi.gov, Robert.Tripp@fbi.gov, piu@doj.ca.gov, Kimberly.Kirchmeyer@dca.ca.gov, Patrick_Dorais@dca.ca.gov, Ricardo.Lara@insurance.ca.gov, Ursula.Dickson@acgov.org, Steve.Gordon@dmv.ca.gov, AAveriett@SanLeandro.org

CC: ethan.Quinn@ic.fbi.gov, Linda_Janssen@dca.ca.gov, Bill_Thomas@dca.ca.gov, shaina.Witter@fbi.gov, agustin.Lopez@fbi.gov, bryan.Stevens@fbi.gov, dsnyder@firstamendmentcoalition.org, jerry@consumerwatchdog.org, Teresa.Campbell@insurance.ca.gov, Lucy.Wang@insurance.ca.gov, Michael.Soller@insurance.ca.gov, Madison.Voss@insurance.ca.gov, Bernard.Soriano@dmv.ca.gov, Eric.Partington@oai.ca.gov, Nicole.Carrillo@oai.ca.gov, Ismail.Ramsey@usdoj.gov, dmvrodlsu@dmv.ca.gov, Marcela.Sencion@dmv.ca.gov, India.Fayne@dmv.ca.gov, Juan.Cornejo@dmv.ca.gov, Christina.Michel@dmv.ca.gov, Robert.Crockett@dmv.ca.gov, Sonia.Huestis@dmv.ca.gov, Lucy.Wang@insurance.ca.gov, Teresa.Campbell@insurance.ca.gov, DBlanchard@acgov.org, KKelly@alacritysolutions.com, jhall@alacritysolutions.com, JChavez@acgov.org, CLenahan@acgov.org, MSayles@acgov.org, TAnderson@acgov.org, GGosal@acgov.org, rlucia@acgov.org, CNice@acgov.org, TMadigan@acgov.org, Jmendiola@acgov.org, SSullivan@acgov.org, Francesca.Gessner@doj.ca.gov, Damon.Brown@doj.ca.gov, Laura.Stuber@doj.ca.gov, Maheen.Ahmed@doj.ca.gov, Venus.Johnson@doj.ca.gov, Clay.Leek@doj.ca.gov, Elvis.Chan@fbi.gov, Jeff.Fields@fbi.gov, Sid.Patel@fbi.gov, Paul.Zambelli@fbi.gov, dhaunold@fbi.gov, Ismail.Ramsey@usdoj.gov, Michelle.Lo@usdoj.gov, Jeff.Nedrow@usdoj.gov, Patrick.Robbins@usdoj.gov, Kimberly.Hopkins@usdoj.gov, vivian.wang@usdoj.gov, Elizabeth.Kurlan@usdoj.gov, Ilham.Hosseini@usdoj.gov, Matthew.Olson@usdoj.gov, Ajay.Krishnamurthy@usdoj.gov, charles.bisesto@usdoj.gov, Nicholas.Balestrieri@acgov.org, Mikael.Boyer@acgov.org, Josie.Chan@acgov.org, Suzanne.Simpkins@acgov.org, udickson@sbcglobal.net, “Dept. 105, Superior Court” <dept105@alameda.courts.ca.gov>, “Dept. 711, Superior Court” <dept711@alameda.courts.ca.gov>, “Dept .1, Superior Court” <dept1@alameda.courts.ca.gov>, “Dept. 605, Superior Court” <dept605@alameda.courts.ca.gov>, “Nixon, Judge Thomas, Superior Court” <tnixon@alameda.courts.ca.gov>, “Finke, Chad, Superior Court” <cfinke@alameda.courts.ca.gov>, “Dept .1, Superior Court” <dept1@alameda.courts.ca.gov>, “Caruth, Judge Brian, Superior Court” <bcaruth@alameda.courts.ca.gov>, “Gaffey, Judge Michael, Superior Court” <mgaffey@alameda.courts.ca.gov>, “Hing, Judge Stuart, Superior Court” <shing@alameda.courts.ca.gov>, VSapp@SanLeandro.org, TQiu@SanLeandro.org, JSanchez@SanLeandro.org

BCC: ajalil@berkeley.edu

ABDUL-JALIL al-HAKIM

4200 Park Blvd., Ste. #One16, Oakland CA 94602
Phone (510) 394-4101

Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation

Abdul-Jalil Profile , Abdul-Jalil Intro , Portrait of Abdul-Jalil by Artist Buford Delaney in Paris, France

Linked In Profile on Abdul-Jalil, Kobe Bryant Supports AMWF

Abdul-Jalil Honored in Port Au-Prince, Haiti and Miami, Fla. for Relief Missions to Haiti , Thanks You from Arch Bishop Joel Jeune to Abdul-Jalil

CALIFORNIA STATE ASSEMBLY HONORS ABDUL-JALIL Receives Certificate-of-Recognition for 2021-22

Belal Salih Esa receives Posthumous Congressional Proclamation/Resolution for his work with the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation (AMWF)
Belal Salih Esa received a Posthumous Legislative Proclamation/Resolution from California Governor Gavin Newsom and the State Legislature for his work with the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation (AMWF)
Belal Salih Esa received a Posthumous Legislative Proclamation/Resolution from the Mayor, City Council and the Unified School District Board of Supervisors of the City of Albany for his work with the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation (AMWF)

Humanitarian Civil and Human Rights Achievements

Articles on Abdul-Jalil: ABDUL-JALIL GENIUS- BOY WONDER!!MC Hammer Tribute to ABDUL-JALIL Emanuel Steward on ABDUL-JALIL
ABDUL-JALIL’S BABE with Maze Featuring Frankie Beverly and Marvin Gaye
ABDUL-JALIL’S BABE with Khalid al-Mansour, President Barack Obama and Prince Al-Waleed
ABDUL-JALIL’S BABE with Destiny and Marvin Gaye

Abdul-Jalil BMI Songwriter/Producer

Abdul-Jalil Wrote/Produced/Adminstered Survey, Poll, Analysis, Song, and Commercials for City of Oakland Image Campaign “I Know You’ll Love Oakland”

Abdul-Jalil Wrote/Produced/Adminstered Mayor Lionel Wilson and City of Oakland “Conference On Urban Economic Development” and Commercials

Abdul-Jalil Hosted the City of Oakland’s “Holiday Season at the Trans Pacific Centre”

Ron Dellums Congressional Acknowledgement to Abdul-Jalil for Bicentennial Basketball Classic

Abdul-Jalil and The Jesse Jackson 4 President 1984 Fundraiser
Abdul-Jalil and The Historic Jesse Jackson 4 President 1984 Campaign pg1
Abdul-Jalil and The Historic Jesse Jackson 4 President 1984 Campaign pg2
Abdul-Jalil and The Historic Jesse Jackson 4 President 1984 Campaign pg3

ABDUL-JALIL- the First _SUPER AGENT_ Legal Black History Page 1
ABDUL-JALIL-Sports and Entertainment Law Courses in All Major Law and MBA Programs Page 2
ABDUL-JALIL-Sports and Entertainment Law Courses in All Major Law and MBA Programs Page 3
ABDUL-JALIL-Sports and Entertainment Law, Lecturor, Presenter, Marketing, Branding Page 4

Award for “Distinguished Marketing and Promotional Services” from NFL Super Bowl NFL Experience , Abdul-Jalil Award from NFL Super Bowl, Rihanna SUPER BOWL Celebrity Promo , Dr. Dre SUPER BOWL Celebrity Promo

SUPER BOWL CELEBRITY PLACEMENT, Abdul-Jalil Duo Role in “Free Base Ain’t Free” pg1, Abdul-Jalil Duo Role in “Free Base Ain’t Free” pg2 , Abdul-Jalil Duo Role in “Free Base Ain’t Free” pg3

The Man Who Turn$ Hit$ Into Million$, One Special Case,

The Historic Jr. Moore Contract pg1, The Historic Jr. Moore Contract pg2,

ESPN Bostock 5th & Jackson TV Special Part 1, and Part 2, ESPN Bostock Magazine Special, ESPN Magazine- The History and Mystery of The High Five,
the “al-Hakim Tax Code Ruling”, Smart Agent, Busy Agent,
Abdul-Jalil in Harvard University Law School Federal Tax Course Outline
Abdul-Jalil in Yale University Law School Federal Tax Course 13th Ed., Prof. Eric Zolt
Abdul-Jalil in Wake Forest University Law School “Islamic and Jewish Perspective On Interest”
Abdul-Jalil in Washington University Law School Tax Code Abdul-Jalil in Washington & Lee University Law School Tax Code ,Abdul-Jalil in University of Virginia Law School Tax Course

You can click on any highlighted word to view or download that itemTo:      Ismail J. Ramsey-Director                    Rob Bonta
            U. S. Attorney’s Office                         Attorney General of California
            Federal Courthouse                            1300 I Street, Suite 125
            450 Golden Gate Avenue                     P.O. Box 944255
            San Francisco, CA 94102                  Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
            Fax No.: 415-436-7234                       Fax: 916-324-8835

Presiding Judge Thomas Nixon Chad Finke Executive Officer
             Superior Court of Alameda County                   Superior Court of Alameda County
             René C. Davidson Courthouse                           René C. Davidson Courthouse
             Department 1                                                     1225 Fallon Street, Room 209
             Oakland, CA 94612                                         Oakland, CA 94612
             Fax: 510-891-5304, 510-891-6276        Fax: 510-891-6276
TNixon@alameda.courts.ca.gov cfinke@alameda.courts.ca.gov
dept1@alameda.courts.ca.gov
            Judge Stuart Hing                                                 Judge Michael Gaffey
            East County Hall of Justice                                Fremont Hall of Justice
            Fremont Law & Motion, Dept 711                       Fremont Law & Motion, Dept. 605
            5151 Gleason Drive                                              39439 Paseo Padre Parkway
            Dublin, CA 94568                                                Fremont, CA 94538
            SHing@alameda.courts.ca.gov                            MGaffey@alameda.courts.ca.gov
dept711@alameda.courts.ca.gov Dept605@alameda.courts.ca.gov
            925-227-6711                                                        510-818-7510
            Robert Tripp, FBI Director                                 Yesenia Sanchez
            Northern District of California                            Alameda County Sheriff
            San Francisco Field Office                                1401 Lakeside Drive, 12th Floor
            450 Golden Gate Avenue, 13th Floor                Oakland, CA 94612-4305
            San Francisco, CA 94102-9523                           Fax: (510) 272-6811

            Chief Brian Matthews                                         Casey Hallinan             Hayward Police Department                               Attorney General of California             300 W. Winton Ave.                                            Attn: Public Inquiry Unit             Hayward, CA 94544                                            P.O. Box 944255             Fax: 510-293-7183                                            Sacramento, CA 94244-2550Fax: (916) 323-5341

         Senator Aisha Wahab (SD-10)                Ursula Jones Dickson
           California State Senate                            District Attorney
           39510 Paseo Padre Pkwy, Ste 280          René C. Davidson Courthouse
           Fremont, CA 94538                                1225 Fallon Street, Room 900
           Fax: 916-319-2125                                  Oakland CA 94612
                                                                           Fax: 510-452-5625, 510-271-5157

           Steve Gordon- Director                            Kenneth J. Pogue- Director
           Department of Motor Vehicles                 Office of Administrative Law
           2415 1st Ave., Mail Station F101             300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1250
           Sacramento, CA 95818-2606                   Sacramento, CA 95814-4339
           Fax:                                                           Fax: 916-323-6826
Steve.Gordon@dmv.ca.gov Kenneth.Pogue@oai.ca.gov

           Kimberly Kirchmeyer- Director                Patrick Dorais- Bureau Chief
           Department of Consumer Affairs            Bureau of Automotive Repair
          1625 North Market Blvd., Suite N 112      Complaint Intake Unit
           Sacramento, CA 95834                             10949 N. Mather Blvd.
           Fax: (916) 574-8623                                  Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Kimberly.Kirchmeyer@dca.ca.gov           Fax: (916) 464-3405
Patrick_Dorais@dca.ca.gov

        Ricardo Lara- Commissioner                    Alex Anneker         Department of Insurance                           State Farm Insurance Agent          300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1700                     5301 Claremont Ave          Sacramento, CA 95814                            Oakland, CA 94618          Fax: 916-445-5276                                    alex.anneker.vadygn@statefarm.com, EastBayAuto6@gmail.com Ricardo.Lara@insurance.ca.gov
         Custodian of Records
         State Farm Claims
         PO Box 52250
         Phoenix, AZ 85072-2250
        Alacrity Fax: 985-345-4400, 800-952-5371sent via: U. S. Mail, Fax, and email
FROM:    Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation
DATE:     June 6, 2025
NO. PAGES: 8
RE:        A. G. Bonta, Law Enforcement Fraud, Misrepresentation, Concealment of Material Facts with Intent to Induce Court’s Act or Reliance; VIDEO ADMISSIONS, PROOF Sheriff’s Deputy MARKITA SAYLES COMMITTED FRAUD, FIXING THE CASE; ADMITTED SHE WAS INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES; PERJURY; FILING AN ENTIRE “FALSE POLICE REPORT”; WILLFULLY FABRICATED EVIDENCE; COMMITTED MISCONDUCT; CONCEALMENT; to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto

Dear Sheriff Sanchez, Chief Chaplin, A. G. Ramsey, A. G. Bonta, Director Tripp, Steve Gordon- DMV, Ricardo Lara- DOI, Kimberly Kirchmeyer- DCA , Patrick Dorais- BAR, Kenneth J. Pogue- OAL, A. G. Hallinan, Senator Wahab, D. A. Price, State Farm Claims, East Bay Auto Center, et. al.,

Law Enforcement Fraud, Misrepresentation, Concealment of Material Facts with the Intent to Induce the Court’s Act or Reliance: 24SC067622 EAST BAY AUTO CENTER vs AARON & MARGARET WALLACE

Judge Brian Caruth                                           Muhammad Khan, Numi Khan
              Superior Court of Alameda County                  East Bay Auto Center
              Wiley Manuel Courthouse                                21099 Mission Blvd.
              Department 105                                                 Hayward, CA 94541
              661 Washington St.                                            Email: EastBayAuto6@gmail.com
              Oakland, CA 94607                                         Ph:510‐690‐2728
              Email: dept105@alameda.courts.ca.gov
BCaruth@alameda.courts.ca.gov

             Presiding Judge Thomas Nixon Chad Finke Executive Officer
             Superior Court of Alameda County                   Superior Court of Alameda County
             René C. Davidson Courthouse                           René C. Davidson Courthouse
             Department 1                                                    1225 Fallon Street, Room 209
             Oakland, CA 94612                                         Oakland, CA 94612
             Fax: 510-891-5304, 510-891-6276        Fax: 510-891-6276
TNixon@alameda.courts.ca.gov cfinke@alameda.courts.ca.gov
dept1@alameda.courts.ca.gov

cc: Judges Stuart Hing, Michael Gaffey, Clerks of Dept. 1, 105, 605, 711
U.S. Postal Mail and Emailed
FROM:     Defendant Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation
DATE:     June 5, 2025
NO PAGES:     1
RE:        Declaration for finding Alameda County Sheriff’s Office, Attorney General Rob Bonta, San Leandro Police, Hayward Police, Alameda County District Attorney, Chad Finke and Clerks in Superior Court Administration with support from U. S. Attorney- Northern District, FBI, California Department of Motor Vehicles, California Department of Insurance, California Department of Consumer Affairs, California Bureau of Automotive Repair, engaged in GROSS MISCONDUCT in this continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme complete with Fraud, Misrepresentation and Concealment of Material Facts with Knowledge of the Truth with the Intent to Induce the Court’s Act or Reliance.

“JUDGE NOT LEAST YE BE JUDGED!!”
“Judge not, that ye be not judged.
For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged:
and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye,
but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?” Matthew 7:1-3

The Mote and the Beam is a parable of Jesus given at the Sermon on the Mount in the Gospel of Matthew,

Dear Judges Thomas Nixon, Brian Caruth, Stuart Hing, Michael Gaffey, Clerks of Dept. 1, 105, 605, 711, and Chad Finke, Plaintiffs, et. al.,

Attached please find our Defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation Declaration and Legal Argument in Support of Order finding Alameda County Sheriff’s Office, Attorney General Rob Bonta, San Leandro Police, Hayward Police, Alameda County District Attorney, Chad Finke and Clerks in Superior Court Administration with support from U. S. Attorney- Northern District, FBI, California Department of Motor Vehicles, California Department of Insurance, California Department of Consumer Affairs, California Bureau of Automotive Repair, engaged in GROSS MISCONDUCT in this continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme complete with Fraud, Misrepresentation and Concealment of Material Facts with Knowledge of the Truth with the Intent to Induce the Court’s Act or Reliance; Fixing the Case against Defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation behind their declaration the CRIME being a “civil” action, NOT A CRIMINAL ACTION, as their defense for NOT filing police crime reports AND destroying the evidence, FORCING a civil court actions; Judges, Court Administration, Clerks Obstructed, Perverted Course, Due Administration of Justice.

THE OATH OF OFFICE

I, ________________________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter.

PROOF of Attorney General Rob Bonta’s GROSS MISCONDUCT in this continuing Targeted Entrapment Scam/Sting/Scheme completed with this misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court’s act or reliance!
   Below is a recent email exchange with the California Registry of Charities and Fundraisers operating under the auspicious of Attorney General Rob Bonta.

Dear Registry of Charities and Fundraisers,

    Attached hereto please find the AG’s summary receipt for the filing of the requested 2022-23 YE filed documents that MUST be properly completed and confirmed BEFORE any electronic payment for the fee can be processed and accepted! Again, there never was any unspecified “deficiencies” for 2022-23 nor 2023-24 YE!!
    Again, we filed the forms, submitted the documents and paid, for which we presented the receipts for, online at the AG’s website.
    As we stated earlier. we had NOT received ANY RESPONSE to our multiple 2 emails, a fax and letters to your offices since May 14, 2025 regrading a notice that our Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation non-profit 2024 YE filing has been rejected for unspecified “deficiencies”. You probably would NOT have responded if it were NOT for the intervention of Alicia Xiong in RegCompliance <RegCompliance@doj.ca.gov>!
    AGAIN, we ALWAYS DISAGREED WITH THIS FINDING and requested you PLEASE provide specifically what the 2024 YE filing unspecified “deficiencies” are?
    We filed the forms, submitted the documents and paid, for which we have the receipts for, online at the AG’s website.
    AFTER we provided the copies of the requested filings AS PROOF there was never any alleged “deficiencies”, you responded that you had the 2024 YE filings BUT the 2023 YE was missing!
    THAT ALSO WAS A FALSE STATEMENT! We provided the filed documents AND the AG’s completed summary for the filing that MUST be completed properly BEFORE the system will electronically allow for the processing and acceptance of the fee, for which we also had the receipts for!!
    As stated before, we find the “timing and non-responses suspicious” as the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation have ongoing litigation that this action may impact!
   This ENTIRE “DEFICIENCIES” ACTION WAS A COMPLETE FABRICATION TO PROVOKE AND ENTRAP US INTO AN INDEFENSIBLE LEGAL POSITION as if our our Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation would be “suspended” for the alleged non-filing of the “deficiencies” for 2022-23 nor 2023-24 YE, THEY ARE/WOULD THEN Not be currently registered with California Secretary of State nor the California Franchise Tax Board, thus they are NOT authorized to do business in the State of California and don’t have legal standing to file nor defend a law suit. They DO NOT have legal standing to exist, if they may be suspended for some reason.  A suspended corporation may not prosecute or defend an action in a California court.  A corporation may be suspended for at least one of the following reasons:
   •   Failure to file one or more tax returns. Cal Rev. & Tax Code Sec. 23301.
   •   Failure to pay the business’ tax balance due. This can include the penalty for failing to file the annual Statement of Information with the Secretary of State. California Corporations Code Section 2205.
Timberline, Inc. v. Jaisinghani, (1997) 54 Cal. App. 4th 1361.(Stating a suspended corporation is disqualified from exercising any right, power, or privilege, including prosecuting or defending an action, or appealing a judgment). A suspended corporation may not prosecute or defend an action in a California court. (Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Superior Court [54 Cal.App.4th 1366] (1922) 188 Cal. 393, 396-397 [205 P. 446]; Alhambra-Shumway Mines, Inc. v. Alhambra Gold Mine Corp. (1957) 155 Cal.App.2d 46, 50-51 [317 P.2d 649].)
    Nor may a suspended corporation appeal from an adverse judgment (Boyle v. Lakeview Creamery Co. (1937) 9 Cal.2d 16, 20-21 [68 P.2d 968]; Gar-Lo, Inc. v. Prudential Sav. & Loan Assn. (1974) 41 Cal.App.3d 242, 245 [116 Cal.Rptr. 389]), or seek a writ of mandate (Brown v. Superior Court (1966) 242 Cal.App.2d 519, 635 [51 Cal.Rptr. 633]).
    Given this heinous, blatant attempt to eliminate our status as a current Corporation with Secretary of State and State Franchise Tax Board authorized to do business in the State of California, we will file another Complaint with the Alameda County Judges Brian Caruth, Tom Nixon, Michael Gaffey, Stuart Hing, Joscelyn Jones, and Superior Court administrator Chad Finke, Alameda County Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez, Hayward Police Chief Brian Matthews, U. S. Attorney Ismail Ramsey, California Attorney General Rob Bonta, F.B.I. Northern District Director Robert Tripp, California Attorney General Casey Hallinan, California State Senator Aisha Wahab, Alameda County District Attorney Ursula Jones Dickson, Director of California Department of Motor Vehicles Steve Gordon, California Department of Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara, California Director Department of Consumer Affairs Kimberly Kirchmeyer, California Bureau of Automotive Repair Chief Patrick Dorais, Director California Office of Administrative Law Kenneth J. Pogue, California Attorney General Hallinan- Public Inquiry Unit, and several Federal government offices.
    We consider this further PROOF of Attorney General Rob Bonta’s GROSS MISCONDUCT in this continuing Targeted Entrapment Scam/Sting/Scheme completed with this misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court’s act or reliance!
    As we have always maintained and is proven by their bad faith fact pattern, this was ALWAYS an entrapment scheme designed to take possession of the truck with it’s contents and trigger civil/criminal actions knowing that the courts are inapposite to our justice. They are not acting alone!
    IT IS CLEAR THAT OUR NON-PROFIT AARON & MARGARET WALLACE FOUNDATION, ABDUL-JALIL al-HAKIM, THE AL-HAKIM FAMILY, THEIR BUSINESSES AND BUSINESS PROPERTY, THEIR REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY, THEIR CHARITIES, THEIR COMMUNITIES, AND THE COMMUNITIES THEY SERVE- PERSONALLY, PROFESSIONALLY, MORALLY, ETHICALLY, AND FINANCIALLY, HAS BEEN TARGETED WITH SPECIOUS, TORTIOUS ILLEGAL CLANDESTINE ACTS ON THE PART OF LAW ENFORCEMENT WITH THE INTENT TO DESTROY THEIR LIVES!
    WE HAVE PRESENTED further PROOF there is a continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme and Hate Crimes. Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office trapped themselves in CORRUPTION and SUBORNED PERJURIOUS TESTIMONY, in this State sponsored terror; with vindictive retaliation against AMWF and al-Hakim family while defending, concealing and thereby being further complicit in committing THE ADMITTED willful and intentional extrinsic fraud upon the people of the great State of California and the Court; fraud; prosecutorial misconduct; willful and malicious prosecution; willful misconduct; conflict of interest; obstruction of justice; denial of due process under the law; willful and intentional fabrication and authoring false evidence; misstating and mischaracterizing evidence; misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court’s act or reliance; harassment; intimidation on behalf of Attorney General Rob Bonta; abuse of discretion, misconduct, conduct prejudicial, illegal ex-parte communications and bias designed to result in fixing the case against defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation and al-Hakim; appointing themselves a Real Primary Party of Interest to the litigation with their OWN agenda; weaponizing the legal, judicial and investigative process in furtherance of their agenda; engaging in the defense of opposing parties; provocation, bias, prejudice, Islamophobia, Xenophobia, hate, bigotry and racism!
    The Entrapment Strategy is disable, destroy, and eliminate the TARGET- defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation, Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, the al-Hakim family, their businesses and business property, their real and personal property, their charities, their communities, and the communities they serve- personally, professionally, morally, ethically, and financially with the courts system to deny and exhaust any and all notions of civil rights, civil liberties, human rights without the God given right to undertake unbiased litigation without the deciding and controlling actions and influence of corrupt unscrupulous judicial, law enforcement, governmental and legal entities, agencies and operatives.
    We have documented AND filed SEVERAL Federal and State complaints of being complicit in the illegal TARGETED ENTRAPMENT activities WITH AND AGAINST Police Chiefs Tony Chaplin/Brian Matthew; Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez; Police Chief Abdul Pridgen; U. S. Attorney Ismail Ramsey; Attorney General Rob Bonta; F.B.I. Director Robert Tripp; Governor Gavin Newsom; Casey Hallinan; Ricardo Lara- DOI; Steve Gordon- DMV; Patrick Dorais- BAR; Kimberly Kirchmeyer- DCA; Grant Parks- State Auditor; Selvi Stanislaus- FTB; Senator Aisha Wahab; District Attorney Pam Price; HUD; et. al., against co-conspirators East Bay Auto/State Farm for their active, continuing role in this Targeted Entrapment Scheme and “Bad Faith” by them, their agents, contractors, and ALL known and unknown, announced and unannounced Third Parties!
    We will respond further in mass with the affect that our Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation non-profit business has been actually and potentially DAMAGED by your agency, Attorney General Rob Bonta, and ALL those referenced herein.
    THIS NEVER SHOULD HAVE HAPPENED!
We continue this section herewith below for argument and law:
ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFFS, LAW ENFORCEMENT IMPLICATED BY EAST BAY AUTO IN TARGETED ENTRAPMENT, TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE, FRUAD, MISREPRESENTATION WITH THE INTENT TO INDUCE THE COURT’S ACT OR RELIANCE
Law Enforcement, Attorney General Rob Bonta, Hayward Police Chiefs Tony Chaplin/Brian Matthew; County Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez; San Leandro Police Chiefs Abdul Pridgen/Angela Averiett; U. S. Attorneys Stephanie Hinds/Ismail Ramsey; F.B.I. NorCal Directors Craig Fair/Robert Tripp; with support from the Court, California Department of Motor Vehicles, California Department of Insurance, California Department of Consumer Affairs, California Bureau of Automotive Repair, and associated third parties, engaged and framed this TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE for the expressed purposes of fraud, misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court’s act or reliance while claiming to hide behind their declaration of the CRIME being a “CIVIL” action, NOT A CRIMINAL ACTION, as their defense for NOT filing a legitimate police crime report AND destroying the evidence, FORCING a civil court/small claims action as their criminal prosecutor, deputy counsel, judge, jury, witness, executioner, demonstrate a CLEAR deprivation of federally protected rights under the U. S. Constitution and Civil Rights Act.
Further, they committed fraud upon the people of the State of California in fixing this case; they were instructed by and with special services resources; perjury; fraud; subornation and solicitation of perjurious testimony; prejudicial misconduct; corrupt misconduct; illegal ex parte communications; grand larceny; tortious interference; intentional spoliation of evidence; fraudulent misrepresentation; intentional misrepresentation; property damage; filing an entire “false police report” OR NONE AT ALL; willfully fabricated evidence; committed misconduct; concealment; to covering for their “asset” co-conspirators; engaging in this Continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme, “Bad Faith” Fact Pattern and Hate Crimes.
The Plaintiffs, the Sheriffs, co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, Law Enforcement with associated third parties continuing Targeted Entrapment Strategy expose these actions of Grand Corruption as willful, intentional, malicious, capricious, outrageous and tortious in their failed attempt to avoid investigation, detection and collection of the necessary evidence; as they willfully and intentionally improperly altered, concealed, suppression and destroyed evidence was founded to take the responsibility, accountability, and liability off the Sheriff’s to have performed their investigation and filing a legitimate police crime report by destroying the evidence wherein the egregiousness of this spoliation, the strength and nature of their actions is untenable with any JUSTICE!
The COUNTY SHERIFFS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT have been IMPLICATED BY EAST BAY AUTO CENTER as an accessory and collaborator in this case, providing them protection and cover up for them, implying GROSS MISCONDUCT as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by the Sheriff’s deputy Markita Sayles whom ADMITS she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES. Video is available on Youtube. See “ILLEGAL POLICE TARGETED ENTRAPMENT BACKFIRES! TRAPS POLICE, EXPOSES IMMORAL, UNETHICAL SCHEME!” at: https://youtu.be/kus80M56Vas. IN AN UNSOLICITED, UNWANTED MAY 28, 2024 PHONE CALL TO AL-HAKIM, SAYLES ADMITS SHE LIED ABOUT THE ENTIRE “FALSE POLICE REPORT” and willfully committed PERJURY, FABRICATE EVIDENCE, MISCONDUCT, CONCEALMENT, COMMITTED FRAUD UPON THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN FIXING THE CASE! See video at: https://youtu.be/ZEgZRhuYOMM.
The Plaintiffs, Sheriffs and co-conspirator State Farm insurance company continuing Targeted Entrapment Strategy expose these actions of Grand Corruption as willful, intentional, malicious, capricious, outrageous and tortious in their failed attempt to avoid investigation, detection and collection of the necessary evidence to establish the truck was “STOLEN, BURGLARIZED, VANDALIZED AND DAMAGED ” from East Bay Auto Center by East Bay Auto Center and/or with associated third parties, while claiming to hide behind their declaration of the CRIME being a “civil” action, NOT A CRIMINAL ACTION, as their defense for NOT filing a legitimate police crime report AND destroying the evidence, FORCING a civil court/small claims action as their criminal prosecutor, deputy counsel, judge, jury, witness, executioner, demonstrate a CLEAR deprivation of a federally protected right under the Civil Rights Act”.
Plaintiffs, the Sheriffs, co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, Law Enforcement and Deputy Markita Sayles committed fraud upon the people of the State of California in fixing the case; admitted she was instructed by special services resources; perjury; fraud; subornation and solicitation of perjurious testimony; prejudicial misconduct; corrupt misconduct; illegal ex parte communications; grand larceny; tortious interference; intentional spoliation of evidence; fraudulent misrepresentation; intentional misrepresentation; property damage; filing an entire “false police report”; willfully fabricated evidence; committed misconduct; concealment; to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto; engaging in this Continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme, “Bad Faith” Fact Pattern and Hate Crimes.
As it is the RESPONSIBILITY of the COUNTY SHERIFFS to conduct a complete investigation, analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages IN THE LEGAL FORM OF A FILED POLICE REPORT, IT IS NOT WITHIN THE RIGHTS OF EAST BAY TO REFUSE THAT RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COUNTY SHERIFFS NOR FOR THEM TO COMPLY FOR THE PURPOSES OF DENYING OUR RIGHTS TO “COVER UP” FOR THEIR ASSET! We declared we will NOT move the truck unless and until East Bay allows the COUNTY SHERIFFS and us to inspect the truck for a complete investigation, analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages IN THE LEGAL FORM OF A FILED POLICE REPORT!!! This established a legal relationship between the Sheriffs and defendants that lead to liability based on the Sheriffs inducing reliance by the defendants, resulting in a greater risk of harm due to Sheriffs negligence than what the defendants already faced, then the Sheriffs fail to respond to requests for assistance or investigate when they promised to do so.
Law Enforcement with associated third parties, engaged and framed this TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE for the expressed purposes of misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court’s act or reliance while claiming to hide behind their declaration of the CRIME being a “CIVIL” action, NOT A CRIMINAL ACTION, as their defense for NOT filing a legitimate police crime report AND destroying the evidence, FORCING a civil court/small claims action as their criminal prosecutor, deputy counsel, judge, jury, witness, executioner, demonstrate a CLEAR deprivation of federally protected rights under the U. S. Constitution and Civil Rights Act. The April and May 2024 videos PROVIDES ADMISSIONS from Markita Sayles she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES TWICE is PROOF there is a continuing Targeted Entrapment Scam/Sting/Scheme and Hate Crimes. The Sheriff’s office trapped themselves, Plaintiff’s, co-conspirator State Farm insurance company and Law Enforcement in CORRUPTION and SUBORNED PERJURIOUS TESTIMONY, in this State sponsored terror; with vindictive retaliation against AMWF and al-Hakim family while defending, concealing and thereby being further complicit in committing THE ADMITTED willful and intentional extrinsic fraud upon the people of the great State of California and the Court; fraud; prosecutorial misconduct; willful and malicious prosecution; willful misconduct; conflict of interest; obstruction of justice; denial of due process under the law; willful and intentional fabrication and authoring false evidence; misstating and mischaracterizing evidence; misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court’s act or reliance; harassment; intimidation on behalf of the County Sheriffs; abuse of discretion, misconduct, conduct prejudicial, illegal ex-parte communications and bias designed to result in fixing the case against AMWF and al-Hakim; appointing themselves a Real Primary Party of Interest to the litigation with their OWN agenda; weaponizing the police report and investigative process in furtherance of their agenda; engaging in the defense of opposing parties; provocation, bias, prejudice, Islamophobia, Xenophobia, hate, bigotry and racism!
East Bay Auto Center is the ONLY suspects that could have stolen, burglarized, vandalized, and damaged the truck as it was not stolen by anyone else! AMWF’s truck was “STOLEN” from East Bay Auto Center by East Bay Auto Center and/or with an associated third party while there for the insurance repair estimate. BUT NOT stolen nor burglarized through entry from knocking out the passenger door lock! There is ONLY 16 inches from the passenger door lock to the metal fence and 24 inches from the passenger door lock to the outer metal fence. That makes it PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for someone to knock out the passenger door lock and a human body to open the door and enter the truck with less than 4 inches of clearance to enter given the design and build of the truck!! THE TRUCK WAS STOLEN THROUGH ENTRY FROM THE DRIVERS SIDE DOOR AND THERE IS NO SIGN OF ANY DAMAGE TO THE DRIVERS SIDE DOOR LOCK, THUS LEAVING THE ONLY POSSIBLE ENTRY THROUGH THAT DRIVERS SIDE DOOR WITH A KEY!!
On October 1, 2024 we discovered that our truck had been moved from the Plaintiff’s shop on Mission Blvd. in Hayward. This was done WITHOUT OUR PERMISSION OR KNOWLEDGE! This was done to DESTROY the crime scene from the truck being stolen without being inspected nor investigated by law enforcement and destroying the evidence and chain of custody!
On October 2, 2024, Plaintiffs EBAC FAILED AND REFUSED TO DISCLOSE TO THE COUNTY SHERIFF’S WHERE TO AND WHEN EBAC MOVED THE TRUCK AFTER IT WAS STOLEN, BURGLARIZED, VANDALIZED AND DAMAGED AS PART OF COMPLETING A POLICE REPORT THAT IS ALSO REQUIRED BY THE INSURANCE COMPANIES IN THE PRESENCE OF THE COUNTY SHERIFF’S Deputies Sean Sullivan #2137 and Collin Lenahan #2453 as Percipient Eye Witnesses.
Law Enforcement with associated third parties, engaged and framed this TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE for the expressed purposes of misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court’s act or reliance while claiming to hide behind their declaration of the CRIME being a “CIVIL” action, NOT A CRIMINAL ACTION, as their defense for NOT filing a legitimate police crime report AND destroying the evidence, FORCING a civil court/small claims action as their criminal prosecutor, deputy counsel, judge, jury, witness, executioner, demonstrate a CLEAR deprivation of federally protected rights under the U. S. Constitution and Civil Rights Act.
On Friday, October 4, 2024, East Bay ADMITTED and CONFESSED in unsolicited emails to the court and Judges Thomas Nixon, Brian Caruth, Stuart Hing, Michael Gaffey, the Clerks of Dept. 1, and 105, and Superior Court Administrator Chad Finke that they have willfully and intentionally absconded with our truck and transferred the possession and control to a Third Party without our knowledge or consent!
These admissions and confessions are evidence that they willfully and intentionally improperly altered, concealed, suppression and destroyed evidence wherein the egregiousness of this spoliation, the strength and nature of their actions is untenable with any JUSTICE! They have NO REGARD FOR THE LAW NOR JUSTICE witnessed by this inference arising from the spoliation.
The Plaintiffs, the Sheriffs, co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, and Law Enforcement continuing Targeted Entrapment Strategy expose these actions of Grand Corruption as willful, intentional, malicious, capricious, outrageous and tortious in their failed attempt to avoid investigation, detection and collection of the necessary evidence to establish the truck was “STOLEN, BURGLARIZED, VANDALIZED AND DAMAGED ” from East Bay Auto Center by East Bay Auto Center and/or with associated third parties, while claiming to hide behind their declaration of the CRIME being a “civil” action, NOT A CRIMINAL ACTION, as their defense for NOT filing a legitimate police crime report AND destroying the evidence, FORCING a civil court/small claims action as their criminal prosecutor, deputy counsel, judge, jury, witness, executioner, demonstrate a CLEAR deprivation of a federally protected right under the U. S. Constitution and Civil Rights Act.
Then East Bay Auto Center attempt’s to EXTORT monies from us by holding the truck HOSTAGE and DEMANDING an unknown amount of towing and storage fees for payment to an unknown third party to be paid TO THEM in advance of any delivery of the truck, AS WELL AS payment of towing and storage fees to THEM to be paid TO THEM in advance of any delivery of the truck!
AGAIN, this was done WITHOUT OUR PERMISSION OR KNOWLEDGE and was done to DESTROY the crime scene from the truck being stolen without being inspected nor investigated by law enforcement and to destroy the chain of custody!
But Plaintiffs, the Sheriffs and co-conspirator State Farm insurance company are NOT acting alone, but with governmental entities and their associates!
Plaintiffs, the Sheriffs, co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, and Law Enforcement facing claims of intentional spoliation of evidence have several irrefutable facts they can not overcome: 1) they were fully aware at all times of their duty to preserve the evidence, 2) they were fully aware at all times there was NO accidental destruction, this was willful and intentional; 3) they were aware at all times of the relevance of the evidence, 4) they were fully aware at all times of their intent and motive in the spoliation of evidence and this provided them the opportunity, 5) they were fully aware at all times of the willful and intentional causation of the spoliation of evidence, 6) they were fully aware at all times of the damages for the spoliation of evidence, and 7) they were fully aware at all times of their need for compliance with legal obligations regarding the spoliation of evidence.
The County Sheriff’s coercive, malicious, intentional tortious interference are a violation of our rights under the California Constitution is a deprivation of life, liberty, and property without due process and their police actions are inherently coercive due to their societal trust. For a Civil Code Section 52.1 cause of action, two elements must be established: (1) intentional interference with a constitutional or legal right, and (2) that such interference was executed through threats, intimidation, or coercion. The courts, in Venegas v. County of Los Angeles, (2004) 32 Cal.4th 820, 829, it was determined that relief is granted under Civil Code Section 52.1 if coercive actions are present. Cal. Civ. Code § 1714.10.
Plaintiffs, the Sheriffs, co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, and Law Enforcement Intentional Spoliation of Evidence can be viewed through Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior Court, California Supreme Court, California. 1998-05-11 and Penal Code section 135 establishes criminal penalties for spoliation, defining it as the willful destruction or concealment of evidence intended to prevent its production in legal proceedings, classifying such acts as misdemeanors.
Defendant argues that Plaintiffs, the Sheriffs, co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, and Law Enforcement actions were NOT justified, that the interference was not justified, acted with the intent to interfere, was conducted with malice and this wrongful conduct lead to their liability. The evidence shows that Plaintiffs, the Sheriffs, co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, and Law Enforcement’s acted with the intent to deny, disrupt and intentional interfere with Defendants Constitutional and legal rights, that such interference was executed through threats, intimidation, or coercion, with their unreasonable seizure and deprivation of life, liberty, and property without due process; and to deny and impede access to court and insurance companies with ALL the evidence that should have been readily available. Plaintiffs, the Sheriffs, co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, and Law Enforcement actions of interference with Defendants rights protected by state or federal laws, specifically noting that Civil Code § 52.1 emphasizes the element of fear for safety associated with hate violence, particularly focusing on threats, intimidation, or coercion was deliberate and spiteful, serves to undermine the public trust and allowing such conduct to go unchecked sets a dangerous precedent.
Under Coprich v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeal, California. 2000-05-19 , the court allowed the plaintiff to amend her complaint, because the officers were responsible for gathering or preserving evidence or for preventing her from doing so. However, the court did not determine that remedies monetary and contempt sanctions, with criminal sanctions for intentional destruction of evidence, and disciplinary measures against attorneys/law enforcement involved in suppressing evidence.
Defendant asserts that Plaintiffs, the Sheriffs, co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, and Law Enforcement intentionally failed to preserve evidence of the truck burglary is tortious interference due to spoliation of evidence and intentional interference with defendant’s prospective economic advantage, emphasizing defendants’ right to their injury claims are a valuable expectancy.
On November 2, 2024 we discovered that our truck had been returned to Plaintiff’s shop on Mission Blvd. in Hayward with additional damage. Upon investigation, the truck has been further BURGLARIZED by the breach of the lock on the roll up door and the roll up door itself! THE DAMAGES ARE UNKOWN AND YET TO BE INVESTIGATED!
Law Enforcement with associated third parties, engaged and framed this TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE for the expressed purposes of misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court’s act or reliance while claiming to hide behind their declaration of the CRIME being a “CIVIL” action, NOT A CRIMINAL ACTION, as their defense for NOT filing a legitimate police crime report AND destroying the evidence, FORCING a civil court/small claims action as their criminal prosecutor, deputy counsel, judge, jury, witness, executioner, demonstrate a CLEAR deprivation of federally protected rights under the U. S. Constitution and Civil Rights Act.
Irrefutable evidence shows that Plaintiff’s and the Alameda County Sheriff’s acted with the intent to disrupt Defendants contractual relationship and deny defendants civil rights.
Plaintiffs, the Sheriffs, co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, and Law Enforcement had knowledge of this contract and intentionally interfered with it AND violated the defendants civil rights (Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp. (2003) 29 Cal.4th 1134 establishes the elements of tortious interference with contractual relations, emphasizing that the defendant must have knowledge of the contract and intentionally interfere with it) by deputy SAYLES whom ADMITS SHE LIED ABOUT THE ENTIRE FALSE POLICE REPORT, willfully committed PERJURY, FABRICATE EVIDENCE, MISCONDUCT, CONCEALMENT, COMMITTED FRAUD UPON THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, failed and refused to conduct a complete investigation, analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages IN THE LEGAL FORM OF A FILED POLICE REPORT, AS IT IS NOT WITHIN THE RIGHTS OF EAST BAY AUTO TO REFUSE THAT RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COUNTY SHERIFFS NOR FOR THEM TO COMPLY FOR THE PURPOSES OF DENYING OUR RIGHTS TO “COVER UP” FOR THEIR ASSET IN FIXING THIS CASE! See video at: https://youtu.be/ZEgZRhuYOMM.
As a direct result of Plaintiffs, the Sheriffs, co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, and Law Enforcements actions, Defendant has suffered losses and damages including but not limited to loss of business, personal, and real property, lost use of the truck, loss of services to the communities that they serve, loss of revenue, reputational harm, and emotional distress. Defendant also suffered damages, that need to be determined by the order ASAP for the truck be made available to us to get vital information from the engine, body, cab, under body, exhaust, etc., and a complete video investigation, analysis and documentation of the condition of the truck and the contents; to search, inspect, process and document the truck as a crime scene for evidence, finger printing, and clues for the damage, theft, vandalism, and missing/stolen business and personal property to ascertain the total vehicle costs, loss, damages as well as the theft costs, loss and damages. The truck has over $200,000 in valuable items in the cargo payload bay since it has been in the possession and custody of the Plaintiffs a year ago. Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC v. Sherwood Partners, Inc. (2005) 131 Cal.App.4th 802. This case highlights the requirement that the plaintiff must show that the defendant’s conduct was independently wrongful, which can include unlawful actions by law enforcement.
Defendant argues that the actions of Plaintiff’s and the Alameda County Sheriff’s violated the defendants civil rights and contends that the interference was not justified and was willful, intentional and conducted with malice. Westside Center Associates v. Safeway Stores 1990, Inc. (1996) 42 Cal.App.4th 507. This case discusses the necessity of proving that the interference was wrongful and that the plaintiff suffered damages as a result.
Defendant had a valid and enforceable contract with State Farm insurance company and Plaintiffs, the Sheriffs, co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, and Law Enforcement had knowledge of this contract. Reeves v. Hanlon, 33 Cal. 4th 1140 (2004): This case illustrates intentional interference and the knowledge of the contract by the defendant and they acted with the intent to interfere.
Plaintiffs, the Sheriffs, co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, and Law Enforcement actions were intentional and wrongful, constituting tortious interference with Defendants contractual relations. Burden v. County of Santa Clara, 81 Cal. App. 4th 244 (2000): This case highlights the limitations of tortious interference claims against government entities, noting that while government entities may have certain immunities, intentional and wrongful conduct still lead to liability.
Plaintiffs, the Sheriffs, co-conspirator State Farm insurance company and Law Enforcement coercive, malicious, intentional tortious interference are a violation of our rights under the California Constitution is a deprivation of life, liberty, and property without due process and their police actions are inherently coercive due to their societal trust. For a Civil Code Section 52.1 cause of action, two elements must be established: (1) intentional interference with a constitutional or legal right, and (2) that such interference was executed through threats, intimidation, or coercion. The courts, in Venegas v. County of Los Angeles, (2004) 32 Cal.4th 820, 829, it was determined that relief is granted under Civil Code Section 52.1 if coercive actions are present. Cal. Civ. Code § 1714.10. Plaintiff’s and the County Sheriff’s actions were the actual and proximate cause of the interference.
Defendant argues that Plaintiffs, the Sheriffs, co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, and Law Enforcement actions were NOT justified, that the interference was not justified, acted with the intent to interfere, was conducted with malice and this wrongful conduct lead to their liability. The evidence shows that Plaintiffs and Sheriff’s acted with the intent to deny, disrupt and intentional interfere with Defendants Constitutional and legal rights, that such interference was executed through threats, intimidation, or coercion, with their unreasonable seizure and deprivation of life, liberty, and property without due process; and to deny and impede access to court and insurance companies with ALL the evidence that should have been readily available. Plaintiffs, the Sheriffs, co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, and Law Enforcement actions of interference with Defendants rights protected by state or federal laws, specifically noting that Civil Code § 52.1 emphasizes the element of fear for safety associated with hate violence, particularly focusing on threats, intimidation, or coercion was deliberate and spiteful, serves to undermine the public trust and allowing such conduct to go unchecked sets a dangerous precedent.
Defendant asserts that Plaintiffs, the Sheriffs, co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, and Law Enforcement intentionally failed to preserve evidence of the truck burglary is tortious interference due to spoliation of evidence and intentional interference with defendant’s prospective economic advantage, emphasizing defendants’ right to their injury claims are a valuable expectancy.
The Plaintiffs, the Sheriffs, co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, and Law Enforcement continuing Targeted Entrapment Strategy expose these actions of Grand Corruption as willful, intentional, malicious, capricious, outrageous and tortious in their failed attempt to avoid investigation, detection and collection of the necessary evidence to establish the truck was “STOLEN, BURGLARIZED, VANDALIZED AND DAMAGED ” from East Bay Auto Center by East Bay Auto Center and/or with associated third parties, while claiming to hide behind their declaration of the CRIME being a “civil” action, NOT A CRIMINAL ACTION, as their defense for NOT filing a legitimate police crime report AND destroying the evidence, FORCING a civil court/small claims action as their criminal prosecutor, deputy counsel, judge, jury, witness, executioner, demonstrate a CLEAR deprivation of a federally protected right under the U. S. Constitution and Civil Rights Act.
This Grand corruption is systemic and endemic in ALL al-Hakim cases involves the unscrupulous judicial, law enforcement, governmental and legal entities colluding and conspiring using the judicial arm of government whom perform and serve in the roles as suspect, culprit, criminal, evidence, testimony, facts, truth, perjury, investigator, witness, defendant, conspirators, corruptors, colluders, judge, jury, executioner, as the opposition party with their agenda of criminal corruption and persecution to the detriment and oppression of AMWF, al-Hakim, the al-Hakim family, their businesses and business property, their real and personal property, their charities, their communities, and the communities they serve.
This Plaintiffs, the Sheriffs, co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, and Law Enforcement ill advised strategy with actions to avoid investigation, detection and collection of the necessary evidence was founded to take the responsibility, accountability, and liability off the Sheriff’s to have performed their investigation and filing a legitimate police crime report by destroying the evidence!
Defendants expressed concern over the Sheriffs officers intentionally mishandling of the crime scene, bad faith failure to investigate and collect incriminating evidence, noting the significant stakes given the involvement of the Plaintiffs and their admissions implicating and incriminating police, that they worked with law enforcement, the police are accomplishes, collaborators, and Plaintiffs are under the protection of law enforcement covering for their asset and would NOT do anything to assist AMWF or Abdul-Jalil.
The courts has established that the government must investigate, detect, collect, and preserve evidence relevant to guilt or innocence as ministerial actions. The critical issue in this ministerial action of evidence collection by the Sheriffs is without discretion, leaving them solely responsible for evidence collection, and the failure to investigate and seize material evidence convicts them of their failure of duty to preserve it. Hence, Sheriffs DO NOT have unchecked discretion to investigate, detect, collect, and preserve evidence; AND given that Plaintiffs are admitted government assets, with court’s prior rulings on informant disclosure suggest that police should exert reasonable efforts to locate material witnesses, reflecting a similar duty to seize material evidence. Sheriffs were aware of the materiality of evidence and this understanding should have compelled them to act to preserve such evidence, aligning with the principle favoring the state in ministerial actions.
Case law indicates that while police officers have liability and they can be held accountable for negligent execution of decisions of issues that involve distinguishing between discretionary and ministerial actions.
The objective of the continuing Targeted Entrapment Strategy with “Target, Engagement, Harassment, Provocation, Litigation” tactics is designed to disable, destroy, and eliminate the TARGET- AMWF, Abdul-Jalil, al-Hakim family, their businesses and business property, their real and personal property, their charities, their communities, and the communities they serve- personally, professionally, morally, ethically, and financially with the courts system to deny and exhaust any and all notions of civil rights, civil liberties, human rights without the God given right to undertake unbiased litigation without the deciding and controlling actions and influence of corrupt unscrupulous judicial, law enforcement, governmental and legal entities, agencies and operatives. The very nature and inherent structure/operation of the Political/Judicial Institution (Judges are Politicians= elected officials by the Public, to serve for the public) makes it diabolically impossible to journey from the Constitution to the Institution “Of The People, For The People, By The People!” that places them in this evil “criminal and civil rights/litigation meat grinder”.
This East Bay action is one of AMWF and Abdul-Jalil being forced into a small claims action that is both oppressive and coercive by limiting the money awards and the depravation of ones rights as the court decision is non-appealable.
This means that as a litigant, AMWF and Abdul-Jalil waives their most basic Civil and Human Right to a fair trial without recourse to appeal an intentionally wrongful decision that may be by design! This is unlawful, offends public policy, common law and an established concept of unfairness, is immoral, unethical, oppressive or unscrupulous and causes substantial injury as a part of the larger planned “judgment peonage”, an activity to take bankrupting judgments against us, causing SEVER economic legal damages, non-economic damages, and punitive damages sentencing us to LIFE in “debtors prison”!
Over the last 50+ years al-Hakim’s “court activities” has documented, with filed and served court actions, filed and served complaints, and filed and served correspondence memorializing and exposing the judicial, law enforcement, governmental and legal entities criminal corruption and persecution, Fixing Cases against al-Hakim because he is Muslim and Black, a Whistleblower; appointing themselves a Real Primary Party of Interest to the litigation with their OWN agenda; weaponizing vindictive rulings in furtherance of their agenda; engaging in the defense of opposing parties; the denial of due process, obstruction of justice, the harassment, provocation, and government sponsored terror, the gross examples of white class and privileged bias, prejudice, Islamophobia, Xenophobia, hate induced, vindictive, retaliatory agenda, favoritism, bigotry and racism, al-Hakim continues to experience with the courts retaliation against plaintiff by taking adverse judicial and legal actions against him as punishment of al-Hakim, his family, businesses, and communities they serve continue to suffer at their individual and collective gavels and authorities.
al-Hakim proves where charges has shown that previously, under color of law, these judicial, law enforcement, governmental and legal entities criminal corruption and persecution sought to deprive plaintiff of litigation due him contrary to the right to due process and immunity from takings without due process is a gross abuse of discretion in violation of the law that will violate his rights guaranteed under the First, Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution; First Clause of Section 13 of Article I of California Constitution, art. VI, § 4 1/2; California Code of Civil Procedure §§ 355, 356, 473, 475; Civ. Code, §§ 3523, 3528.
Some of those litigation opponents referenced these judicial, law enforcement, governmental and legal entities in their filings, ALL of whom have been complained of or to are, in major part because al-Hakim reported the very obvious agenda of parties by memorializing and exposing the judicial, law enforcement, governmental and legal entities corruption and persecution and their involvement in the cover-up of that criminal corruption.
The parties are Governmental and Quasi-governmental employees, agents, contractors, entities, associates, members, and contractors of their companies, the U. S. Federal Government, State of California, County, and City agencies, among others, have engaged and framed this TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE for the expressed purposes of misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court’s act or reliance while claiming to hide behind their declaration of the CRIME being a “CIVIL” action, NOT A CRIMINAL ACTION, as their defense for NOT filing a legitimate police crime report AND destroying the evidence, FORCING a civil court/small claims action as their criminal prosecutor, deputy counsel, judge, jury, witness, executioner, demonstrate a CLEAR deprivation of federally protected rights under the U. S. Constitution and Civil Rights Act.
Law Enforcement with associated third parties, engaged and framed this TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE for the expressed purposes of misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court’s act or reliance by and with unethical and criminal means, instigated and encouraged said acts, which gives rise to fraudulent, corruption as they conspired, consorted, colluded, conceived, employed and enacted the criminal, tactical, torture inspired policy of TARGETED HATE CRIME, Terror, Civil Conspiracy, Islamophobia, Xenophobia, Hate Induced Bigotry, Vindictive Retaliation, Oppression, Harassment, Racism, Discrimination, Bias, Prejudice, Unfairness, Persecution, AND GRAND CORRUPTION, victimization, inciting acrimony, animus, in the continued persecution with calumny deceit and the attempted entrapment of us as the continuing “TARGET”.
ALL the DOCUMENTED actions alleged with cite relevant legal case authority to support arguments and assertions for a FORMAL COMPLAINT and Request for Investigation for Hate Crimes include violations of California Law including violations of the Unruh and Ralph Civil Rights Acts Civil Code section 51.7, the Tom Bane Civil Rights Acts, Civil Code section 52.1, Equal Protection under 42 U.S.C. ß 1983; California Government Code sections 11135 et seq., 12900 et seq., California Penal Code section 13023, California Penal Code section 422.55 and California Civil Code sections 51, 51.7, 52.5, and 54 et seq.; the First, Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution; California Constitution, Article VI, § 4 1/2; California Code of Civil Procedure §§ 355, 356, 473, 475, 3523, and 3528, and for Harassment, Censorship, Fraud, Negligence, Misrepresentation, Abuse of Process, Abuse of Power, Breach of Contract, Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Breach of Contract/Common Law Warranty, Deceptive Trade Practices, Intentional Misrepresentation, Negligent Misrepresentation, Fraud by Concealment, California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal Bus & Prof Code §§ 17200 et seq, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, Discrimination in Violation of the Unruh Act, Nuisance, Abuse of Process, Fraud by Concealment, Violation of California False Advertising Law, Violation of California Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), Breach of Implied Warranty, Deceit-(California Civil Code § 1710), Unfair and Deceptive Business Practices, Unconscionability (UDAP), Elder Abuse.
The Tom Bane Civil Rights Act, Civil Code section 52.1, provides protection against interference or attempts to interfere by threat, intimidation, or coercion with a person’s exercise or enjoyment of any constitutional or statutory rights. Remedies for violations of the Ralph Civil Rights Act or the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act include restraining orders, injunctive relief, equitable relief to secure constitutional and statutory rights, actual damages, exemplary or punitive damages, a civil penalty of $25,000, and attorney’s fees. An action may be brought by the Attorney General, or any district attorney or city attorney, or by the individual harmed.
California Penal Code section 13023. California Penal Code section 422.55 defines a hate crime as “a criminal act committed, in whole or in part, because of one or more of the following actual or perceived characteristics of the victim: (1) Disability, (2) Gender, (3) Nationality, (4) Race or ethnicity, (5) Religion, (6) Sexual orientation, (7) Association with a person or group with one or more of these actual or perceived characteristics.”
The California Attorney General DEMANDS an Investigation for Hate Crimes in violation of California Unruh and Ralph Civil Rights Acts; the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act, Civil Code section 52.1, Equal Protection under 42 U.S.C. ß 1983, California Penal Code sections 13519.6, Penal Code section 13023 and Penal Code 422.55 which defines a hate crime as “a criminal act committed, in whole or in part, because of one or more of the following actual or perceived characteristics of the victim: (1) Disability, (2) Gender, (3) Nationality, (4) Race or ethnicity, (5) Religion, (6) Sexual orientation, (7) Association with a person or group with one or more of these actual or perceived characteristics.” Cite relevant legal case authority to support arguments and assertions. Depending on the circumstances of each case, bias motivation may include, but is not limited to, hatred, animosity, discriminatory selection of victims, resentment, revulsion, contempt, unreasonable fear, paranoia, callousness, thrill-seeking, desire for social dominance, desire for social bonding with those of one’s “own kind,” or a perception of the vulnerability of the victim due to the victim being perceived as being weak, worthless, or fair game because of a protected characteristic, including, but not limited to, disability, gender, Age, Ancestry, Anti-Islamic, Anti-black or African American, Anti-other ethnicity/national origin, association with a person or group with one or more of these actual or perceived characteristics of a protected class, Citizenship, Color Disability (physical, intellectual/developmental, mental health/psychiatric), Medical Condition (cancer or genetic characteristic), National Origin (includes language restrictions), Political Affiliation, Race (includes hairstyle and hair texture), Religious creed (includes dress and grooming practices), and aggrieve in their entrapment strategy with the use of confidential informants, snitches, government operatives can provide a number of conditions under which “an inducement to an individual to engage in crime is authorized.” This could apply to any or all of the actions taken in and of their services agency acting in their clients name and stead.

JUDGES THOMAS NIXON, BRIAN CARUTH, STUART HING, MICHAEL GAFFEY, CLERKS OF DEPT. 1, 105, 605, 711, PLAINTIFFS, AND CHAD FINKE ALL PERCIPIENT EYE WITNESSES

On Friday, October 4, 2024, East Bay ADMITTED and CONFESSED in an unsolicited email to the court with Judges Thomas Nixon, Brian Caruth, Stuart Hing, Michael Gaffey, Clerks of Dept. 1, 105, 605, 711, and Chad Finke, et. al., that they have willfully and intentionally absconded with our truck and transferred the possession and control to a Third Party without our knowledge or consent!  
    In that email East Bay wrote:

Hello Abdul jalil.
This is EAST BAY AUTO CENTER. I spoken last time with you to pick up your truck. Also I send email and text messages to pick up the truck.
We have no space for keep your truck that long. We small parking lot. This is Michanic shop not storage for your truck.
We send the truck back to storage yard. We not touched any things for your truck.
The truck is locked from the back of the truck. It’s still the same locked 🔒.

If you still want to pick up your truck please let me know we will pick it up from storage yard. Paying the storage money.
You have to pay me for the storage fee.
Please call for schedule to pick up the car.

If you have any questions please call me. Thanks
510-940-8675
Eastbayauto6@gmail.com

These admissions and confessions are evidence that they willfully and intentionally improperly altered, concealed, suppression and destroyed evidence wherein the egregiousness of this spoliation, the strength and nature of their actions is untenable with any JUSTICE!
They have NO REGARD FOR THE LAW NOR JUSTICE witnessed by this inference arising from the spoliation.
Now they attempt to EXTORT monies from us by holding the truck HOSTAGE and DEMANDING an unknown amount of towing and storage fees for payment to a unknown third party to be paid TO THEM in advance of any delivery of the truck, AS WELL AS payment of towing and storage fees to THEM to be paid TO THEM in advance of any delivery of the truck!
EBAC’s unsolicited admissions and confessions to the court and judges makes them all percipient eye witnesses. Further, in your/their fiduciary capacity as officers of the court and guardians of the public trust and interest, YOU ALL ARE MANDATED TO REPORT THESE CRIMINAL ACTIONS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT! HAVE ANY OF YOU DONE THAT??!!? Judges Thomas Nixon, Brian Caruth, Stuart Hing, Michael Gaffey, Clerks of Dept. 1, 105, 605, 711, and Chad Finke, et. al., failure to perform your ministerial and/or judicial duty, (as an officer/member of the court), by not acting upon EBAC unsolicited admissions and confessions with defendant’s NOTICED pleading constitutes a Subversion, Perversion, Obstruction, and Defeats the Course and Administration of Justice is a denial of access to the courts, in violation of defendant’s federally secured U.S. Constitutional Rights, guaranteed by the 1st, 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendments! Thus as Judges and court administrators, you have rules governing the disposition of the such actions and pleading and it is clearly established, but yet, YOU ALL have been forever silent regarding this; mainly, due to fraud placed upon the court. “Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.” (See U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F. 2d. 297 (5 th cir. 1977)). Fraud upon the court also warrants dismissal (see Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. HartfordEmpire Co., 322 U.S. 238 (1944)).4
THIS SECTION ABOVE APPLIES TO EACH AND EVERY SECTION OF THIS DOCUMENT.

The Matters of the December 20, 2024 Hearing
At the December 20, 2024 Hearing, the court had appointed Cabral Bonner an attorney, in accordance with Article 6, section 21 of the Constitution of the State of California, to act as the Temporary Judge in this matters before the Court in this department on this date. The Defendant informs the court that he objects to having a pro- tem preside over the matter AND THAT THIS MATTER HAD BEEN ASSIGNED TO JUDGE CARUTH AFTER BEING REASSIGNED FROM A PRO-TEM COMMISSIONER FICKLES. If the court was aware of this fact, it should have continued the matter BEFORE we appeared in court, as this was a complete waste of time!
Yet, Plaintiff’s East Bay Auto Center (EBAC) DID NOT appear and there was NO reason given for same. However, Mr. Bonner admits in court that EBAC had contacted the court earlier stating they would NOT appear, BUT NO ONE CONTACTED US, the DEFENDANTS! Here we have the court ADMITTING to having illegal ex-parte communications with the plaintiff’s WITHOUT informing defendants when a matter of a pro-tem was ALREADY DECIDED! As a hypothetical, what would have happened if defendants had agreed to having the matter heard by Bonner and the plaintiff’s FAILED TO APPEAR?! Would a default have been entered?! IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN!
THE ENTIRE “HEARING” WAS JUST AN ILLEGAL, PRETENTIOUS CHARADE BY THE COURT!

Conspiracy to Subvert, Pervert, Obstruct, or Defeat the Course of Justice
Pen.Code, §§ 182, subd. (a)(1), 4570) and conspiracy to pervert or obstruct justice (§ 182, subd. (a)(5)).
Under section 182, subdivision (a)(5), it is a crime for two or more persons to conspire to commit any act “to pervert or obstruct justice, or the due administration of the laws.”
In 1950, the California Supreme Court explained the meaning of an act that perverts or obstructs justice, or the due administration of the laws:

“Generally speaking, conduct which constitutes an offense against public justice, or the administration of law includes both malfeasance and nonfeasance by an officer in connection with the administration of his public duties, and also anything done by a person in hindering or obstructing an officer in the performance of his official obligations. Such an offense was recognized at common law and generally punishable as a misdemeanor. Now, quite generally, it has been made a statutory crime and, under some circumstances, a felony. [Citation.]

“In California, the statutes relating to ‘Crimes Against Public Justice’ are found in part I, title [7], of the Penal Code. Bribery, escapes, rescues, perjury, falsifying evidence, and other acts which would have been considered offenses against the administration of justice at common law are made criminal by legislative enactment. Section 182, subdivision 5,[7] is a more general section making punishable a conspiracy to commit any offense against public justice.

The meaning of the words ‘to pervert or obstruct justice, or the due administration of the laws’ is easily ascertained by reference either to the common law or to the more specific crimes enumerated in part I, title [7]. A conspiracy with or among public officials not to perform their official duty to enforce criminal laws is an obstruction of justice and an indictable offense at common law. [Citation.]In the same category is a conspiracy to obtain the release of a person charged with a felony by presenting a worthless and void bail bond. Such a conspiracy has been held to be a perversion of the due administration of the law, and an offense within the meaning of subdivision [ (a) ]5 of section 182 of the Penal Code. [Citation.]” (Lorenson v. Superior Court (1950) 35 Cal.2d 49, 59–60, italics added (Lorenson ).)
In Lorenson, the defendant was a police captain in the Los Angeles Police Department indicted for conspiracy to commit robbery, to commit assault with a deadly weapon, and to pervert or obstruct justice. (Lorenson, supra, 35 Cal.2d at pp. 50–51.) In rejecting a claim of insufficient evidence to support the indictment, the court concluded that one could infer from the evidence that there was agreement among the defendant, other members of the police department, and criminal associates of Mickey Cohen to assault and rob the victim, Pearson. The court further noted that there was evidence from which one could infer that the defendant and other police officers “were to furnish protection to the participants in the conspiracy by refusing to disclose the identity of Pearson’s attackers, if they were arrested, and to effect their release from custody.”(Id. at p. 57.) After the robbery and assault, Cohen’s associates were arrested (apparently by officers not involved in the conspiracy), but they were immediately released from the police station before Pearson could arrive to identify any of them, and the arresting officers were instructed not to talk about the incident. (Id. at p. 54.) Lorenson is an example of “[a] conspiracy with or among public officials not to perform their official duty to enforce criminal laws,” an indictable offense at common law. (Id. at pp. 59–60.)
THIS SECTION ABOVE APPLIES TO EACH AND EVERY SECTION OF THIS DOCUMENT.

A “RAT” in Court Administration and Clerks Obstructed, Perverted the Course and Due Administration of Justice
   On June 11, 2024, Abdul-Jalil appeared at window 12 in the Clerks General Office in the Hayward Hall of Justice and filed our “Defendants Claim and Order to Go to Small Claims Court”. I was waited on by a young lady that appeared to be of Latin/Asian descent.
We had a discussion regarding my listing my name as the CEO and Person of Interest as it relates to the “defendants” filed in the East Bay Auto Center claim. As this conversation directly addressed MY NAME, she laughingly kept referring to me as “Mr. Wallace”, CLEARLY taunting, being disrespectful, antagonistic and provocative! I corrected her INTENTIONALLY calling me out of my name 3 times by responding softly with “Mr. al-Hakim” the first 3 times! At her fourth lashing out, I corrected her with a chuckle that let her know that I acknowledged she was being childish and petty trying to provoke me! When she grasped it, she got up and said “I’m going to lunch!”. She left and another clerk came over, Jamie J. Thomas, and took her place to complete the filing. While she left several times as I sat at her window for over 15 minutes as she met with different people at a computer discussing something.
   On June 13, 2024, I appeared at window 9 in the Clerks General Office in the Hayward Hall of Justice and attempted to file our proof of service for the Defendants Small Claim and Order, and a letter to Commissioner Fickles and East Bay Auto Center that we OPPOSED the case being heard by and Request reassignment of the Case from a Judge Pro Team or Commissioner and Requesting a Court Reporter for the July 8, 2024 hearing. The clerk filed the letter but questioned the proof of service (attached as Exh. B), so she said she would talk to her supervisor. I sat at her window for over 15 minutes as she spoke with someone (others) before she returned with clerk Jamie J. Thomas whom preceded to say that she could NOT accept the proof of service BECAUSE the ONLY one that they could accept was the standard form that comes with the SC-120 form. I informed her that this proof of service was the same as the standard form and is used more commonly in court filings and I have used them over 20 years without any problem. She said that I would have to serve the claim again or have the server to sign a new proof. But more alarming, she said I could fill out the proof to be signed by the process server, but I could NOT serve it because I’m listed as the agent for the service of process. NOW, just how did she know that and why did she need to know that? She obviously conducted her own investigation. She issued her ORDER and refused to accept the proof!
   She read the letter then said that she could NOT give the letter to the Commissioner because she would be engaging in illegal ex-parte communications. I again stated that I have filed over 100 letters in the same fashion and never had a problem with them before as long as there was a filing cover page. (Attached as Exh. C)
   Not wanting to argue with her also early trying to harass and inconvenience me, I said that I would file both with the presiding court judge whom I was going to file the Request for Reassignment with anyway, and I left.
   On June 18, 2024, I appeared at window 4 in the Clerks General Office in the Rene Davidson of Justice and attempted to file our proof of service for the Defendants Continuance and Reassignment, a female clerk- “T. Hayle?” came out on 2 occasions, the first after a 15 minute wait, addressed me as Mr. Wallace, questioned the proof of service, debated the motion vs. declaration and need to refile with a reservation number. She made the RIDICULOUS argument that the “electronic filing system does not recognize documents on pleading paper” thus, I had to have the documents served again!
   On December 19, 2024, I appeared at window 9 in the Clerks General Office in the Hayward Hall of Justice and attempted to file our proof of service for the Defendants EBAC Subpoena, Request for Production of Documents and Video Taped Depositions, and Order Shortening Time and was told by the clerk- “Malen Jih MSG?” that the server should have signed in Sheriff’s location on the proof of service. While she left as I sat at her window for over 15 minutes as she met with different people discussing something. She returned and repeated her statement and accepted the proof. Clearly that was NOT the case nor had the documents been signed in the wrong place! This statement exposes the fact that the court has had some interaction with third parties that has informed them that the documents WERE signed in the wrong place on the proof.
   As we have EXTENSIVE documentation on the MANY egregious, unscrupulous, heinous illegal activities of court administrator Chadrat Finke and the employees with the District Attorneys office, WE ARE SURE THAT THEY HAVE EMPLOYED THE FULL FORCE OF THEIR OFFICES AND THOSE OF THEIR CO-CONSPIRATORS TO AFFACT AND DIRECT THE COURSE AND OUTCOME OF THIS AND ALL RELATED MATTERS!

Dept. 105 Clerk Sergio Lopez subverted, obstructed, perverted and defeated the course of justice, the due administration of the laws and administration of justice.
   On May 8, 2025 we sent the following email to Judges Thomas Nixon, Brian Caruth, Stuart Hing, Michael Gaffey, Clerks of Dept. 1, 105, 605, 711, Plaintiffs, and Chad Finke in response to the Continuing FAILED compliance from Dept. 105 Clerk Sergio Lopez.
That email is as follows:

CLERKS USUAL NON-RESPONSE TO EMAIL: 24SC067622 EAST BAY AUTO CENTER vs AARON & MARGARET WALLACEDear Judges Thomas Nixon, Brian Caruth, Stuart Hing, Michael Gaffey, Clerks of Dept. 1, 105, 605, 711, Plaintiffs, and Chad Finke, et. al., After NOT getting a response from Mr. Lopez, the Clerk of department 105, for THREE (3) MONTHS, we still have NOT gotten a response to our email just a week ago! WE WANT A DIRECT AND DEFINITIVE ANSWER TO THESE ISSUES! HAVE YOU DISCUSSED THIS MATTER WITH THE JUDGES AND COURT ADMINISTRATION REFERENCED HEREIN? We are requesting clarity on the issues below as follows:A) Does the reservation number provides for the motion to compel response to subpoenas and production of documents which are already listed, INCLUDE our demand for Videotape Depositions for each of 1) Plaintiffs, 2) California Department of Motor Vehicles, 3) Alameda County Sheriff’s Office, 4) California Bureau of Automotive Repair, 5) California Department of Insurance, 6) State Farm Insurance, and 7) Alameda County Business Tax Collector as needed? Are we to use the same number for each separately?B) We want this heard on the Ex-Parte calendar ASAPC) Does the hearing on 6/10/2025, 9AM calendar INCLUDE an order on our Motion for Order 1) shorten time per Code Civ. Proc. § 1005(b) ); 2) ascertain the correct legal name Plaintiff’s; 3) to amend the complaint; 4) Order to Return Defendants truck; 5) Compel Videotape Depositions and Plaintiffs Production of Documents; 7) Transfer to Court of competent jurisdiction; 8) an order Striking Complaint of East Bay Auto Center; 9) Grand Larceny; 10) Tortious Interference; 11) Intentional Spoliation of Evidence; 12) Fraudulent Misrepresentation; 13) Intentional Misrepresentation; 14) Property Damage; 15) Grand Larceny of Suspended LLC, 16) Fraudulent Misrepresentation of Suspended LLC, 17) Intentional Misrepresentation of Suspended LLC, 18) Property Damage of Suspended LLC, and 19) Extortion and our motions to enter default for the non-response to the above motions was personally served on December 17, 2025 and filed on December 19, 2025?D) IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE PLAINTIFF’S EBAC’S UNSOLICITED ADMISSIONS and CONFESSIONS to the court and Judges makes them ALL PERCIPIENT EYE WITNESSES. Further, in your fiduciary capacity as officers of the court and guardians of the public trust and interest, YOU ALL ARE MANDATED TO REPORT THESE CRIMINAL ACTIONS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT! HAVE ANY OF YOU DONE THAT??!!??E) OUR UNRESOLVED concern for the hearing being continued to TUESDAY, JUNE 10, 2025. I was told by Mr. Lopez that small claims matters are ONLY HEARD ON MONDAYS AND FRIDAYS. The court is aware that I have Religious obligations on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays and therefore unable to attend. What is the court going to do about this? Why is the date not changed to the very NEXT DAY, JUNE 11, 2025??!!?? Again, we will respond more thoroughly to these and other issues in a Declaration/Motion to be filed and served AND MUST be addressed by the court ASAP!Respectfully,AJ

——– Message ——–Dear Judges Thomas Nixon, Brian Caruth, Stuart Hing, Michael Gaffey, Clerks of Dept. 1, 105, 605, 711, Plaintiffs, and Chad Finke, et. al.,  So I’m very confused Mr. Lopez, just how does your attempted missed phone call to us this morning, May 1, 2025 at 7:58am, JUSTIFY YOUR THREE MONTHS OF WILLFUL OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE SINCE FEBRUARY 4, 2025??!!?? The requests are very plain and does NOT take three months of your deliberation to understand, (or maybe it does!) and if they were THAT confusing, WHY DID YOU WAIT 3 MONTHS TO CALL AND HANG UP WITHOUT LEAVING A MESSAGE??!!?? Therefore, if you had NO idea of what we wanted in my EXTENSIVE emails and voicemails messages I left for you, WHY DIDN’T YOU JUST CALL to get clarity THREE MONTHS AGO??!!?? Your reservation number provides for the motion to compel response to subpoenas and production of documents which are already listed, BUT as written, excludes our demand for Videotape Depositions for each. It also does NOT address the fact we want this heard on the Ex-Parte calendar ASAP. You, Mr. Lopez have told us and written to us “Please be advised that Department 105 does not conduct ex-parte hearings”, yet, AS PART OF THE AUDIO RECORDING INFORMATION PROVIDED TO THE PUBLIC IN THE COURTS ANNOUNCEMENT, YOU EXPRESSLY STATE THAT LITIGANTS CAN REQUEST EX-PARTE HEARINGS AND THE PROCEDURE FOR SAME! WE WANT A DIRECT AND DEFINITIVE ANSWER TO THESE ISSUES! HAVE YOU DISCUSSED THIS MATTER WITH THE JUDGES AND COURT ADMINISTRATION REFERENCED HEREIN? You note that the following is scheduled for hearing on 6/10/2025 9AM:Hearing on Motion – Other Motion to Order Plaintiff East Bay Auto Center to Immediately Disclose Location and Examination of Defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation truck. For clarity, WE WANT A DIRECT AND DEFINITIVE ANSWER to does this INCLUDE our Motion for Order 1) shorten time per Code Civ. Proc. § 1005(b) ); 2) ascertain the correct legal name Plaintiff’s; 3) to amend the complaint; 4) Order to Return Defendants truck; 5) Compel Videotape Depositions and Plaintiffs Production of Documents; 7) Transfer to Court of competent jurisdiction; 8) an order Striking Complaint of East Bay Auto Center; 9) Grand Larceny; 10) Tortious Interference; 11) Intentional Spoliation of Evidence; 12) Fraudulent Misrepresentation; 13) Intentional Misrepresentation; 14) Property Damage; 15) Grand Larceny of Suspended LLC, 16) Fraudulent Misrepresentation of Suspended LLC, 17) Intentional Misrepresentation of Suspended LLC, 18) Property Damage of Suspended LLC, and 19) Extortion and our motions to enter default for the non-response to the above motions was personally served on December 17, 2025 and filed on December 19, 2025? The court should have ruled on these matters as summary judgment before now! Also shown on the schedule is “Motion to Order Plaintiff East Bay Auto Center to Immediately Disclose Location and Examination of Defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation truck.” We had Requested an IMMEDIATE Ex-Parte Hearing on Wednesday, October 9, 2024 or Friday, October 11, 2024 for Motion to Order Plaintiff East Bay Auto Center to Immediately Disclose Location and Examination of Defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation truck and to Compel Videotape Depositions, Production of Documents. We had requested the order ASAP for the truck be made available to us to get vital information from the engine, body, cab, under body, exhaust, etc., and video the condition of the truck and the contents to search, inspect, process and document the truck as a crime scene for evidence, finger printing, and clues for the damage, theft, vandalism, missing/stolen business and personal property.

On October 1, 2024 we discovered that our truck had been moved from the Plaintiff’s shop on Mission Blvd. in Hayward. This was done WITHOUT OUR PERMISSION OR KNOWLEDGE! This was done to DESTROY the crime scene from the truck being stolen without being inspected nor investigated by law enforcement and destroy the chain of custody! We called the County Sheriff’s and made arrangements to meet them there for a truck theft/missing report on October 2, 2024. Once we met there, Plaintiff’s FAILED AND REFUSED TO DISCLOSE TO THE COUNTY SHERIFF’S THE LOCATION OF THE TRUCK, OR WETHER IT WAS STOLEN, BURGLARIZED, VANDALIZED AND DAMAGED AGAIN AS PART OF COMPLETING A POLICE REPORT THAT IS ALSO REQUIRED BY THE INSURANCE COMPANIES! As you are aware from our previous filings, in April 2024 Plaintiff’s FAILED AND REFUSED TO ALLOW THE COUNTY SHERIFF’S TO INSPECT THE TRUCK AFTER IT WAS STOLEN, BURGLARIZED, VANDALIZED AND DAMAGED AS PART OF COMPLETING A POLICE REPORT THAT IS ALSO REQUIRED BY THE INSURANCE COMPANIES! As a result, we do not have a total value of the scope of loss and damage to the truck therefrom. The truck has over $200,000 in valuable items in the cargo payload bay since it has been in the possession and custody of the Plaintiffs a year ago! As it is the RESPONSIBILITY of the COUNTY SHERIFFS to conduct a complete investigation, analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages IN THE LEGAL FORM OF A FILED POLICE REPORT, IT IS NOT WITHIN THE RIGHTS OF EAST BAY TO REFUSE THAT RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COUNTY SHERIFFS NOR FOR THEM TO COMPLY FOR THE PURPOSES OF DENYING OUR RIGHTS TO “COVER UP” FOR THEIR ASSET!!  We declared we will NOT move the truck unless and until East Bay allows the COUNTY SHERIFFS and us to inspect the truck for a complete investigation, analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages IN THE LEGAL FORM OF A FILED POLICE REPORT!!!  The COUNTY SHERIFFS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT have been IMPLICATED BY EAST BAY AUTO as an accessory and collaborator in this case, providing them protection and cover up for them, implying GROSS MISCONDUCT as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by the Sheriff’s deputy Markita Sayles whom ADMITS she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES. Video is available on Youtube. See “ILLEGAL POLICE TARGETED ENTRAPMENT BACKFIRES! TRAPS POLICE, EXPOSES IMMORAL, UNETHICAL SCHEME!” at: https://youtu.be/kus80M56Vas. IN AN UNSOLICITED, UNWANTED PHONE CALL TO ME, SAYLES ADMITS SHE LIED ABOUT THE ENTIRE “FALSE POLICE REPORT” and willfully committed PERJURY, FABRICATE EVIDENCE, MISCONDUCT, CONCEALMENT, COMMITTED FRAUD UPON THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN FIXING THE CASE! See video at: https://youtu.be/ZEgZRhuYOMM  This video PROVIDES ADMISSIONS from Markita Sayles she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES TWICE is PROOF there is a continuing Targeted Entrapment Scam/Sting/Scheme and Hate Crimes. The Sheriff’s office trapped themselves in CORRUPTION and SUBORNED PERJURIOUS TESTIMONY, in this State sponsored terror; with vindictive retaliation against AMWF and al-Hakim family while defending, concealing and thereby being further complicit in committing THE ADMITTED willful and intentional extrinsic fraud upon the people of the great State of California and the Court; fraud; prosecutorial misconduct; willful and malicious prosecution; willful misconduct; conflict of interest; obstruction of justice; denial of due process under the law; willful and intentional fabrication and authoring false evidence; misstating and mischaracterizing evidence; misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court’s act or reliance; harassment; intimidation on behalf of the County Sheriffs; abuse of discretion, misconduct, conduct prejudicial, illegal ex-parte communications and bias designed to result in fixing the case against AMWF and al-Hakim; appointing themselves a Real Primary Party of Interest to the litigation with their OWN agenda; weaponizing the police report and investigative process in furtherance of their agenda; engaging in the defense of opposing parties; provocation, bias, prejudice, Islamophobia, Xenophobia, hate, bigotry and racism!  Here we have the County Sheriff covering for their “asset” East Bay Auto and co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, is proven in the video by THEIR AND POLICE ADMISSIONS and Bad Faith/Hate crime fact pattern, was ALWAYS a Scheme to take possession of the truck, provoke and frame civil/criminal legal actions by fabricating a disputed legal issue we would be subjected to knowing that the courts are inapposite to our justice. As witnessed, in April 2024 Plaintiff’s FAILED AND REFUSED TO ALLOW THE COUNTY SHERIFF’S TO INSPECT THE TRUCK AFTER IT WAS STOLEN, BURGLARIZED, VANDALIZED AND DAMAGED AS PART OF COMPLETING A POLICE REPORT THAT IS ALSO REQUIRED BY THE INSURANCE COMPANIES! East Bay Auto Center is the ONLY suspects that could have stolen, burglarized, vandalized, and damaged the truck as it was not stolen by anyone else! AMWF’s truck was “STOLEN” from East Bay Auto Center while there for the insurance repair estimate, BUT NOT stolen nor burglarized through entry from knocking out the passenger door lock! There is ONLY 16 inches from the passenger door lock to the metal fence and 24 inches from the passenger door lock to the outer metal fence. That makes it PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for someone to knock out the passenger door lock and a human body to open the door and enter the truck with less than 4 inches of clearance to enter given the design and build of the truck!! THE TRUCK WAS STOLEN THROUGH ENTRY FROM THE DRIVERS SIDE DOOR AND THERE IS NO SIGN OF ANY DAMAGE TO THE DRIVERS SIDE DOOR LOCK, THUS LEAVING THE ONLY POSSIBLE ENTRY THROUGH THAT DRIVERS SIDE DOOR WITH A KEY!! The information as to the causes are stated herein AND THE IMMEDIACY WAS OBVIOUS. On Friday, October 4, 2024, East Bay ADMITTED and CONFESSED in an unsolicited email to the court with Judges Thomas Nixon, Brian Caruth, Stuart Hing, Michael Gaffey, Clerks of Dept. 1, 105, 605, 711, and Chad Finke, et. al., that they have willfully and intentionally absconded with our truck and transferred the possession and control to a Third Party without our knowledge or consent! In that email East Bay wrote:

Hello Abdul jalil.This is EAST BAY AUTO CENTER. I spoken last time with you to pick up your truck. Also I send email and text messages to pick up the truck.We have no space for keep your truck that long. We small parking lot. This is Michanic shop not storage for your truck.We send the truck back to storage yard. We not touched any things for your truck.The truck is locked from the back of the truck. It’s still the same locked 🔒.
If you still want to pick up your truck please let me know we will pick it up from storage yard. Paying the storage money.You have to pay me for the storage fee.Please call for schedule to pick up the car.
If you have any questions please call me. Thanks510-940-8675Eastbayauto6@gmail.com

These admissions and confessions are evidence that they willfully and intentionally improperly altered, concealed, suppression and destroyed evidence wherein the egregiousness of this spoliation, the strength and nature of their actions is untenable with any JUSTICE! They have NO REGARD FOR THE LAW NOR JUSTICE witnessed by this inference arising from the spoliation. Now they attempt to EXTORT monies from us by holding the truck HOSTAGE and DEMANDING an unknown amount of towing and storage fees for payment to a unknown third party to be paid TO THEM in advance of any delivery of the truck, AS WELL AS payment of towing and storage fees to THEM to be paid TO THEM in advance of any delivery of the truck! IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THESE UNSOLICITED ADMISSIONS and CONFESSIONS to the court and Judges makes them ALL PERCIPIENT EYE WITNESSES. Further, in your fiduciary capacity as officers of the court and guardians of the public trust and interest, YOU ALL ARE MANDATED TO REPORT THESE CRIMINAL ACTIONS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT! HAVE ANY OF YOU DONE THAT??!!?? Since you, Mr. Lopez, failed to respond, I will reiterate that we still have OUR UNRESOLVED concern for the hearing being continued to TUESDAY, JUNE 10, 2025. I was told by Mr. Lopez that small claims matters are ONLY HEARD ON MONDAYS AND FRIDAYS. The court is aware that I have Religious obligations on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays and therefore unable to attend. Previously, we received notice that the above entitled case has been reassigned from Commissioner Fickles to Judge Caruth in Department 105 as per Judge Nixon’s order and also received separate notice that the court date has been changed to Tuesday, July 9, 2024, in Department 105, at 9:00 a.m. It is well documented with the court over 40 years, AND MR. FINKE CAN VERIFY THAT, I have religious commitments on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays and unavailable on those dates. The new date falls on one of those days I am unavailable. The matter was continued to present. How is this possible and what is the court going to do about this? Why is the date not changed to the very NEXT DAY, JUNE 11, 2025??!!?? Again, we will respond more thoroughly to these and other issues in a Declaration/Motion to be filed and served AND MUST be addressed by the court ASAP!Respectfully,AJ

On 5/1/25 8:00 AM, Dept. 105, Superior Court wrote:

Please be advised that the court was attempting to understand the nature of your motions.The court had also attempted to call you to no answer (510-394-4501).A reservation number has been generated for the following:A-67622-003 Hearing on Motion – Other Motions to Compel Compliance with the Filed and Served Civil Subpoena Duces Tecum and Request for Production of Documents. The following is scheduled for hearing on 6/10/2025 9AM24SC067622 EAST BAY AUTO CENTER VS AARON & MARGARET WALLACE Small Claims Trial Hearing on Motion – Other Motion to Order Plaintiff East Bay Auto Center to Immediately Disclose Location and Examination of Defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation truck. Hearing on Motion – Other Motions to Compel Compliance with the Filed and Served Civil Subpoena Duces Tecum and Request for Production of Documents. Thank you,Mr. LopezDepartment 105 – Courtroom ClerkWiley W. Manuel Courthouse661 Washington StreetOakland, CA 94607(510) 627-4712

From: A. J. <ajalil1234@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2025 8:50 PM
To: Dept. 105, Superior Court <dept105@alameda.courts.ca.gov>; Dept. 711, Superior Court <dept711@alameda.courts.ca.gov>; Dept .1, Superior Court <dept1@alameda.courts.ca.gov>; Dept. 605, Superior Court <dept605@alameda.courts.ca.gov>; Nixon, Judge Thomas, Superior Court <tnixon@alameda.courts.ca.gov>; Finke, Chad, Superior Court <cfinke@alameda.courts.ca.gov>; Dept .1, Superior Court <dept1@alameda.courts.ca.gov>; Caruth, Judge Brian, Superior Court <bcaruth@alameda.courts.ca.gov>; Gaffey, Judge Michael, Superior Court <mgaffey@alameda.courts.ca.gov>; Hing, Judge Stuart, Superior Court <shing@alameda.courts.ca.gov>; eastbayauto6@gmail.com <eastbayauto6@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 24SC067622 EAST BAY AUTO CENTER vs AARON & MARGARET WALLACE

Dear Judges Thomas Nixon, Brian Caruth, Stuart Hing, Michael Gaffey, Clerks of Dept. 1, 105, 605, 711, Plaintiffs, and Chad Finke, et. al., So I guess you, Mr. Lopez, et. al., DID NOT receive the emails below and therefore had NO idea of what I wanted in my EXTENSIVE voicemail messages I left for you either??!!?? We requested a hearing date and a reservation number(s) for our Motions to Compel Compliance with the Filed and Served Civil Subpoena Duces Tecum and Request for Production of Documents on the 1) Plaintiffs, 2) California Department of Motor Vehicles, 3) Alameda County Sheriff’s Office, 4) California Bureau of Automotive Repair, 5) California Department of Insurance, 6) State Farm Insurance, and 7) Alameda County Business Tax Collector and Videotape Depositions for each. This matter MUST be heard in ANY Law and Motion judge including Dept. 1, 105, 605, 711 as soon as possible after the date above. We have yet to find ANY legal experts that can confirm that Small Claims Court DOES NOT ALLOW Ex-Parte motions. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SAME SO THAT WE CAN MOVE THIS MATTER FORWARD AS IT IS TOTALLY INCOMPREHENSIBLE THAT THIS WOULD TAKE THREE MONTHS FOR MR. LOPEZ TO DO!! THIS IS NOT JUST INCOMPETENCE, IT IS OBSTRUCTION IN IT’S MOST BLATANTLY PURIST FORM!! We want this heard on the Ex-Parte calendar ASAP. Additionally, attached is a copy of the filed proofs of service of our motions that the court allegedly ruled was NOT filed without disclosing “what motion(s)”? This may be a result of the proofs being filed a day before the hearing. On November 18, 2024, Defendants filed our Motion for Order 1) shorten time per Code Civ. Proc. § 1005(b) ); 2) ascertain the correct legal name Plaintiff’s; 3) to amend the complaint; 4) Order to Return Defendants truck; 5) Compel Videotape Depositions and Plaintiffs Production of Documents; 7) Transfer to Court of competent jurisdiction; 8) an order Striking Complaint of East Bay Auto Center; 9) Grand Larceny; 10) Tortious Interference; 11) Intentional Spoliation of Evidence; 12) Fraudulent Misrepresentation; 13) Intentional Misrepresentation; 14) Property Damage; 15) Grand Larceny of Suspended LLC, 16) Fraudulent Misrepresentation of Suspended LLC, 17) Intentional Misrepresentation of Suspended LLC, 18) Property Damage of Suspended LLC, and 19) Extortion AND our Motion to Compel Compliance with Civil Subpoena Duces Tecum AND the Civil Subpoena Duces Tecum and Request for Production of Documents against Plaintiffs. They failed and refused to respond. The motion was personally served on November 20, 2025 and filed on December 19, 2025 is attached. The motions to enter default for the non-response to the above motions was personally served on December 17, 2025 and filed on December 19, 2025 is attached. We also have a concern for the hearing being continued to TUESDAY, JUNE 10, 2025. I was told by Mr. Lopez that small claims matters are ONLY HEARD ON MONDAYS AND FRIDAYS. The court is aware that I have Religious obligations on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays and therefore unable to attend. How is this possible and what is the court going to do about this? We will respond more thoroughly to these and other issues in a Declaration/Motion to be filed and served ASAP. This seems Mr. Lopez NOT receiving OUR emails is a reoccurring theme with you AND NEEDS TO STOP IMMEDIATELY as I reference my previous last TWO (2) voicemails and emails of February 4, 2025 and March 3, 2025 as follows: 1) ——– February 4, 2025 Message ——–Dear Mr. Lopez, I called you today at 1:47 pm and left you a message regarding my latest email to you on January 27, 2025 requesting a copy of the Courts order continuing the December 20, 2024 hearing and any rulings on our motions; Civil Subpoena Duces Tecum, Compel Videotape Depositions and Production of Documents, Entry of Default Order, Transfer to Court of competent jurisdiction, Order Striking Complaint, Tortious Interference, Spoliation of Evidence, Intentional Misrepresentation, Grand Larceny, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Intentional Misrepresentation, Property Damage, and Extortion. Amazingly you replied to that message with this email at 1:56 pm. Thanks so much! But, why have you NOT responded to my emails regarding same, if in fact you respond to emails much quicker than phone calls/voice mails? You even remind the callers to your department 105 that the clerks may take up to 5 days to reply to phone calls/voicemails. I’m a little confused as to whether or not you are even getting my emails as there is NO indication that they have NOT been delivered to you as well as the others, Judges Thomas Nixon, Brian Caruth, Stuart Hing, Michael Gaffey, Clerks of Dept. 1, 1605, 711, and Chad Finke. If there is a problem with the email delivery to you, PLEASE let me know, as it would ascertain just where the real problem is.Thanks again,AJ

2) ——– March 3, 2025 Message ——–TO: Judge Brian Caruth Muhammad Khan, Numi Khan Superior Court of Alameda County East Bay Auto Center Wiley Manuel Courthouse 21099 Mission Blvd. Department 105 Hayward, CA 94541 661 Washington St. Email: EastBayAuto6@gmail.com Oakland, CA 94607 Ph:510‐690‐2728 Email: dept105@alameda.courts.ca.gov BCaruth@alameda.courts.ca.gov Presiding Judge Thomas Nixon Chad Finke Executive Officer Superior Court of Alameda County Superior Court of Alameda County René C. Davidson Courthouse René C. Davidson Courthouse Department 1 1225 Fallon Street, Room 209 Oakland, CA 94612 Oakland, CA 94612 Fax: 510-891-5304, 510-891-6276 Fax: 510-891-6276 TNixon@alameda.courts.ca.gov cfinke@alameda.courts.ca.gov dept1@alameda.courts.ca.govcc: Judges Stuart Hing, Michael Gaffey, Clerks of Dept. 1, 105, 605, 711U.S. Postal Mail and EmailedFROM: Defendant Aaron & Margaret Wallace FoundationDATE: March 3, 2025NO PAGES: 1RE: Annual Retreat for Ramadan and Request Reservation number for Defendants Motion to Compel Compliance with Filed and Served Civil Subpoena Duces Tecum and Request for Production of Documents on the California Department of Motor Vehicles, Alameda County Sheriff’s Office, State Farm Insurance, and Alameda County Business Tax Collector and Videotape Depositions.“JUDGE NOT LEAST YE BE JUDGED!!”“Judge not, that ye be not judged.For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged:and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye,but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?” Matthew 7:1-3The Mote and the Beam is a parable of Jesus given at the Sermon on the Mount in the Gospel of Matthew,

Dear Judges Thomas Nixon, Brian Caruth, Stuart Hing, Michael Gaffey, Clerks of Dept. 1, 105, 605, 711, and Chad Finke, Plaintiffs, et. al.,This notice is to inform the Court and parties that I will be in annual retreat for the Holy Month of Ramadan until April 5, 2025 and unavailable to respond to any litigation.We also want to request a hearing date and a reservation number for our Motion to Compel Compliance with the Filed and Served Civil Subpoena Duces Tecum and Request for Production of Documents on the Plaintiffs, the California Department of Motor Vehicles, Alameda County Sheriff’s Office, State Farm Insurance, and Alameda County Business Tax Collector and Videotape Depositions for each. This matter MUST be heard in ANY Law and Motion judge including Dept. 1, 105, 605, 711 as soon as possible after the date above. We have yet to find ANY legal experts that can confirm that Small Claims Court DOES NOT ALLOW Ex-Parte motions.As referenced in our December 19, 2024, email to the court that the Civil Subpoena Duces Tecum and Request for Production of Documents were filed and served on the California Department of Motor Vehicles, Alameda County Sheriff’s Office, State Farm Insurance, and Alameda County Business Tax Collector that THEY ALL did not respond wherein we would file Motions to Compel Compliance with Civil Subpoena Duces Tecum and Videotape Depositions and Production of Documents for ALL of them. Hence this request.As previously mentioned, I KNOW the court is aware, as is everyone else, that this matter CAN NOT BE HEARD IN FIFTEEN (15) MINUTE SMALL CLAIMS HEARING. OUR LITIGATION WITH WITNESSES ALONE WILL BE AT LEAST TWO (2) DAYS!!On November 18, 2024, Defendants filed our Motion for Order 1) shorten time per Code Civ. Proc. § 1005(b) ); 2) ascertain the correct legal name Plaintiff’s; 3) to amend the complaint; 4) Order to Return Defendants truck; 5) Compel Videotape Depositions and Plaintiffs Production of Documents; 7) Transfer to Court of competent jurisdiction; 8) an order Striking Complaint of East Bay Auto Center; 9) Grand Larceny; 10) Tortious Interference; 11) Intentional Spoliation of Evidence; 12) Fraudulent Misrepresentation; 13) Intentional Misrepresentation; 14) Property Damage; 15) Grand Larceny of Suspended LLC, 16) Fraudulent Misrepresentation of Suspended LLC, 17) Intentional Misrepresentation of Suspended LLC, 18) Property Damage of Suspended LLC, and 19) Extortion AND our Motion to Compel Compliance with Civil Subpoena Duces Tecum AND the Civil Subpoena Duces Tecum and Request for Production of Documents against Plaintiffs. They failed and refused to respond.As mentioned, we waited over a month for the courts to respond to our last requests via email and there was NO RESPONSE, thus the earlier motion for an order shortening time.AGAIN, IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THESE UNSOLICITED ADMISSIONS and CONFESSIONS by the Plaintiffs to the court and Judges makes YOU ALL PERCIPIENT EYE WITNESSES.Thanks,Abdul-Jalil al-Hakimajalil1234@gmail.com510-394-4501 In closing, these and other issues MUST be addressed by the court ASAP!Respectfully,AJ

On 4/7/25 4:13 PM, Dept. 105, Superior Court wrote:

Hello,Please specify what kind of motions you are attempting to file for the subjected case.Please list each motion numerically.Thank you,Mr. LopezDepartment 105 – Courtroom ClerkWiley W. Manuel Courthouse661 Washington StreetOakland, CA 94607(510) 627-4712

I consider the actions of ALL the clerks on those days to undermining and compromising the justice system and actually prevented the orderly administration of justice. As Faretta recognized, the record can only be read as an attempt to abuse the dignity of the courtroom and impugn the integrity of the rule of law as their actions “deliberately engages in serious and obstructionist misconduct” (Faretta v. California (1975) 422 U.S. 806, 834-835, fn. 46. at pp. 834-835, fn. 46 [45 L.Ed.2d at p. 581, fn. 46]) that threatens to subvert the core concept of a trial.
The court clerks staff could be viewed as having subverted, obstructed, perverted and defeated the course of justice, the due administration of the laws and administration of justice.
Under section 182, subdivision (a)(5), it is a crime for two or more persons to conspire to commit any act “to pervert or obstruct justice, or the due administration of the laws.” (Pen.Code, §§ 182, subd. (a)(1), 4570) 1 and conspiracy to pervert or obstruct justice (§ 182, subd. (a)(5)).

Conclusion
Defendant has provided uncontroverted, uncontested, irrefutable PROOF of:
1) Proof Judges Thomas Nixon, Brian Caruth, Stuart Hing, Michael Gaffey, Clerks of Dept. 1, 105, 605, 711, and Chad Finke, et. al., failure to perform your ministerial and/or judicial duty, (as an officer/member of the court), by not acting upon EBAC unsolicited admissions and confessions with defendant’s NOTICED pleading constitutes a Subversion, Perversion, Obstruction, and Defeats the Course and Administration of Justice is a denial of access to the courts, in violation of defendant’s federally secured U.S. Constitutional Rights, guaranteed by the 1st, 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendments! Thus as Judges and court administrators, you have rules governing the disposition of the such actions and pleading and it is clearly established, but yet, YOU ALL have been forever silent regarding this; mainly, due to fraud placed upon the court. “Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.” (See U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F. 2d. 297 (5 th cir. 1977)). Fraud upon the court also warrants dismissal (see Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. HartfordEmpire Co., 322 U.S. 238 (1944)).4
2) PROOF Pro Tem Mr. Bonner admits at December 20, 2024 hearing that EBAC had contacted the court earlier stating they would NOT appear, BUT NO ONE CONTACTED US, the DEFENDANTS! Here we have the court ADMITTING to having illegal ex-parte communications with the plaintiff’s WITHOUT informing defendants when a matter of a pro-tem was ALREADY DECIDED! As a hypothetical, what would have happened if defendants had agreed to having the matter heard by Bonner and the plaintiff’s FAILED TO APPEAR?! Would a default have been entered?! IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN!,
3) PROOF of Attorney General Rob Bonta’s GROSS MISCONDUCT in this continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme completed with this misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court’s act or reliance,
4) PROOF of Alameda County Sheriffs, Law Enforcement, Attorney General Rob Bonta, Hayward Police Chiefs Tony Chaplin/Brian Matthew; County Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez; San Leandro Police Chiefs Abdul Pridgen/Angela Averiett; U. S. Attorneys Stephanie Hinds/Ismail Ramsey; F.B.I. NorCal Directors Craig Fair/Robert Tripp; with support from the Court, California Department of Motor Vehicles, California Department of Insurance, California Department of Consumer Affairs, California Bureau of Automotive Repair, and associated third parties implicated by East Bay Auto engaged and framed this TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE for the expressed purposes of targeted entrapment, tortious interference, fraud, misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court’s act or reliance while claiming to hide behind their declaration of the CRIME being a “CIVIL” action, NOT A CRIMINAL ACTION, as their defense for NOT filing a legitimate police crime report AND destroying the evidence, FORCING a civil court/small claims action as their criminal prosecutor, deputy counsel, judge, jury, witness, executioner, demonstrate a CLEAR deprivation of federally protected rights under the U. S. Constitution and Civil Rights Act
5) Proof a “RAT” in Court Administration, Judges and Clerks actions constitutes a Subversion, Perversion, Obstruction, and Defeats the Course and Administration of Justice

Respectfully submitted.
Abdul-Jalil
510-394-4501
*******
Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez, attached hereto please find a CIVIL SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) Evidence Code sections 1560, 1561, 1562, and 1271 governing this SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) AND Code of Civil Procedure Section 2031 (CCP 2031) for Personal Appearance and Production of Documents, Electronically Stored Information, and Things in response to the court order (attached) for production of documents in the above referenced matter. You were served this subpoena for the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office, Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez and Deputy Markita Sayles today, December 11, 2024 and should respond immediately.
Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez, as the Custodian of Records you are NOT required to appear in person if within ten (10) days from the date of the serving of this request upon you, you produce (i) the Bates-stamped or otherwise numbered sequentially records described in the “DEFINITIONS” Section as part of this attached affidavit and (ii) a completed declaration of custodian of records in compliance with Evidence Code sections 1560, 1561, 1562, and 1271. (1) Place a copy of the records in an envelope (or other wrapper) where Documents produced shall be Bates-stamped or otherwise numbered sequentially. Enclose the original declaration of the custodian with the records. Seal the envelope. (2) Attach a copy of this subpoena to the envelope or write on the envelope the case name and number; your name; and the date, time, and place. (3) Place this first envelope in an outer envelope, seal it, and mail it to me at the address or email address (ajalil1234@gmail.com ) above. (4) The written response shall be served within ten (10) days of the service of this request.
SUBPOENA REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
Pursuant to Evidence Code sections 1560, 1561, 1562, and 1271 governing this SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) AND Code of Civil Procedure Section 2031 (CCP 2031) on Responding Party: Custodian of Records and Person Most Knowledgeable is used herein to refer to, and includes Alameda County Sheriff’s Office, Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez and Deputy Markita Sayles, AND YOU are NOT required to appear in person if you produce (i) the Bates-stamped or otherwise numbered sequentially records described in the declaration on page two or the attached declaration or affidavit and (ii) a completed declaration of custodian of records in compliance with.As might be YOUR custom, you may provide responsive records in electronic format (i.e., text files that can be opened with any word processing software such as Word or TextEdit) or a searchable portable document file (PDF).
If any DOCUMENT requested herein was, but no longer is, in YOUR possession, custody, or control, please state whether such DOCUMENT was lost, destroyed or otherwise disposed of, and describe the circumstances and date(s) of such disposition.
REQUESTS FOR DOCUMENTS
ALL the Defendants, Requestors and Propounders seek disclosure of any and all records created which were prepared, received, transmitted, collected and/or maintained by the Plaintiffs, Responding Parties, ALL Government Related Parties, and ALL Government Related Third Parties, including but not limited to those listed in those sections herein.
YOU are requested to produce for inspection and copying, pursuant to Evidence Code sections 1560, 1561, 1562, and 1271 governing this SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) AND Code of Civil Procedure Section 2031 (CCP 2031), the DOCUMENTS in the below-numbered categories. The production shall take place on December 16, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., at 4200 Park Blvd., Oakland, California, 94602.
This is a request for an opportunity to inspect and/or obtain copies of records of any and all documents, files, correspondence, audio and video files, or other records of yours and various National, State, County of Alameda and City of Oakland Offices under the provisions of CCP 2031 on behalf of the Defendant/Requestors and Propounders.
YOU are required to serve a written response, under oath, responding to each item or category as provided by Evidence Code sections 1560, 1561, 1562, and 1271 governing this SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) AND Code of Civil Procedure Section 2031 (CCP 2031).
The written response shall be served within seven (7) days of the service of this request.
If any DOCUMENT requested herein was, but no longer is, in YOUR possession, custody, or control, please state whether such DOCUMENT was lost, destroyed or otherwise disposed of, and describe the circumstances and date(s) of such disposition.
This is a request for an opportunity to inspect and/or obtain copies of records of any and all documents, files, correspondence, audio and video files, or other records of yours and various offices under the provisions of Evidence Code sections 1560, 1561, 1562, and 1271 governing this SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) AND Code of Civil Procedure Section 2031 (CCP 2031) on behalf of the Defendant/Requestors and Propounders, the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation, Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, family members Harun al-Hakim-Miller, Jalil Omar al-Hakim, Bari al-Hakim-Williams, and their siblings; and the entities Superstar Management, The Genius of Randy Wallace, Inc., Nowtruth.org, eX-whY Adventures, their real, personal and business property (all herein after referred to as “ALL the Defendant/Requestors and Propounders and/or Defendant/Requestors and Propounders”)
Please process this request for ALL SECTION Requests under ALL statutes herein to release the maximum number of documents and records in the interests of justice and achieving full compliance with Evidence Code sections 1560, 1561, 1562, and 1271 governing this SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) AND Code of Civil Procedure Section 2031 (CCP 2031). Please search ALL your automated indices to the Central Records System, the older general (manual) indices, all Field Offices, other facilities that are separate from the office processing the request, or with another agency or agencies having a substantial interest in the determination of the request, or among two or more components of the agency or agencies having substantial subject matter interest therein needed to coordinate the response with different sections in the department that have responsibility for the requested records. This search is essential to collect and appropriately examine the separate and distinct records which are demanded so that copies of the following documents containing the following information be provided to us by Responding Parties and ALL Related Parties seek disclosure of any records for the Plaintiff/Responding Party.East Bay Auto filed a Small claims action to try to collect $3,400 in back storage fees BUT their status is not listed as a current Corporation with Secretary of State or State Franchise Tax Board authorized to do business in the State of California, they may never have legally existed, they may be suspended for some reason, or they may not legally exist any longer, there are multiple individual parties including East Bay Auto Center, their owners, and Asian investors, there is good cause and we are asking the court to ascertain the correct legal name and status of East Bay Auto Center, the owners and investors of East Bay Auto, the correct legal names of the plaintiff’s, and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s. CA Civ Pro Code § 116.560. (b) As the defendant, we filed a cross complaint and may request the court at any time, whether before or after judgment, to amend the defendant’s claim or judgment to include both the correct legal name and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s. Upon a showing of good cause, the court shall amend the claim or judgment to state the correct legal name of the plaintiff’s, and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s and investors.We asked that the court award ALL costs, losses and damages from the un-inspected theft, burglary, vandalism, and damage to the truck we have yet to observe and document the losses and damages to the truck door locks, ignition, exterior and interior cab, engine, parts, body, theft and damage of it’s contents, other losses and damages, and monetary sanctions in an amount according to proof. The costs are well over $20,000 at present.
As we have always maintained and is proven by their bad faith fact pattern, this was ALWAYS an entrapment scheme designed to take possession of the truck with it’s contents and trigger civil/criminal actions knowing that the courts are inapposite to our justice. They are not acting alone!These requests are deemed to be continuing insofar as if any of the above is secured subsequent to the date herein for the production of same, said documents are to be provided to Defendant’s consistent within the applicable Rule of Civil Procedure.
This subpoena is not intended as a full or complete statement of all relevant demands, claims, facts or applicable law, and nothing herein is intended as, nor should it be deemed to constitute, a waiver or relinquishment of any of my rights, remedies, claims or causes of action, all of which are hereby expressly reserved.
Please provide the records in an electronic format to: ajalil1234@gmail.com. Documents not in electronic format should be forwarded Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim below on or before the return date of this subpoena if you wish to comply voluntarily rather than appearing before the court.The COUNTY SHERIFFS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT have been IMPLICATED BY EAST BAY AUTO as an accessory and collaborator in this case, providing them protection and cover up for them, implying GROSS MISCONDUCT as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by the Sheriff’s deputy Markita Sayles whom ADMITS she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES. Video is available on Youtube. See “ILLEGAL POLICE TARGETED ENTRAPMENT BACKFIRES! TRAPS POLICE, EXPOSES IMMORAL, UNETHICAL SCHEME!” at: https://youtu.be/kus80M56Vas.
Here we have the County Sheriff covering for their “asset” East Bay Auto and co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, is proven in the video by THEIR AND POLICE ADMISSIONS and Bad Faith/Hate crime fact pattern, was ALWAYS a Scheme to take possession of the truck, provoke and frame civil/criminal legal actions by fabricating a disputed legal issue we would be subjected to knowing that the courts are inapposite to our justice.
IT IS CLEAR THAT ABDUL-JALIL, HIS FAMILY, THEIR BUSINESSES, AND NON-PROFIT, the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation, HAS BEEN TARGETED WITH SPECIOUS, TORTIOUS ILLEGAL CLANDESTINE ACTS ON THE PART OF LAW ENFORCEMENT WITH THE INTENT TO DESTROY THEIR LIVES!
Defendants the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation Claims
Defendants/Requesting Party’s, the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation, Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, Harun al-Hakim-Miller, Patty Flenory, Jalil Omar al-Hakim, Bari al-Hakim-Williams, Joette al-Hakim-Hall, and their siblings; their affected entities Superstar Management, The Genius of Randy Wallace, Inc., Nowtruth.org, eX-whY Adventures, their real and personal property, their real property including but not limited to 7633 Sunkist Drive, Oakland, CA 94605, their businesses and business property, their charities, their communities, the communities they serve, those that they serve, HAVE an on going claim against the Responding Parties Alameda County Sheriff’s Office, Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez and Deputy Markita Sayles and Plaintiffs Shah Sons LLC, DOING BUSINESS AS (DBA) East Bay Auto Center and Muhammad Khan, Sani Khan, Tariq Khan, Numi Khan, their alleged Asian investors, State Farm Mutual Insurance Company, State Farm Mutual Insurance Company Claims, State Farm Mutual Insurance Company Appraisal Team (“State Farm”), Gary O’Donnell, or any of its employees or representatives including but not limited to Mary Weaver, Gary O’Donnell, Madison Ritter, Kaitlin Hampe, Samantha B, Lex, Kendra Behrens, Victor Walker, “Neg”, Karena Kelly-Guishard, Lexie Figueroa, each of their contractors Alacrity Solutions, LLC, Snapsheet, Up North Towing, Blue Star Towing, with each of their investors, their predecessors, affiliates, subsidiaries, successors, assigns, divisions, each of their past or present officers, their previous and current directors, previous and current employees, agents, consultants, independent contractors, representatives, lobbyist, experts, private investigators, private security, past and current attorneys, partners, associates, investigators, witnesses, litigation opponents, conspirators, corruptors, colluders, predecessors, affiliates, subsidiaries, successors, assigns, others unnamed as Does One through One Hundred, et. at.
On January 30, 2024, at 3:25 pm I went to East Bay Auto at 21099 Mission Blvd., Hayward, CA 94541 for a Alameda County Sheriff’s Civil Stand By observed by Deputies Joshua Chavez #2287 and Collin Lenahan #2453 to pick up our truck and East Bay Auto Center REFUSED to release it claiming they are owed storage.
East Bay admitted in the presence of the two (2) Deputies, whom are percipient eye witnesses, 1) that they DO NOT have a contract with us in any capacity, 2) that they were paid $1,050 by the insurance company for storage, 3) that East Bay has had many other communications and agreements with the insurance company and their agents, 4) they have had communications and agreements which we were NOT privy to and do not have copies of, 5) East Bay had previously told me that they had an agreement with the insurance company for the storage, BUT revealed that they actually have a check and displayed it before the deputies, 6) they referred to their hand written policy posted on the wall that they charge storage 2 days AFTER the completion of any work performed.
They have NOT and will NOT perform any work on the truck and I will never sign any work order for same nor have we singed a release for them to be paid!
I am the person for the Service Process in this Plaintiff’s fraudulent claim and named as the Person of Interest in this fraudulent alleged Lien Sale denied on February 7, 2024 by the Department of Motor Vehicle filed by these same Plaintiff East Bay Auto Center.
Plaintiff East Bay Auto Center filed this claim March 13, 2024, and allegedly served it via U. S. postal mail from Hayward, California with postage meter dated Monday, May 20, 2024.
We received the mailed letter claim on Friday, May 31, 2024. Yet only FIVE (5) DAYS LATER, on March 19, 2024, plaintiff’s contacted AMWF and Abdul-Jalil by phone and reply email dated March 25, 2024 with invoice dated March 19, 2024 DISAVOWING AND REJECTING their claim and REQUESTING that we come and retrieve the truck AT NO COSTS!
On April 22, 2024 Plaintiff’s FAILED AND REFUSED TO ALLOW THE COUNTY SHERIFF’S TO INSPECT THE TRUCK AFTER IT WAS STOLEN, BURGLARIZED, VANDALIZED AND DAMAGED AS PART OF COMPLETING A POLICE REPORT THAT IS ALSO REQUIRED BY THE INSURANCE COMPANIES! As a result, we do not have a total value of the scope of loss and damage to the truck therefrom. The truck has over $200,000 in valuable items in the cargo payload bay since it has been in the possession and custody of the Plaintiffs a year ago! As it is the RESPONSIBILITY of the COUNTY SHERIFFS to conduct a complete investigation, analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages IN THE LEGAL FORM OF A FILED POLICE REPORT, IT IS NOT WITHIN THE RIGHTS OF EAST BAY TO REFUSE THAT RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COUNTY SHERIFFS NOR FOR THEM TO COMPLY FOR THE PURPOSES OF DENYING OUR RIGHTS TO “COVER UP” FOR THEIR ASSET!! We declared we will NOT move the truck unless and until East Bay allows the COUNTY SHERIFFS and us to inspect the truck for a complete investigation, analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages IN THE LEGAL FORM OF A FILED POLICE REPORT!!!
On October 1, 2024 we discovered that our truck had been moved from the Plaintiff’s shop on Mission Blvd. in Hayward. This was done WITHOUT OUR PERMISSION OR KNOWLEDGE! This was done to DESTROY the crime scene from the truck being stolen without being inspected nor investigated by law enforcement and destroy the chain of custody! We called the County Sheriff’s and made arrangements to meet them there for a truck theft/missing report on October 2, 2024. Once we met there, Plaintiff’s FAILED AND REFUSED TO DISCLOSE TO THE COUNTY SHERIFF’S THE LOCATION OF THE TRUCK, OR WETHER IT WAS STOLEN, BURGLARIZED, VANDALIZED AND DAMAGED AGAIN AS PART OF COMPLETING A POLICE REPORT THAT IS ALSO REQUIRED BY THE INSURANCE COMPANIES!
On Friday, October 4, 2024, East Bay ADMITTED and CONFESSED in several unsolicited emails to the court and Judges Thomas Nixon, Brian Caruth, Stuart Hing, Michael Gaffey; Clerks of Dept. 1, 105, 605, 711; and court administrator Chad Finke that they have willfully and intentionally absconded with our truck and transferred the possession and control to a Third Party without our knowledge or consent!
These admissions and confessions are evidence that they willfully and intentionally improperly altered, concealed, suppression and destroyed evidence wherein the egregiousness of this spoliation, the strength and nature of their actions is untenable with any JUSTICE! Plaintiffs and Sheriffs have NO REGARD FOR THE LAW NOR JUSTICE witnessed by this inference arising from the spoliation.
Now they attempt to EXTORT monies from us by holding the truck HOSTAGE and DEMANDING an unknown amount of towing and storage fees for payment to an unknown third party to be paid TO THEM in advance of any delivery of the truck, AS WELL AS payment of towing and storage fees to THEM to be paid TO THEM in advance of any delivery of the truck!
On November 2, 2024 we discovered that our truck had been returned to Plaintiff’s shop on Mission Blvd. in Hayward with additional damage. Upon investigation, the truck has been further BURGLARIZED by the breach of the lock on the roll up door and the roll up door itself! THE DAMAGES ARE UNKOWN AND YET TO BE INVESTIGATED!
IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THESE UNSOLICITED ADMISSIONS and CONFESSIONS to the court and Judges makes them ALL PERCIPIENT EYE WITNESSES AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR DISQUALIFICATION.
As reported of this date, East Bay STILL has the truck and REFUSES to release it to us unless and until we indemnify them from ALL liability for their civil and criminal charges of larceny, fraud, theft, damage, if the vehicle is stolen from them, etc., so they may be able to do or have done anything they choose to the vehicle and it’s contents without any possible consequences!
The truck was supposed to have been returned to defendants by March 7, 2024, BUT that DID NOT HAPPEN.
Now, the truck has been STOLEN, was burglarized, vandalized, is damaged, and East Bay has refused to allow the COUNTY SHERIFFS nor us to inspect the truck for a complete analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages, UNLESS AND UNTIL WE SIGN A WAIVER OF THEIR LIABILITY FOR SAME! We will NOT ever do that.
As you have been advised, East Bay Auto Center filed a Small Claims action against us for an additional $3,400 storage fees beyond the amount they settled with State Farm for. We have filed a Cross Complaint against them for undetermined costs, losses and damages from the un-inspected theft, burglary, vandalism, and damage to the truck we have yet to observe and document the losses and damages to the truck door locks, ignition, exterior and interior cab, engine, parts, body, theft and damage of it’s contents, and other losses and damages, has cab damage that is 57 inches long stretching from the rear passenger side to start of the cab damage that is 6-8 inches wide through the corporate lettering, the truck is currently lodged 2 inches within and against the fence and CAN NOT be moved without causing MORE significant damage!
The truck was NOT stolen nor burglarized through entry from knocking out the passenger door lock! There is ONLY 16 inches from the passenger door lock to the metal fence and 24 inches from the passenger door lock to the outer metal fence. That makes it PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for someone to knock out the passenger door lock and a human body to open the door and enter the truck with less than 4 inches of clearance to enter given the design and build of the truck!! THE TRUCK WAS STOLEN THROUGH ENTRY FROM THE DRIVERS SIDE DOOR AND THERE IS NO SIGN OF ANY DAMAGE TO THE DRIVERS SIDE DOOR LOCK, THUS LEAVING THE ONLY POSSIBLE ENTRY THROUGH THAT DRIVERS SIDE DOOR WITH A KEY!
East Bay Auto Center is NOT currently registered with California Secretary of State nor the California Franchise Tax Board, California Board of Equalization, California Bureau of Automotive Repair nor the Alameda County Business License AS A LEGAL BUSINESS ENTITY, thus they are NOT authorized to do business in the State of California and don’t have legal standing to file nor defend a law suit. They, East Bay Auto Center, may never have legally existed, they may be suspended for some reason, or they may not legally exist any longer.
We discovered that the Bureau of Automotive Repair (BAR) has Shah Sons LLC, listed as the “owner” of East Bay Auto Center. That is also true for the Alameda County Business License although their license is invalid for failure to file and pay taxes and comply with a mandatory audit.
HOWEVER, Shah Sons LLC, HAS NOT REGISTERED NOR ARE THEY USING A DBA (DOING BUSINESS AS) for East Bay Auto Center with any Federal, State, or County governmental agency, NOT the IRS, California Secretary of State State, California Franchise Tax Board, California Board of Equalization, California Bureau of Automotive Repair nor the Alameda County Business License.
In order for East Bay Auto Center to legally exist AS A LEGAL BUSINESS ENTITY, they would have to file the proper documents with the IRS, California Secretary of State State, California Franchise Tax Board, California Board of Equalization, California Bureau of Automotive Repair and the Alameda County Business License, establishing Shah Sons LLC, DOING BUSINESS AS (DBA) East Bay Auto Center. They have NOT done that even though they filed a Fictitious Business Name Statement with Alameda County.
Additionally, there are NO other REQUIRED means, NO INVOICES, NO ADVERTISEMENTS, NOTHING ON THEIR WEBSITE, that they comply with for the use of the legal name of the LLC- Shah Sons LLC, followed by the DBA- doing business as East Bay Auto Center. This practice clarifies the legal entity involved and maintain the LLC’s limited liability status. This ensures that the contracts are enforceable and that the LLC is recognized as the party to these endeavors.
If an LLC does not properly use its DBA, it operates under a DBA without using its legal name, it intentionally breaches the line between personal and business activities and loses the limited liability protection typically afforded to LLC members.This leads to “piercing the corporate veil,” where courts hold members personally liable for business debts and obligations, negating the primary benefit of forming an LLC. Courts have determined that the LLC is not a separate entity if it does not clearly identify itself, leading to personal liability for members.
Contracts should include clear liability clauses that outline the responsibilities and limitations of liability for the LLC. This can help protect the LLC from claims that may arise from business activities conducted under the DBA.
To maintain the limited liability protection of SHAH SONS LLC, it is crucial to keep personal and business finances separate. This includes using a dedicated business bank account and credit cards for all transactions related to the DBA- “Shah Sons LLC, doing business as East Bay Auto Center”. Open a dedicated business bank account for the LLC- Shah Sons LLC, that uses the legal name- “Shah Sons LLC, doing business as East Bay Auto Center”. This separation helps maintain the SHAH SONS LLC’s limited liability protection and simplifies financial management.
Given that EBA status is not listed as a current Corporation with Secretary of State or State Franchise Tax Board authorized to do business in the State of California, there are multiple individual parties including East Bay Auto, Muhammad Khan, Sani Khan, Tariq Khan, Numi Khan, and Asian investors, there is good cause and we are asking the court to ascertain the correct legal name and status of East Bay Auto, the owners and investors of East Bay Auto, the correct legal names of the plaintiff’s, and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s. CA Civ Pro Code § 116.560. (b) The defendant may request the court at any time, whether before or after judgment, to amend the defendant’s claim or judgment to include both the correct legal name and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s. Upon a showing of good cause, the court shall amend the claim or judgment to state the correct legal name of the plaintiff’s, and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s and investors.
East Bay Auto has suspensions with the Bureau of Automotive Repair (BAR).
We will ask the court to transfer the Small Claims action to Court of Competent Jurisdiction because we have no projected total of the costs, losses and damages to the truck that exceed the jurisdictional limits stated in Sections 116.220, 116.221, and 116.231, and request the small claims court to transfer the small claims action to a court of competent jurisdiction.
As it is the RESPONSIBILITY of the COUNTY SHERIFFS to conduct a complete investigation, analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages IN THE LEGAL FORM OF A FILED POLICE REPORT, IT IS NOT WITHIN THE RIGHTS OF EAST BAY TO REFUSE THAT RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COUNTY SHERIFFS NOR FOR THEM TO COMPLY FOR THE PURPOSES OF DENYING OUR RIGHTS TO “COVER UP” FOR THEIR ASSET!!
We will NOT move the truck unless and until East Bay allows the COUNTY SHERIFFS and us to inspect the truck for a complete investigation, analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages IN THE LEGAL FORM OF A FILED POLICE REPORT!!!
The COUNTY SHERIFFS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT have been IMPLICATED BY EAST BAY AUTO as an accessory and collaborator in this case, providing them protection and cover up for them, implying GROSS MISCONDUCT as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by the Sheriff’s deputy Markita Sayles whom ADMITS she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES. Video is available on Youtube. See “ILLEGAL POLICE TARGETED ENTRAPMENT BACKFIRES! TRAPS POLICE, EXPOSES IMMORAL, UNETHICAL SCHEME!” at: https://youtu.be/kus80M56Vas.
Here we have the County Sheriff covering for their “asset” East Bay Auto and co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, is proven in the video by THEIR AND POLICE ADMISSIONS and Bad Faith/Hate crime fact pattern, was ALWAYS a Scheme to take possession of the truck, provoke and frame civil/criminal legal actions by fabricating a disputed legal issue we would be subjected to knowing that the courts are inapposite to our justice.
IT IS CLEAR THAT ABDUL-JALIL, HIS FAMILY, THEIR BUSINESSES, AND NON-PROFIT, the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation, HAS BEEN TARGETED WITH SPECIOUS, TORTIOUS ILLEGAL CLANDESTINE ACTS ON THE PART OF LAW ENFORCEMENT WITH THE INTENT TO DESTROY THEIR LIVES!
However, co-conspirators East Bay Auto/State Farm are not acting alone as the ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF AND LAW ENFORCEMENT have been IMPLICATED BY EAST BAY as an accessory and collaborator in this case, providing them protection and cover implying GROSS MISCONDUCT as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by the Sheriff’s officers. Video is available on Youtube. See “ILLEGAL POLICE TARGETED ENTRAPMENT BACKFIRES! TRAPS POLICE, EXPOSES IMMORAL, UNETHICAL SCHEME!” at: https://youtu.be/kus80M56Vas.
This video PROVIDES ADMISSIONS from Sheriff’s Deputy Markita Sayles that she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES is PROOF of how POLICE FILE FALSE REPORTS, FABRICATE EVIDENCE, FIX THE CASE, COMMIT FRAUD to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto AFTER she:
1) admitted she talked with Law Enforcement Special Services resources twice to ascertain that she was proceeding in the correct manner according to their plan and her instructions. WHY WOULD SHE NEED TO CONSULT WITH AND BE INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES TO TAKE AND FILE A SIMPLE, COMMON POLICE REPORT?,
2) East Bay Auto incriminated police admitting that they worked with police, are accomplishes, collaborators, were under the protection of law enforcement covering for their asset and would NOT do anything to assist defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation or Abdul-Jalil,
3) The vehicle was ADMITTED stolen, burglarized, vandalized, fraud, larceny and damaged, BUT, BOTH policemen said “this is NOT a criminal matter, truck was not stolen”,
4) Dep. Sayles said she can’t inspect/process nor document the truck as a crime scene for evidence, damage, theft, vandalism, missing/stolen business and personal property, nor can Abdul-Jalil without the approval of their asset East Bay Auto,
5) Abdul-Jalil requested a Police Report OVER 21 times,
6) Dep. Sayles said she would conduct a thorough investigation, interview shop owner, personnel and neighbors, check local cameras,
7) Dep. Sayles said Abdul-Jalil didn’t answers her questions, BUT she NEVER asked basic questions as: Name, Address, City, State, Zip Code, Telephone, nothing on damage, suspects, the truck registration or VIN,
Dep. Sayles said Abdul-Jalil needed to go to court in order to get a police report, REFUSING TO TAKE A REPORT!, and
9) Dep. Sayles said it’s a civil matter 8 Times! NOT a criminal matter.
THIS VIDEO PROVIDES PROOF THAT SHERIFF’S DEPT. MARKITA SAYLES LIED ABOUT THE ENTIRE “POLICE REPORT”! Sayles “event/police report” states:

“RP (Reporting Party, Abdul-Jalil) UPSET THAT HIS VEHICLE THAT UNDER THE AUTO REPAIR SHOP HAS DAMAGE. THE AUTO BODY SHOP STILL HAS CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE AND THE VEHILCE HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED TO THE RP. THE RP WAS ADVISED THE MATTER WAS CIVIL. THE RP WAS ADAMENT THE THERE IS A CRIME EVEN THOUGH DEPS TOLD HIM IT WAS CIVIL. THE RP WAS UPSET AND DEMANDED A REPORT. WHEN ASKED WHAT WE WERE INVESTIGATING THE RP SAID THAT WOULD BE UP TO US. NO REPORT TAKEN”

Abdul-Jalil requested a Police Report OVER 21 times, AND Dep. Sayles said she would conduct a thorough investigation, interview shop owner, personnel and neighbors, check local cameras! SAYLES LIED ABOUT THE ENTIRE “FALSE POLICE REPORT” and willfully committed PERJURY, FABRICATE EVIDENCE, MISCONDUCT, CONCEALMENT, COMMITTED FRAUD UPON THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN FIXING THE CASE!
This video PROVIDES ADMISSIONS from Markita Sayles she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES TWICE is PROOF there is a continuing Targeted Entrapment Scam/Sting/Scheme and Hate Crimes. The Sheriff’s office trapped themselves in CORRUPTION and SUBORNED PERJURIOUS TESTIMONY, in this State sponsored terror; with vindictive retaliation against AMWF and al-Hakim family while defending, concealing and thereby being further complicit in committing THE ADMITTED willful and intentional extrinsic fraud upon the people of the great State of California and the Court; fraud; prosecutorial misconduct; willful and malicious prosecution; willful misconduct; conflict of interest; obstruction of justice; denial of due process under the law; willful and intentional fabrication and authoring false evidence; misstating and mischaracterizing evidence; misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court’s act or reliance; harassment; intimidation on behalf of the County Sheriffs; abuse of discretion, misconduct, conduct prejudicial, illegal ex-parte communications and bias designed to result in fixing the case against defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation and al-Hakim; appointing themselves a Real Primary Party of Interest to the litigation with their OWN agenda; weaponizing the police report and investigative process in furtherance of their agenda; engaging in the defense of opposing parties; provocation, bias, prejudice, Islamophobia, Xenophobia, hate, bigotry and racism!
The Entrapment Strategy is disable, destroy, and eliminate the TARGET- defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation and Abdul-Jalil, the al-Hakim family, their businesses and business property, their real and personal property, their charities, their communities, and the communities they serve- personally, professionally, morally, ethically, and financially with the courts system to deny and exhaust any and all notions of civil rights, civil liberties, human rights without the God given right to undertake unbiased litigation without the deciding and controlling actions and influence of corrupt unscrupulous judicial, law enforcement, governmental and legal entities, agencies and operatives.
We have documented AND filed SEVERAL Federal and State complaints of being complicit in the illegal TARGETED ENTRAPMENT activities WITH AND AGAINST Police Chiefs Tony Chaplin/Brian Matthew; Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez; Police Chief Abdul Pridgen; U. S. Attorney Ismail Ramsey; Attorney General Rob Bonta; F.B.I. Director Robert Tripp; Governor Gavin Newsom; Casey Hallinan; Ricardo Lara- DOI; Steve Gordon- DMV; Patrick Dorais- BAR; Kimberly Kirchmeyer- DCA; Grant Parks- State Auditor; Selvi Stanislaus- FTB; Senator Aisha Wahab; District Attorney Pam Price; HUD; et. al., against co-conspirators East Bay Auto/State Farm for their active, continuing role in this Targeted Entrapment Scheme and “Bad Faith” by them, their agents, contractors, and ALL known and unknown, announced and unannounced Third Parties, the threats/demands for Payment of Storage, refusal to pay for a Rental vehicle, mitigating the continuing Loss of Use and Damages, and their illegal clandestine efforts to gain ownership of our truck WITHOUT PAYING FOR THE REPAIR NOR COMPENSATING US with the FRAUDULENT attempted East Bay Auto Lien Sale and REFUSAL to release our truck to defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation.
Defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation is going forward with Civil and Criminal Charges/Claims for Grand Larceny, Grand Theft Auto, Fraud, Property Theft, Burglary, Vandalism, Extortion, Phone (Terrorist) Threats, Deception, attempted Grand Theft, Costs, Damages, Mitigating the Continuing Loss of Use, and Monetary Sanctions, among others with Federal and State Complaints filed against East Bay Auto and State Farm Insurance and served them both with Preservation-of-Evidence Demand Letter.
Additionally, with respect to any and all business operation regarding the defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation insurance policy and claim, and THE FACT that State Farm, their employees, their referenced agents, sub-agents, contractors, State Farm Claims, State Farm Appraisal Team, Alacrity Solutions, LLC, Snapsheet, Up North Towing, Blue Star Towing, and ALL known and unknown Third Parties have clearly “targeted” defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation and using recognizable government entrapment tactics the latest of which was the refusal to release the truck and “lien sale” to gain ownership of their truck WITHOUT PAYING FOR THE REPAIR NOR COMPENSATING US! As a direct and proximate result of State Farm and their co-conspirators East Bay’s continuing actions, defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation is FORCED to make long term arrangements for the storage of the truck UNTIL STATE FARM PAYS FOR THE REPAIR AS AMWF PURSUES ALL OTHER REMEDIES!
Some Requests for Documents include:
61. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references which YOU contend support any position YOU have taken at any time with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by Markita Sayles PROVIDES ADMISSIONS from deputies Markita Sayles and Collin Lenahan is proof of MARKITA SAYLES FILED A FALSE REPORT, LIED ABOUT ENTIRE POLICE REPORT, see: https://youtu.be/ZEgZRhuYOMM, include ALL legal requirements, legal statutes, legal theory supported with law and case citations, review, analysis, evaluation, handling, adjustment, report, agreement, policy, guide lines, and regulations applicable in your argument denying YOU and Deputy Markita Sayles committed fraud upon the people of the State of California in fixing the case; admitted she was instructed by special services resources; perjury; fraud; subornation and solicitation of perjurious testimony; prejudicial misconduct; corrupt misconduct; illegal ex parte communications; grand larceny; tortious interference; intentional spoliation of evidence; fraudulent misrepresentation; intentional misrepresentation; property damage; filing an entire “false police report”; willfully fabricated evidence; committed misconduct; concealment; to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto; engaging in this Continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme, “Bad Faith” Fact Pattern and Hate Crimes.
62. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references which YOU contend support any position YOU have taken at any time with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by Markita Sayles PROVIDES ADMISSIONS from deputies Markita Sayles and Collin Lenahan is proof of MARKITA SAYLES LIED ABOUT THE ENTIRE “POLICE REPORT”! as Sayles her “event/police report” states “ RP (Reporting Party, Abdul-Jalil) UPSET THAT HIS VEHICLE THAT UNDER THE AUTO REPAIR SHOP HAS DAMAGE. THE AUTO BODY SHOP STILL HAS CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE AND THE VEHILCE HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED TO THE RP. THE RP WAS ADVISED THE MATTER WAS CIVIL. THE RP WAS ADAMENT THE THERE IS A CRIME EVEN THOUGH DEPS TOLD HIM IT WAS CIVIL. THE RP WAS UPSET AND DEMANDED A REPORT. WHEN ASKED WHAT WE WERE INVESTIGATING THE RP SAID THAT WOULD BE UP TO US. NO REPORT TAKEN”, include ALL legal requirements, legal statutes, legal theory supported with law and case citations, review, analysis, evaluation, handling, adjustment, report, agreement, policy, guide lines, and regulations applicable in your argument denying YOU and Deputy Markita Sayles committed fraud upon the people of the State of California in fixing the case; admitted she was instructed by special services resources; perjury; fraud; subornation and solicitation of perjurious testimony; prejudicial misconduct; corrupt misconduct; illegal ex parte communications; grand larceny; tortious interference; intentional spoliation of evidence; fraudulent misrepresentation; intentional misrepresentation; property damage; filing an entire “false police report”; willfully fabricated evidence; committed misconduct; concealment; to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto; engaging in this Continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme, “Bad Faith” Fact Pattern and Hate Crimes.
63. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references which YOU contend support any position YOU have taken at any time with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by Markita Sayles PROVIDES ADMISSIONS from deputies Markita Sayles and Collin Lenahan is proof that Abdul-Jalil requested a Police Report OVER 21 times, include ALL legal requirements, legal statutes, legal theory supported with law and case citations, review, analysis, evaluation, handling, adjustment, report, agreement, policy, guide lines, and regulations applicable in your argument denying YOU and Deputy Markita Sayles committed fraud upon the people of the State of California in fixing the case; admitted she was instructed by special services resources; perjury; fraud; subornation and solicitation of perjurious testimony; prejudicial misconduct; corrupt misconduct; illegal ex parte communications; grand larceny; tortious interference; intentional spoliation of evidence; fraudulent misrepresentation; intentional misrepresentation; property damage; filing an entire “false police report”; willfully fabricated evidence; committed misconduct; concealment; to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto; engaging in this Continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme, “Bad Faith” Fact Pattern and Hate Crimes.
64. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references which YOU contend support any position YOU have taken at any time with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by Markita Sayles PROVIDES ADMISSIONS from deputies Markita Sayles and Collin Lenahan is proof that Sayles said she would conduct a thorough investigation, interview shop owner, personnel and neighbors, check local cameras, include ALL legal requirements, legal statutes, legal theory supported with law and case citations, review, analysis, evaluation, handling, adjustment, report, agreement, policy, guide lines, and regulations applicable in your argument denying YOU and Deputy Markita Sayles committed fraud upon the people of the State of California in fixing the case; admitted she was instructed by special services resources; perjury; fraud; subornation and solicitation of perjurious testimony; prejudicial misconduct; corrupt misconduct; illegal ex parte communications; grand larceny; tortious interference; intentional spoliation of evidence; fraudulent misrepresentation; intentional misrepresentation; property damage; filing an entire “false police report”; willfully fabricated evidence; committed misconduct; concealment; to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto; engaging in this Continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme, “Bad Faith” Fact Pattern and Hate Crimes.
101. INVESTIGATE, PRODUCE AND Identify in detail all persons who may have knowledge of facts with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that “IN AN UNSOLICITED, UNWANTED PHONE CALL TO DEFENDANTS, SAYLES ADMITS SHE LIED ABOUT THE ENTIRE “FALSE POLICE REPORT” and willfully committed PERJURY, FABRICATE EVIDENCE, MISCONDUCT, CONCEALMENT, COMMITTED FRAUD UPON THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN FIXING THE CASE! See video at: https://youtu.be/ZEgZRhuYOMM”. In that detail describe the actions of such individuals, those communications, identify all persons, and produce ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references to and concerning the communications described in this action, any investigation, and identify the author of each such document. State the persons, business, employee or employees, agents, etc., who were aware of such facts, the source of their knowledge, the facts of which each such persons, business, agents, employee or employees was aware, and Defendant’s response to such facts, if any.
102. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references which YOU contend support any position YOU have taken at any time with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that “Sheriff failure and refusal to investigate and file a report established a legal relationship between the Sheriffs and defendants that lead to liability based on the Sheriffs inducing reliance by the defendants, resulting in a greater risk of harm due to Sheriffs negligence than what the defendants already faced, then the Sheriffs fail to respond to requests for assistance or investigate when they promised to do so”, include ALL legal requirements, legal statutes, legal theory supported with law and case citations, review, analysis, evaluation, handling, adjustment, report, agreement, policy, guide lines, and regulations applicable in your argument denying YOU and Deputy Markita Sayles committed fraud upon the people of the State of California in fixing the case; admitted she was instructed by special services resources; perjury; fraud; subornation and solicitation of perjurious testimony; prejudicial misconduct; corrupt misconduct; illegal ex parte communications; grand larceny; tortious interference; intentional spoliation of evidence; fraudulent misrepresentation; intentional misrepresentation; property damage; filing an entire “false police report”; willfully fabricated evidence; committed misconduct; concealment; to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto; engaging in this Continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme, “Bad Faith” Fact Pattern and Hate Crimes.
103. INVESTIGATE, PRODUCE AND Identify in detail all persons who may have knowledge of facts with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that “Sheriff failure and refusal to investigate and file a report established a legal relationship between the Sheriffs and defendants that lead to liability based on the Sheriffs inducing reliance by the defendants, resulting in a greater risk of harm due to Sheriffs negligence than what the defendants already faced, then the Sheriffs fail to respond to requests for assistance or investigate when they promised to do so”. In that detail describe the actions of such individuals, those communications, identify all persons, and produce ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references to and concerning the communications described in this action, any investigation, and identify the author of each such document. State the persons, business, employee or employees, agents, etc., who were aware of such facts, the source of their knowledge, the facts of which each such persons, business, agents, employee or employees was aware, and Defendant’s response to such facts, if any.
104. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references which YOU contend support any position YOU have taken at any time with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that “Plaintiffs and the Sheriffs facing claims of intentional spoliation of evidence have several irrefutable facts they can not overcome: Plaintiffs and the Sheriffs facing claims at all times of their duty to preserve the evidence, 2) they were fully aware at all times there was NO accidental destruction, this was willful and intentional; 3) they were aware at all times of the relevance of the evidence, 4) they were fully aware at all times of their intent and motive in the spoliation of evidence and this provided them the opportunity, 5) they were fully aware at all times of the willful and intentional causation of the spoliation of evidence, 6) they were fully aware at all times of the damages for the spoliation of evidence, and 7) they were fully aware at all times of their need for compliance with legal obligations regarding the spoliation of evidence”, include ALL legal requirements, legal statutes, legal theory supported with law and case citations, review, analysis, evaluation, handling, adjustment, report, agreement, policy, guide lines, and regulations applicable in your argument denying YOU and Deputy Markita Sayles committed fraud upon the people of the State of California in fixing the case; admitted she was instructed by special services resources; perjury; fraud; subornation and solicitation of perjurious testimony; prejudicial misconduct; corrupt misconduct; illegal ex parte communications; grand larceny; tortious interference; intentional spoliation of evidence; fraudulent misrepresentation; intentional misrepresentation; property damage; filing an entire “false police report”; willfully fabricated evidence; committed misconduct; concealment; to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto; engaging in this Continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme, “Bad Faith” Fact Pattern and Hate Crimes.
105. INVESTIGATE, PRODUCE AND Identify in detail all persons who may have knowledge of facts with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that “Plaintiffs and the Sheriffs facing claims of intentional spoliation of evidence have several irrefutable facts they can not overcome: Plaintiffs and the Sheriffs facing claims at all times of their duty to preserve the evidence, 2) they were fully aware at all times there was NO accidental destruction, this was willful and intentional; 3) they were aware at all times of the relevance of the evidence, 4) they were fully aware at all times of their intent and motive in the spoliation of evidence and this provided them the opportunity, 5) they were fully aware at all times of the willful and intentional causation of the spoliation of evidence, 6) they were fully aware at all times of the damages for the spoliation of evidence, and 7) they were fully aware at all times of their need for compliance with legal obligations regarding the spoliation of evidence”. In that detail describe the actions of such individuals, those communications, identify all persons, and produce ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references to and concerning the communications described in this action, any investigation, and identify the author of each such document. State the persons, business, employee or employees, agents, etc., who were aware of such facts, the source of their knowledge, the facts of which each such persons, business, agents, employee or employees was aware, and Defendant’s response to such facts, if any.
110. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references which YOU contend support any position YOU have taken at any time with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that “Defendant argues that Plaintiffs and Sheriffs actions were NOT justified, that the interference was not justified, acted with the intent to interfere, was conducted with malice and this wrongful conduct lead to their liability. The evidence shows that Plaintiffs and Sheriff’s acted with the intent to deny, disrupt and intentional interfer with Defendants Constitutional and legal rights, that such interference was executed through threats, intimidation, or coercion, with their unreasonable seizure and deprivation of life, liberty, and property without due process; and to deny and impede access to court and insurance companies with ALL the evidence that should have been readily available. Plaintiffs and Sheriffs actions of interference with Defendants rights protected by state or federal laws, specifically noting that Civil Code § 52.1 emphasizes the element of fear for safety associated with hate violence, particularly focusing on threats, intimidation, or coercion was deliberate and spiteful, serves to undermine the public trust and allowing such conduct to go unchecked sets a dangerous precedent.”, include ALL legal requirements, legal statutes, legal theory supported with law and case citations, review, analysis, evaluation, handling, adjustment, report, agreement, policy, guide lines, and regulations applicable in your argument denying YOU and Deputy Markita Sayles committed fraud upon the people of the State of California in fixing the case; admitted she was instructed by special services resources; perjury; fraud; subornation and solicitation of perjurious testimony; prejudicial misconduct; corrupt misconduct; illegal ex parte communications; grand larceny; tortious interference; intentional spoliation of evidence; fraudulent misrepresentation; intentional misrepresentation; property damage; filing an entire “false police report”; willfully fabricated evidence; committed misconduct; concealment; to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto; engaging in this Continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme, “Bad Faith” Fact Pattern and Hate Crimes.
111. INVESTIGATE, PRODUCE AND Identify in detail all persons who may have knowledge of facts with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that “Defendant argues that Plaintiffs and Sheriffs actions were NOT justified, that the interference was not justified, acted with the intent to interfere, was conducted with malice and this wrongful conduct lead to their liability. The evidence shows that Plaintiffs and Sheriff’s acted with the intent to deny, disrupt and intentional interfer with Defendants Constitutional and legal rights, that such interference was executed through threats, intimidation, or coercion, with their unreasonable seizure and deprivation of life, liberty, and property without due process; and to deny and impede access to court and insurance companies with ALL the evidence that should have been readily available. Plaintiffs and Sheriffs actions of interference with Defendants rights protected by state or federal laws, specifically noting that Civil Code § 52.1 emphasizes the element of fear for safety associated with hate violence, particularly focusing on threats, intimidation, or coercion was deliberate and spiteful, serves to undermine the public trust and allowing such conduct to go unchecked sets a dangerous precedent”. In that detail describe the actions of such individuals, those communications, identify all persons, and produce ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references to and concerning the communications described in this action, any investigation, and identify the author of each such document. State the persons, business, employee or employees, agents, etc., who were aware of such facts, the source of their knowledge, the facts of which each such persons, business, agents, employee or employees was aware, and Defendant’s response to such facts, if any.
273. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references to June 26, 2012, 50 page complaint regarding al-Hakim being accosted by the Sheriffs deputy stating “I have recently called and left messages as well as speaking to your clerk Elaine just last week regarding my desire to file several law suits as well as answering other matters that require the ability to file those required documents without the fear of being ambushed by the District Attorney’s office enforcers or the County Sheriff’s Department acting in their place and stead for other judicial entities. I have been precluded from any legal rights by virtue of this illegal, repressive censorship enacted by the DA’s office. This has gone on far too long and the legal consequences continue to mount as I am forbidden to pursue my civil rights in court without the oppression of the system by those in control of it. I want to and will file my law suits and go forward to resolution of these unprecedented matters in this public forum.” filed against Alameda County Superior Court Judge C. Don Clay.
274. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references to January 7, 2014, 11 page letter, fax and email complaint in (ACDCSS) case number #0010274454-01 (previously listed as FSD #274454A) regarding “Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim being profiled, surveilled, identified, and targeted by the District Attorney and Sheriff’s Deputy, al-Hakim being accosted by Sheriffs Deputies and prevented from entering the Alameda Family Law Courthouse by County Sheriff’s who informed defendant that he must go to Judge Pulido’s courtroom to file the letter, that he would be handling this matter in Probate Court and defendants requesting security” filed with Winifred Smith- Presiding Judge, Superior Court of California; C. Don Clay- Supervising Judge, Superior Court of California; Stephen Pulido- Presiding Judge Family Law Court, Superior Court of California; and Judge Sandra Bean- Alameda Family Law Court, Superior Court of California.
289. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references which YOU contend support any position YOU have taken at any time with respect to plaintiffs July 11, 2018 hearing in the matters of al-Hakim v. Interserver, Case No.: RG18888371 and resultant complaint filed against Alameda County Superior Court Judge C. Don Clay with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that is evidenced in RE: “al-Hakim states “I have been in your courtroom over 20 times and I have never seen a deputy standing right behind the party during a hearing.” and you have THREE deputies in the courtroom right now!”, include ALL legal requirements, legal statutes, legal theory supported with law and case citations, review, analysis, evaluation, handling, adjustment, report, agreement, policy, guide lines, and regulations applicable in your argument denying YOU and Deputy Markita Sayles committed fraud upon the people of the State of California in fixing the case; admitted she was instructed by special services resources; perjury; fraud; subornation and solicitation of perjurious testimony; prejudicial misconduct; corrupt misconduct; illegal ex parte communications; grand larceny; tortious interference; intentional spoliation of evidence; fraudulent misrepresentation; intentional misrepresentation; property damage; filing an entire “false police report”; willfully fabricated evidence; committed misconduct; concealment; to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto; engaging in this Continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme, “Bad Faith” Fact Pattern and Hate Crimes.
290. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references to the October 3, 2018 hearing, the resultant letter, fax and email Complaint filed against Alameda County Superior Court Judge C. Don Clay with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that is evidenced in RE: “Clay says “that’s normal, I may even have more!” al-Hakim says “for a civil ex-parte motion at 3:00 p.m.? I don’t believe that! Clay says ” It’s true”
297. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references to the April 14, 2008 Complaint with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that is evidenced therein the request for security against Alameda County Superior Court Judge Jon Tigar RE: “when al-Hakim entered the courthouse building, the deputy at the metal detector called upstairs to the courtroom, Department 21 to inform them of his arrival in the building” filed with Victoria B. Henley, Director-Chief Counsel of the Sate of California Commission on Judicial Performance, Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye- Supreme Court of California and Chair, Judicial Council of California, and Commission Judicial Appointments; Judge Phyllis Hamilton- Chief District Judge, U. S. District Court- No. Division; Alex Tse- Director, U. S. Attorney’s Office; Xavier Becerra- Attorney General of California; Victoria Henley-Director-Chief Counsel, Commission on Judicial Performance; Martin Hoshino- Director, Judicial Council of California, Alameda County Presiding Court Judge Yolanda Northridge, former Presiding Court Judge George Hernandez and Alameda County Superior Court Administration.

These torts exposes the Responding Parties to the full array of tort remedies, including punitive damages on top of regular tort damages, for an insurance company’s unreasonable breach of an insurance contract.
Responding Parties engaging in the herein referenced Targeted Entrapment Scheme and “Bad Faith” persecution to the detriment and oppression of Defendants, the al-Hakim family, their businesses and business property, their real and personal property, their charities, their communities, the communities they serve, and those they serve was both covert and overt, consisting of both actions and inactions of subterfuges and evasions that violated the obligation of good faith in performance with their continuing evasion of the spirit of the bargain, lack of diligence and slacking off, willful rendering of imperfect performance, abuse of a power to specify terms, and interference with or failure to cooperate in the other party’s performance.” (R. J. Kuhl Corp. v. Sullivan (1993) 13 Cal.App.4th 1589, 1602 [17 Cal.Rptr.2d 425].)
As a direct and proximate result of Responding Parties actions, Defendant’s has suffered losses and damages, including but not limited to: 1) repair of their vehicle, 2) loss of use of the vehicle during the repair period, measured by the rental value of a similar vehicle, 3) loss of income due to the inability to use the vehicle for business purposes, 4) additional expenses incurred due to the inability to use the vehicle for personal and business purposes, emotional distress and inconvenience caused by the loss of use. As this matter is part of an ongoing action, defendants also has claims for 1) general and special damages in an amount to be proven at trial; 2) for costs of suit incurred herein; and 3) for any other relief the Court deems just and proper.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim at:
Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation
4200 Park Blvd., Suite 116
Oakland, CA 94602
Tel: 510-394-4501Respectfully, Abdul-Jalil
510-394-4501
*******     We received a voicemail for someone named Mary from State Farm claims inquiring into our moving the Truck from East Bay Auto Center.
   As reported of this date, East Bay STILL has the truck and REFUSES to release it to us unless and until we indemnify them from ALL liability for their civil and criminal charges of larceny, fraud, theft, damage, if the vehicle is stolen from them, etc., so they may be able to do or have done anything they choose to the vehicle and it’s contents without any possible consequences!
     The truck was supposed to have been returned to us by March 7, 2024, BUT that DID NOT HAPPEN.
      Now, the truck has been STOLEN, was burglarized, vandalized, is damaged, and East Bay has refused to allow the COUNTY SHERIFFS nor us to inspect the truck for a complete analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages,UNLESS AND UNTIL WE SIGN A WAIVER OF THEIR LIABILITY FOR SAME! We will NOT ever do that.
   As you ALL have been advised, East Bay Auto Center filed a Small Claims action against us for an additional $3,400 storage fees beyond the amount they settled with State Farm for. We have filed a Cross Complaint against them for undetermined costs, losses and damages from the un-inspected theft, burglary, vandalism, and damage to the truck we have yet to observe and document the losses and damages to the truck door locks, ignition, exterior and interior cab, engine, parts, body, theft and damage of it’s contents, and other losses and damages, has cab damage that is 57 inches long stretching from the rear passenger side to start of the cab damage that is 6-8 inches wide through the corporate lettering, the truck is currently lodged 2 inches within and against the fence and CAN NOT be moved without causing MORE significant damage!
   The truck was NOT stolen nor burglarized through entry from knocking out the passenger door lock! There is ONLY 16 inches from the passenger door lock to the metal fence and 24 inches from the passenger door lock to the outer metal fence. That makes it PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for someone to knock out the passenger door lock and a human body to open the door and enter the truck with less than 4 inches of clearance to enter given the design and build of the truck!! THE TRUCK WAS STOLEN THROUGH ENTRY FROM THE DRIVERS SIDE DOOR AND THERE IS NO SIGN OF ANY DAMAGE TO THE DRIVERS SIDE DOOR LOCK, THUS LEAVING THE ONLY POSSIBLE ENTRY THROUGH THAT DRIVERS SIDE DOOR WITH A KEY!
   East Bay Auto Center is Not currently registered with California Secretary of State nor the California Franchise Tax Board, thus they don’t have legal standing to file nor defend a law suit.
   EBA status is not listed as a current Corporation with Secretary of State or State Franchise Tax Board authorized to do business in the State of California. They may never have legally existed, they may be suspended for some reason, or they may not legally exist any longer.
   Given that EBA status is not listed as a current Corporation with Secretary of State or State Franchise Tax Board authorized to do business in the State of California, there are multiple individual parties including East Bay Auto, Muhammad Khan, Sani Khan, Tariq Khan, Numi Khan, and Asian investors, there is good cause and we are asking the court to ascertain the correct legal name and status of East Bay Auto, the owners and investors of East Bay Auto, the correct legal names of the plaintiff’s, and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s. CA Civ Pro Code § 116.560. (b) The defendant may request the court at any time, whether before or after judgment, to amend the defendant’s claim or judgment to include both the correct legal name and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s. Upon a showing of good cause, the court shall amend the claim or judgment to state the correct legal name of the plaintiff’s, and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s and investors.
   East Bay Auto has suspensions with the Bureau of Automotive Repair (BAR).
   We will ask the court to transfer the Small Claims action to Court of Competent Jurisdiction because we have no projected total of the costs, losses and damages. losses and damages to the truck that may exceed the jurisdictional limits stated in Sections 116.220, 116.221, and 116.231, and if so, request the small claims court to transfer the small claims action to a court of competent jurisdiction.
   I base my request for the imposition of a sanction on the basis that it took me over 47 hours to research and locate the correct Plaintiff’s personnel, many phone calls, letters, emails and faxes in communication with the parties referenced herein, to research and prepare this motion, costs, and expenses according to proof. My discounted hourly wage is $350 per hour (from regular posted fee of $550/hour) for the 47 hours spent on this matter equals $16,450 alone.
   As it is the RESPONSIBILITY of the COUNTY SHERIFFS to conduct a complete investigation, analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages IN THE LEGAL FORM OF A FILED POLICE REPORT, IT IS NOT WITHIN THE RIGHTS OF EAST BAY TO REFUSE THAT RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COUNTY SHERIFFS NOR FOR THEM TO COMPLY FOR THE PURPOSES OF DENYING OUR RIGHTS TO “COVER UP” FOR THEIR ASSET!!
We will NOT move the truck unless and until East Bay allows the COUNTY SHERIFFS and us to inspect the truck for a complete investigation, analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages IN THE LEGAL FORM OF A FILED POLICE REPORT!!!
    The COUNTY SHERIFFS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT have been IMPLICATED BY EAST BAY AUTO as an accessory and collaborator in this case, providing them protection and cover up for them, implying GROSS MISCONDUCT as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by the Sheriff’s deputy Markita Sayles whom ADMITS she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES. Video is available on Youtube. See “ILLEGAL POLICE TARGETED ENTRAPMENT BACKFIRES! TRAPS POLICE, EXPOSES IMMORAL, UNETHICAL SCHEME!” at: https://youtu.be/kus80M56Vas.   A FORMAL COMPLAINT WILL FOLLOW UNDER SEPARATE COVER.
   Here we have the County Sheriff covering for their “asset” East Bay Auto and co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, is proven in the video by THEIR AND POLICE ADMISSIONS and Bad Faith/Hate crime fact pattern, was ALWAYS a Scheme to take possession of the truck, provoke and frame civil/criminal legal actions by fabricating a disputed legal issue we would be subjected to knowing that the courts are inapposite to our justice.
   IT IS CLEAR THAT ABDUL-JALIL, HIS FAMILY, THEIR BUSINESSES, AND NON-PROFIT, the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation, HAS BEEN TARGETED WITH SPECIOUS, TORTIOUS ILLEGAL CLANDESTINE ACTS ON THE PART OF LAW ENFORCEMENT WITH THE INTENT TO DESTROY THEIR LIVES!
   However, co-conspirators East Bay Auto/State Farm are not acting alone as the ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF AND LAW ENFORCEMENT have been IMPLICATED BY EAST BAY as an accessory and collaborator in this case, providing them protection and cover implying GROSS MISCONDUCT as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by the Sheriff’s officers.
    This video PROVIDES ADMISSIONS from Sheriff’s Deputy Markita Sayles that she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES is PROOF of how POLICE FILE FALSE REPORTS, FABRICATE EVIDENCE, FIX THE CASE, COMMIT FRAUD to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto AFTER she:
1) admitted she talked with Law Enforcement Special Services resources twice to ascertain that she was proceeding in the correct manner according to their plan and her instructions. WHY WOULD SHE NEED TO CONSULT WITH AND BE INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES TO TAKE AND FILE A SIMPLE, COMMON POLICE REPORT?,
2) East Bay Auto incriminated police admitting that they worked with police, are accomplishes, collaborators, were under the protection of law enforcement covering for their asset and would NOT do anything to assist AMWF and Abdul-Jalil,
3) The vehicle was ADMITTED stolen, burglarized, vandalized, fraud, larceny and damaged, BUT, BOTH policemen said “this is NOT a criminal matter, truck was not stolen”,
4) Dep. Sayles said she can’t inspect/process nor document the truck as a crime scene for evidence, damage, theft, vandalism, missing/stolen business and personal property, nor can Jalil without the approval of their asset East Bay Auto,
5) Jalil requested a Police Report OVER 21 times,
6) Dep. Sayles said she would conduct a thorough investigation, interview shop owner, personnel and neighbors, check local cameras,
7) Dep. Sayles said Jalil didn’t answers her questions, BUT she NEVER asked basic questions as: Name, Address, City, State, Zip Code, Telephone, nothing on damage, suspects, the truck registration or VIN,
Dep. Sayles said Jalil needed to go to court in order to get a police report, REFUSING TO TAKE A REPORT!, and
9) Dep. Sayles said it’s a civil matter 8 Times! NOT a criminal matter.
    THIS VIDEO PROVIDES PROOF THAT SHERIFF’S DEPT. MARKITA SAYLES LIED ABOUT THE ENTIRE “POLICE REPORT”! Sayles “event/police report” states:

“RP (Reporting Party, Abdul-Jalil) UPSET THAT HIS VEHICLE THAT UNDER THE AUTO REPAIR SHOP HAS DAMAGE. THE AUTO BODY SHOP STILL HAS CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE AND THE VEHILCE HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED TO THE RP. THE RP WAS ADVISED THE MATTER WAS CIVIL. THE RP WAS ADAMENT THE THERE IS A CRIME EVEN THOUGH DEPS TOLD HIM IT WAS CIVIL. THE RP WAS UPSET AND DEMANDED A REPORT. WHEN ASKED WHAT WE WERE INVESTIGATING THE RP SAID THAT WOULD BE UP TO US. NO REPORT TAKEN”

—
Creating and Edvocating Relevant Social Service Programs Attachments:

EBAC AlaCo Sheriff Sanchez Compel Subpeona Prod Docs Dec:PA 5:18:25.pdf

392 KB

“In another religion they honor people who serve like you with Sainthood!” – Economics Professor Adeel Malik,Oxford University, England and World Renowned News Expert Commentator, speaking about Abdul-Jalil and the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation.

“GOD sent me an ANGEL!” – Hammer, speaking about Abdul-Jalil.

“Jalil, YOU ARE A TZADIK (SAINT)!”– Barry Barkan, Live Oak Institute and

Ashoka Fellow at Ashoka Foundation:Innovators for the Public

“I thank God for you and for bringing you into my life and for the ministry you have been given to help the people of God!”– Pastor L. J. Jennings, Kingdom Builders Christian Fellowship, speaking about Abdul-Jalil and AMWF

Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, c.1971

In 1971 Abdul-Jalil had the HONOR of having his portrait painted by Beauford Delaney, hailed as the most important African-American artists of the 20th century, whose life appeared to symbolize the mythical artistic existence of privation and relative obscurity, that show a retrospective of “uninhibited colorist (though never an unintelligent one)” that is “apotheosized” and whose talent and “free, open and outgoing nature” engendered admiration from everyone whom was fortunate enough to encounter him as he was THE darling of the international culture scene in New York and Paris. James Baldwin called him his “spiritual father.”

Beauford Delaney is ranked among the Top 10 globally, and in United States. Delaney’s best rank was in 1944, the artist’s rank has improved over the last 5 years, with the most dramatic change in 1992.

His list of friends and acquaintances including artists, World Leaders, politicians, activist, authors/poets/writers, intellectuals, filmmakers, promoted by numerous patrons of the arts, world Cultural Ambassadors, art gallery owners, befriended by notable figures, and musicians Stuart Davis — his closest painter compatriot — W.E.B. Du Bois (whose portrait he painted), Salvadore Dalí (whose portrait he painted), Countee Cullen, Louis Armstrong (whose portrait he painted), Duke Ellington (whose portrait he painted), Ethel Waters (whose portraits he painted), W.C. Handy (whose portrait he painted), Henry Miller (who wrote a tribute to him), John F. Kennedy (whose portraits he painted), Robert Kennedy (whose portraits he painted), Jean-Claude Killy (whose portraits he painted), Herb Gentry, Alain Locke, Cy Twombly, Sterling Brown, Langston Hughes, Georgia O’Keeffe (who drew charcoal and pastel portraits of Delaney in 1943), Augusta Savage, Stuart Davis, John Marin, Pablo Picasso (whose portrait he painted), Richard A. Long (whose portrait he painted), John Koenig (whose portrait he painted), and Claude McKay were connected to Paris in various ways.

Josephine Baker

Luminaries Josephine Baker, Bob Blackburn, Ed Clark, Bob Thompson, Marian Anderson (whose portrait he painted), Jacob Lawrence, Ella Fitzgerald (whose portrait he painted), Zora Neale Hurston, Alfred Stieglitz, Carl Van Vechten, Edward Steichen, Dorothy Norman, Anaïs Nin, art studio owner Charles Alston, Jackson Pollock, Vassili Pikoula, Henri Chahine (whose portrait he painted), Charlie Parker (whose portrait and music he painted.), James Jones, Jean Genet, Lawrence Calcagno, Cab Calloway, Elaine DeKooning, Palmer C. Hayden (whose portrait he painted), art dealer Darthea Speyer (whose portrait he painted) who had exhibitions of Delaney's art at Paris' Galerie Lambert in 1964. Others include artists Charles Boggs, Al Hirschfeld, John Franklin Koenig, Harold Cousins, Herbert Gentry (whose portrait he painted), Ed Clark, and Ellis Wilson, authors James Jones and Henry Miller (who was also a water colorist), Writers Richard Wright, Surrealist poet Stanislas Rodanski, Chester Himes, Ralph Ellison, William Gardner Smith, Richard Gibson, Lorraine Hansberry, Ted Joans, art historian Richard A. Long, and his friend Lynn Stone.

* * TESTIMONIALS ON ABDUL-JALIL * *

Emanuel Steward on Jalil

Emanuel Steward, Evander Holyfield, and Hammer in ring with Heavyweight Title Belts

“The Man who turns hits into MILLION$.” – The Tribune.
“You really are the BEST.” – L. BOSTOCK, California Angels.
“GOD sent me an Angel” – M.C. HAMMER.
“Smart Youth, most intriguing, has the Baseball world at his feet.” – N.Y. POST .

“Thanks for getting the Deal DONE Jalil!”- Evander “Real Deal” Holyfield, the only boxer in history to win the undisputed championship in two weight classes (cruiserweight in the late 1980s and at heavyweight in the early 1990s).

Reggie's Prayer

“Jalil, I told everybody that you guys are representing me!”- Reggie "the Minister of Defense" White, two-time NFL Defensive Player of the Year, Super Bowl XXXI champion, 13-time Pro Bowl, holds second place all-time among NFL career sack leaders with 198 (behind Bruce Smith's 200 career sacks). He was selected to the NFL 75th Anniversary All-Time Team, NFL 100th Anniversary All-Time Team, NFL 1990s All-Decade Team, and the NFL 1980s All-Decade Team. White is a member of the College Football Hall of Fame and the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

Deion "Prime Time" Sanders playing with Atlanta Braves and Atlanta Falcons at the same time!

“You are going to have to deal with him (Jalil) now!”- Deion “Prime Time” Sanders to Atlanta Braves and Atlanta Hawks former President and General Manager Stan Kasten and Atlanta Braves General Manager John Schuerholz

“I don’t know what I would have done without you!.” – J.C. WATTS, U.S. HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES.
“Thanks for directing me to the Sonics.” – GUS WILLIAMS, NBA.
“Imaginative, foresighted, some pretty impressive credentials. His I.Q. QUALIFIES HIM AS A GENIUS.” – UPI .
“That’s the finest promotion job for an unknown athlete that I have ever seen.” – N.Y. JETS.
“I’m so happy!! I’m full of money!!” – C. ROBINSON, NBA.
“He is personable, unafraid, confident. and athletes are attracted to him” – D. MAGGARD, U.S. Olympic Committee.
“You have never been wrong” – EMANUEL STEWARD, Boxing
“He told me what he wanted, we shook hands. We made the deal in 5 minutes.” – B. BAVASI, California Angels

Superstar Management’s Podcast

For the BEST in Pro Sports and Entertainment

itunes pic
Part 2 of 2 Interviews of Abdul-Jalil, Nanita Strong and Imam Wali Mohammed on AmericanMuslim360 (AM360)
Abdul-Jalil, Nanita Strong and Imam Wali Mohammed discuss Feeding the needy on AmericanMuslim360 (AM360)in Part 2 of 2 Interviews by Niamat Shaheed.
AmericanMuslim360 (AM360)
AmericanMuslim360 Premium Channel is about Islam and being Muslim in American. AmericanMuslim360 has programing space available for Muslims who wish to host their own show. AM360 goal is to become a Network Channel in 2013, creating the AmericanMuslim360 Network Channel broadcasting an Islamic focused, 24/7 Muslim hosted Internet radio. If you wish to be a part of this progressive Community Life building effort, then host or move your show to AM360 Premium Channel. Connect Thomas Abdul-Salaam at www.AmericnMuslim360.com for details. Programing needs : Muslimah2Muslimah, Finance, Education, Economic Development, Brother2Brother, Youth, Music/Hip-Hop, Sports, News, Entertainment, Weather, Fashion, Business2Business, Social Issues, Politics, Movie Reviews, Arts, Stock Market, Islamic History, Hadith, Quran, Prophet Muhammad, Imam Warith Deen Mohammed, Jumah, Arabic, Taleem, How-to shows, and more.

Search Episodes

Part 2 of 2 Interviews of Abdul-Jalil, Nanita Strong and Imam Wali Mohammed on AmericanMuslim360 (AM360)

January 17, 2013

Abdul Jalil

Part 1 of 2 Interviews of Abdul-Jalil on AmericanMuslim360 (AM360)

January 17, 2013

Abdul Jalil

KNBR Law of Sports broadcast on “Bounce, The Don Barksdale Story”

December 13, 2010

Abdul Jalil

Law of Sports w-AJ, Doug, Ivan 12-4-10

December 5, 2010

Abdul Jalil

KGO Radio’s broadcast discussion of “Out. The Glenn Burke Story”

November 22, 2010

Abdul Jalil

Hip Hop and The Spread of Islam Part 1 of 2

June 19, 2009

Abdul Jalil

National Balsa Law Conference Part 2 of 2

June 19, 2009

Abdul Jalil

National Balsa Law Conference Part 1 of 2

June 19, 2009

Abdul Jalil

Search Results placeholder

Name *

First

Last

Cell and Home/Work Phone Numbers

Email *

Comment or Message *

Please note that this information has been gathered to help us provide Your Client with a service that will meet their needs. They should not fail to provide information required of them and which is relevant to this application for legal aid/assistance. Be assured that the information we have requested is essential to our understanding and how best to satisfy your current request and future needs, and that it will remain completely confidential. Please watch for an e-mail from us after we have reviewed your request. They MUST provide all documents to us in connection with this application for legal aid/assistance and it is a crime to present information that is false or misleading and they MUST NOT make a false or misleading statement either orally or in writing in relation to this application for legal aid/assistance and therefore declare that all the information they have given is true and correct. The information will be treated in STRICT CONFIDENCE. By submitting this form, you agree to ALL conditions herein and I Accept NOWTRUTH’s Terms of Submission. *

Who We Serve

We provide FREE groceries, clothing, shoes, hygiene kits, sleeping bags, blankets, medicine, and hot chef’s prepared gourmet meals to the homeless and homeless encampments and habitations of ALL kinds, from the streets to parks, from trees and bushes to alleys, from corners to ditches, from hand built shanties to tents under freeway overpasses!

Homeless encampment under the freeway on Peralta and 35th streets in Oakland, Calif.

We provide FREE groceries, bagged and hot chef’s prepared gourmet meals, plus the above, to the Oakland Safe Parking Program and the CAREavan Safe Parking Programs, among others, at local senior and community centers, and faith based organizations in an effort to provide families and/or individuals who have been displaced and are temporarily homeless, living in their vehicles and need a safe place to park and sleep overnight, with restrooms and an attendant present throughout the night at all of the locations.

We also provide food to those that had previously obtained necessary items at their Senior Center. But now that they’re closed are vital to the wellness of the community and senior population with our Food Bank program and Free Farmers Market Food Give-Aways.

Our HISTORIC Hammer “Rap-The-Vote Concert Series” Secured Re-Election of Russian President Boris Yeltsin AND Spawned Rise of Vladamir Putin to Power!

Our HISTORIC Hammer “Rap-The-Vote Concert Series” Secured Re-Election of Russian President Boris Yeltsin AND Spawned Rise of Vladamir Putin to Power!

“As long as there are reformers in the Russian Federation and the other states leading the journey toward democracy's horizon, our strategy must be to support them. And our place must be at their side.” -President Bill Clinton on the re-election of Russian President Boris Yeltsin in 1995-

This 1995 event is a WORLD HISTORIC perspective about how our “WORLD ALTERING” Urban-American, western style, political campaign strategy utilizing M. C. Hammer in a “Rap-The-Vote Concert Series” secured the 18-45 voter turnout and the re-election of Russian President Boris Yeltsin in 1995 with the “Our Home Is Russia” (NDR), a Russian liberal political party. Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim devised a strategic plan, executive produced, produced, filmed and broadcast on Russian National TV a series of concerts in St. Petersburg, Moscow, and the WORLD. This campaign tactic was their most effective strategy, greatest strength- uniquely different and vastly superior to anything Russia had ever witnessed. This comprehensive, targeted attack with our expertise well grounded in modern focused campaigning strategy, advertising, marketing, and promotions was trumpeted for saving Russian democracy with Yeltsin’s re-election ensuring continuity in the Democratic evolution of Russia and securing world peace. The television programming was so successful that it has regularly run on air since 1995!

At the time we began our concerts and campaign events over the weeks in St. Petersburg, Vladimir Putin was then Deputy mayor of St. Petersburg, organized the St. Petersburg branch of the Party Our Home Is Russia, was it’s Chairman, and led the campaign issue of the party in the elections to the Duma that led to his rise to power and being named President of Russia by Boris Yeltsin.

This strategy was trumpeted for saving Russian democracy with Yeltsin’s re-election ensuring continuity in the Democratic evolution of Russia and securing world peace!

This strategy was heralded world wide by political pundits as “incredibly brilliant”, a “triumph for democratic reform” and “universally invaluable” in it’s effect of having “saved” Russian democracy, as Yeltsin was the only alternative in ensuring continuity in the evolution of Russia and securing world peace.

This coup, a miraculous event in history, was depicted and canonized in the 2004 film “Spinning Boris” starring Jeff Goldblum, Anthony LaPaglia and Liev Schreiber.

“Spinning Boris” The Best President of Russia America Ever Had ..L. A. Times Review

Jeff Goldblum, Anthony LaPaglia and Liev Schreiber star as a trio of elite American political campaign operatives who were hired in secret to manage Russian President Boris Yeltsin’s election campaign in 1996. He’s polling at 6 percent with the election a few months away. First, they must get someone’s attention; they succeed finally with Yeltsin’s daughter, then it’s polling, focus groups, messages and spin. Even as Yeltsin’s numbers go up, they are unsure who hired them and if Yeltsin’s allies have a different plan in mind than victory. When the going gets toughest, they put a spin on their stake: democracy and capitalism must win. They orchestrate the most spectacular political comeback of the twentieth century – as they “sold” Boris Yeltsin to the Russian public gaining Yeltsin’s successful re-election.

Excerpts of the Re-election of Russian President Boris Yeltsin in “Clinton Secrets”, a book by JOHN DIAMOND, Associated Press Writer

The campaign tactic was their most effective strategy, greatest strength- uniquely different and vastly superior to anything Russia had ever witnessed. This strategic plan with our expertise well grounded in modern American campaigning got Yeltsin re-elected. This was simply a matter of fact that he was the best the modern world could get compared to the alternative communist and he was fully supported by the U.S.

A State Department memorandum, marked “confidential,’’ summarized then President Bill Clinton’s meeting with Yeltsin at a summit in Egypt, where Clinton told Yeltsin he ”wanted to make sure that everything the United States did would have a positive impact and nothing should have a negative impact’’ on Yeltsin’s re-election. The memo added the U. S. wanted an upcoming summit with the Russian leader to be successful to “reinforce everything that Yeltsin had done.’’

THIS BLACK HISTORY IS WORLD HISTORY!

Abdul-Jalil was honored in Miami, Florida and Haiti—

World Conference of Mayors 2010- Abdul-Jalil was honored in Miami, Florida and Haiti, for the Relief Missions to Arch Bishop Joel Jeune of Grace Village in Haiti

they received from the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation, Stepping Together and Superstar Management with recognition of The World Conference of Mayors (WCM) and The National Conference of Black Mayors (NCBM). This is a tangible reality of SUCCESS in Haiti for ALL the members of the organizations world-wide rather than the many idle cocktail party rants and raves of projects that exist without any substance behind them!
Page One of Letter

Page Two of Letter

2005- Federal Complaint with United States Attorney General, Department of Justice, of Hate Crime of Islamophobia and Xenophobia
In 2005 he filed a federal complaint with the United States Attorney General, Department of Justice, of a hate crime of Islamophobia and Xenophobia committed against him by Judge David C. Lee during a trial in Superior Court of Alameda County, California, that is moving forward with the investigation and charges of criminal extrinsic fraud upon the court of the State of California, spoliation of evidence, and the doctrine “unclean hands” against defendants/hostile intervener AAA Insurance; Ron Cook and the law firm of WILLOUGHBY, STUART & BENING; defense counsel Steve Barber and the law firm of Ropers Majeski; and others. The complaint, drafted and filed by al-Hakim in pro per, has broad based support from Democrats and Republicans, was submitted by Congresswoman Barbara Lee with the offices of Congressmen John Conyers, and Charles Rangel, has been review by several legal experts, with advocacy by former Republican Senator J. C. Watts, a client of al-Hakim’s.
The complaint addresses the concern that a Superior Court Judges’ conduct rose to the level of consideration for a Federal Crime and a Civil Rights violation because the bench upon which the judge rules is “under the color of law” and certainly the violation of anyone’s civil rights is a federal crime. “Muslims, just as any other group, can not be afraid to speak up when their rights have been abridged. If one does not speak up, then the transgressions goes unreported and the perpetrator goes on to harm again unchecked, it does not matter whom the transgressor is” said al-Hakim. The complaint, perhaps even more importantly, not only requested Merrily Friedlander, Chief of the Civil Rights Division, to make an investigation of a judicial hate crime, but also the many other civil rights and due process violations of judicial misconduct, and attorney extrinsic fraud upon the court and law that are themselves directly the matters complained. J. C. Watts in asking “What does a supposed terrorist act in Russia have to do with the negligent contamination of a home in America?” posed the argument that there must be consideration of and a response to the many issues in the complaint.

2003- al-Hakim Prevails in Motion to Vacate the Appraisal Awards Against CSAA
In February 2003 after 3 years of defendants legal delays with ten motions for terminating sanctions to prevent the motion from being heard, al-Hakim prevailed in his Motion to Vacate the Appraisal awards against CSAA. (View or download Order here http://www.box.net/shared/n10p7erncv)
The courts found that the awards had to be vacated if, among other grounds, “the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or other undue means”; or the appraisers(A. Michael DeCeasare, Ruben Estrada, Ron Magin and Gene Roberts) “exceeded their powers and the award cannot be corrected without affecting the merits of the decision upon the controversy submitted”. The order further cited the improper use of “cash value” as replacement cost, use of erroneous “used cost” figures, denial of coverage, injection of fraud, concealment, breach of contract, and coverage issues without any reason or evidence, CSAA could not defend their actions nor those of their own appraiser. What the court did not address in the motion to vacate was the actual collusion and fraud again perpetrated upon the court by the defendant Ron Cook and the hostile intervener when they provided to and the appraisal panel adopted the improper “cash values” used in the vacated award and the exhibits to support them came directly from the presentation of CSAA’s expert Gary Halpin at the vacated appraisal, and that the fraudulent award itself was further prepared, written, submitted and distributed by defendant Cook and the hostile intervener. This victory locks CSAA in on the Bad Faith actions we submitted to the courts and are subject to summary judgment.

Abdul-Jalil negotiated a series of contracts that included many unprecedented benefits to the individual clients, one of which was interest-free loans that could be forgiven. Upon review by the Internal Revenue Service, the contracts and returns where thrown out and challenged by the IRS as the IRS filed suit. After an 8 year legal battle, he prevailed in Federal Tax Court and established that Interest free Loans where in fact legal. This unprecedented legal ruling was established as a standard in the Tax Laws and was written in several National Law Journals. Cite:

“IRS vs Al-Hakim” published by Commerce Clearing House(CCH) Tax Court Memorandum Cases editions KF 6234A 505 and Maxwell McMillian (Prentice Hall) Federal Tax Cases edition KF 6234A 512 Tax Court Memorandum Decisions. Articles and citations available upon request….
The Historic “al-Hakim” Tax Code §7872 [692] Ruling
After al-Hakim’s victory in the Federal Tax Courts against the Tax Commissioner, in

Abdul-Jalil

December 2000 the IRS moved to change the Tax Codes with the historic “al-Hakim” Tax Code §7872 [692] Ruling. The IRS changed the Federal Tax Codes such that it now “prevents no-interest loans” and was instituted to eliminate and close the Federal Income Tax loop-hole created with al-Hakim’s use of interest free loans in sports and entertainment financial transactions.
CITE: Tax Notes, Dec. 4, 2000, p. 1311; 89 Tax Notes 1311 (Dec. 4, 2000) “al-Hakim Tax Code” Ruling
al-Hakim’s victory in the Federal Tax Court over the U. S. Tax Commissioner has the nations foremost academic institutions and academians in the study of Law and Business teaching al-Hakim’s use of interest free loans in Tax Free financial transactions as part of the Law and Business curriculum in such hallowed halls as Harvard University, Yale University,Washington University, Stanford University, University of Virginia, and Wake Forest University Schools of Law Federal Tax Courses, among others.

Abdul-Jalil negotiated a series of contracts that included many unprecedented benefits to the individual clients, one of which was interest-free loans that could be forgiven. Upon review by the Internal Revenue Service, the contracts and returns where thrown out and challenged by the IRS as the IRS filed suit. After an 8 year legal battle, he prevailed in Federal Tax Court and established that Interest free Loans where in fact legal. This unprecedented legal ruling was established as a standard in the Tax Laws and was written in several National Law Journals. Cite: “IRS vs Al-Hakim” published by Commerce Clearing House(CCH) Tax Court Memorandum Cases editions KF 6234A 505 and Maxwell McMillian (Prentice Hall) Federal Tax Cases edition KF 6234A 512 Tax Court Memorandum Decisions. Articles and citations available upon request….
The Historic “al-Hakim” Tax Code §7872 [692] Ruling
After al-Hakim’s victory in the Federal Tax Courts against the Tax Commissioner, in

Abdul-Jalil