Please Support AMWFT Efforts with Your Secure Paypal Sponsorship Donation

Sponsorship of a Benefit!

Man Who Turn$ HIt$ Into Million$

Man Who Turn$ HIt$ Into Million$

Ed Snowden PRISM Whistleblower Part 1

Ed Snowden PRISM Whistleblower Part 1

BORP Sponsor Poster

Jalil & AMWFT Sponsor Wheelchair Basketball Tournament

Ed Snowden PRISM Whistleblower Part 2

Ed Snowden PRISM Whistleblower Part 2

Distribution of Wealth in America

Distribution of Wealth in America

KGO Radio Conversation On "OUT. The Glenn Burke Story"

KGO Radio Conversation On "OUT. The Glenn Burke Story"

Oink’Malley & Carson Coontoon

Occupiers Redeem Kings Dream While Keith Carson and His Poverty Pimps are Killers of Kings Dream- Sell It Out

Alameda DA Nancy Oink'Malley & Supervisor Keith Carson Civil Rights Violations & Corruption!

Jalil on ESPN/KNBR Sports Radio

Jalil on ESPN/KNBR Sports Radio

Oakland City Attorney John Russo's Political Suicide

Jalil Enshrined in “Who’s Who”

Jalil Enshrined in "Who's Who"

“Reppin Superstar Pro Athletes & Entertainers”

Superstar Managements Lecture Series "Reppin Superstar Pro Athletes & Entertainers"

Purchase SUPERSTAR MANAGEMENT Lecture Series

Lecture Series Purchase Prices

Previous Posts

Oscar Grant's "Fruitvale Station"

Oscar Grant's "Fruitvale Station"

Call Us Free Here

Drug Agents Use Vast Phone Trove of AT&T and DEA Surveillance Records

Drug Agents Use Vast Phone Trove of AT&T and DEA Surveillance Records

Click “Discuss on ooVoo” on any page for Video Chat

1995 Pizza Hut Commercial with Deion Sanders and Jerry Jones

1995 Pizza Hut Commercial with Deion Sanders and Jerry Jones

Portrait of Abdul-Jalil by Artist Buford Delaney in Paris, France

Portrait of Abdul-Jalil by Artist Buford Delaney in Paris, France

Black Sports Leaders Summitt on Civil Rights

Black Sports Leaders Summitt on Civil Rights

Santa Fe Elementary School's Peace March with Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation

Santa Fe Elementary School's Peace March with Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation

Nowtruth Pages

Nowtruth Documents Box

ABDUL-JALIL AL-HAKIM’s Reply Declaration in Attorney General, Judges, and DA Admitted Fraud and Extortion

ABDUL-JALIL AL-HAKIM

7633 Sunkist Drive

Oakland, CA  94605

Tel: (510) 394-4501

Defendant

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

Joette al-Hakim-Hall, Alameda County

District Attorney Nancy O’Malley, Alameda County Director of Child Support Services Matthew Brega, Kamala Harris, Attorney General of State of California and Does 1 through 100, inclusively,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Abdul-Jalil aI-Hakim,

Defendant,

Case No.:C-556643-7

Defendant’s Reply Declaration in Support of Motion for Review of License Denial

Date: July 21, 2014

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Location: Hayward Hall of Justice

Department 508

Hearing Date: July 21, 2014

 

I, Abdul-Jalil al- Hakim, declare:

1. I am the Defendant herein and if called as a witness, I would and could competently testify to the following facts, all of which are within my personal knowledge, except as to those matters based upon information and belief, and on that basis, allege them to be true and correct.

2. That I am self employed for over 40 years and my driving privilege is basic and essential to my profession, for the economic survival of my family, and our joint pursuit of happiness.

3. On June 12, 2014 I filed a Motion for Review of License Denial. On June 23, 2014 that Motion complete with Declaration, Points and Authorities, and Judicial Notice was served on the Parties via personal service, fax, U. S. mail and email. It was also served on Superior Court Judges Winifred Smith, C. Don Clay, Stephen Pulido, U. S. Attorney Director- No. District Melinda Haag, U. S. Chief District Judge Claudia Wilken, Superior Court Commissioner  Boydine Hall, and County Supervisor Keith Carson.

4. As of July 10, 2014 ALL THE PARTIES HAVE FAILED AND REFUSED TO RESPOND TO THE MOTION as there has been no communication from ANY of the Parties.

5. The EVIDENCE, FACTS and TRUTH in this case are uncontested and irrefutable.

6. In June 1993 Defendant Abdul-Jalil aI-Hakim was ordered to pay $350 per month as child support for his daughter Bari al-Hakim to the mother, Joette Hall(FSD # 044308A) in the above entitled matter. Of this amount $250 represented current support and $100 was for payment of accrued arrears. At the same time I was ordered to pay $100 per month toward arrears to Patty Flenory (FSD # 274454A) in the separate District Attorney enforcement action no. 511339.

7. In February, 1998 my child support obligation to Joette Hall ended because the daughter reached the age of 18 years old.

8. I have always denied owing arrears to Joette Hall and provided all of the receipts for payments made since 1992 (certain payments were made by my attorney at the time, Ed Bell, who did not receive receipts for these payments). The District Attorney acknowledged that there was a mistake. I attached a letter that was sent to me with copies sent to the mothers by District Attorney Tom Orloff apologizing for the error in the application of the funds and ascertaining these facts in October 19, 1999. They indicated that it would take up to six months to research the matter. Among the many responses that I have gotten from the District Attorney’s office is that “since this was a non-welfare case, the money has been paid out and there is nothing that the District Attorney could do” to get the money back”.

9. I had always made payments to the District Attorney, but adamantly refuse to pay the extortion and again renewed my objection to such action on behalf of the District Attorney and advised that I would not be liable for any miscalculations, partial payments, late payments, interest, or penalties as a result of their continued willful fraud in the misapplication of the funds I paid on that account, and dereliction on their behalf.

10. The District Attorney and DCSS has sought many, many ways and attempts to extort money from me to pay their fraudulent violation of the prevailing court order and their fiduciary responsibility to my then minor child with the outstanding order for payment of support.

11. I have made many, many reasonable and good faith attempts to resolve the matter with Department of Child Support Services (DCSS) ALLEGING to “represent” Plaintiffs and have realized that further efforts will probably be futile or unduly burdensome because Plaintiffs have failed and refused to properly respond in the past as recently as this motion.

12. The child support orders and their violation by the DA , AG and DCSS, which are the nexus in this case, was entered requiring al-Hakim to make his child support payments through the District Attorney’s office as the court trustee for the family with the fiduciary responsibility to comply with the court’s order, receipt for payment, and the proper disbursement pursuant thereto. al-Hakim and the DA agreed with this process because there were claims in the past of payments being made as gifts, as opposed to being truthful payments of child support that resulted in the arrearage that the court has awarded in another case that is now settled.

13. In spite of the courts orders for DCSS to compile the actual accounting of the complete proper application of the child support payments al-Hakim made pursuant the court orders of December 1992, February 5, 2007 complete with al-Hakim’s submitted documents and pleadings commensurate with the court orders for child support, DCSS’s own receipts in his possession and the law, DCSS refused to do as ordered! In defiance of the courts orders and effectuating their extortionate scheme, the DCSS continued to fail and refuse to properly apply the payments while placing 10 year holds and suspensions on al-Hakim’s drivers license with the California Department of Motor Vehicles with the intent of al-Hakim being arrested and harmed physically and financially; revoked his passport despite; illegally charging al-Hakim with the crime of violating the child support statute for nonpayment, reporting the alleged violation to multiple collection agencies and the State of California for Collection, illegally tossing al-Hakim into “debtors prison” ruining his credit; all this despite  multiple court orders for their release and the accounts being current, in their attempt to force al-Hakim and Family to pay for the DCSS defrauding THEM!

14. THERE IS NO ARREARAGE IN THIS CASE.

15. I have and will suffer immediate and irreparable harm because my drivers license and passport travel privileges were suspended on October 29, 2006 and prior. It is terribly oppressive and inhumanely punitive that I can not work nor support my family in the manner in which we have all become dependent on because I am unable to lawfully drive while my license has been unjustly suspended.

16. The DA and DCSS admitted extrinsic fraud upon the court and The People of the State of California is the only thing left of these cases and must now be finally ended, including the illegal holds on al-Hakim’s drivers license and passport.. The family ask this court to grant this Motion to in Interest of Justice.

17. Due to the DA and DCSS admitted extrinsic fraud upon the court and The People of the State of California, as the only evidence they have or can produce is the product of their admitted fraud order the release of al-Hakim’s drivers license and passport, and grant sanctions of ALL cost including professional costs associated with this case.

18. The ripple effect of the suspension is: no drivers license (suspended), no insurance; no insurance, no registration. As a direct result of this continuing persecution of the Family with their fraud, al-Hakim was finally issued a traffic citation for driving with a suspended license, no proof of insurance and no current registration on October 10, 2013. The arresting officer called for back-up and a tow truck to impound the truck that was filled with food for a free food distribution that al-Hakim’s family charity was having that day. This truck is used in the 57 year old Family charity for free food distribution to the needy. He told al-Hakim of the child support suspension and upon al-Hakim showing him court documents showing the order for the release of the hold and explaining the situation, he cancelled the tow truck and released al-Hakim to go on to the food distribution. This citation is further proof of the product of their admitted fraud, which includes the illegal holds on al-Hakim’s drivers license and passport.

19. On May 1, 2014  Defendant sent a 3 page letter to the Honorable Winifred Smith- Presiding Judge, Superior Court of California, C. Don Clay- Supervising Judge, Stephen Pulido- Presiding Judge Family Law, Judge The Hon. Melinda Haag- Director- No. District U. S. Attorney’s Office, The Hon. Claudia Wilken-Chief District Judge U. S. District Court- No. Division, Kamala D. Harris- Attorney General of California, Mr. Brega, Nancy O’Malley and County Supervisor Keith Carson, regarding our food truck, 1990 Isuzu-TROOPER with license plate# 5XOK965, though properly parked, was towed from a street in Berkeley because of no current registration. It was impounded and towed to:

East Bay Tow, 1210 7th St., Berkeley, CA 94710, (510) 559-8500

The charges are $160 for the tow, $75 per day for storage, and the registration and violations must be cleared and current before it can be released to me with my current valid drivers license.

20. On June 26, 2014  Defendant filed and served a letter/notice that I would not waive my right to have this matter heard by Commissioner Boydine Hall and served that notice on the Parties via personal service, fax and email. It was also served on Superior Court Judges Winifred Smith, C. Don Clay, Stephen Pulido, U. S. Attorney Director- No. District Melinda Haag, U. S. Chief District Judge Claudia Wilken and County Supervisor Keith Carson.

21. I had spent a total of 15 hours at a reduced corporate rate of $250 per hour on the motions therein for the first litigation with professional fees of $3,750 (15 x $250.00 per hour), and costs of $145 (process service costs of $75.00, copy costs of $30.00 and filing fees of $40.00) for a total costs of $3,895. I previously paid Attorney Brent Kernan $870.00 for his services in 1999 in resolving these same issues that I sought to resolve a second time with the total cost to resolve that matter of $4,765.00, then spent well over 95 hours at a reduced corporate rate of $250 per hour on this litigation for a third time with professional fees of $23,750 (95 x $250.00 per hour), and costs of $145 (process service costs of $75.00, copy costs of $30.00 and filing fees of $40.00) for costs of $23,895 for the total cost to resolve this matter up to this filing of  $24,620.00 for the previous actions, and will move this court for and the amount of fees, costs and sanctions according to proof for bringing this current action with sanctions and damages for the loss of income, pursuit of happiness, pain and suffering for the years of punitive depravation of my driving and traveling privileges.

22. That relief is imperative in this case in that I have suffered irreparable harm since my driving privilege was suspended when it is uncontested that I have complied with the orders and the account in question does not exist. Further, since I am forced to litigate this non-issue again I have needlessly incur thousands of dollars (including attorneys’ fees, professional fees and months of time in these legal proceeding) in a proceeding which will result in an award in favor of Defendant. I request the court:

  1. order the enforcement of the courts order of February 5, 2007 for the District Attorney’s fair and proper application and accounting of Defendant’s payments made in trust to the DA in their fiduciary capacity for the Hall account as per Defendant’s pleading, supported by Defendant’s submitted documents,
  2. officially close the Hall account with no arrearage owed;
  3. the D. A. is estopped from any attempt to collect any alleged arrearages,  the D. A. pay the arrearages that they themselves caused, and the alleged delinquent child support payments expunged from al-Hakim’s records;
  4. the immediate reinstatement of al-Hakim’s driving privilege and passport with all references to his license being suspended and passport being revoked expunged from his records;
  5. awarding Attorney’s and Professional Fees, and Sanctions as the professional services of the company has spent well over 95 hours at a reduced corporate rate of $250 per hour on this litigation for professional fees of $23,750 (95 x $250.00 per hour), and costs of $145 (process service costs of $75.00, copy costs of $30.00 and filing fees of $40.00) for current costs of $23,895. Appellant previously paid Attorney Brent Kernan $870.00 for his services in 1999 for the total cost to resolve this matter is $24,620.00 for the previous actions; and the amount of fees, costs and sanctions according to proof for bringing this current action Plaintiff’s counsel to pay appropriate sanctions to Defendant pursuant to CCP §2023(a)(9) in the total amount of $_______________;
  6. sanctions and damages for the loss of income, pursuit of happiness, pain and suffering for the years of punitive depravation of plaintiff’s driving and traveling privileges;
  7. return to al-Hakim $2400 in overpayments made to the then minor al-Hakim-Hall child; and
  8. the reversal of all vehicle registration violations and payment of East Bay Tow charges of $160 for the tow, $75 per day for storage;
  9. the immediate correction of al-Hakim’s credit status and all references to child support payments expunged from his records with sanctions and damages for illegally charging al-Hakim with the crime of violating the child support statute for nonpayment, reporting the alleged violation to multiple collection agencies and the State of California for Collection, illegally tossing al-Hakim into “debtors prison” ruining his credit; and
  10. this Court remands this case to the Civil Court trial level to continue further trial proceedings consistent with the requested decision and order for former and current Alameda County District Attorney Tom Orloff and Nancy O’Malley, former and current Director of Alameda County Child Support Services Maureen Lenahan and Matthew Brega, former and current Attorney General of State of California Jerry Brown and Kamala Harris, their staff’s, agents and contractors face charges for committing Extrinsic Fraud Upon the Court, Prosecutorial Misconduct, Willful and Malicious Prosecution, Conflict of Interest, Obstruction of Justice, Denial of Due Process, Willful and Intentional Fabrication and Authoring False Evidence; Misrepresentation and Concealment of Material Facts, among others, as demanded.

23. That I am not an attorney and I am not currently represented by counsel. I am unfamiliar with judicial procedure, unable to conduct depositions, answer pleadings, file oppositions and the necessary motions to competently litigate this case so that it can be decided on it’s merits and not my inability to serve as an attorney.

I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed this 10th day of July, 2014.

 

____________________________

ABDUL-JALIL al-HAKIM

Defendant

 

Attorney General, Judges, D. A. Obstructed Justice, Extorting Victim, Impounds Truck

ABDUL-JALIL al-HAKIM

7633 SUNKIST DR.,   OAKLAND,  CA    94605-3024  (510) 394-4501

 

TO:The Hon. Stephen Pulido                    Matthew A. Brega

Presiding Judge Family Law Court          Director- D C. S. S.

Superior Court of California                      Alameda County District Attorney

County of Alameda                                      5669 Gibraltar Drive

24405 Amador Street                                 Pleasanton, CA 94588-8547

Hayward, CA 94544                                    Fax No.: 925 468-9008

Fax No.: 510 690-2824

 

TO:The Hon. Winifred Smith                   The Hon. C. Don Clay

Presiding Judge                                           Supervising Judge

Superior Court of California                     Superior Court of California

County of Alameda                                     County of Alameda

1225 Fallon St., Dept #1                            1225 Fallon St., Dept.#6

Oakland, CA 94612                                    Oakland, CA 94612

Fax No.: 510 891-6276                               Fax No.: 510 891-6276

 

TO:The Hon. Melinda Haag                      The Hon. Claudia Wilken

Director- No. District                                  Chief District Judge

U. S. Attorney’s Office                                U. S. District Court- No. Division

Federal Courthouse 6th Floor                  Oakland Courthouse- 2

450 Golden Gate Avenue                          1301 Clay Street

San Francisco, CA 94102                           Oakland, CA 94612

Fax No.: (415) 436-7234                            FAX No.: 415 522-3605

 

TO:The Hon. Kamala D. Harris

Attorney General of California

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

FAX No.: (916) 324-8835

cc: Keith Carson, Nancy O’Malley, B. Hofmann- DCSS

FROM: Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim

DATE: May 1, 2014

NO PAGES: 3

RE: The immediate reinstatement of my driving privilege and passport with all references to my license being suspended and passport being revoked expunged from my records and the reversal of all vehicle registration violations; Stipulation in Superior Court Case #511339-2.

Dear Judges Pulido, Smith, Clay, Haag, Wilken, A. G. Harris and Dir. Brega,

Judge Pulido, in my letter to you dated April 1, 2014 I requested the court to order the immediate reinstatement of my driving privilege and passport with all references to my license being suspended and passport being revoked expunged from my records and the reversal of all vehicle registration violations, and the recognition of the Stipulation my Family submitted to the court for endorsement on December 19, 2013. Nothing has happened on your end and today there was a notice that you can’t take that position any longer.

At 2:00 pm today our food truck, 1990 Isuzu-TROOPER with license plate# 5XOK965, though properly parked, was towed from a street in Berkeley because of no current registration. It was impounded and towed to:

East Bay Tow

1210 7th St

Berkeley, CA 94710

(510) 559-8500

The charges are $160 for the tow, $75 per day for storage, and the registration and violations must be cleared and current before it can be released to me with my current valid drivers license.

I called Mr. Brega and left a message for him with Ricca Alcantara and explained to her what happened with the truck and gave her some background information including the fact that she had called me several times herself. I later received a call from B. Hofmann in the DCSS and discussed the matter with her as well.

As you well know Judge Pulido, in furtherance of their obstruction of justice and attempted extortion of the family, the District Attorney and DCSS has failed and refused to submit any of the releases of child support holds my drivers license to the California State Department of Motor Vehicles for nearly ten years! This despite court orders to do so and the accounts being current. We have directed the Court’s attention to the fact that as recent as November 28, 2006, the court ordered the holds and suspension of my drivers license released in the al-Hakim-Hall case, which only left the case that was current in payment that is now settled and should not have had a suspension for non payment nor delinquency.

District Attorney and DCSS has tried to further their litigation, legislative, and political strategies to compel their enforcement strategy, extortionate scheme to force me to pay their fraudulent arrears including enforcement in multiple jurisdictions by placing illegal and unwarranted holds on my drivers license with the California Department of Motor Vehicles with the intent of my being arrested and harmed physically and financially; placing illegal and unwarranted holds on his passport with the State Department; and these efforts to use judgment enforcement for settlement leverage to undertake in the event they don’t prevail before the courts. These proceeding efforts are ongoing.

We just completed the matter of The People vs Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, Docket # WWM00000560171, Citation # 5330190 in Dept. 103 of the Traffic court on February 10, 2014 at 2:00 PM. for the alleged crime of driving with a suspended license, no current registration and no proof of insurance. The matter was dismissed.

For the foregoing reasons, I submitted that the Court MUST move to prosecute the District Attorney and DCSS for their admitted fraud and bribery in the proceedings and overturn the judgment as the illegitimate product of an partial court and order:

(1) the enforcement of the courts order of February 5, 2007 for the DA’s fair and proper application and accounting of al-Hakim’s payments made in trust to the DA in their fiduciary capacity for the minor al-Hakim-Hall account as per al-Hakim’s pleading, supported by al-Hakim’s submitted documents,

(2) officially close the al-Hakim-Hall account with nothing owed;

(3) the D. A.pay the arrearages that they themselves caused with the alleged delinquent child support payments expunged from his records;

(4) the immediate reinstatement of al-Hakim’s driving privilege and passport with all references to his license being suspended and passport being revoked expunged from his records;

(5) awarding Attorney’s and Professional Fees, Costs, and Sanctions for the total cost of $24,620.00;

(6) sanctions for the loss of income, pursuit of happiness, pain and suffering for the years of punitive depravation of al-Hakim driving privilege; and

(7) return to al-Hakim $2400 in overpayments made to the then minor al-Hakim-Hall child.

The cash register is ringing every minute that we do not have the use of the truck and damages are mounting. This MUST come to an end now!!!

There MUST be an immediate reinstatement of my driving privilege and passport with all references to my license being suspended and passport being revoked expunged from my records and the reversal of all vehicle registration violations so that we can register the truck and move on.

We presented the Stipulation to the Court and appreciate your signing where indicated, we all want this matter resolved immediately. We hand delivered the original and two copies to the Court for endorsement and filing and was to provide an endorsed filed copy to the Director of the Department of Child Support Services afterwards. We all look forward to resolving this matter as soon as possible.

I can be reached at (510) 394-4501 if you have any questions. Thanks’ for taking the time to endorse and return the Stipulation.

Respectfully,

Abdul-Jalil

Defendant

Judge “Orders” Rape Victim to Get Approval of “Rapist”, Defendant Targeted by D. A., Sheriff’s Deputy

ABDUL-JALIL al-HAKIM

7633 SUNKIST DR.,   OAKLAND,  CA    94605-3024  (510) 394-4501

 

TO:The Hon. Stephen Pulido                     Matthew A. Brega

Presiding Judge Family Law Court           Director- D C. S. S.

Superior Court of California                       Alameda County District Attorney

County of Alameda                                      5669 Gibraltar Drive

24405 Amador Street                                  Pleasanton, CA 94588-8547

Hayward, CA 94544                                    Fax No.: 925 468-9008

Fax No.: 510 690-2824

 

TO:The Hon. Winifred Smith                   The Hon. C. Don Clay

Presiding Judge                                           Supervising Judge

Superior Court of California                     Superior Court of California

County of Alameda                                     County of Alameda

1225 Fallon St., Dept #1                             1225 Fallon St., Dept.#6

Oakland, CA 94612                                    Oakland, CA 94612

Fax No.: 510 891-6276                              Fax No.: 510 891-6276

 

TO:The Hon. Melinda Haag                   The Hon. Claudia Wilken

Director- No. District Chief                    District Judge

U. S. Attorney’s Office                              U. S. District Court- No. Division

Federal Courthouse 6th Floor               Oakland Courthouse- 2

450 Golden Gate Avenue                       1301 Clay Street

San Francisco, CA 94102                       Oakland, CA 94612

Fax No.: (415) 436-7234                         FAX No.: 415 522-3605

 

TO:The Hon. Kamala D. Harris

Attorney General of California

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

FAX No.: (916) 324-8835

cc: Keith Carson, Nancy O’Malley

FROM: Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim

DATE: April 1, 2014

NO PAGES: 17

RE: Stipulation in Superior Court Case #511339-2; requesting security after being identified and targeted by the District Attorney and Sheriff’s Deputy.

Dear Judges Pulido, Smith, Clay, Haag, Wilken, A. G. Harris and Dir. Brega,

Judge Pulido, I am in possession of a letter to me from you dated February 5, 2014 allegedly in response to my letters of December 23, 2013 and January 9, 2014 regarding the Stipulation my Family submitted to the court for endorsement on December 19, 2013. You also CC: Presiding Judge Winifred Smith and Charlene Perry of Department of Child Support Services (DCSS).

Your letter and the requests contained therein would clearly disqualify you from ANY POSSIBLE INVOLVEMENT in this matter as a demonstrated conflict of interest, an abuse of discretion, obstruction of justice, and make you a co-conspirator in the DCSS’s continuing fraud upon The People of The Sate of California, the Superior Court and the al-Hakim Family, continuing their persecution of our family.

Let me get this straight- you are asking the al-Hakim Family, the victims of the DCSS’s near 30 year fraud, obstruction of justice and extortion, to submit to the DCSS, the perpetrators of that fraud, obstruction of justice and extortion, the  Stipulation and order, and upon the DCSS’s approval, provide the court with “evidence to support the requested relief”, then you might consider it’s approval as an order? Now that’s special!

Simply a casual perusal of the letters would confirm your requests are almost “mindless” in it’s response to any of our previous letters and request that we know you received! You can not be MORE WRONG nor possibly be that singularly uninformed and/or misinformed and be impartial without bias. This raises more questions about your ability to serve in this case justly while providing crucial answers that you can not avoid.

We fear it would be no less than a GREATER travesty of justice to allow the Superior Court, the District Attorney, and DCSS to proceed on ANY NOTION of standing to prosecute or defend their criminal actions without presenting this extensive and critically important evidence of fraud and we do not want to re-try the litigation. We don’t need to, the DCSS and the courts do! We don’t even have to submit this evidence to rebut the Superior Court, the District Attorney, DCSS’s fundamental-and fundamentally false-allegation as that order was NOT procured by fraud. The remedy is clear, the proper sanction for the willful admitted fraud upon the court and People of The State of California, of the evidence and witnesses is the exclusion of all tainted items.

The concerns outlined in this letter are not exhaustive and do not waive our ongoing objections to the court’s hearing this case with it’s unresolved jurisdictional issues such that we can NOT be tried by an impartial fact finder and other objections made by the family and our various counsel since the inception of these proceedings 30 years ago.

I will address your letter and the requests procedurally but there are unanswered questions from the previous letters and others raised by your requests herein.

1.)if in fact Judge Pulido you are handing this matter, in what capacity and jurisdiction are you acting? Is it as the Family Law Presiding Court Judge? Please explain how you were assigned this case and all your sources of knowledge of this case and their sources?

The family has accounts that confirm that the Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS and other representatives engaged in repeated ex-parte meetings and communications with judicial officials presiding over litigation involving the family, including meetings and communications relating to the case and stipulation with court administration personnel that has limited knowledge of civil law rules, both substantively and especially procedurally, including the selection of Judge Pulido to preside over this case. Such evidence would further establish the Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS ex-parte contacts are improper under the law and would also further prove the Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS were attempting to exert undue influence over this case. This evidence indicates that the Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS contacts were inappropriate and secret, if even through third parties.

The family believes the Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS nefarious and inappropriate “ordered” abandonment of the family’s right to settle the case and have the courts to acknowledge the stipulation without any civil law citations and no evidence of such to support the alleged ruling by a “judge” is untenable and designed to prevent efforts to move the case towards resolution. The family has every right, and very good reason, to seek an end to the individual persecution that they KNOW the Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS has been using as a way to extort the family, drag out the case and bleed their resources. We are requesting that the court immediately sign the order for the stipulation and noting that we realize that it should have already been ordered. By requesting that it be ordered, we are simply exercising our procedural right to that evidence.

The Family’s constitutional and common law right to a just order is particularly important in the instant case given the “terrorizing” nature and “nuclear” impact of the RICO statute and the continuing criminal nature of the Superior Court, the District Attorney and DCSS actions. As we have maintained repeatedly, we believe this case has been brought with this Court’s encouragement and your “order” that we resolve this matter with the DCSS is further evidence of that! This insidious “killer drone” is now personally wielded by you, the Superior Court, the District Attorney and DCSS as a retaliatory weapon to exact revenge against me and my Family for holding you all publicly accountable for the grave harm your reckless and criminal behavior has caused and continues to cause us. Given the stakes involved, how the Superior Court, the District Attorney and DCSS is caught in fraud and potential RICO actions; their blatant conspiracy against the family to deprive us of the Stipulation, previous fair trials; the private and public condemnation of the family with members of the judicial, law enforcement, political, legal and social communities; and the media; totally compromises our right to a fair process in every way; we believe it is only fair that we be granted our order.

If this Court were to continue to condone the District Attorney and DCSS’s handling of this case, it would be signaling that a private litigant’s desire to secure favorable, legal trial in a civil case warrants this obstruction of justice and it’s fixing cases with the admitted product and evidence of fraud and bribery is NOT a serious criminal matter, but a profitable legal strategy. This means the possibilities for abuse are limitless and regular.

The Court, District Attorney and DCSS are essentially operating a private racketeering program in service of a civil case. Because the al-Hakim family has exposed these egregious crimes for years the court, the District Attorney and DCSS has orchestrated a public relations and lobbying campaign designed to imbue the public consciousness with fear and suspicion regarding al-Hakim as a lawless and “dangerously angry black man” and now attempts to reap the fruits of the antipathy it has so deliberately sown. The Court, District Attorney and DCSS trashing of al-Hakim with impunity in these proceedings is the culmination of nearly three decades of cynical groundwork-laying.

2.)Judge Pulido, you state in your letter that you ONLY had my letters of December 23, 2013 and January 9, 2014 regarding the Stipulation before your response to me with your February 5, 2014 letter. That is NOT true!

On January 9, 2014, I was informed by the Sheriffs Department in Alameda Family Law Court that the stipulated order had allegedly been submitted to the Family Law Presiding Court Judge Stephen Pulido for endorsement. For nearly two months I have submitted letters to Judges Smith, Clay, Bean, and Pulido trying to ascertain the process to resolve these cases to no avail as there has been no response from the courts. However, in a phone call I placed to your clerk Kasha Clarke on February 3, 2014, seeking direction from the court on these pending matters of the drivers license suspension and the pending stipulated order awaiting court endorsement, she was unaware of any such action being taken and suggested that I file the motions and letters with the court for resolution.You have been faxed and personally delivered the following letters as well as their having been filed in both Traffic and Superior Courts:

A)Letter of December 16, 2014 to Superior Court Judges Clay, Pulido and Director Matthew A. Brega, 2 Pages

B)Letter of December 23, 2014 to Superior Court Judges Clay, Pulido, Bean and Clerk Michelle Esguerra, 2 Pages

C)Letter of January 7, 2014 to Superior Court Judges Clay, Pulido and Bean Commissioner Hendrickson, 2 Pages

D)Letter of January 9, 2014 to Superior Court Judges Smith, Clay, Pulido and Bean, 3 Pages

E)Letter of January 30, 2014 to Superior Court Judges Smith, Clay, Pulido Bean and Commissioner Hendrickson, 14 Pages

We have fax confirmations that the faxes were received by your offices, so you had ALL this documentation BEFORE you wrote the letter to me and are aware of their content and requests for answers from you. Is that true Judge Pulido?

3.)Judge Pulido, you state in your letter that the stipulation was rejected “after judicial review” because “the signature of each person who has signed the stipulation must be notarized”.

You further state “each judicial officer has the discretion to require that the signatures of self-represented litigants be notarized and also the discretion to set the matter for hearing”

First, what law and legal citations require the signatures of the parties to a stipulation be notarized?

What judicial officer exercised the discretion to require that the signatures of this stipulation be notarized and when? How was this process undertaken given the need for judicial review, and what was reviewed? Since the Family NEVER waived the right for a Commissioner to do so, it would have to have been reviewed by a judge. Have you reviewed this case in that same manner and legal context and when did you first see the Stipulation, if you have?

4.)You claim that “the above-entitled matter was commenced in 1998 and upon my review of the Register of Actions in this matter I have many questions regarding the procedural aspects of this case”

This matter is nearly three decades old, not since 1998, and a continuing story of the conflict between the al-Hakim Family with the District Attorney (DA) and the Department of Child Support Service (DCSS) that MUST be among the most extensively told in the history of the American judiciary.

This and other courts have previously described in detail the parties’ underlying dispute, which concerns the admitted willful fraud and extortionate scheme that the District Attorney and DCSS extensively exercised to persecute the family that they are liable for. The courts acceptance of ACDCSS’s known fraudulent accounting of the monies paid in trust to the DA for the minor al-Hakim-Hall child in their fiduciary capacity in defiance of the law and the courts December 1992, and February 5, 2007 orders with knowledge the accounting was totally in error, had no integrity, no legal basis, no factual support, no evidence of any actual disbursements and changed ten times with ACDCSS’s desired result creating this mythical $5,000 arrearage and open account.

As for the many questions you have regarding the procedural aspects of this case, the ONLY ones you need to be concerned about that you have any influence in can best be answered by Commissioner Glenn P. Oleon and the Department of Child Support Services and we don’t need to file an action for that, you can do that on your own motion.

As ALL the evidence and testimony is a matter of record, we don’t need to be present nor testify and they can’t because ALL the evidence is the inadmissible product of their admitted fraud and their prosecution subject to the crime-fraud exception. Prosecute them ALL! That’s what you should do and we DEMAND just that! The SAME thing that you would do if I HAD committed the same crimes the DA and DCSS committed in my name! This matter is ALREADY over, we/you can submit this case on Summary judgment and prevail without opposition.

You must acknowledge this evidence to establish the District Attorney and DCSS’s fundamental and fundamentally patently false-allegations of non-payment that the court issued judgment was procured by admitted willful fraud rebuts ANY argument that the Courts, District Attorney and DCSS can or should have EVER been able to make! The court MUST vacate that order and would be forced to under a Motion for Summary Judgment.

5.)You also claim that “The Department of Child Support Services is involved in this matter and must sign off on any proposed Stipulation and Order regarding child support arrears, especially if money is owed to the Department of Child Support Services.

At this time I am requesting that you obtain the approval of the Department of Child Support on your proposed Stipulation and Order or set the matter for hearing, with notice to all interested parties, including the Department of Child Support Services in the appropriate department and be prepared to provide the Court with appropriate evidence to support your requested relief.”

The family believes that this latest maneuver by Judge Pulido of demanding “the Department of Child Support Services must sign off on any proposed Stipulation or set the matter for hearing“ is legally infirm, terribly oppressive, inhumanely punitive and a clear abuse of discretion establishing law and legal precedent that does not now exist without judicial review and just decision by a higher court. However it is  a GREAT example of the continuing persecution of the Family by the Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS as yet just another attempt to alter the ordinary course of litigation and inject more delay into already protracted proceedings and brings serious doubt regarding judge Pulido’s impartiality and ability to rule in this matter. If you read the letters and know the prevailing law, you would know that the Stipulation was presented to the DCSS to no avail, it’s not legally required, THIS IS NOT A WELFARE CASE, and there’s nothing to try here!

Your request for these procedures violate the court’s obligations to the parties under the Federal and State Rules that trials “should be construed and administered to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding.” This situation is made no less easy by the court’s obvious bias and prejudice toward us over the nearly thirty years that we have attempted to address and finalize this issue in the court. We are putting our concerns in writing and will continue to do so as necessary so the record will be clear. We also hope these issues can be addressed in timely fashion consistent with the court’s mandate to administer these proceedings expeditiously and fairly.

6.)You claim that “At this time I am requesting that you obtain the approval of the Department of Child Support on your proposed Stipulation and Order or set the matter for hearing, with notice to all interested parties, including the Department of Child Support Services in the appropriate department and be prepared to provide the Court with appropriate evidence to support your requested relief.”

We provided the Court with appropriate evidence to support our requested relief with the Stipulation itself! Nothing else needs to be submitted! This Stipulation reflects the notarized agreement between the parties that settles the alleged arrears in child support payments on behalf of Harun Marwan aI-HAKIM.

On December 16, 2013 we faxed a letter to Judge Clay and Mr. Brega presenting this Stipulation to the Court and asking their signing where indicated, although we believe that it is superfluous and not mandatory for the Director of the Department of Child Support Services to do so, we all wanted this matter resolved immediately. Further, we would hand deliver the original and two copies to the Court for endorsement and filing and would provide an endorsed filed copy to the Director of the Department of Child Support Services afterwards. On December 18, 2013 at 4:32 PM I received a phone call from Mrs.Remelton of DCSS stating that the attorney for DCSS had reviewed the letter and declined the request and stating it was not necessary and that they DON’T sign off on stipulations as they are not a party and did not want to be involved. You can listen to and/or download that conversation at: https://app.box.com/s/k2zgu1cy3ombflq39ypn. The original stipulation submitted to the court has a signature line for the DCSS that was later whited out as per their request.

On December 19, 2013 at 10:49AM however I received voice mail message from Mrs. Alcantara of DCSS requesting the attachment to the letter they rejected. You can listen to and/or download that conversation at: https://app.box.com/s/yf2if5sgq0xwpa1plr55. Mrs. Alcantara of DCSS followed that with another voice mail request on January 2, 2014 at 3:29PM. You can listen to and/or download that conversation at: https://app.box.com/s/eoizygico6im1sd92xi2. Ms. Alder of DCSS followed that with another voice mail request on January 9, 2014 at 3:39PM. You can listen to and/or download that conversation at: https://app.box.com/s/ljvjb102dgsle6ggoq5j

Then I received collection “robo-calls” from DCSS on January 8, 2014 which you can listen to and/or download at: https://app.box.com/s/cr5hrzx9tte6mghhx7f1 February 6, 2014 which you can listen to and/or download at: https://app.box.com/s/p2vppp8k7nymdxb8s04d and March 36, 2014 which you can listen to and/or download at: https://app.box.com/s/qtqf85tmlty6cyzzatlu. What’s really unique about this effort is that I have NEVER received any such call in the entire 39 year life of my children.

On March 12, 2014 at 3:20 PM I received a voice mail message from a Terry Simmons-Booker allegedly from DCSS stating that he calling regarding the stipulation asking that I call him back. You can listen to and/or download that voice mail message at: https://app.box.com/s/zvurhqzy8qvmxb56ym1a

Twenty (20) minutes later on March 12, 2014 at 3:41 PM, I returned the call to Terry Simmons-Booker asking if there was a Mrs. Remelton available and he responded that there wasn’t and asked whom I was. I identified myself and wherein a 3 minute long conversation he says he wants to know what I intend to do about a stipulation signed by a Dana Medler, that he’s responding to a letter I sent to the court in February 2014 and Judge Pulido ordered me to get DCSS approval on the stipulation. I told him I had received several calls from people at DCSS with Mrs. Remelton being one, I wanted to respond to all of them, that he is misinformed about the process regarding the stipulation, I couldn’t talk now, that he could call back in a half hour if he wanted to and I asked what his position was there since he didn’t know Mrs. Remelton. He didn’t answer regarding his position at DCSS and said he only wanted one answer now and that was what I intended to do about the stipulation.

I again stated to call me back in 30 minutes, that I was unavailable and just wanted to acknowledge that I had received his call. He objected stating that he didn’t call me, that I called him. I reminded him that he had left a voice mail message for me that I was returning his call and a Mrs. Remelton’s, among others, as well. I again told him couldn’t talk now and that he could call back if he wanted to, wherein he said he’ll be gone in 30 mins, and had to call back tomorrow. I said that’s fine if he wants to call me then, it’s OK. He didn’t call back.

It was very easy to glean from the conversation that he was not an attorney from DCSS trying to resolve any self created “problems” with the stipulation, if he’s from DCSS at all. He felt empowered, even if falsely, that the judge had given him a weapon to bludgeon me with to extract some type of payment/conciliation. His position was clear, he wanted one thing and one thing only “what do you intend to do about the stipulation?” that needs his approval! Again, another really unique aspect of his call is that the phone number he called from was the same as the one for the robo-collection calls that I had NEVER received before in the entire 39 year life of my children.

There’s no doubt in my mind that he is in collections, an investigator or both! Neither of which should be involved in a simple stipulation for a court order that the DCSS IS NOT A PARTY TO!!! This is simply another attempt to force this family to submit to an illegal process furthering the now Superior Courts attempt at extorting money from us by persecuting the victims with the use of “court ordered” force and intimidation! Pulido can NOT serve in this case!

Why did Simmons-Booker call me? Who asked that he do so? Who is Simmons-Booker‘s supervisor? Who did Simmons-Booker talk to about the case and when? What was discussed about the case?

Did Charlene Perry ask Simmons-Booker to call me? Who asked that Charlene Perry handle this case, Judge Pulido? Is Charlene Perry Simmons-Booker‘s supervisor? Who is Charlene Perry’s supervisor? Who did Charlene Perry talk to about the case and when? What was discussed about the case with Charlene Perry? What is the relationship between Charlene Perry and Judge Pulido? Why and how did Pulido refer this case to Charlene Perry? What is the relationship between Simmons-Booker and Judge Pulido?

What is the relationship between Nancy O’Malley, former DA Tom Orloff, Ann Diem, Kevin Dunleavy, Bob Connor, Bruce Brock, Towanda Lee, Michael O’Connor, others unnamed in the DA’s office and Judge Pulido?

What is the relationship between former DCSS Director Maureen Lenahan, Matt Brega, Charlene Perry, Valgeria Harvey, counselors L. Lavagetto, Ms. K. Pendergrass, Ms. Adler, Kris Ferre, accountant Mr. Lovelady, Ricca Alcantara, Ombudsman Mrs. Reese, Mrs. Carlilse, Mrs. Remelton, Terry Simmons-Booker, others unnamed in the DCSS office and Judge Pulido?

What is the relationship between Judge Bean, Judge Tara DeSautels, Commissioner Thomas Nixon, Michelle Escerra, Tanisha Jones, others unnamed in the Superior Court’s Family Law Clerk’s office and Judge Pulido?

What is the relationship between former DCSS Director Maureen Lenahan, Matt Brega, Charlene Perry, Valgeria Harvey, counselors L. Lavagetto, Ms. K. Pendergrass, Ms. Adler, Kris Ferre, accountant Mr. Lovelady, Ricca Alcantara, Ombudsman Mrs. Reese, Mrs. Carlilse, Mrs. Remelton, Terry Simmons-Booker, others unnamed in the DCSS office with Nancy O’Malley, former DA Tom Orloff, Ann Diem, Kevin Dunleavy, Bob Connor, Bruce Brock, Towanda Lee, Michael O’Connor, others unnamed in the DA’s office?

When I was accosted in the DA’s office lobby by a fire armed Conner, Brock and another unknown third party, I was physically escorted/abducted downstairs into a private locked room and informed by Conner that he was the DA’s investigator in the Formal Complaint I brought against former City Attorney’s Jayne Williams and John Russo and the DCSS for their fraud and obstruction. He couldn’t explain one thing about the case so I got up and left only to be pursued by them both. This is the same report that Michael O’Connor claimed to Supervisor Keith Carson to have had prepared with Kevin Dunleavy’s direction. Carson said he never saw the reports, I never saw the reports and now demand a copy of both.

I also want to know the results and demand a copy the report from the complaint I filled with Judge Clay against a gun wielding Connor for his and Brock’s physically accosting me in the DA’s lobby, falsely imprisoning me downstairs in a private locked room, and armed threatening me with arrest and physical violence if I did not leave the court house and never return. There was litigation that was to be filed that has been delayed until such time as I can be allowed to freely pursue these claims without interference from the DA’s office.

We invited the Superior Court, District Attorney, and DCSS to respond to the stipulation and letters. They all have respectfully declined to become involved in this inherently judicial breech until this self-serving letter from Judge Pulido. The District Attorney and DCSS admitted they were not really a party to the submission and does not have any legally cognizable interest in the order. But we ALL know thats NOT TRUE!

Recognizing they ALL lack standing to file an opposition to the stipulation, we nevertheless invited a response from the Court due to the obvious impact any ruling would have on the Superior Court, District Attorney, and DCSS. After receiving an informal request from the Sheriffs Department to submit all further documents to Family Law Presiding Judge Pulido, this court must issued an order on the stipulation or show cause. We will consider the Court’s non-response and informal “order” to submit all further documents to Judge Pulido whom has asked he DCSS to intercede in support as an alleged real party in interest.

We have said this repeatedly and will say it yet again: the court can not mount a meaningful defense to the fact the Superior Court, the District Attorney and DCSS’ judgment was procured by fraud through their use of the presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of their admitted fraud and bribery and they are barred from presenting the evidence on which the court relied to find al-Hakim liable. The court must summarily reject the use of the presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of admitted fraud and bribery from the prior trials and the appellate records. Those records should come into evidence for PROSECUTION in complete form to address these concerns of the Superior Court, the District Attorney and DCSS’ continuing fraud upon the court, The People of the State of California, and the al-Hakim Family.

In any event, the Court allowed the presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of their admitted fraud and bribery to award the judgment, but did not allowing our side to defend the validity of the judgment using the previous court orders and actual facts. Nor did the Court let us impeach any witnesses. This is especially disturbing given that the Court in its ruling defined this trial in part as conclusory by Commissioner Olean stating “I will award the judgment if I determine that there’s money owed” which was not before the court and the money owed was already admitted and determined to be the presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of their admitted fraud and bribery.

The matter ruled on was not plead, argued, nor submitted, was not before the court and it’s judgment’s findings have NO support untainted by fraud in the record that existed before the court at the time the judgment was issued.

Without the benefit of the full record of the proceedings as evidence, the Court simply cannot adequately defend this case. We note that the evidence against the Superior Court, the District Attorney and DCSS and their judicial team of covert illicit participants exists in the trial record independent of the putative accounting expert that created and complied the entire presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of admitted fraud and bribery, the accounting report used as the sole basis for the judgment by Oleon despite the fact he knew it was the product of fraud!

The Family cites this fact in support of its RICO and fraud allegations. We can show that there is extensive, competent and reliable evidence in the trial record provided by the Superior Court, the District Attorney, DCSS and others, corroborated by the Family and other third parties that were EXCLUDED by the court to make its findings. This evidence includes the relevant, current court order; the payment receipts made to the mothers and in trust to the DCSS on their behalf; the testimony and evidentiary reports; all unchallenged by the Superior Court, the District Attorney, DCSS and disregarded by the court.

We ask that the court complete the order on the stipulation, order all related future evidentiary requests, list any objections and provide us with guidance regarding the relevance of evidence critical to our ability to mount our case in the future, as explained in my letters. All of which we believe is entirely appropriate and unprotected by law; all reports on the part of the Superior Court, the District Attorney, DCSS, County officials, other law enforcement officials, political officials, and media parties.

7.)al-Hakim Requesting Security after being Identified and Targeted by the District Attorney and Sheriff’s Deputy.

I have been threatened by both Judges and the District Attorney staff and had requested security from both since 1989. In May 2008 Alameda County Superior Court Judge Jon Tigar attempted to provoke me with comments made during a side bar at the testimony on behalf of al-Hakim by fellow Judge Leo Dorado in al-Hakim’s bad faith insurance case.

In deciding pre-trial issues Tigar addressed the court with the admission that he had erred, without any real specifications, and the error was of such magnitude that al-Hakim was entitled to mistrial and an appeal.

The worst part of that admission is that it was predicted by al-Hakim in the 4th of 7 disqualifications filed against Tigar. In a fit of retaliation, Tigar continued his attempt to instill fear in al-Hakim with continued threats of contempt for speaking the truth and then added the threat for objecting, al-Hakim’s right to due process and civil right was now being taken away by Tigar. al-Hakim responded with “your constant threats of contempt and jail is tantamount to your hanging a noose from the tree in front of my home, or burning a cross in my front yard”. “As a African-Native American and Muslim, our people have come too far to accept this kind of treatment, these attempts to intimidate and instill fear to force me to capitulate to your demands”.

As a result of this and Tigar’s continuing misconduct, al-Hakim took the extraordinary measure of filing another complaint with Victoria Henley and the Judicial Council, Alameda County Superior Court Presiding Judge Yolanda Northridge and former Presiding Judge George Hernandez demanding that all side bars be recorded for his own security.

I received a letter dated April 15, 2008 from then Presiding Judge Yolanda Northridge acknowledging receipt of my Complaint for Disciplinary Action and Censure Against Tigar from The Judicial Council, Commission On Judicial Performance, The California Judges Association, and The Alameda County Superior Court referring the matter to the Supervising Judge Robert Freedman for review but I have gotten no response as promised at all. I am not surprised in that Judge Freedman shared a common chambers entrance as courtroom mates, and has had his own well documented problems with honesty by willfully and intentionally filing false, perjurious and deceiving documents and affidavits, the timeliness in the administration of his duties, ALL for pay, yet only got a public reprimand. He has a checkered past in this case as well. At one hearing in this matter he openly stated bias, prejudice, voiced a fixed opinion of me and having an improper ex-parte communications regarding me and my case while using such information to hold me to a higher legal standard than that of the opposing counsel in this case as a guise for sanctioning me for it. I am convinced that he will not seriously review nor is he capable of impartially or fairly judging this matter, even for review.  We now demand a copy of the report on my Complaint for Disciplinary Action and Censure Against Tigar.

We recognize the life threatening situations al-Hakim was placed in by DA investigator Bob Conner, that the judicial, law enforcement, political and governmental agencies/authorities have thus far been entirely unreceptive to our concerns about their own criminal acts, interference with litigation, and surveillance tactics—even insofar as they involve spying on al-Hakim—and has failed and refused to investigate, much less end this persecution of the family and denied any knowledge of this issue. Still, what appears to be happening with respect to al-Hakim and family must be taken seriously and they are dedicated to setting the record straight. al-Hakim is essentially “Public Enemy No. 1” in the eyes of one of the world’s largest and most powerful illustrations of conspiracy, corruption, fraud, bribery and obstruction of justice.

In this hostile circumstance, one cannot shrug off what the Superior Court, the District Attorney, DCSS and their co-conspirators is apparently doing as harmless “information gathering”—whether or not intended (though we know it is), the effect is devastating.

We are asking the Court to take all necessary measures to guard against intimidation and protect al-Hakim and family, including ordering the Superior Court, the District Attorney, DCSS and County Sheriff’s Department to cease and desist from it’s illegal tactics, extra-judicial requirements, and provide security protection.

The court must note our continuing objection to the use of any Alameda County Judge given the track record of bias as previously put on the record both in writing and orally by both myself and contained in numerous court records. We also demand, yet again, that the Court order the delivery and disclosure of all records, including those of all Federal and State law enforcement agencies records, all Federal and State governmental agencies, all Federal and State political officials, Oakland City Attorney, Oakland City Auditor, Mayor of Oakland, the Oakland City Administrator, the Superior Court, the District Attorney, DCSS and County Sheriff’s Department, attorneys and their army of hundreds of lawyers, contractors, agents and employees, ALL their records related to al-Hakim and his family. This issue goes directly to their bias and it must be made transparent so the full record of this case can be made available to the higher Courts.

We believe it is critical that the entire record of the courts be submitted as evidence. We believe the Superior Court, the District Attorney, DCSS and County Sheriff’s Department has the entire record – or at least substantial parts of it.

This is not attorney work product and must be produced. We demand that the

Court require the Superior Court, the District Attorney, DCSS and County Sheriff’s Department to state under oath whether:

a) it has the above referenced records including but not limited to governmental and law enforcement records, related to al-Hakim and his family; and

b) if not, what portions it has, including all reports submitted to the court.

There is simply no good reason why that records should not be submitted as evidence in this case, if the Superior Court, the District Attorney, DCSS and County Sheriff’s Department possesses all or part of it. It is the Superior Court, the District Attorney and DCSS that wanted to have a trial about a trial, and the family cannot afford to not have the full record and we do not have the funds to pay for it. We will be highly prejudiced if this does not occur.

8.)Question of the Legality of Standing of the District Attorney and Attorney General of The State of California.

The District Attorney and DCSS false statements to the court, and fraud, flow from their conduct in this litigation and in their promotion of that litigation with the support of the courts around the State in a pressure campaign intended to cause the family economic and emotional harm. The court, the District Attorney, the DCSS, and the People of the State of California, its residents that they claim to represent in their continued persecution of the family merely serve as a means to perpetrate this fraud and bribery in their name and as props in that campaign.

The District Attorney and DCSS, the court of co-conspirators, their fictional “independent” expert, and the paid-for judges were the actors whose conduct is the substance of the family’s claims.

What is relevant to this case is evidence related to the District Attorney and DCSS’ conduct and their relationship with the court, with government officials, and with others.

The family will submit evidence that the judgment is taken solely and verbatim from documents in the District Attorney and DCSS’ confidential files, documents never publicly submitted to the court. The family will challenge the natural inference from that evidence, that the District Attorney and DCSS wrote the judgment, with the same counter-evidence of the presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of admitted fraud in the proceedings they themselves developed. The family will offer the testimony of various parties was merely legal theory orchestrated by the District Attorney and DCSS to willfully deceive the court, or allow them to pretend that they were by the District Attorney and DCSS and whose work was manipulated by the District Attorney and DCSS. Since this is admitted fraudulent evidence and testimony there is no need to impeach these assertions about the District Attorney and DCSS’ conduct. Nothing else has any bearing on this case. If the family proves its allegations, the District Attorney and DCSS are liable, even if their action had potentially been meritorious before it became corrupted or the citation was proper. And if the family does not prove its allegations, the District Attorney and DCSS are still liable, even if the claim was baseless. In short, the conditions under which the citation was issued are overruled by the fraud and bribery, whatever they may be, the citation has no tendency to make any fact of consequence in determining this action “more or less probable.”

The District Attorney and DCSS has no standing in this case and their only apparent purpose is to pursue re-litigation of the judgment with evidence for the continued pursuit of this improper strategy can have no purpose other than to inject irrelevant and presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of admitted fraud and bribery in the proceedings must be precluded as irrelevant, as should any related argument or questions. It is also unfairly prejudicial, confusing, and wasteful, and should be precluded on these grounds as well. Their aim is to distract from their conduct with inflammatory imagery of al-Hakim, replete with descriptions of crazy and poor. This material, selected and positioned by the District Attorney and DCSS for emotional appeal, and falsely tied to al-Hakim, has no place in this action. (“[A] litigant who has engaged in misconduct is not entitled to ‘the benefit of calculation, which can be little better than speculation, as to the extent of the wrong inflicted upon his opponent.’”) (quoting Minneapolis, St. Paul & S.S. Marie Ry. Co. v. Moquin, 283 U.S. 520, 521-522, 51 S. Ct. 501, 502 (1931)).

The family asserts that good cause exists to question the legality of the standing of the Attorney General of The State of California whom substituted in as attorney of record allegedly “representing” The People of The State of California, et. al., “In The Interest of Justice” in this case for the District Attorney and the DCSS as they exercised a clearly illegal conflict of interest in misrepresenting the family, conducting a complete trial to defend their illegal actions and presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of admitted fraud and bribery before admitting the conflict AFTER the trial was completed. They can not prosecute nor defend because of their actions and did not have standing then and CAN NOT NOW!

9.) Jurisdiction

The Family argues that there are serious issues regarding the Courts jurisdiction due to it’s complicity in the criminal conduct and actions of the Superior Court, the District Attorney and DCSS and their efforts to conceal and cover them up, have failed to act impartially in good faith, in fact, has acted improperly and in bad faith with respect to the commencement, acknowledgment, prosecution, and disclosure or lack thereof of their knowledge and involvement in and of the willful fraud in the proceedings that culminated in the illegal ruling. On that elucidated basis, the Family moves the court to relinquish that authority with this challenge of the Court’s jurisdiction over them, and the Court must resolve this jurisdictional challenge. Indeed, it is axiomatic that the court must decide this jurisdictional issue without being given that jurisdictional right to do so.

When the laws jurisdiction conflict with the conduct of the court, the court must balance the interests, including the respective interests of the parties involved and the hardship that would be imposed upon the person subject to compliance.

The Family contends that a party need not obey the orders of a court until it is established that the court has jurisdiction over that party. If there is no obligation to obey a judicial order, a sanction cannot be applied for the failure to comply. This decision is appropriate and preferable here because the factual issues pertinent to the case are intertwined with the many merits of the case and material evidence is necessary to resolve the jurisdictional challenge.

In such circumstances, some United States courts have sustained these requests related to these questions before a determination of jurisdiction, provided the plaintiff has made an initial showing giving reason to believe that the bases for jurisdiction are present.

Certainly, there is no reason to deem a single judge in the Superior Court of Alameda County even capable of deciding whether norms of civil procedure or legal ethics have been or can be followed in this case. Yet that is exactly what needs to be done here as the family has asked this Court to do just that. Indeed, it has gone further, putting the’s entire County government, the Superior Court, the District Attorney and DCSS on trial. A courtroom spectacle more anathema to justice and civil rights is hard to imagine.

All of this is bad enough. But it is made worse by the central irony hanging over this case: The reason the case is toxic is because the District Attorney and DCSS alleged “representing” the family, their creation and use of the presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of admitted fraud and bribery in the proceedings, the substantive merit of their paid testifying witness for admitted fraudulent evidence and testimony on that subject, the judgment as the illegitimate product of an partial court, conducting a complete trial to defend their illegal actions and evidence before admitting the conflict.

For nearly a quarter century, the District Attorney and DCSS showered praise on itself and the judiciary, extolling its impartiality and independence in an effort to persuade this Court to award litigation in it’s favor. That effort succeeded. The Court concluded the case in their favor every time with dubious and illegal rulings that contravened procedural law despite the evidence and testimony as it had “everything to do with extorting money from al-Hakim and persecuting the family and nothing to do with the truth, facts or evidence.

CONCLUSION

This is an excerpt from a court hearing as described below:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

BEFORE THE HONORABLE JOHN PORTER , COMMISSIONER

Department 3

—000—

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

and JOETTE RENON AL- HAKIM,NO . 55 6643 – 7

Petitioners,

VS .

ABDUL-JALIL AL-HAKIM,

Respondent.

 

REPORTER’S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

Rene C. Davidscn

Alameda County Courthcuse

1225 Fallon Street

Oakland, California

September 10, 1999

 

APPEARANCES

For the County : WILLIAM KLEEMAN

Attorney at Law

For the Respondent : BRENT KERNAN

Attorney at Law

CAROL B. GILBERT, CSR #5800

 

Page 13

19 And, Mr . Kleeman , I would request that you

18 prepare – -

19 MR . KLEEMAN: I’ll have to – -

20 THE COURT : – - an accounting .

21 MR . KLEEMAN: I”ll also have to notify both

22 the people since Ms. Hall and Ms . Flenory both have an

23 interest in this, because Ms. Flenory or Ms . Hall is not

24 going to get the money, or one of them is not going to

25 get the money, that’s being paid in and maybe–

26 THE COURT : That’s a possibility. The other

27 possibility is that what Mr. Kernan is requesting — and

28 I agree with you, he hasn’t cited me any authority – - is

 

Page 14

1 that the money come out of your office ‘s pocket today to

2 rectify the situation.

3 I think, Mr . Kernan, if you want to stand by

4 that proposition, as opposed to a resolution along the

5 lines of what Mr. Kleeman is suggesting, which is monies

6 come in and get paid out disproportionately to adjust,

7 you’ re going to need to give me some authority for that.

The Court was prophetic in it’s wisdom that the District Attorney and DCSS would be liable for and would have to pay as the ONLY thing left of this case is their fraud!

In furtherance of their obstruction of justice and attempted extortion of the family, the District Attorney and DCSS has failed and refused to submit any of the releases of child support holds my drivers license to the California State Department of Motor Vehicles for nearly ten years! This despite court orders to do so and the accounts being current. We would respectfully direct the Court’s attention to the fact that as recent as November 28, 2006, the court ordered the holds and suspension of al-Hakim’s drivers license released in the al-Hakim-Hall case, which only left the case that was current in payment that is now settled and should not have had a suspension for non payment nor delinquency.

District Attorney and DCSS has launched illegal proceedings that have resulted in numerous illegal orders and opinions from the courts, they gained access to an extraordinary quantity of material, including all of al-Hakim’s litigation files in totally unrelated cases that have absolutely NO value in this case to further their litigation, legislative, and political strategies to compel their enforcement strategy, extortionate scheme to force him to pay their fraudulent arrears including enforcement in multiple jurisdictions by placing illegal and unwarranted holds on his drivers license with the California Department of Motor Vehicles with the intent of al-Hakim being arrested and harmed physically and financially; placing illegal and unwarranted holds on his passport with the State Department; and these efforts to use judgment enforcement for settlement leverage to undertake in the event they don’t prevail before the courts. These proceeding efforts are ongoing.

For the foregoing reasons, that the Court MUST move to prosecute the District Attorney and DCSS for their admitted fraud and bribery in the proceedings and overturn the judgment as the illegitimate product of an partial court and order:

(1) the enforcement of the courts order of February 5, 2007 for the DA’s fair and proper application and accounting of al-Hakim’s payments made in trust to the DA in their fiduciary capacity for the minor al-Hakim-Hall account as per al-Hakim’s pleading, supported by al-Hakim’s submitted documents,

(2) officially close the al-Hakim-Hall account with nothing owed;

(3) the D. A.pay the arrearages that they themselves caused with the alleged delinquent child support payments expunged from his records;

(4) the immediate reinstatement of al-Hakim’s driving privilege and passport with all references to his license being suspended and passport being revoked expunged from his records;

(5) awarding Attorney’s and Professional Fees, Costs, and Sanctions for the total cost of $24,620.00;

(6) sanctions for the loss of income, pursuit of happiness, pain and suffering for the years of punitive depravation of al-Hakim driving privilege; and

(7) return to al-Hakim $2400 in overpayments made to the then minor al-Hakim-Hall child.

We presented this Stipulation to the Court and appreciate your signing where indicated, we all want this matter resolved immediately. We hand delivered the original and two copies to the Court for endorsement and filing and was to provide an endorsed filed copy to the Director of the Department of Child Support Services afterwards. We all look forward to resolving this matter as soon as possible.

I can be reached at (510) 394-4501 if you have any questions. Thanks’ for taking the time to endorse and return this Stipulation.

Respectfully,

Abdul-Jalil

Defendant

Attorney General, Superior Court Judges, District Attorney, and Department of Child Support Services Caught in Fraud of Minor Child!

ABDUL-JALIL al-HAKIM

7633 SUNKIST DR.,   OAKLAND,  CA    94605-3024  (510) 394-4501

 

TO:The Honorable Winnifred Smith          The Honorable C. Don Clay

Presiding Judge                                               Supervising Judge

Superior Court of California                         Superior Court of California

County of Alameda                                         County of Alameda

1225 Fallon St., Dept #1                                 1225 Fallon St., Dept #6

Oakland, CA 94612                                          Oakland, CA 94612

Fax No.: 510 891-6276                                   Fax No.: 510 891-6276

 

TO:The Honorable Sandra Bean                  The Honorable Stephen Pulido

Alameda Family Law Court                          Presiding Judge Family Law Court

Superior Court of California                        Superior Court of California

County of Alameda                                        County of Alameda

2233 Shoreline Drive                                     24405 Amador Street

Alameda, CA 94501                                       Hayward, CA 94544

Fax No.: 510 263-4309                                 Fax No.: 510 690-2824

 

The Honorable Elizabeth Hendrickson

Dept. 103 Traffic

WILEY W. MANUEL COURTHOUSE

661 Washington Street

Oakland, CA  94607

Fax No.: 510 627-4906

 

bcc:

FROM: Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim

DATE: January 30, 2014

NO PAGES: 14

RE: Stipulation in Superior Court Case #511339-2; The People vs Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, Docket # WWM00000560171and reassign this matter as per then Judicial Administration Rule 6.603 (b) (1) (D) now Rule 10.603 (c) (1) (D); requesting security after being identified and targeted by the District Attorney and Sheriff’s Deputy.

Dear Judges Smith, Clay, Pulido Bean and Commissioner Hendrickson,

This three decades old continuing story of the conflict between the al-Hakim Family with the District Attorney (DA) and the Department of Child Support Service (DCSS) must be among the most extensively told in the history of the American judiciary. This and other courts have previously described in detail the parties’ underlying dispute, which concerns the admitted willful fraud and extortionate scheme that the District Attorney and DCSS extensively exercised to persecute the family that they are liable for.

In the case of Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim v. CSAA, Alameda County Case No. 811337-3 an over $20 million,12 year; contentious legal action; that has the largest case file in the history of Alameda County Superior Court, with over 60 file boxes of pleadings; over 120 motions and responses; plaintiff had over 300 trail exhibits; over 5,000 pages of exhibits; 3,000 pages of documents for trial rebuttal argument; 20 expert witnesses; 77 other witnesses; over 100 pages of jury instructions; with DQ’s filed against EVERY Judge for numerous charges from judicial misconduct to corruption, where EVERY judge in this case has admitted error, committed perjury, recused themselves, or all three!

Alameda County District Attorney Tom Orloff’s Extrinsic Fraud Upon the Court, Prosecutorial Misconduct, Willful and Malicious Prosecution, Conflict of Interest, Obstruction of Justice, Denial of Due Process, Willful and Intentional Fabrication and Authoring False Evidence; Misrepresentation and Concealment of Material Facts

al-Hakim had to file an action against Tom Orloff and the Alameda County District Attorney’s (DA) and the Alameda County Department of Child Support Services (ACDCSS) because for over 25 years they repeatedly failed and refused to enforce the courts own orders for the fair and proper application and accounting of payments al-Hakim made in trust to the DA in their fiduciary capacity for the minor al-Hakim child depriving al-Hakim and the minor child of over $2,000 of monies paid, thus creating a “mythical” arrearage and open account in al-Hakim’s name and on his behalf owed to the minor child, then illegally charging al-Hakim with the crime of violating the child support statute for nonpayment, reporting the alleged violation to the State of California for Collection and the State Department of Motor Vehicles for suspension of his driving privilege for nonpayment and illegally tossing al-Hakim into “debtors prison”, suspending his drivers license, revoking his passport, and ruining his credit. ACDCSS actions and claimed “right” to perform in this manner are not contained in any State or Federal statute, regulation, or other legislative act and therefore, do not have the force of law and renders it constitutionally infirm and no court officer can merely “grant” a ruling in their favor to cover getting caught having done so. Full Story with Videos and Documents at http://tinyurl.com/ljk8av

Attorney General of The State of California Substituted In for DA Tom Orloff

On January 22, 2008 Attorney General Jerry Brown and the Office of The Attorney General of The State of California substituted in as attorney of record in this case for the Alameda County Department of Child Support Services allegedly “in the interest of justice”. What justice is there in the Attorney General defending, concealing and thereby further complicitly committing the admitted willful and intentional extrinsic fraud upon the court; prosecutorial misconduct; willful and malicious prosecution; misconduct; conflict of interest; obstruction of justice; denial of due process under the law; willful and intentional fabrication and authoring false evidence; misstating and mischaracterizing evidence; misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court’s act or reliance; harassment; and intimidation on behalf of District Attorney Nancy O’Malley, former DA Tom Orloff, Maureen Lenahan, Valgeria Harvey, counselors L. Lavagetto, Ms. K. Pendergrass, Ms. Adler, Kris Ferre, and accountant Mr. Lovelady and others unnamed in the DA’s office; various judges and Commissioner Oleon’s abuse of discretion, willful misconduct, conduct prejudicial, illegal ex-parte communications and bias that resulted in error.

This was done to excuse and protect the Alameda County Department of Child Support Services from their ongoing conflict of interest in their alleging to represent the interest of Joette Hall, whom they had defrauded along with al-Hakim of the funds paid to the DCSS in trust for their minor child.

The Alameda County Department of Child Support Services was never representing the al-Hakim Hall family, they were defending and covering up their extrinsic fraud upon the state and the families. The Alameda County Department of Child Support Services wanted to conceal their attempted coercion of al-Hakim to pay the arrearage they created in his name.

al-Hakim and his family had complained many times each year about the misapplication of the funds tendered to the Department of Child Support Services in trust for the al-Hakim Hall family.

For nearly three decades the District Attorney and DCSS has launched criminal legal proceedings that can aptly characterized as “unique in the annals of American judicial history.” Through these proceedings – which have resulted in numerous illegal orders and opinions from the courts, the District Attorney and DCSS gained access to an extraordinary quantity of material, including all of al-Hakim’s litigation files in totally unrelated cases that have absolutely NO value in this case to further their litigation, legislative, and political strategies to compel their enforcement strategy, extortionate scheme to force him to pay their fraudulent arrears including enforcement in multiple jurisdictions by placing illegal and unwarranted holds on his drivers license with the California Department of Motor Vehicles with the intent of al-Hakim being arrested and harmed physically and financially; placing illegal and unwarranted holds on his passport with the State Department; and these efforts to use judgment enforcement for settlement leverage to undertake in the event they don’t prevail before the courts. These proceeding efforts are ongoing.

The District Attorney and DCSS presented its admitted evidence of fraud and bribery to the trial court, convincing it to rule against the family’s court ordered compliant payments complete with DCSS’s own receipts for same– instead using its unfettered, presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of admitted fraud and bribery, accounting report– as the basis for the trial court’s final decision. On the basis of these and other materials, the ruling and judgment was fundamentally obtained and tainted by fraud. The heart of the alleged fraud is two-fold.

First, the District Attorney and DCSS and their judicial team of covert illicit participants– the putative accounting expert that created and complied the entire presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of admitted fraud and bribery, the accounting report used as the sole basis for the judgment by Commissioner Glenn Oleon despite the fact he knew it was the product of fraud.

Second, the District Attorney and DCSS wresting control of the judicial process by exercising a clearly illegal conflict of interest in misrepresenting the family, conducting a complete trial to defend their illegal actions and evidence before admitting the conflict AFTER the trial was completed, exerting undue influence in the process, by conspiring with the court Commissioner Oleon; applying political pressure in order to obtain a judgment based on political advantage rather than the rule of law. Upon the substitution of attorneys, then California Attorney General Jerry Brown, responsible for carrying out investigation of Alameda County Superior Court and State Appeals Court judges, District Attorney Tom Orloff, Oakland City Attorney and various corporate defendants is himself defending some of the criminals and covering up the very same corruption he is supposed to be investigating and prosecuting! Full Story with Videos and Documents at http://tinyurl.com/ljk8av

Nevertheless, as noted above, the court returned a judgment against the family, rejecting the decades of presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of admitted fraud and bribery in the proceedings; family’s claims of civil conspiracy; conspiracy to commit obstruction of justice; obstruction of justice; conspiracy to commit extrinsic fraud; extrinsic fraud; fraud upon the court and The People of the State of California; conspiracy to commit extortion; extortion; conspiracy to commit bribery; bribery; conspiracy to commit embezzlement; embezzlement; conspiracy to commit intimidation; intimidation; conspiracy to commit harassment; harassment; conspiracy to commit blackmail; blackmail; conspiracy to misappropriate funds; misappropriation of funds; conspiracy to violate fiduciary trust; violation of fiduciary trust; conspiracy to co-mingle funds; co-mingling of funds; conspiracy to commit deception; deception; conspiracy to commit concealment; concealment; conspiracy to commit misrepresentation; misrepresentation; conspiracy to commit diversion of funds; diversion of funds; conspiracy to create and falsify documents as evidence; creating and falsifying documents as evidence; conspiracy to procure false testimony; procuring false testimony; witness tampering; conspiracy to violate racketeering laws; violate racketeering laws; conspiracy to commit tortious interference with contract; tortious interference with contract; conspiracy to commit unjust enrichment; unjust enrichment; conspiracy to commit conflict of interest; conflict of interest; admitting conflict of interest AFTER the trial was completed; conspiracy to commit misrepresentation; misrepresentation; conspiracy to intentionally inflict maximum pain, suffering, emotional distress; the intentional infliction of maximum pain, suffering, emotional distress; conspiracy to commit ; slander; conspiracy to conduct a complete trial to defend their illegal actions and evidence; conducting a complete trial to defend their illegal actions and evidence; conspiracy to exert undue influence in the judicial process; exerting undue influence in the judicial process; civil conspiracy with court Commissioner Oleon; conspiracy to directly or indirectly funding, commencing, prosecuting, advancing in any way, or receiving benefit from any action or proceeding; directly or indirectly funding, commencing, prosecuting, advancing in any way, or receiving benefit from any action or proceeding; conspiracy to litigate for recognition or enforcement of an illegal judgment previously rendered in the court; litigating for recognition or enforcement of an illegal judgment previously rendered in the court; among others.

I last contacted you all above with the exception of Commissioner Hendrickson on January 9, 2014 after I went to the Alameda Family Law Court to file a letter to the Judges dated January 7, 2014 and was prevented from doing so by a County Sheriff’s Deputy who informs me that I must go to Judge Pulido’s courtroom to file the letter and that he would be handling this matter in Probate Court. Both letters had already been faxed, served, or both on all the parties above except the January 7, 2014 one to Judge Smith and this is the first to Commissioner Hendrickson. The family and I have had no response to ANY of the five previous letters to the court to clarify the pending matters in this case totally comprised of the District Attorney (DA) and Department of Child Support Service (DCSS) presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of their admitted fraud in the proceedings that they themselves alone developed. The court must now address that issue with the family in open court with these admission and the product of fraud upon the court, The People of the State of California and the family. The District Attorney and DCSS’ larcenous moral turpitude, obstruction of justice and misrepresentation is all that remains of this case.

So again, now we need to know if in fact Judge Pulido is handing this matter, and if so, in what capacity and jurisdiction. Is he acting as the Family Law Presiding Court Judge or as the Judge in Probate Court? Is this a Family Law matter addressing the stipulation, or is this a Probate matter?

We need to know what Civil Code section specifically requires that a Stipulation by the parties without attorneys MUST be notarized? Who rejected the Stipulation and when?

The family has accounts that confirm that the Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS and other representatives engaged in repeated, substantive ex-parte meetings and communications with the judicial officials presiding over litigation involving the family, including meetings and communications relating to the case and stipulation with court administration personnel that has very limited knowledge of civil law rules, substantively and especially procedurally including the selection of Judge Pulido to preside over this case in Probate. Such evidence would further establish the Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS ex-parte contacts are improper under law and would also further prove the Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS were attempting to exert undue influence over the court. This evidence indicates that the Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS meetings were inappropriate and secret.

The family believes the Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS nefarious and inappropriate abandonment of the family’s right to settle the case and have the courts to acknowledge the stipulation without any civil law citations and no evidence of such to support the alleged ruling by a judge is an untenable to prevent efforts to move the case towards resolution. The family has every right, and very good reason, to seek an end to the individual persecution that they believed the Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS has been using as a way to extort the family, drag out the case and bleed their resources. We are requesting that the court immediately sign the order for the stipulation and noting that we realize that it should have already been ordered. By requesting that it be ordered, we are simply exercising our procedural right to that evidence.

The family believes that this maneuver by the Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS attempted to alter the ordinary course of the trial and inject more delay into already protracted proceedings.

Now we have the pending matter of The People vs Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, Docket # WWM00000560171, Citation # 5330190 presently assigned to Dept. 103 the Traffic court for trial on February 10, 2014 at 2:00 PM.

With this matter involving the alleged crime of driving with a suspended license, it would be an impossible burden on the court to hear the matter in Dept. 103 and further would be an unavoidable conflict nor would the family EVER agree for the matter to be heard by a commissioner after the most recent travesty of justice by yet another one. It was unconscionable that Commissioner Oleon would EVER entertain the presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of the District Attorney and DCSS admitted fraud much less use it SOLEY as the basis for an illegal judgment and think he could get away with it! Amazing!

In furtherance of their obstruction of justice and attempted extortion of the family, the District Attorney and DCSS has failed and refused to submit any of the releases of child support holds my drivers license to the California State Department of Motor Vehicles for nearly ten years! This despite court orders to do so and the account being current. Dept. 103 does not provide the time to plead, examine and hear this matter and we do not want to provide the same excuse that Oleon used of a “lack of time” to hear the matter, “it should be in another courtroom”. If he were truly concerned about a lack time to hear the case and JUSTICE, he NEVER would have heard the only evidence presented by the District Attorney and DCSS, that of their admitted fraud upon the court.

For these and the reasons presented herein, we request that this matter be re-assigned to another court room that has the necessary facilities of time and court staff, including a reporter and security. I have been threatened by both judges and the District Attorney staff and had requested security from both since 1989. So as Judge Northridge did in November 8, 2006, I am asking this court to reassign this matter as per then Judicial Administration Rule 6.603 (b) (1) (D) now Rule 10.603 (c) (1) (D).

However, it should be noted the family will contest jurisdiction because the testimony of various parties was merely legal theory orchestrated by the District Attorney and DCSS to willfully deceive the court, to allow them to pretend that the Family was represented by the District Attorney and DCSS and whose work was manipulated by the District Attorney and DCSS. Since this is admitted fraudulent evidence and testimony there is no need to impeach these assertions about the District Attorney and DCSS’ conduct. Nothing else has any bearing on this case. This was done in context for the District Attorney and DCSS’ furtherance of their fraud upon the court, the People of California and the family with the intent to deceive and their continued obstruction of justice scheme supported by the court itself to enhance their overall extortion scheme to make al-Hakim pay for their fraud and bribery- not a purported justification or belief in a larger good. This judgment is NOT the legitimate product of an impartial court.

Thus, throughout these extraordinary trials, the most important facts have gone uncontested:

the family has made it abundantly clear and by their actions and evidence that the District Attorney and DCSS violated a court order, perpetrated fraud upon the Court, defrauded the People of the State of California and the al-Hakim family, violated their fiduciary trust, engage in civil conspiracy, bribery, paid a testifying witness for admitted fraudulent evidence and testimony, obstructed justice and has pursued this litigation by a variety of unethical, corrupt, and illegal means, including exercising a clearly illegal conflict of interest in misrepresenting the family, conducting a complete trial to defend their illegal actions and evidence before admitting the conflict, exerting undue influence in the process, by conspiring with the court Commissioner Oleon, its designated accounting expert presenting admitted fraudulent evidence, and by controlling the subsequent production of that evidence over the objection of the family allegedly as a neutral damages assessment.

Certainly, there is no reason to deem a single judge in the Superior Court of Alameda County even capable of deciding whether norms of civil procedure or legal ethics have been or can be followed in this case. Yet that is exactly what needs to be done here as the family has asked this Court to do just that. Indeed, it has gone further, putting the’s entire County government, the Superior Court, the District Attorney and DCSS on trial. A courtroom spectacle more anathema to justice and civil rights is hard to imagine.

All of this is bad enough. But it is made worse by the central irony hanging over this case: The reason the case is toxic is because the District Attorney and DCSS alleged “representing” the family, their creation and use of the presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of admitted fraud and bribery in the proceedings, the substantive merit of their paid testifying witness for admitted fraudulent evidence and testimony on that subject, the judgment as the illegitimate product of an partial court, conducting a complete trial to defend their illegal actions and evidence before admitting the conflict. For nearly a quarter century, the District Attorney and DCSS showered praise on itself and the judiciary, extolling its impartiality and independence in an effort to persuade this Court to award litigation in it’s favor. That effort succeeded. The Court concluded the case in their favor every time with dubious and illegal rulings that contravened procedural law despite the evidence and testimony as it had “everything to do with extorting money from al-Hakim and persecuting the family and nothing to do with the truth, facts or evidence.

There are multiple legal defects that independently require that this case be dismissed but I will discuss this one:

First, there can no longer be any question that this Court lacks jurisdiction. No court has jurisdiction unless the plaintiff has standing, the courts and RICO imposes rigorous standing limits. The District Attorney and DCSS alleged “representing” the family, their creation and use of the presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of admitted fraud and bribery in the proceedings, the substantive merit of their paid testifying witness for admitted fraudulent evidence and testimony on that subject, the judgment as the illegitimate product of an partial court, conducting a complete trial to defend their illegal actions and evidence before admitting the conflict is yet another admission of willful fraud and bribery and lack of standing. Intent on depriving the family of their constitutional right to a fair trial- and apparently lacking confidence in its own actions and evidence-  dropped all of its claims of representation of the family upon the filing of appeal of trial. The California State Attorney General substituted in for The People of the State of California and the family. That also was a conflict as the family had filed a complaint with the U. S. Department of Justice that was referred to and filed with the California State Attorney General regarding these and other activities of the Superior Court, the District Attorney, DCSS, the Oakland City Attorney, other governmental and political officials, attorneys and their contractors, agents and employees. Though the conflict is clear, the investigation has not yet been done nor enforced, so its injury is still pending, not concrete nor non-speculative, and the evidence has gone uncontested.

The Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS case fares no better on the facts. Given the mountain of discovery at its disposal, one would expect them to present a coherent narrative, backed by evidence. It hasn’t, it won’t and it can’t. Even on its own terms, this theory was implausible: how could anyone in the family possibly cause the District Attorney and DCSS to commit this willful fraud to the family’s own detriment and be responsible for it?

In my last letter to the courts, I said I would address several open concerns as well as the issue of being identified by the Sheriff’s Deputy and Court Administration without having announced my name and being pulled aside by the Sheriff Deputy in the next communication with the court. I will now do so.

We have been informed and thereon believe that several unknown operatives made illegal ex-parte contact with the Superior Court, the District Attorney, DCSS and County Sheriff’s Department regarding this case. al-Hakim has previously been asked by the the District Attorney to place himself in harms way that could have easily resulted in his death, and by design, it would have rid the Superior Court and the District Attorney of the one indispensable factor in proving the guilt of a rampant Police Department theft ring that the chief investigator, Bob Connor wanted to DISPROVE!

He first investigated al-Hakim, the victim, to compile/create enough evidence to force al-Hakim to give up the investigation/prosecution of the known guilty cops. I complained about his tactics and felt he wasn’t doing the job of investigating the burglars but the victim in an effort to let them off. Then he began to try to compile/create enough evidence to exonerate the known guilty cops. I again complained about his tactics and felt he wasn’t doing the job of investigating the burglars but trying to create a means to let them off. Realizing that he could not do so, he began to try to compile/create enough evidence to exonerate others involved in the same crimes, over 30 officers, and restrict the prosecution to the two known guilty cops. Upon having compiled enough evidence to convict the two known guilty cops, he began to try to negotiate with me how the case would be tried to the exclusion of others involved unless I was able to personally identify the guilty cops in the course of the burglary. He stated that he had knowledge that they were going to strike again and proposed that I pretend to leave the store, lock it up, yet wait inside for the burglary to occur and step out to identify the burglars. I asked if he had this knowledge, why wouldn’t they just “stake out the building and capture them when they set off the bomb on the windows and entered the store?”. He couldn’t answer with any logic other than to say he needed an eye witness. I rejected this fool hearty request to put my life in the line of fire to be shot by the same cop who set off the bomb to commit the burglary and then kills the the alleged perpetrator (me) whom he caught in the building while responding to the burglary-in-progress call he himself had made. Perfectly stupid!!! I complained about his tactics and felt he wasn’t doing the job of investigating the burglars but trying to eliminate the victim in an effort to let them off. I made it clear that I had no intention to talk to him again. He lastly came to the store to inform me that they had secured enough evidence and information to serve a search warrant and file a criminal complaint, that I should not speak to anyone, including the media excluding Tribune reporter Harry Harris. He further stated that I should know that half the police force thought I was a hero and the other half thought I was a “problem” and I should watch by back. My family, friends and I have lived with that fear since then. It was exacerbated when one night I came home from the store and laid down when shortly I heard a loud noise and saw bright lights hovering over the roof of my home. Since the home has skylights I could see a helicopter hovering over the home and shining a light around my home. I got a phone call from the Oakland Police Department asking me to identify myself, what was going on in the home, who was there, etc. I asked why was there a helicopter over my home and was told there was a report of a “burglary in progress” at my home. I told the person on the phone that there was no such thing happening and that this was perpetrated by some elements of the Police Department that wanted me out the way. They called off the report and I later went outside to find my house surrounded by police and one makes the remark “ you got away this time!”. Life threatening scary, but forces you to resolve NEVER to be intimidated by REAL PIGS! No decent, honorable human being would EVER initiate such actions because a person stood up to crime! Is that not what they are hired to do or are they above the law? This same investigator Bob Connor.

In letters to Judge Clay and others, I have expressed my fear for my safety after being verbally accosted; physically threatened; attempted to be baited, provoked and intimidated into a physical altercation; threatened with arrest, disallowed from going to Judge Leo Dorado’s courtroom; forcibly removed and escorted from the courthouse building; and ordered not to return by District Attorney Officer Bob Connor on November 22, 2010 at approximately 3:45 p.m  I had litigation that was to be filed in November 2010 the day of my being forcibly removed from the court house and threatened with arrest if I returned by District Attorney henchman Bob Connor whom is very well known to me. The District Attorney Nancy O’Malley’s office has compromised these suits and this issue also must be corrected ASAP. District Attorney Nancy O’Malley’s abridging these inalienable, sacred rights are not a joke to African-Americans.

This apparently was on order from Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O’Malley and assistant District Attorney Kevin Dunleavy as I sat alone in the lobby of the D. A.’s office for 30 minutes waiting to speak to Dunleavy on an update on the formal 200 page Corruption, Extrinsic Fraud, Criminal Misconduct, Ethics and “Whistle-Blower” Complaint complete with audio CD filed and served on their office on June 7, 2010 stemming from criminal actions committed by John Russo and the City Attorney’s office resulting from the sewer main collapse alongside my home in 1991. After requesting a response to Formal Complaint Served and Filed June 7, 2010 and several conversations with the Alameda County District Attorney office, District Attorney Nancy O’Malley assigned the case to Assistant District Attorney Kevin Dunleavy. After his review and several more conversations with me, Dunleavy decided to assign the case for investigation after he had been assigned this case in July 2010 when he told me months before that he had assigned it to another investigator.

The D. A.’s lobby reception area is merely a very small space between the elevators and the bullet proof glass doors and windows that separate the public from the D. A. There are only a few chairs that line one side of the space and is not meant to accommodate more than 4-8 people. During the 30 minutes that I waited in the lobby, only 3 people from the general public came onto the floor from the elevators, yet 10-12 came to and from the D. A.’s office. Clearly I represented no threat to anyone, and I could have been assisted without any concern nor fear on anyone’s behalf. I’m sure that the lobby area is equipped with surveillance cameras and would verify my account of this incident.

After the encounter with Bob Connor and my ouster from the Courthouse that was ordered by Dunleavey, I spoke with District Attorney Matt Golde and Superior Court Judge Leo Dorado regarding my treatment and called O’Malley to voice my extreme concern wherein I received a return call from Dunleavy. Dunleavey expressed his concern for the fact that I knew Golde and Dorado, but not as if it would have made a difference in their decision or actions in having me threatened and removed from the courthouse. He laughed as he recanted stories about them playing on a basketball team together, never once exhibiting any remorse for his or O’Malleys’ actions. The recorded conversation with Dunleavy regarding the encounter with Connor and the investigation can be listened to and/or downloaded at: http://www.box.net/shared/x46rvjorhj.

We discussed Dunleavy’s second call to me stating the he would speak with the Department of Child Support Services attorney Valgeria Harvey that had to admit in court several times that they and the D. A.’s office had committed fraud, embezzlement and theft against me and my family. When I refused to pay for the D. A.’s fraud, they attempted to extort the money from me by suspending my drivers license and revoking my passport! You can listen to D. A. Kevin Dunleavy voicemail as he tells me he is going to talk with V. Harvey of CSS http://www.box.net/shared/ma0fyvzkdc.

At the conclusion and throughout these conversations, I had been discussing this matter with  Rodney Brooks, the Chief of Staff for Supervisor Keith Carson who said that he would talk with Nancy O’Malley and get back to me.

Again on February 23, 2011, I spoke with Rodney for 25 minutes wherein he said that he had discussed the case with Assistant District Attorney Kevin Dunleavey, the same DA that had me forcibly removed from the Courthouse without notice, cause or legal grounds.

Rodney informed me that Dunleavey admitted he had me removed from the Courthouse without notice, cause or legal grounds and gave no reason nor legal grounds for doing so. Rodney further expressed through his “teeth clenched disdain” that the D.A. had concluded an investigation of the cases, found no wrong doing, and had sent me a letter of their findings and decision. I informed Rodney that Mike O’Connor, Senior Deputy District Attorney, had left me a voice mail message stating that, but in fact I have never received anything from them at all and asked him for a copy of this investigation report, and if he had read it. You can listen to D. A. Mike O’Connor voice mail stating he has ended the investigation at: http://www.box.net/shared/3oampngtby.

Rodney said that he had not seen the report and did not have a copy. I asked Rodney if he trusted the person whom ordered me removed from the courthouse to conduct a fair and impartial investigation of his employer, boss, co-workers, department, friends, allies and himself- he couldn’t answer, but he didn’t need to. I reiterated my request for a copy of the alleged “investigation report” from the D. A.’s office and that this matter be referred to the Justice Department and the Alameda County Grand Jury for investigation. Throughout the entire conversation Rodney was clearly discourteous to the point he was aggressively attempting to provoke a verbal response from me such that he could abruptly end the conversation. I merely acknowledged his attitude and stayed the course to ascertain that he would respond to my requests in writing and provide a copy of the alleged “investigation report” from the D. A.’s office. Needless to say I have received nothing from Rodney, and after his actions for the last year, it is not unexpected.

It is unfathomable that such a thing could happen right in your lobby and visitors reception area in today’s highly charged racial, political, and law enforcement versus community interactive environment, especially in Oakland and Alameda County where deadly force seems to be the rule rather than the exception. Given the history of the D. A.’s office, and in your short tenure, I should have expected it!

To allow the D. A.’s office to handle me and my complaint in such a Gestapo fashion and to use Judge Leo Dorado as a ruse is unacceptable, needs to be investigated, the responsible parties held accountable and punished.

Clearly something must be done as I have waited for Judge Clay and everyone notified to get back to me to move this process forward. There is no circumstance or law that can justify this use of force, intimidation, and threat of imprisonment under the guise and color of law! The family will not allow this continuing injustice to go on unnoticed and want to know what time is best for Judge Clay to meet as soon as possible!

The critically serious, incriminating, willful admissions in the conversations and interactions of Rodney Brooks and yourself Judge Clay with D. A.’s Connor, Dunleavey and O’Malley has made everyone witnesses to these actions of the D. A. and any non-action on the prosecution of these crimes will entrap YOU ALL in complicity in the commission of these crimes, in it’s corruption, conspiracy, fraud, obstruction of justice, false imprisonment, aiding and abetting the crimes mentioned, the attempted cover up of these crimes, and willful blindness, among others. It is settled law that the cover up of a crime is itself greater than the crimes themselves! Those stakes are raised exponentially when it concerns corruption on behalf of Judges, elected public officials, law enforcement and legal servants whom are embodied with protecting the public trust.

In May 2008 Alameda County Superior Court Judge Jon Tigar attempted to provoke plaintiff Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim with comments made during a side bar at the recent testimony on behalf of plaintiff by fellow Judge Leo Dorado in al-Hakim’s bad faith insurance case.

As a result of this and Tigar’s continuing misconduct, al-Hakim took the extraordinary measure of filing another complaint with Victoria Henley and the Judicial Council, Alameda County Superior Court Presiding Judge Yolanda Northridge and former Presiding Judge George Hernandez demanding that all side bars be recorded for his own security.

You can view, listen to, and/or download the following related documents or audio files:

Judge Dorado Responds to D. A.pdf

http://www.box.net/shared/4ai0vr2s5j

 

City Administrator Dan Lindhiem Respond Russo Formal Complaint.pdf

http://www.box.net/shared/yfyvhaug0l

 

City Administrator Dan Lindhiem Post Russo Complaint Meeting.pdf

http://www.box.net/shared/6gj1ae9pa4

 

D. A. O’Malley Responds to Russo Formal Complaint.pdf

http://www.box.net/shared/pdquncg8x6

 

County Presiding Judge Rolfenson Responds to Russo Formal Complaint.pdf

http://www.box.net/shared/n8xxh4a93e

 

County Presiding Judge Rolfenson Discards Formal Complaint- Maggie Takeda Voice mail

http://www.box.net/shared/g10s3kzxn7

 

County Presiding Judge Rolfenson Receives Formal Complaint Maggie Takeda email

http://www.box.net/shared/2fqsl69z79

 

City Auditor Courtney Ruby Responds to Russo Formal Complaint.pdf

http://www.box.net/shared/pdi4kxel16

 

City Auditor Courtney Ruby’s Second Respond Russo Formal Complaint.pdf

http://www.box.net/shared/5a5ndkbmrb

 

al-Hakim’s Notice to Russo of Action.pdf

http://www.box.net/shared/lnvn6kn92k

 

Russo Responds to Formal Complaint.pdf

http://www.box.net/shared/dz72had24u

 

District Attorney Investigates City Attorneys John Russo, Jayne Williams, Meyers Nave Corruption Complaint.pdf

http://www.box.net/shared/sjgi7ynhgh

 

Oakland City Administrator to Meet al-Hakim on Fate of City Attorneys John Russo, Jayne Williams, Meyers Nave Corruption Complaint.pdf

http://www.box.net/shared/kuf0d18b7i

 

al-Hakim’s Second Notice to Russo of Action.pdf

http://www.box.net/shared/9gn72snasl

 

al-Hakim’s ROAR Complaint Against Russo.pdf

http://www.box.net/shared/4424e7822p

 

D. A. Kevin Dunleavy Removed al-Hakim from Davidson Courthouse Building VM

http://www.box.net/shared/x46rvjorhj

 

D. A. Mike O’Connor Ends Investigation VM

http://www.box.net/shared/3oampngtby

 

D. A. Kevin Dunleavy Tells al-Hakim he to Talk with V. Harvey VM

http://www.box.net/shared/ma0fyvzkdc

We presented the Stipulation to the Court as we expect and appreciate the signing where indicated, for we all want this matter resolved immediately. We hand delivered the original and two copies to the Court for endorsement and filing and was to provide an endorsed filed copy to the Director of the Department of Child Support Services afterwards. We all look forward to resolving this matter as soon as possible.

I can be reached at (510) 394-4501 if you have any questions. Thanks’ for taking the time to address these issues and endorse and return this Stipulation.

Respectfully,

Abdul-Jalil

Defendant

al-Hakim Identified & Stopped by County Sheriff’s Deputy Filing Letter

ABDUL-JALIL al-HAKIM

7633 SUNKIST DR.,   OAKLAND,  CA    94605-3024  (510) 394-4501

 

TO:The Honorable Winifred Smith          The Honorable C. Don Clay

Presiding Judge                                            Supervising Judge

Superior Court of California                      Superior Court of California

County of Alameda                                     County of Alameda

1225 Fallon St., Dept #1                             1225Fallon St., Dept #6

Oakland, CA 94612                                     Oakland, CA 94612

Fax No.: 510 891-6276                               Fax No.: 510 891-6276

 

TO:The Honorable Sandra Bean              The Honorable Stephen Pulido

Alameda Family Law Court                      Presiding Judge Family Law Court

Superior Court of California                     Superior Court of California

County of Alameda                                     County of Alameda

2233 Shoreline Drive                                 24405 Amador Street

Alameda, CA 94501                                   Hayward, CA 94544

Fax No.: 510 263-4309                             Fax No.: 510 690-2824

 

bcc:

FROM: Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim

DATE: January 9, 2014

NO PAGES: 3

RE: Stipulation in Superior Court Case #511339-2 and 511488-1; Alameda County Department of Child Support Services(ACDCSS) case number #0010274454-01 (previously listed as FSD #274454A)

Dear Judges Smith, Clay, Pulido and Bean,

This morning I went to the Alameda Family Law Court to file a letter to the Judges dated January 7, 2014 and was prevented from doing so. I waited in line for over 30 minutes and upon being called up to the counter and asking to file the letter, the clerk took the letter, immediately turned and walked away. Within three minutes a County Sheriff’s Deputy calls my name in the hallway and asked that I leave the line and come speak with him. He informs me that I must go to Judge Pulido’s courtroom to file the letter and that he would be handling this matter in Probate Court. I asked “why can’t I simply file the letter as this is a Family Law matter and not a Probate matter”, he could not answer. I asked “will I would be notified by Judge Pulido” and he said “I’m notifying you now!” I asked if he was acting at anyones insistence and he said “as an officer of the court”. I asked “who told you that this case was transferred” he said “Michelle”. I asked “what’s her last name” and he pointed to “Michelle Esguerra” in the letter and said “this is her name here”.

I will address several open concerns as well as the issue of being identified by the Sheriff’s Deputy and Court Administration without having announced my name and being pulled aside by the Sheriff Deputy in the next communication with the court.

Now I need to know if in fact Judge Pulido is handing this matter, and if so, in what capacity and jurisdiction. Is he acting as the Family Law Presiding Court Judge or as the Judge in Probate Court? Is this a Family Law matter addressing the stipulation, or is this a Probate matter?

Let’s begin by addressing the actions of the Deputy Clerk- Michelle Esguerra that ended with her hanging up the phone when she could not answer any simple questions regarding the rejection of the filed stipulation in this matter. She would only say that a Commissioner rejected the filing citing a need for it to be notarized and “you must go to the Family Law Help Center or have an attorney” for the stipulation to be approved as filed.

I was first told that the Stipulation was rejected by Judge Bean, then after weeks of ignoring the request for the Civil Code justifying the rejection, she tells me that it was rejected by “a Commissioner”. When asked “which one?” she refused to answer and hung up the phone. Now I want to know who rejected the Stipulation and when? Given the conversations and actions of Mrs. Esquerra we don’t believe that the Stipulation was ever reviewed by anyone until after we made the demand for the citation for it’s rejection.

This extra-judicial requirement is wholly untrue and a misrepresentation of the courts requirements to file ANY document, much less a stipulation that just reflects there is an agreement between the parties that does not need to be litigated, simply approved by the court! Again, I want to know what Civil Code section specifically requires that a Stipulation by the parties without attorneys MUST be notarized? After receiving proof that this is proper, if that is the case, you can merely return the original stipulation and we will have it filed by counsel. The agreement between the parties is notarized but NOT the Stipulation. You can respond via email to: Legal@superstarmanagement.com

We presented this Stipulation to the Court as we expect and appreciate your signing where indicated, for we all want this matter resolved immediately. We hand delivered the original and two copies to the Court for endorsement and filing and was to provide an endorsed filed copy to the Director of the Department of Child Support Services afterwards. We all look forward to resolving this matter as soon as possible.

I can be reached at (510) 394-4501 if you have any questions. Thanks’ for taking the time to endorse and return this Stipulation.

Respectfully,

Abdul-Jalil

Defendant

Presiding Judge Family Law Court Covers For Clerk Issuing Rulings, Targeted By DA, Sheriffs Deputy

ABDUL-JALIL al-HAKIM

7633 SUNKIST DR.,   OAKLAND,  CA    94605-3024  (510) 394-4501

 

TO: The Honorable C. Don Clay                    NO PAGES: 2

Supervising Judge

Superior Court of California

County of Alameda

1225 Fallon St., Dept #1

Oakland, CA 94612

Fax No.: 510 891-6276

 

TO: The Honorable Sandra Bean           The Honorable Stephen Pulido

Alameda Family Law Court                   Presiding Judge Family Law Court

Superior Court of California                 Superior Court of California

County of Alameda                                County of Alameda

2233 Shoreline Drive                             24405 Amador Street

Alameda, CA 94501                               Hayward, CA 94544

Fax No.: 510 263-4309                         Fax No.: 510 690-2824

 

bcc:

FROM: Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim

DATE: January 7, 2014

RE: Stipulation in Superior Court Case #511339-2 and 511488-1; Alameda County Department of Child Support Services(ACDCSS) case number #0010274454-01 (previously listed as FSD #274454A)

 

Dear Judge Clay and Bean,

I have just finished a phone conversation with your Deputy Clerk- Michelle Esguerra that ended with her hanging up the phone when she could not answer any simple questions regarding the rejection of the filed stipulation in this matter. She would only say that a Commissioner rejected the filing citing a need for it to be notarized and “you must go to the Family Law Help Center or have an attorney” for the stipulation to be approved as filed.

This extra-judicial requirement is wholly untrue and a misrepresentation of the courts requirements to file ANY document, much less a stipulation that just reflects there is an agreement between the parties that does not need to be litigated, simply approved by the court! This happened despite the fact that I have gone to the Family Law Dept. in person several times to get the necessary answers to resolving this matter; filed several letters along with the stipulation regarding this matter with the courts, as well as Judges Clay, Bean and Pulido; left several voice mail messages for both Judges Bean and Pulido; and left four voice mail messages for Esguerra that were all not responded to by anyone.

I want to know what Civil Code section specifically requires that a Stipulation by the parties without attorneys MUST be notarized? After receiving proof that this is proper, if that is the case, you can merely return the original stipulation and we will have it filed by counsel. The agreement between the parties is notarized but NOT the Stipulation. You can respond via email to: Legal@superstarmanagement.com

The legal and binding Stipulation was drafted by previous counsel, is signed by the responsible parties, Harun Marwan aI-HAKIM as the Plaintiff, the natural child of and Co-Executor of the will of PATTY JO FLENORY; Dana Medler as the natural child of and Co-Executor of the will of PATTY JO FLENORY; and myself Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, Defendant and natural father of HARUN MARWAN aI-HAKIM.

This Stipulation merely reflects the notarized agreement between the parties that settles the alleged arrears in child support payments to PATTY JO FLENORY on behalf of Harun Marwan aI-HAKIM.

We presented this Stipulation to the Court and appreciate your signing where indicated, we all want this matter resolved immediately. We hand delivered the original and two copies to the Court for endorsement and filing and was to provide an endorsed filed copy to the Director of the Department of Child Support Services afterwards. We all look forward to resolving this matter as soon as possible.

I can be reached at (510) 394-4501 if you have any questions. Thanks’ for taking the time to endorse and return this Stipulation.

 

Respectfully,

 

Abdul-Jalil

Defendant

Court Deputy Clerk Giving Judicial Rulings

ABDUL-JALIL al-HAKIM

7633 SUNKIST DR.,   OAKLAND,  CA    94605-3024  (510) 394-4501

 

TO: The Honorable C. Don Clay          NO PAGES: 2

Presiding Judge

Superior Court of California

County of Alameda

1225 Fallon St., Dept #1

Oakland, CA 94612

 

TO: Michelle

Deputy Clerk – Alameda Family Law Court

Superior Court of California

County of Alameda

2233 Shoreline Drive

Alameda, CA 94501

cc: Hon. Stephen Pulido, Presiding Judge- Family Law, Superior Court of California

FROM: Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim

DATE: December 23, 2013

RE: Stipulation in Superior Court Case #511339-2 and 511488-1; Alameda County Department of Child Support Services(ACDCSS) case number #0010274454-01 (previously listed as FSD #274454A)

 

Dear Judge Clay and Michelle,

On Thursday, December 19, 2013 at 10:45 am, I appeared in your courtroom to file the above referenced Stipulation. After review, I was informed by your clerk to file it in the main Civil Court Division and it would be routed back to you for execution. I then went downstairs to file it and was told that because it was a Family Law matter it had to be filed in Alameda Courthouse on Shoreline.

I then proceeded to attempt to file it with the Family Law Court at 11:30 am when I was informed by the Deputy Clerk named Michelle (no last name given) that ALL Stipulations without attorneys involved MUST be notarized before filing. I questioned that procedure then asked for and received a “received” stamped copy from her that bears the date of “August 10, 2013”. I was further told that the filing would be submitted to the court for review and execution if proper and an approved or rejected copy would be available by the next day.

I went to the Family Law courthouse today and retrieved a copy, NOT THE ORIGINAL, of the filing that was rejected for the following reason:

“After judicial review, the following has been determined:

The signature of each person who has signed the stipulation must be notarized”.

It is executed with a digital signature by the Executive Officer/Clerk of the Superior Court, Deputy Clerk. Unable to read it, I asked whom had signed the notice of rejection and was told it was Michelle again.

I want to know what Civil Code section specifically requires that a Stipulation by the parties without attorneys MUST be notarized? The agreement between the parties must be notarized but NOT the Stipulation. You can respond via email to: ajalil1234@gmail.com

The legal and binding Stipulation was drafted by previous counsel, is signed by the responsible parties, Harun Marwan aI-HAKIM as the Plaintiff, the natural child of and Co-Executor of the will of PATTY JO FLENORY; Dana Medler as the natural child of and Co-Executor of the will of PATTY JO FLENORY; and myself Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, Defendant and natural father of HARUN MARWAN aI-HAKIM.

This Stipulation merely reflects the notarized agreement between the parties that settles the alleged arrears in child support payments to PATTY JO FLENORY on behalf of Harun Marwan aI-HAKIM.

We presented this Stipulation to the Court and appreciate your signing where indicated, we all want this matter resolved immediately. We hand delivered the original and two copies to the Court for endorsement and filing and was to provide an endorsed filed copy to the Director of the Department of Child Support Services afterwards. We all look forward to resolving this matter as soon as possible.

I can be reached at (510) 394-4501 if you have any questions. Thanks’ for taking the time to endorse and return this Stipulation.

 

Respectfully,

Abdul-Jalil

Defendant

These Eight Charts Show Why Racial Equality Is a Myth in America

Ta-Nehisi Coates’ cover story at The Atlantic, “The Case for Reparations,” pubCover of The Case for Reparationslished last night — and the subject of this week’s Moyers & Companyinterview — shows how dramatically the legacy of slavery and centuries of legalized and institutionalized racism have held back our country’s African-American population. In 2014, there still very much exists what in 1967 Martin Luther King described as “two Americas,” one “overflowing with the milk of prosperity and the honey of opportunity,” the other tainted by “a daily ugliness … that constantly transforms the buoyancy of hope into the fatigue of despair.”

Last summer, America celebrated the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington, and this week marks the 50th anniversary of the beginning of President Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society programs. But in 2014, just as in the mid-1960s, which one of Dr. King’s two Americas you live in likely depends on the color of your skin.

These charts show what those two Americas look like.

Screen Shot 2014-05-27 at 12.49.07 AM

For the last few decades, the median household income for African-Americans has done little to catch up to that of whites. The comparatively low incomes of Hispanic and black households is made worse by the fact that across races, Americans are making less today than they were in the year 2000.

 Screen Shot 2014-05-27 at 12.46.53 AM

Median household income is just one measure of a given demographic’s economic wellbeing: as the Urban Institute notes, the racial wealth gap is three times greater than the racial income gap. Wealth is a measure of all the money a family has, as well as assets — such as a house. In 1983, for every dollar held by the average black or Hispanic family, the average white family had five. Rather than shrinking, that gap has increased from the 1980s through today; white families now have nearly six times as much as black families.

(Matt Bruenig does a good job delving further into this gap at Demos’ Policy Shopblog »)

 Screen Shot 2014-05-27 at 12.51.00 AM

These divides put a far greater proportion of racial minorities below the poverty line than whites. Today, about one in 10 white Americans lives in poverty; compare that with roughly one in four Hispanic-Americans and African-Americans. The Great Recession hit minorities particularly hard, with poverty rising from 24.2 percent to 27.5 percent among African-Americans and 20.6 percent to 25.3 percent among Hispanic-Americans between 2006 and 2011.

 Screen Shot 2014-05-27 at 12.52.33 AM

Racial poverty figures are even more stark when you look at child poverty. Across racial demographics, children are more likely to live in poverty than adults. But with racial minorities, the numbers are striking: In 2011, 37.4 percent of black children and 34.1 percent of Latino children lived in poverty. That’s more than a third of children in both groups. (In 2011, a family of three was in “poverty” if it made less than $18,530 a year.) Compare that with 12.5 percent of white children living in poverty — which is, of course, still a depressingly high figure.

 Screen Shot 2014-05-27 at 12.53.58 AM

Research by the Economic Policy Institute, a labor-oriented think tank, shows one of the drivers of the yawning inequalities in the charts above: The unemployment rate among black Americans has remained at least twice as high as that of white Americans for 50 years. Back in 1963, the unemployment rate was 5 percent for whites and 10.9 percent for blacks — or 2.2 times as high for blacks as for whites. In 2012, it was 2.1 times as high (6.6 percent for whites, 14 percent for African-Americans) after 50 years of fluctuating more or less between 2 and 2.5 times as high.

 Screen Shot 2014-05-27 at 12.55.21 AM

The structural racism behind these economic disparities takes many forms; some can be quantified, and some cannot. One that can is the rate of incarceration.

Across races, a greater share of Americans are imprisoned today than 50 years ago. But the increase has been more dramatic among African-Americans. For every one white man out of 100,000 imprisoned in 1960, 2.6 are imprisoned today. For every one black man out of 100,000 imprisoned in 1960, 3.3 are imprisoned today. Even though, in 1960, there were still US states maintaining “separate but equal” schools, disenfranchising African-Americans and barring interracial marriage, a larger share of the black population is behind bars today. According to the Pew Research Center, for every white man in prison in 2010, 6.4 black men were in prison.

(This, argue many, is the legacy of the War on Drugs. “We have not ended racial caste in America; we have merely redesigned it,” writes Michelle Alexander in her book on the topic, The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness.)

 Screen Shot 2014-05-27 at 12.56.39 AM

It’s been 60 years since the Supreme Court struck down the concept of “separate but equal” schools in Brown v. Board of Education, but today, the majority of black students attend schools that are majority non-white. The share of black students attending a majority-non-white school today — 74.1 percent — is little changed from figures from the 1960s. Nearly 40 percent of black children attend schools that are almost entirely (more than 90 percent) non-white.

 Screen Shot 2014-05-27 at 12.57.39 AM

Housing is another form of segregation with centuries of history in America. Today, it is not always so overt as in the past — such as what Ta-Nehisi Coates documents in mid-century Chicago in “The Case for Reparations” — though, of course, housing-related racism is still ugly and overt often enough (see: Donald Sterling).

But it takes insidious, harder-to-document forms too. The chart above shows one of them: Latinos and African-Americans with good credit receive high interest rate mortgages far more often than whites. These mortgages are supposed to go to risky borrowers; because of their higher rates, houses purchased with these mortgages are harder to pay off, and are more likely to be foreclosed on. This phenomenon — giving higher-rate, or subprime, mortgages to families of colorwho qualified for more traditional mortgages — was one of the reasons why the housing bubble burst, which, in turn, helped set off the global financial crisis.

This phenomenon also helps explain why minorities were hit harder by the Great Recession, and illuminates the modern-day racism that keeps the wealth gap so strikingly wide.

District Attorney Embezzles Child Support from Minor, Extorts Parents

NOWTRUTH.ORG

Award for “Distinguished Marketing and Promotional Services” from NFL Super Bowl NFL Experience,
Founder of BLACK EXPO shown with Olympic Sprinter John Carlos , Hip Hop’s Islamic Influence, 1979 National BALSA Conference , Dellums for Mayor, Hip Hop’s Islamic Influence, 1979 National BALSA Conference, Oakland Police Officers Arrested for Computer Store Burglaries, Police Found Guilty in Burglaries, Police Officers Sentenced for Burglaries,


You can click on any highlighted word to view or download that item

MEDIA ADVISORY

February 20, 2014,  Oakland, CA:

Contact:
Martin Silverman (510) 394-4701
nowtruth@nowtruth.org;

The following is an actual copy of the letter that was faxed, hand delivered, personally served, and filed in the Alameda County Superior Courts in response to the continued persecution and extortionate scheme of the al-Hakim Family by the Alameda County Superior Court, District Attorney and Department of Child Support Services or more appropriately entitled the “Department of Child Support Fraud Services”.
The DA’s goon, Bob “BULL” Conner is coincidently the chief investigator for the DA in the Oscar Grant case, yet was listed as the chief witness for the DEFENSE in that case. HHhhmmmmm? The main investigator and witness for the prosecution is the main witness for the DEFENSE???!!!
Further, the County judge in the Oscar Grant case, Judge Don Clay whom is very familiar with Conner, also failed and refused to pursue a formal complaint by Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim against “Bull” Connor for his armed accosting al-Hakim, falsely arresting/detaining him in a room, threatening al-Hakim, forcing from the Courthouse, and telling al-Hakim “don’t ever come back!”. A racist example no less violent then the original “Bull Connor” from Alabama! It must be his daddy!
These actions are unconscionable!
Read and distribute widely!!!

Martin

Oink'Malley-Carson Cybil Whrites

http://nowtruth.org/occupiers-redeem-kings-dream-while-keith-carson-and-his-poverty-pimps-are-killers-of-kings-dream-sell-it-out/

FAX MEMO
ABDUL-JALIL al-HAKIM
7633 SUNKIST DRIVE, OAKLAND, CA  94605-3024
PH (510) 394-4501


TO:         The Honorable Winnifred Smith        The Honorable C. Don Clay
Presiding Judge                                  Supervising Judge
Superior Court of California              Superior Court of California
County of Alameda                            County of Alameda
1225 Fallon St., Dept #1                    1225 Fallon St., Dept #6
Oakland, CA 94612                           Oakland, CA 94612
Fax No.: 510 891-6276                      Fax No.: 510 891-6276

TO:        The Honorable Sandra Bean            The Honorable Stephen Pulido
Alameda Family Law Court            Presiding Judge Family Law Court
Superior Court of California           Superior Court of California
County of Alameda                         County of Alameda
2233 Shoreline Drive                      24405 Amador Street
Alameda, CA 94501                       Hayward, CA 94544
Fax No.: 510 263-4309                   Fax No.: 510 690-2824

The Honorable Elizabeth Hendrickson
Dept. 103 Traffic
WILEY W. MANUEL COURTHOUSE
661 Washington Street
Oakland, CA  94607
Fax No.: 510 627-4906

bcc:
FROM:     Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim
DATE:     January 30, 2014
NO PAGES: 14
RE:         Stipulation in Superior Court Case #511339-2; The People vs Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, Docket # WWM00000560171and reassign this matter as per then Judicial Administration Rule 6.603 (b) (1) (D) now Rule 10.603 (c) (1) (D); requesting security after being identified and targeted by the District Attorney and Sheriff’s Deputy.

Dear Judges Smith, Clay, Pulido Bean and Commissioner Hendrickson,

This three decades old continuing story of the conflict between the al-Hakim Family with the Alameda County District Attorney (DA) and the Department of Child Support Service (DCSS) must be among the most extensively told in the history of the American judiciary. This and other courts have previously described in detail the parties’ underlying dispute, which concerns the admitted willful fraud and extortionate scheme that the District Attorney and DCSS extensively exercised to persecute the family that they are liable for.
In the case of Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim v. CSAA, Alameda County Case No. 811337-3 an over $20 million,12 year; contentious legal action; that has the largest case file in the history of Alameda County Superior Court, with over 60 file boxes of pleadings; over 120 motions and responses; plaintiff had over 300 trail exhibits; over 5,000 pages of exhibits; 3,000 pages of documents for trial rebuttal argument; 20 expert witnesses; 77 other witnesses; over 100 pages of jury instructions; with DQ’s filed against EVERY Judge for numerous charges from judicial misconduct to corruption, where EVERY judge in this case has admitted error, committed perjury, recused themselves, or all three!
Alameda County District Attorney Tom Orloff’s Extrinsic Fraud Upon the Court, Prosecutorial Misconduct, Willful and Malicious Prosecution, Conflict of Interest, Obstruction of Justice, Denial of Due Process, Willful and Intentional Fabrication and Authoring False Evidence; Misrepresentation and Concealment of Material Facts
al-Hakim had to file an action against Tom Orloff and the Alameda County District Attorney’s (DA) and the Alameda County Department of Child Support Services (ACDCSS) because for over 25 years they repeatedly failed and refused to enforce the courts own orders for the fair and proper application and accounting of payments al-Hakim made in trust to the DA in their fiduciary capacity for the minor al-Hakim child depriving al-Hakim and the minor child of over $2,000 of monies paid, thus creating a “mythical” arrearage and open account in al-Hakim’s name and on his behalf owed to the minor child, then illegally charging al-Hakim with the crime of violating the child support statute for nonpayment, reporting the alleged violation to the State of California for Collection and the State Department of Motor Vehicles for suspension of his driving privilege for nonpayment and illegally tossing al-Hakim into “debtors prison”, suspending his drivers license, revoking his passport, and ruining his credit. ACDCSS actions and claimed “right” to perform in this manner are not contained in any State or Federal statute, regulation, or other legislative act and therefore, do not have the force of law and renders it constitutionally infirm and no court officer can merely “grant” a ruling in their favor to cover getting caught having done so. Full Story with Videos and Documents at http://tinyurl.com/ljk8av
Attorney General of The State of California Substituted In for DA Tom Orloff
On January 22, 2008 Attorney General Jerry Brown and the Office of The Attorney General of The State of California substituted in as attorney of record in this case for the Alameda County Department of Child Support Services allegedly “in the interest of justice”. What justice is there in the Attorney General defending, concealing and thereby further complicitly committing the admitted willful and intentional extrinsic fraud upon the court; prosecutorial misconduct; willful and malicious prosecution; misconduct; conflict of interest; obstruction of justice; denial of due process under the law; willful and intentional fabrication and authoring false evidence; misstating and mischaracterizing evidence; misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court’s act or reliance; harassment; and intimidation on behalf of District Attorney Nancy O’Malley, former DA Tom Orloff, Maureen Lenahan, Valgeria Harvey, counselors L. Lavagetto, Ms. K. Pendergrass, Ms. Adler, Kris Ferre, and accountant Mr. Lovelady and others unnamed in the DA’s office; various judges and Commissioner Oleon’s abuse of discretion, willful misconduct, conduct prejudicial, illegal ex-parte communications and bias that resulted in error.
This was done to excuse and protect the Alameda County Department of Child Support Services from their ongoing conflict of interest in their alleging to represent the interest of Joette Hall, whom they had defrauded along with al-Hakim of the funds paid to the DCSS in trust for their minor child.
The Alameda County Department of Child Support Services was never representing the al-Hakim Hall family, they were defending and covering up their extrinsic fraud upon the state and the families. The Alameda County Department of Child Support Services wanted to conceal their attempted coercion of al-Hakim to pay the arrearage they created in his name.
al-Hakim and his family had complained many times each year about the misapplication of the funds tendered to the Department of Child Support Services in trust for the al-Hakim Hall family.
For nearly three decades the District Attorney and DCSS has launched criminal legal proceedings that can aptly characterized as “unique in the annals of American judicial history.” Through these proceedings – which have resulted in numerous illegal orders and opinions from the courts, the District Attorney and DCSS gained access to an extraordinary quantity of material, including all of al-Hakim’s litigation files in totally unrelated cases that have absolutely NO value in this case to further their litigation, legislative, and political strategies to compel their enforcement strategy, extortionate scheme to force him to pay their fraudulent arrears including enforcement in multiple jurisdictions by placing illegal and unwarranted holds on his drivers license with the California Department of Motor Vehicles with the intent of al-Hakim being arrested and harmed physically and financially; placing illegal and unwarranted holds on his passport with the State Department; and these efforts to use judgment enforcement for settlement leverage to undertake in the event they don’t prevail before the courts. These proceeding efforts are ongoing.
The District Attorney and DCSS presented its admitted evidence of fraud and bribery to the trial court, convincing it to rule against the family’s court ordered compliant payments complete with DCSS’s own receipts for same– instead using its unfettered, presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of admitted fraud and bribery, accounting report– as the basis for the trial court’s final decision. On the basis of these and other materials, the ruling and judgment was fundamentally obtained and tainted by fraud. The heart of the alleged fraud is two-fold.
First, the District Attorney and DCSS and their judicial team of covert illicit participants– the putative accounting expert that created and complied the entire presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of admitted fraud and bribery, the accounting report used as the sole basis for the judgment by Commissioner Glenn Oleon despite the fact he knew it was the product of fraud.
Second, the District Attorney and DCSS wresting control of the judicial process by exercising a clearly illegal conflict of interest in misrepresenting the family, conducting a complete trial to defend their illegal actions and evidence before admitting the conflict AFTER the trial was completed, exerting undue influence in the process, by conspiring with the court Commissioner Oleon; applying political pressure in order to obtain a judgment based on political advantage rather than the rule of law. Upon the substitution of attorneys, then California Attorney General Jerry Brown, responsible for carrying out investigation of Alameda County Superior Court and State Appeals Court judges, District Attorney Tom Orloff, Oakland City Attorney and various corporate defendants is himself defending some of the criminals and covering up the very same corruption he is supposed to be investigating and prosecuting! Full Story with Videos and Documents at http://tinyurl.com/ljk8av
Nevertheless, as noted above, the court returned a judgment against the family, rejecting the decades of presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of admitted fraud and bribery in the proceedings; family’s claims of civil conspiracy; conspiracy to commit obstruction of justice; obstruction of justice; conspiracy to commit extrinsic fraud; extrinsic fraud; fraud upon the court and The People of the State of California; conspiracy to commit extortion; extortion; conspiracy to commit bribery; bribery; conspiracy to commit embezzlement; embezzlement; conspiracy to commit intimidation; intimidation; conspiracy to commit harassment; harassment; conspiracy to commit blackmail; blackmail; conspiracy to misappropriate funds; misappropriation of funds; conspiracy to violate fiduciary trust; violation of fiduciary trust; conspiracy to co-mingle funds; co-mingling of funds; conspiracy to commit deception; deception; conspiracy to commit concealment; concealment; conspiracy to commit misrepresentation; misrepresentation; conspiracy to commit diversion of funds; diversion of funds; conspiracy to create and falsify documents as evidence; creating and falsifying documents as evidence; conspiracy to procure false testimony; procuring false testimony; witness tampering; conspiracy to violate racketeering laws; violate racketeering laws; conspiracy to commit tortious interference with contract; tortious interference with contract; conspiracy to commit unjust enrichment; unjust enrichment; conspiracy to commit conflict of interest; conflict of interest; admitting conflict of interest AFTER the trial was completed; conspiracy to commit misrepresentation; misrepresentation; conspiracy to intentionally inflict maximum pain, suffering, emotional distress; the intentional infliction of maximum pain, suffering, emotional distress; conspiracy to commit ; slander; conspiracy to conduct a complete trial to defend their illegal actions and evidence; conducting a complete trial to defend their illegal actions and evidence; conspiracy to exert undue influence in the judicial process; exerting undue influence in the judicial process; civil conspiracy with court Commissioner Oleon; conspiracy to directly or indirectly funding, commencing, prosecuting, advancing in any way, or receiving benefit from any action or proceeding; directly or indirectly funding, commencing, prosecuting, advancing in any way, or receiving benefit from any action or proceeding; conspiracy to litigate for recognition or enforcement of an illegal judgment previously rendered in the court; litigating for recognition or enforcement of an illegal judgment previously rendered in the court; among others.
I last contacted you all above with the exception of Commissioner Hendrickson on January 9, 2014 after I went to the Alameda Family Law Court to file a letter to the Judges dated January 7, 2014 and was prevented from doing so by a County Sheriff’s Deputy who informs me that I must go to Judge Pulido’s courtroom to file the letter and that he would be handling this matter in Probate Court. Both letters had already been faxed, served, or both on all the parties above except the January 7, 2014 one to Judge Smith and this is the first to Commissioner Hendrickson. The family and I have had no response to ANY of the five previous letters to the court to clarify the pending matters in this case totally comprised of the District Attorney (DA) and Department of Child Support Service (DCSS) presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of their admitted fraud in the proceedings that they themselves alone developed. The court must now address that issue with the family in open court with these admission and the product of fraud upon the court, The People of the State of California and the family. The District Attorney and DCSS’ larcenous moral turpitude, obstruction of justice and misrepresentation is all that remains of this case.
So again, now we need to know if in fact Judge Pulido is handing this matter, and if so, in what capacity and jurisdiction. Is he acting as the Family Law Presiding Court Judge or as the Judge in Probate Court? Is this a Family Law matter addressing the stipulation, or is this a Probate matter?
We need to know what Civil Code section specifically requires that a Stipulation by the parties without attorneys MUST be notarized? Who rejected the Stipulation and when?
The family has accounts that confirm that the Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS and other representatives engaged in repeated, substantive ex-parte meetings and communications with the judicial officials presiding over litigation involving the family, including meetings and communications relating to the case and stipulation with court administration personnel that has very limited knowledge of civil law rules, substantively and especially procedurally including the selection of Judge Pulido to preside over this case in Probate. Such evidence would further establish the Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS ex-parte contacts are improper under law and would also further prove the Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS were attempting to exert undue influence over the court. This evidence indicates that the Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS meetings were inappropriate and secret.
The family believes the Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS nefarious and inappropriate abandonment of the family’s right to settle the case and have the courts to acknowledge the stipulation without any civil law citations and no evidence of such to support the alleged ruling by a judge is an untenable to prevent efforts to move the case towards resolution. The family has every right, and very good reason, to seek an end to the individual persecution that they believed the Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS has been using as a way to extort the family, drag out the case and bleed their resources. We are requesting that the court immediately sign the order for the stipulation and noting that we realize that it should have already been ordered. By requesting that it be ordered, we are simply exercising our procedural right to that evidence.
The family believes that this maneuver by the Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS attempted to alter the ordinary course of the trial and inject more delay into already protracted proceedings.
Now we have the pending matter of The People vs Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, Docket # WWM00000560171, Citation # 5330190 presently assigned to Dept. 103 the Traffic court for trial on February 10, 2014 at 2:00 PM.
With this matter involving the alleged crime of driving with a suspended license, it would be an impossible burden on the court to hear the matter in Dept. 103 and further would be an unavoidable conflict nor would the family EVER agree for the matter to be heard by a commissioner after the most recent travesty of justice by yet another one. It was unconscionable that Commissioner Oleon would EVER entertain the presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of the District Attorney and DCSS admitted fraud much less use it SOLEY as the basis for an illegal judgment and think he could get away with it! Amazing!
In furtherance of their obstruction of justice and attempted extortion of the family, the District Attorney and DCSS has failed and refused to submit any of the releases of child support holds my drivers license to the California State Department of Motor Vehicles for nearly ten years! This despite court orders to do so and the account being current. Dept. 103 does not provide the time to plead, examine and hear this matter and we do not want to provide the same excuse that Oleon used of a “lack of time” to hear the matter, “it should be in another courtroom”. If he were truly concerned about a lack time to hear the case and JUSTICE, he NEVER would have heard the only evidence presented by the District Attorney and DCSS, that of their admitted fraud upon the court.
For these and the reasons presented herein, we request that this matter be re-assigned to another court room that has the necessary facilities of time and court staff, including a reporter and security. I have been threatened by both judges and the District Attorney staff and had requested security from both since 1989. So as Judge Northridge did in November 8, 2006, I am asking this court to reassign this matter as per then Judicial Administration Rule 6.603 (b) (1) (D) now Rule 10.603 (c) (1) (D).
However, it should be noted the family will contest jurisdiction because the testimony of various parties was merely legal theory orchestrated by the District Attorney and DCSS to willfully deceive the court, to allow them to pretend that the Family was represented by the District Attorney and DCSS and whose work was manipulated by the District Attorney and DCSS. Since this is admitted fraudulent evidence and testimony there is no need to impeach these assertions about the District Attorney and DCSS’ conduct. Nothing else has any bearing on this case. This was done in context for the District Attorney and DCSS’ furtherance of their fraud upon the court, the People of California and the family with the intent to deceive and their continued obstruction of justice scheme supported by the court itself to enhance their overall extortion scheme to make al-Hakim pay for their fraud and bribery- not a purported justification or belief in a larger good. This judgment is NOT the legitimate product of an impartial court.
Thus, throughout these extraordinary trials, the most important facts have gone uncontested:
the family has made it abundantly clear and by their actions and evidence that the District Attorney and DCSS violated a court order, perpetrated fraud upon the Court, defrauded the People of the State of California and the al-Hakim family, violated their fiduciary trust, engage in civil conspiracy, bribery, paid a testifying witness for admitted fraudulent evidence and testimony, obstructed justice and has pursued this litigation by a variety of unethical, corrupt, and illegal means, including exercising a clearly illegal conflict of interest in misrepresenting the family, conducting a complete trial to defend their illegal actions and evidence before admitting the conflict, exerting undue influence in the process, by conspiring with the court Commissioner Oleon, its designated accounting expert presenting admitted fraudulent evidence, and by controlling the subsequent production of that evidence over the objection of the family allegedly as a neutral damages assessment.
Certainly, there is no reason to deem a single judge in the Superior Court of Alameda County even capable of deciding whether norms of civil procedure or legal ethics have been or can be followed in this case. Yet that is exactly what needs to be done here as the family has asked this Court to do just that. Indeed, it has gone further, putting the’s entire County government, the Superior Court, the District Attorney and DCSS on trial. A courtroom spectacle more anathema to justice and civil rights is hard to imagine.
All of this is bad enough. But it is made worse by the central irony hanging over this case: The reason the case is toxic is because the District Attorney and DCSS alleged “representing” the family, their creation and use of the presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of admitted fraud and bribery in the proceedings, the substantive merit of their paid testifying witness for admitted fraudulent evidence and testimony on that subject, the judgment as the illegitimate product of an partial court, conducting a complete trial to defend their illegal actions and evidence before admitting the conflict. For nearly a quarter century, the District Attorney and DCSS showered praise on itself and the judiciary, extolling its impartiality and independence in an effort to persuade this Court to award litigation in it’s favor. That effort succeeded. The Court concluded the case in their favor every time with dubious and illegal rulings that contravened procedural law despite the evidence and testimony as it had “everything to do with extorting money from al-Hakim and persecuting the family and nothing to do with the truth, facts or evidence.
There are multiple legal defects that independently require that this case be dismissed but I will discuss this one:
First, there can no longer be any question that this Court lacks jurisdiction. No court has jurisdiction unless the plaintiff has standing, the courts and RICO imposes rigorous standing limits. The District Attorney and DCSS alleged “representing” the family, their creation and use of the presumptively inadmissible product and evidence of admitted fraud and bribery in the proceedings, the substantive merit of their paid testifying witness for admitted fraudulent evidence and testimony on that subject, the judgment as the illegitimate product of an partial court, conducting a complete trial to defend their illegal actions and evidence before admitting the conflict is yet another admission of willful fraud and bribery and lack of standing. Intent on depriving the family of their constitutional right to a fair trial- and apparently lacking confidence in its own actions and evidence-  dropped all of its claims of representation of the family upon the filing of appeal of trial. The California State Attorney General substituted in for The People of the State of California and the family. That also was a conflict as the family had filed a complaint with the U. S. Department of Justice that was referred to and filed with the California State Attorney General regarding these and other activities of the Superior Court, the District Attorney, DCSS, the Oakland City Attorney, other governmental and political officials, attorneys and their contractors, agents and employees. Though the conflict is clear, the investigation has not yet been done nor enforced, so its injury is still pending, not concrete nor non-speculative, and the evidence has gone uncontested.
The Superior Court, District Attorney and DCSS case fares no better on the facts. Given the mountain of discovery at its disposal, one would expect them to present a coherent narrative, backed by evidence. It hasn’t, it won’t and it can’t. Even on its own terms, this theory was implausible: how could anyone in the family possibly cause the District Attorney and DCSS to commit this willful fraud to the family’s own detriment and be responsible for it?
In my last letter to the courts, I said I would address several open concerns as well as the issue of being identified by the Sheriff’s Deputy and Court Administration without having announced my name and being pulled aside by the Sheriff Deputy in the next communication with the court. I will now do so.
We have been informed and thereon believe that several unknown operatives made illegal ex-parte contact with the Superior Court, the District Attorney, DCSS and County Sheriff’s Department regarding this case. al-Hakim has previously been asked by the the District Attorney to place himself in harms way that could have easily resulted in his death, and by design, it would have rid the Superior Court and the District Attorney of the one indispensable factor in proving the guilt of a rampant Police Department theft ring that the chief investigator, Bob Connor wanted to DISPROVE!
He first investigated al-Hakim, the victim, to compile/create enough evidence to force al-Hakim to give up the investigation/prosecution of the known guilty cops. I complained about his tactics and felt he wasn’t doing the job of investigating the burglars but the victim in an effort to let them off. Then he began to try to compile/create enough evidence to exonerate the known guilty cops. I again complained about his tactics and felt he wasn’t doing the job of investigating the burglars but trying to create a means to let them off. Realizing that he could not do so, he began to try to compile/create enough evidence to exonerate others involved in the same crimes, over 30 officers, and restrict the prosecution to the two known guilty cops. Upon having compiled enough evidence to convict the two known guilty cops, he began to try to negotiate with me how the case would be tried to the exclusion of others involved unless I was able to personally identify the guilty cops in the course of the burglary. He stated that he had knowledge that they were going to strike again and proposed that I pretend to leave the store, lock it up, yet wait inside for the burglary to occur and step out to identify the burglars. I asked if he had this knowledge, why wouldn’t they just “stake out the building and capture them when they set off the bomb on the windows and entered the store?”. He couldn’t answer with any logic other than to say he needed an eye witness. I rejected this fool hearty request to put my life in the line of fire to be shot by the same cop who set off the bomb to commit the burglary and then kills the the alleged perpetrator (me) whom he caught in the building while responding to the burglary-in-progress call he himself had made. Perfectly stupid!!! I complained about his tactics and felt he wasn’t doing the job of investigating the burglars but trying to eliminate the victim in an effort to let them off. I made it clear that I had no intention to talk to him again. He lastly came to the store to inform me that they had secured enough evidence and information to serve a search warrant and file a criminal complaint, that I should not speak to anyone, including the media excluding Tribune reporter Harry Harris. He further stated that I should know that half the police force thought I was a hero and the other half thought I was a “problem” and I should watch by back. My family, friends and I have lived with that fear since then. It was exacerbated when one night I came home from the store and laid down when shortly I heard a loud noise and saw bright lights hovering over the roof of my home. Since the home has skylights I could see a helicopter hovering over the home and shining a light around my home. I got a phone call from the Oakland Police Department asking me to identify myself, what was going on in the home, who was there, etc. I asked why was there a helicopter over my home and was told there was a report of a “burglary in progress” at my home. I told the person on the phone that there was no such thing happening and that this was perpetrated by some elements of the Police Department that wanted me out the way. They called off the report and I later went outside to find my house surrounded by police and one makes the remark “ you got away this time!”. Life threatening scary, but forces you to resolve NEVER to be intimidated by REAL PIGS! No decent, honorable human being would EVER initiate such actions because a person stood up to crime! Is that not what they are hired to do or are they above the law? This same investigator Bob Connor.
In letters to Judge Clay and others, I have expressed my fear for my safety after being verbally accosted; physically threatened; attempted to be baited, provoked and intimidated into a physical altercation; threatened with arrest, disallowed from going to Judge Leo Dorado’s courtroom; forcibly removed and escorted from the courthouse building; and ordered not to return by District Attorney Officer Bob Connor on November 22, 2010 at approximately 3:45 p.m  I had litigation that was to be filed in November 2010 the day of my being forcibly removed from the court house and threatened with arrest if I returned by District Attorney henchman Bob Connor whom is very well known to me. The District Attorney Nancy O’Malley’s office has compromised these suits and this issue also must be corrected ASAP. District Attorney Nancy O’Malley’s abridging these inalienable, sacred rights are not a joke to African-Americans.
This apparently was on order from Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O’Malley and assistant District Attorney Kevin Dunleavy as I sat alone in the lobby of the D. A.’s office for 30 minutes waiting to speak to Dunleavy on an update on the formal 200 page Corruption, Extrinsic Fraud, Criminal Misconduct, Ethics and “Whistle-Blower” Complaint complete with audio CD filed and served on their office on June 7, 2010 stemming from criminal actions committed by John Russo and the City Attorney’s office resulting from the sewer main collapse alongside my home in 1991. After requesting a response to Formal Complaint Served and Filed June 7, 2010 and several conversations with the Alameda County District Attorney office, District Attorney Nancy O’Malley assigned the case to Assistant District Attorney Kevin Dunleavy. After his review and several more conversations with me, Dunleavy decided to assign the case for investigation after he had been assigned this case in July 2010 when he told me months before that he had assigned it to another investigator.
The D. A.’s lobby reception area is merely a very small space between the elevators and the bullet proof glass doors and windows that separate the public from the D. A. There are only a few chairs that line one side of the space and is not meant to accommodate more than 4-8 people. During the 30 minutes that I waited in the lobby, only 3 people from the general public came onto the floor from the elevators, yet 10-12 came to and from the D. A.’s office. Clearly I represented no threat to anyone, and I could have been assisted without any concern nor fear on anyone’s behalf. I’m sure that the lobby area is equipped with surveillance cameras and would verify my account of this incident.
After the encounter with Bob Connor and my ouster from the Courthouse that was ordered by Dunleavey, I spoke with District Attorney Matt Golde and Superior Court Judge Leo Dorado regarding my treatment and called O’Malley to voice my extreme concern wherein I received a return call from Dunleavy. Dunleavey expressed his concern for the fact that I knew Golde and Dorado, but not as if it would have made a difference in their decision or actions in having me threatened and removed from the courthouse. He laughed as he recanted stories about them playing on a basketball team together, never once exhibiting any remorse for his or O’Malleys’ actions. The recorded conversation with Dunleavy regarding the encounter with Connor and the investigation can be listened to and/or downloaded at: http://www.box.net/shared/x46rvjorhj.
We discussed Dunleavy’s second call to me stating the he would speak with the Department of Child Support Services attorney Valgeria Harvey that had to admit in court several times that they and the D. A.’s office had committed fraud, embezzlement and theft against me and my family. When I refused to pay for the D. A.’s fraud, they attempted to extort the money from me by suspending my drivers license and revoking my passport! You can listen to D. A. Kevin Dunleavy voicemail as he tells me he is going to talk with V. Harvey of CSS http://www.box.net/shared/ma0fyvzkdc.
At the conclusion and throughout these conversations, I had been discussing this matter with  Rodney Brooks, the Chief of Staff for Supervisor Keith Carson who said that he would talk with Nancy O’Malley and get back to me.
Again on February 23, 2011, I spoke with Rodney for 25 minutes wherein he said that he had discussed the case with Assistant District Attorney Kevin Dunleavey, the same DA that had me forcibly removed from the Courthouse without notice, cause or legal grounds.
Rodney informed me that Dunleavey admitted he had me removed from the Courthouse without notice, cause or legal grounds and gave no reason nor legal grounds for doing so. Rodney further expressed through his “teeth clenched disdain” that the D.A. had concluded an investigation of the cases, found no wrong doing, and had sent me a letter of their findings and decision. I informed Rodney that Mike O’Connor, Senior Deputy District Attorney, had left me a voice mail message stating that, but in fact I have never received anything from them at all and asked him for a copy of this investigation report, and if he had read it. You can listen to D. A. Mike O’Connor voice mail stating he has ended the investigation at: http://www.box.net/shared/3oampngtby.
Rodney said that he had not seen the report and did not have a copy. I asked Rodney if he trusted the person whom ordered me removed from the courthouse to conduct a fair and impartial investigation of his employer, boss, co-workers, department, friends, allies and himself- he couldn’t answer, but he didn’t need to. I reiterated my request for a copy of the alleged “investigation report” from the D. A.’s office and that this matter be referred to the Justice Department and the Alameda County Grand Jury for investigation. Throughout the entire conversation Rodney was clearly discourteous to the point he was aggressively attempting to provoke a verbal response from me such that he could abruptly end the conversation. I merely acknowledged his attitude and stayed the course to ascertain that he would respond to my requests in writing and provide a copy of the alleged “investigation report” from the D. A.’s office. Needless to say I have received nothing from Rodney, and after his actions for the last year, it is not unexpected.
It is unfathomable that such a thing could happen right in your lobby and visitors reception area in today’s highly charged racial, political, and law enforcement versus community interactive environment, especially in Oakland and Alameda County where deadly force seems to be the rule rather than the exception. Given the history of the D. A.’s office, and in your short tenure, I should have expected it!
To allow the D. A.’s office to handle me and my complaint in such a Gestapo fashion and to use Judge Leo Dorado as a ruse is unacceptable, needs to be investigated, the responsible parties held accountable and punished.
Clearly something must be done as I have waited for Judge Clay and everyone notified to get back to me to move this process forward. There is no circumstance or law that can justify this use of force, intimidation, and threat of imprisonment under the guise and color of law! The family will not allow this continuing injustice to go on unnoticed and want to know what time is best for Judge Clay to meet as soon as possible!
The critically serious, incriminating, willful admissions in the conversations and interactions of Rodney Brooks and yourself Judge Clay with D. A.’s Connor, Dunleavey and O’Malley has made everyone witnesses to these actions of the D. A. and any non-action on the prosecution of these crimes will entrap YOU ALL in complicity in the commission of these crimes, in it’s corruption, conspiracy, fraud, obstruction of justice, false imprisonment, aiding and abetting the crimes mentioned, the attempted cover up of these crimes, and willful blindness, among others. It is settled law that the cover up of a crime is itself greater than the crimes themselves! Those stakes are raised exponentially when it concerns corruption on behalf of Judges, elected public officials, law enforcement and legal servants whom are embodied with protecting the public trust.

In May 2008 Alameda County Superior Court Judge Jon Tigar attempted to provoke plaintiff Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim with comments made during a side bar at the recent testimony on behalf of plaintiff by fellow Judge Leo Dorado in al-Hakim’s bad faith insurance case.
As a result of this and Tigar’s continuing misconduct, al-Hakim took the extraordinary measure of filing another complaint with Victoria Henley and the Judicial Council, Alameda County Superior Court Presiding Judge Yolanda Northridge and former Presiding Judge George Hernandez demanding that all side bars be recorded for his own security.
You can view, listen to, and/or download the following related documents or audio files:
Judge Dorado Responds to D. A.pdf
http://www.box.net/shared/4ai0vr2s5j

City Administrator Dan Lindhiem Respond Russo Formal Complaint.pdf
http://www.box.net/shared/yfyvhaug0l

City Administrator Dan Lindhiem Post Russo Complaint Meeting.pdf
http://www.box.net/shared/6gj1ae9pa4

D. A. O’Malley Responds to Russo Formal Complaint.pdf
http://www.box.net/shared/pdquncg8x6

County Presiding Judge Rolfenson Responds to Russo Formal Complaint.pdf
http://www.box.net/shared/n8xxh4a93e

County Presiding Judge Rolfenson Discards Formal Complaint- Maggie Takeda Voice mail
http://www.box.net/shared/g10s3kzxn7

County Presiding Judge Rolfenson Receives Formal Complaint Maggie Takeda email
http://www.box.net/shared/2fqsl69z79

City Auditor Courtney Ruby Responds to Russo Formal Complaint.pdf
http://www.box.net/shared/pdi4kxel16

City Auditor Courtney Ruby’s Second Respond Russo Formal Complaint.pdf
http://www.box.net/shared/5a5ndkbmrb

al-Hakim’s Notice to Russo of Action.pdf
http://www.box.net/shared/lnvn6kn92k

Russo Responds to Formal Complaint.pdf
http://www.box.net/shared/dz72had24u

District Attorney Investigates City Attorneys John Russo, Jayne Williams, Meyers Nave Corruption Complaint.pdf
http://www.box.net/shared/sjgi7ynhgh

Oakland City Administrator to Meet al-Hakim on Fate of City Attorneys John Russo, Jayne Williams, Meyers Nave Corruption Complaint.pdf
http://www.box.net/shared/kuf0d18b7i

al-Hakim’s Second Notice to Russo of Action.pdf
http://www.box.net/shared/9gn72snasl

al-Hakim’s ROAR Complaint Against Russo.pdf
http://www.box.net/shared/4424e7822p

D. A. Kevin Dunleavy Removed al-Hakim from Davidson Courthouse Building VM
http://www.box.net/shared/x46rvjorhj

D. A. Mike O’Connor Ends Investigation VM
http://www.box.net/shared/3oampngtby

D. A. Kevin Dunleavy Tells al-Hakim he to Talk with V. Harvey VM
http://www.box.net/shared/ma0fyvzkdc

We presented the Stipulation to the Court as we expect and appreciate the signing where indicated, for we all want this matter resolved immediately. We hand delivered the original and two copies to the Court for endorsement and filing and was to provide an endorsed filed copy to the Director of the Department of Child Support Services afterwards. We all look forward to resolving this matter as soon as possible.
I can be reached at (510) 394-4501 if you have any questions. Thanks’ for taking the time to address these issues and endorse and return this Stipulation.

Respectfully,

Abdul-Jalil
Defendant

*********

Anti-SPAM Policy Disclaimer:
This message is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary to our company that is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521 and is legally privileged.
This e-mail message was sent to you because you have previously corresponded with us and/or are subscribed to one of our emailing lists.
If you have received this communication in error, or this e-mail is unsolicited, please accept our apologies and at any time you would like to remove yourself from our mailings, please feel free to do so by clicking on “Unsubscribe“, or you can also notify the sender immediately and we shall delete your address, or replying to this message and type “Unsubscribe” in the subject line to remove yourself from our mailing list.
If you’ve received unsolicited email from one of our users, or if you suspect a user of abusing email services (or have any questions regarding our policies), please do not hesitate to contact us. Under Bill 1618 Title III passed by the 105th U. S. Congress, email cannot be considered Spam as long as it includes contact information and a remove link for removal from the mailing list.
We prohibit users from sending unsolicited email, and do not allow the use of third-party, purchased, rented, or harvested mailing lists. Anyone found abusing such email is banned from the use of our service.
Every complaint is investigated, and you will receive a response from our abuse team detailing the action we’re taking to deal with the issue.
Thanks in advance for you time.


” In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” — George Orwell. For The Truth In The News!

ESPN TV Sports Special; MLB Lyman Bostock Special; The Enlightened Coach,- Coaching For Performance

Ssm_lthdcrest
SUPERSTAR MANAGEMENT

7633 Sunkist Drive, Oakland CA  94605-3032
(510) 394-4501

http://Superstarmanagement.com
Abdul-Jalil on iTunes
Abdul-Jalil Front Row @ 1995 ESPY Awards
Co-Promoted, Managed and Trained Evander Holyfield versus Riddick Bowe Heavyweight Title Boxing Matches 11/13/92, 11/6/93, 11/4/95
1995 Pizza Hut Commercial with Deion Sanders and Jerry Jones “BOTH”
Superstar Management and Hammertime Open Office in New Orleans
Hammer and Deion in ESPN Sports Bloopers 3 Produced by Abdul-Jalil and SSM
http://Ex-Why.com
¿eX-whY ? AdVentures Promotional Video
¿eX-whY? AdVentures Wrote, Directed and Produced “I Know You’ll Love Oakland” Image Campaign PSA’s
Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation
Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation-KPFA Promotional Video:
Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation Kids Celebrity Gift BackPacks
Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation Free Food Program Celebrity Giving Back
The Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation and ¿eX-whY AdVentures? Trader Joe’s Emeryville KPFA Interview Video
The Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation and ¿eX-whY AdVentures? Trader Joe’s Emeryville Customer Appreciation
The Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation and ¿eX-whY AdVentures? Trader Joe’s Alameda Customer Appreciation
The Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation and ¿eX-whY AdVentures? Entourage & Randy Holland in Trader Joe’s Pinole “Tribute to Legends of Jazz” Show
Santa Fe Elementary School’s Peace March with Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation, SemiFreddi’s, Trader Joe’s, Little Ceasar’s Pizza, Marshawn Lynch’s “Fam1ly F1rst” and Leon Powe’s “Fresh Start Oakland”
Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation and Santa Fe Elementary LilCaesars Pizza Part 1
Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation and Santa Fe Elementary LilCaesars Pizza Part 2
FaceBook Fundrazr
Abdul-Jalil Honored in Port Au-Prince, Haiti and Miami, Fla. for Relief Missions to Haiti
Join the Superstars Entertainment and Sports Network
Abdul-Jalil’s Haas School of Business Profile
Haas School of Business Alumni Thank Abdul-Jalil for Cal Head Basketball Coach Mike Montgomery’s $750 Phelps Gift:
Cals’ Haas School of Business, the Y.E.A.H. Program, The Bread Project Giving Back to the Community:
Ziggs Profile of Abdul-Jalil
Linked In Profile on Abdul-Jalil
Abdul-Jalil on Twitter: @ajalil
Thanks You from Arch Bishop Joel Jeune to Abdul-Jalil
Abdul-Jalil’s “ooVoo” Video Chat Room
Abdul-Jalil on FaceBook
iPhone 4 FaceTime: (510) 394-4501
AIM, Video Chat Screen Name: jalil@superstarmanagement.com
Skype Video Chat Screen Contact Name: Superstarmanagement
Portrait of Abdul-Jalil by Artist Buford Delaney in Paris, France
Video and Audio with Abdul-Jalil: “Out. The Glenn Burke Story” , KGO Radio Conversation On “OUT. The Glenn Burke Story” , ESPN Story “Before Jason Collins” , KGO Radio’s broadcast discussion of “Out. The Glenn Burke Story”KNBR Radio’s broadcast discussion of “Out. The Glenn Burke Story”KNBR Radio’s broadcast discussion of “Bounce. The Don Barksdale Story”, ESPN Bostock 5th & Jackson TV Special Part 1, and Part 2, ¿eX-whY? AdVentures Wrote, Directed and Produced Oakland Urban Economic Development Conference, Part 1 of 2 Interviews of Abdul-Jalil on American Muslim 360 (AM360) by Niamat Shaheed., Part 2 of 2 Interviews of Abdul-Jalil, Nanita Strong and Imam Wali Mohammed on American Muslim 360 (AM360) by Niamat Shaheed.,
Community Movement Toward Improvement,

Award for “Distinguished Marketing and Promotional Services” from NFL Super Bowl NFL Experience,
Founder of BLACK EXPO shown with Olympic Sprinter John Carlos , Hip Hop’s Islamic Influence, 1979 National BALSA Conference , Dellums for Mayor, Hip Hop’s Islamic Influence, 1979 National BALSA Conference, Oakland Police Officers Arrested for Computer Store Burglaries, Police Found Guilty in Burglaries, Police Officers Sentenced for Burglaries


You can click on any highlighted word to view or download that item

Hey All,

Jalil Profile QRESPN will film a TV Sports Special with me on Wednesday, September 25, 2013 at 2:00 pm at the Berkeley Masjid, 2716 Derby Street, Berkeley, CA 94705, iA.

Also, the Special show on baseball great Lyman Bostock is airing tonight, Sunday, September 22, 2013 at 10:00 pm EST/7pm PDT on the Major League Baseball (MLB) network.

Thanks,

Abdul-Jalil
(510) 349-4501Divider

NO BOOKS, NO BALL Presents:
“Coaching For Performance”

Hodari Pix 5The Enlightened Coach
-
Coaching For Performance - Learn The Essential Coaching Skills


“When our players help those in our community, they feel the reward that comes with community service. This initiative encourages positive behavior. It will have a profound impact on those who interact with our student-athletes.”
-Hodari McGavock, Founder of NO BOOKS, NO BALL Cares

  • NO BOOKS, NO BALL (NBNB) Introduction
  • NO BOOKS, NO BALL (NBNB) Private Coaching
  • Sports and Social Media Infographic
  • NO BOOKS, NO BALL (NBNB) Academic Services
  • NO BOOKS, NO BALL Basketball Camp STEM Educational Model
  • NO BOOKS, NO BALL Cares
  • About Coach Mac
NO BOOKS, NO BALL (NBNB) is a non-profit community outreach program devoted to charitable, social services, athletic, educational, scientific, literary and educational purposes to foster national and international amateur sports competition, the administration, supervision, coordination or implementation of a sports, recreation or community services program for an individual, group, association, organization, municipality, county agency, recreation district, community Federation, incorporated association, school, university, college, school district, a branch or service area of the armed forces, or not for profit youth serving agency, or any agency that is the provider of educational and/or recreational sports services in the world, to plan, teach, promote, fund, administer and/or operation of supplemental physical, academic, and personal development and revitalization programs to enrich the curriculum of basic education offered to students at academic institutions resulting in expanded employment, economic prosperity, and business opportunities, to develop the game of Basketball in the United States and abroad, and to conduct fundraising activities for the support of such programs and to provide such charitable services that are associated with such purpose as allowed by law.NO BOOKS, NO BALL, the top basketball talent development company in the nation, continues to advance its mission of working with the youth from our communities that are in need of a positive environment and guidance for their future. Through basketball development training and strategies, we teach players from elementary to professional level to develop their social and life skills. The lessons they learn, allow them to excel in life and give back to their community.
Through our programs, we have seen lives change for the better both on and off the court. The philosophy of NO BOOKS, NO BALL focuses on the principles of community outreach, work ethic, dedication, healthy nutrition, exercise, and academic success. Our organization strives to teach the youth about perseverance, motivation, team work, self-determination and overcoming adversity. The goal of NO BOOKS, NO BALL is to continue to make a difference in the lives of our youth and in our society.
NO BOOKS, NO BALL provide the best Professional coaching and offer an opportunity for you to get your game to the next level. Whether it is preparing for summer league, pro training camp or for an upcoming season, professional players can expect a customized program that’s proven to develop talent.
All of our coaches provide a similar philosophy towards the private training concept. In fact, here at NO BOOKS, NO BALL we highly recommend that student athletes experience all of our coaches because with each coach, you will learn more and more little things that will enhance your performance on the court.
Please note – during the private training sessions, the coaches provide a lot of valuable knowledge that the student athlete will receive by coming to the private training session. NO BOOKS, NO BALL coach management team truly believes that doing private training will elevate your performance on the court, but it takes time to really reach the student athletes fullest potential. This falls in line with our NBNB player development philosophy.  NBNB provides the best instructors in the Nation.NO BOOKS, NO BALL’s goal is to:
• to foster national and international amateur sports competition,
• the administration, supervision, coordination or implementation of a sports, recreation or community services program for an individual, group, association, organization, municipality, county agency, recreation district, community Federation, incorporated association, school, university, college, school district, a branch or service area of the armed forces, or not for profit youth serving agency, any agency that is the provider of educational and/or recreational sports services in the world,
• to plan, teach, promote, fund, administer and/or operation of supplemental physical, academic, and personal development and revitalization programs to enrich the curriculum of basic education offered to students at academic institutions resulting in expanded employment, economic prosperity, and business opportunities,
• to develop the game of Basketball in the United States and abroad,
• assist organizations throughout the world in setting up Sports Camps as support groups,
• provide charitable assistance to those in need helping the hurting, poor, and needy to restore and empower themselves to make their dreams a reality,
• provide structured housing and supportive services at Sports Camps for young people in the process of overcoming life’s problems and those reintegrating back into society from homelessness and incarceration.
Funding support is open to the public at large, who believe in our mission and who donate freewill
contributions. Donors may be individuals, churches, ministries, businesses, communities and other public and private entities.NO BOOKS, NO BALL (NBNB) is a non-profit community outreach program devoted to charitable, social services, athletic, educational, scientific, literary and educational purposes to foster national and international amateur sports competition, the administration, supervision, coordination or implementation of a sports, recreation or community services program for an individual, group, association, organization, municipality, county agency, recreation district, community Federation, incorporated association, school, university, college, school district, a branch or service area of the armed forces, or not for profit youth serving agency, or any agency that is the provider of educational and/or recreational sports services in the world, to plan, teach, promote, fund, administer and/or operation of supplemental physical, academic, and personal development and revitalization programs to enrich the curriculum of basic education offered to students at academic institutions resulting in expanded employment, economic prosperity, and business opportunities, to develop the game of Basketball in the United States and abroad, and to conduct fundraising activities for the support of such programs and to provide such charitable services that are associated with such purpose as allowed by law.
Hello All,NO BOOKS, NO BALL is offering it’s Private Coaches Lesson schedule for your registration. Our availability is now offering more times with more coaches because of the outstanding demand!To learn more about private lessons or to book a private lesson please call us at 510-394-4575 or email, coachmac@nobooksnoballsports.org, camp@nobooksnoballsports.org
If you have any questions at all, please feel free to contact the email address listed above or you may call us at 510-394-4575.Thanks and have a great day!

Coach Mac

Donate to NO BOOKS, NO BALL hereNBNB Paypal QRC red

NO BOOKS, NO BALL Private and Semi-Private sessions include:Personalized skill development
Position specific fundamentals
Position specific fundamentals
Speed & agility training
Written player evaluations and progress analysis
Home work-out agenda
Skill development will be optimized to work on player’s individual needs:
Shooting Technique
Ball-handling / dribbling
Footwork & balance techniques
Passing
Individual & team defense
Best Private Training.
NO BOOKS, NO BALL Year-Round Training
FALL TRAINING

If you are serious about making the team
Prepare for upcoming season
* Lay foundation for School/Town Travel season
* Improve performance from prior year
* Set a goal to reach a new level
Key Focus
* Basketball Fundamentals
* Conditioning: Both physical and mental
Goal
Equip student athletes with the tools to get on track for their upcoming season — for whatever team they are preparing for.
WINTER TRAINING
Maintaining your basketball fundamentals
* In-season skill training and conditioning helps a player gain an edge during the season
* Facilitates raising a player’s game to reach personal bests
SPRING TRAINING
Best opportunity to maintain conditioning and improve fundamentals
* Players who do year-round basketball training gain the most competitive edge on the court
* NBNB offers the training tools to get better and increase confidence
* Underpins the Spring tournament season — maintaining conditioning and fundamental skills
* Serves as a complementary work-out for multi-sport athletes
SUMMER TRAINING

The time to focus on raising your game to the next level
* Opportune time to focus on basketball motor-skill development.
* Sufficient repetition is the key ingredient towards mastering basketball skill level.For all those that are looking to workout please contact coachmac@nobooksnoballsports.org, or camp@nobooksnoballsports.org 510-394-4575, with any additional questions.
Sports and Social Media InfographicIt was Inevitable
Since we are at the cutting edge of everything related to sports recruiting we’ve already covered how Sports-Social-Media-Infographic-GMR-MarketingFacebook is changing college recruiting. Please review this for some tips and rules high school and college athletes should consider. Now we feel it’s time for an update.
All Access for Coaches
This Sports and Social Media infographic really breaks it down for you. For instance, how can a college coach resist incorporating social media into his recruiting strategy when 69% of sports fans–potential recruits–will check their Facebook or Twitter during meals? And you know where else they’ll check? 58% will check while they’re in the bathroom, 74% at a party, and 9% will even look at social media in church.
If you’ve spent more than 5 minutes with a teenager you know that Facebook is a force in their lives. But did you know that 81% of sports fans go to the internet for their breaking news? Or that people are 10 times as likely to check Twitter or Facebook for news as they are sports radio?Social Media is Changing Recruiting
There is little doubt that social media is changing recruiting. Coaches learned this–some of them late and against their will–and never looked back. The issue for teenagers being recruited to play sports in college is that lasting negative impact on their lives.Learn From the Yuri Wright Case
One well-publicized case is that of Yuri Wright, one of the nation’s top cornerbacks coming out of New Jersey’s Don Bosco Prep. Yuri made some ill-advised comments on Twitter and it ended up costing him his scholarship to Michigan. The University of Colorado is taking a chance on Wright and, to his credit, he says he’s learned a valuable lesson.Use Social Media as an Asset
As the IG illustrates people, including high school athletes, are increasingly getting their news and interacting through social media. The real question for athletes is will you use this as an asset or will it become something that will cost you your scholarship?
Yuri Wright got a second chance because he was a nationally ranked player. You may not be so lucky so be careful.
No Books, No Ball Academic Services*Monitor the academic progress of student-athletes on a regular basis
*Maintain a specialized tutoring staff available to student-athletes
*Maintain a feedback system throughout the semester requesting professors to provide information concerning academic progress of student-athletes
*Provide supervised study environment where student-athletes may meet tutors, work in small groups, and study in a quiet atmosphere
*Coordinate various educational workshops throughout the semesterInformation Services
*Disseminate information on all aspects of No Books, No Ball and give referral assistance when deemed necessary
*Inform student-athletes of academic progress each semester
*Refer student-athletes to the appropriate source for graduation statusCounseling Services
*Plan schedules each semester with the student-athlete to ensure compliance with the Oakland Athletic League Rules and Oakland School District Regulations
*Provide assistance in choice of major and career counseling
*Counsel individuals concerning problems of a personal or academic natureDevelopmental Services
*Support in making a smooth transition to life as a student-athlete
*   *Making the transition from high school to university academics
*   *Learning appropriate and effective advocacy skills
*   *Developing strategies for balanced growth and development
*Support in learning skills and strategies necessary for success in the college classroom
*   *Private consultation with the Learning Specialist
*   *Informal reading and study skills assessment
*   *Communication and coordination with Academic Department Advisers
*Support in making the most effective use of tutors
*   *Developing effective strategies for use of content area tutoring
*   *Communication with tutors to monitor progress and to consistently support skill and strategy developmentOther Services
*Serve as the liaison with the Dean of Students for issues regarding academic and other misconduct
*Provide counseling for any issue regarding transition to high school and college life, academics, and athletically related issues
*Serve as liaison with Social Services Programs
NO BOOKS, NO BALL Basketball Camp STEM Educational ModelOur educational model is a STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Math) based program that incorporates Reading, Writing, Vocabulary, Problem Solving, and Transitional Readiness in the curriculum.  This program will expose the students to cutting edge information and procedures as well as improve on their fundamental academic skills.  We are very excited about this forward thinking program and believe that it will begin to prepare the students for the ever changing educational and career environment.
Each class we be led by a qualified instructor and also feature an instructor’s aide for added hands on support.
Utilize the versatile and unique qualities of NO BOOKS, NO BALL Basketball Camp we offer the opportunity for players to attend training and get ahead with advanced high school classes, SAT and ACT Prep classes, ESL classes or TOEFL Prep classes.
The comprehensive schedule allows a player to experience what being an Academy program student-athlete is like by completing coursework and a rigorous Basketball training curriculum within the basketball program.  It is designed for players who need to accomplish necessary tasks for school, while also wanting to have fun and improve their game.  The weekday schedule includes basketball training and class work in the afternoon. Class include:
Algebra I,  Geometry,  Math Models,  Algebra 3,  Pre-Cal,  Biology,  Calculus,  Statistics,  US History,  Social Studies,  Government,  Economics,  World Geography,  Spanish,  French,  Art,  Physics,  Journalism,  Chemistry,  Dance,  English,  Computers,  P.E.,  Multi MediaSAT/ACT College Prep
College admission is more competitive than ever before. Just as you wouldn’t enter a competition without practicing, you shouldn’t take the SAT or ACT without knowing exactly what you’ll encounter on the test. With a half day of Basketball and a half day of SAT preparation, you’ll be ready to achieve a better score and improve your chances of gaining entrance to your college of choice.
The SAT/College Prep class is taught for four hours per day in small class sizes. It covers all the SAT/ACT topics including Algebra, Geometry, Vocabulary, Reading Comprehension, Grammar, Rhetorical Writing, Current Events and Writing and Style.Basketball Camp with English Options
NO BOOKS, NO BALL Basketball Camp offers two options for our international participants who wish to improve their English and their sport at the same time.
Academic English/TOEFL Prep Sport Camp:  For participants age 15-19 who wish to prepare for an exam in their home country or for entrance into an American university.   After a half-day of sports exercises and drills,  participants will study reading/writing, academic test preparation and practice,  sample TOEFL exams,  and develop their advanced English skills.
English as a Second Language Sport Camp:  For participants 8 – 19, a half-day of sport drills and a half-day of fun English activities focusing on vocabulary development.   Fun interactive activities are combined with field trips and weekly vocabulary/grammar  units on topics of general interest such as sports and recreation, food , health, the environment and travel.
These programs are designed for visitors to the United States and no I-20s are issued for these programs.
NO BOOKS, NO BALL Cares

NO BOOKS, NO BALL Cares is a non-profit community outreach program dedicated to serving our community. It is founded on the principals of teamwork, not only on the basketball court, but also in our community. Athletes learn more is achieved, the task made easier, when individuals come together to form a collective unit. The experience has a greater influence on all members, both receiving and giving.
In these difficult times, it is necessary for us to extend a hand, and use the talents and gifts that we have, to improve the life of others in our community. NO BOOKS, NO BALL Cares promotes the giving of time, money and tangible goods. Volunteering at organizations that need the help of physical hands is encouraged.
The hope of NO BOOKS, NO BALL Cares is to not only help others, but for our players to understand these core principles of respect, teamwork, and community involvement. Adopting these values can improve the lives of our student-athletes on the basketball court. However, perhaps even more importantly, they can be transferred into the classroom, and in everyday scenarios that call for strong, confident behavior.
“An individual has not started living until he can rise above the narrow confines of his individualistic concerns to the broader concerns of all humanity.”
-The Reverend Martin Luther King JRThis statement is essentially the mission of NO BOOKS, NO BALL Cares.
“When our players help those in our community, they feel the reward that comes with community service. This initiative encourages positive behavior. It will have a profound impact on those who interact with our student-athletes.”
-Hodari McGavock, Founder of NO BOOKS, NO BALLNO BOOKS, NO BALL Supplemental & Emergency Food DistributionWe began our supplemental and emergency food distribution program in the Fall of 2004 with the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation. Boxes of Food is designed to serve the needy in Oakland, California and surrounding communities.
We provide a 3-7 day box of food (dry goods, can food, bread, etc.) to low income and homeless individuals and families (herein referred to as clients) on a bi-weekly basis as well as emergency boxes of food on an as needed basis. As time progresses we will distribute food on a weekly basis as well as have other food pantries in Oakland, California to do so.
In addition to the initial monthly supplemental food box, Boxes of HOPE will have two special Holiday distributions:Thanksgiving Food Boxes – Each year, Boxes of HOPE, will distribute a box of food containing everything needed to prepare a Thanksgiving meal, including a turkey, for a family of four to those registered and receiving monthly supplemental food boxes. Thanksgiving boxes will be distributed the week before Thanksgiving.Christmas Food Boxes – Each year, Boxes of HOPE, will distribute a box of food containing everything needed to prepare a Christmas Day meal, including a ham, for a family of four to those registered and receiving monthly supplemental food boxes. Christmas boxes will be distributed the week before Christmas.
Clients who come to Boxes of HOPE do not have to meet income guidelines set by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and live within our service boundaries. Anyone receiving any type of state or governmental assistance (such as SNAP, WIC, Social Security Income (SSI), or SSI disability) and do not have to present a legal photo ID (state ID or driver’s license), proof of residency (state ID, driver’s license or utility bill), and proof of income or state assistance (such as SNAP, WIC, Social Security Income (SSI), or SSI disability). No one is turned away, will receive a food box as long as supplies are available, and a referral to a food pantry in their area. Clients are provided all the services we offer regardless of race, sex, color, creed, sexual preference or any other non-qualifying designation.
The funding for this program will come from donations from local food stores as well as free-will public donations of food and cash. Our Program Director and volunteers will oversee the operation of this program. This program is offered with the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation.Gifts of HOPE – Christmas Gifts for Families in Need – We expect to begin our Christmas gift distribution for families in need called Gifts of HOPE, Christmas of 2013. Each year the organization will adopt one or more families in need to provide Christmas gifts to the children and parent(s) who would not otherwise be able to provide Christmas gifts to their family. Volunteers will purchase, wrap and deliver gifts to parent(s) for their children – not only delivering the message of hope to a parent that fears not being able to provide for their children, but also the message of love from parent to child, and the true meaning of Christmas. Each member of the family will receive clothes, shoes, toys, and food for the family, including adults and children living in the household.
Clients of this program will be chosen from those families currently receiving some type of assistance from Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation or by referral from other organizations. To qualify, the household income of the clients of the program must fall in the income guidelines set by the Federal Poverty Income Guidelines published in the Federal Registry.
The funding for this program will come from public donations in the form of free-will cash and gift donations as well as the ability to sponsor a family. Individuals, families, or groups may call the organization to sponsor a family. Donators will be asked to provide at least one wrapped gift for each family member. The organization will supplement with purchased gifts as needed. Our Program Director and volunteers will oversee the operation of this program.
About Coach Mac
133_HodariMcGavock
   Hodari McGavock has served as an educator for students from middle and high school through community college in both the Oakland Unified School District and the Peralta Community College District for 38 years. He has worked with this wide range of students in the capacities of teacher, counselor and basketball coach.Born and reared in Indianapolis, Indiana, Hodari McGavock, fondly referred to as “Coach Mac” is a product of the Indianapolis Public School District from elementary through high school and is a proud graduate of Crispus Attucks High, where he was an outstanding student and basketball player. He earned a full basketball scholarship to and graduated with a Bachelors Degree from Tennessee State University in Nashville, Tennessee in 1966. He earned a Masters Degrees from both Eastern Michigan University, Yipailanti, Michigan in 1968 and California State University, Hayward with a Life Pupil Personnel Services Credential as well from California State University, Hayward.The incredible career achievements of Coach Mac as a Men’s Varsity Basketball coach in the Oakland Unified School District at Oakland Technical High School for 25 years and now at major cross-town rival Castlemont High are legendary, highlighted by many noteworthy achievements, only a few follows:*** In 2012 Inducted into the Multi-Ethnic Sports Hall of Fame
*** In 2011 Honored as State of California Coach of the Year
*** 2010 – Oakland Athletic League Championship
*** Selected as 2008-09 California Inter-Scholastic Federation Model Coach Award winner. A model coach demonstrates and teaches the six core ethical values: trustworthiness, respect, responsibility, fairness, caring, and good citizenship (the “Six Pillars of Character”). The CIF believes that the highest potential of sports is achieved when teachers/coaches consciously Teach, Enforce, Advocate and Model (T.E.A.M.) these values and are committed to the ideal of Pursuing Victory with Honor.
*** Honored as Oakland Tribune Newspaper “2002 Coach of The Year”,
*** Nominated for California Interscholastic Federation (CIF) Hall of Fame,
*** He coached for 25 years at Oakland Tech High School until June 2005 moving over to rival Castlemont High School in 2007 after a two year hiatus,
*** First full-time Oakland Public School Counselor to become a full time Oakland Athletic League coach,
*** Won two Northern California State Championships consecutively from 2002-3,
*** Qualified for numerous Northern California State Championships Playoffs,
*** He has won eight Oakland Athletic League Championships,
*** First Basketball coach to ever win four consecutive Oakland Athletic League Championships from 1999-2003,
*** Won over 550 High School basketball games and is a sure “Hall of Fame” inductee upon final retirement,
*** In 1980 he founded of the “No Books, No Ball” Academic Achievement Program for Student-Athletes to aid them in their quest for academic excellence and to facilitate their enrollment into institution of higher learning,
*** Has sent hundreds of student-athletes to colleges all around the country and the world professionally including the NBA,
*** In July 2010 he took Castlemont High School’s Varsity Basketball team to Heidelberg, Germany for an 11-day trip to play four games against club teams where they will stay with German families during the trip that includes visiting and participating in a German school while there.
*** Assistant Men’s Basketball Coach at Merritt Junior College, Oakland, California
*** Has mentored several very successful Men’s High School Varsity Head Basketball Coaches,
*** Has trained many professional basketball players including National Basketball Association (NBA) All-Stars, NBA Scoring Champs, and NBA World Champions.
*** Camp Counselor for University of Sports “Super Star Basketball Camp” for elite Boys and Girls athletes since 1995
If you have any questions at all, please feel free to contact the email address listed here or you may call us at: info@nobooksnoballsports.org, 510-394-4575

Thanks,

Coach Mac

Divider
Unknownname
7633 Sunkist Drive, Oakland CA  94605-3032
Phone  (510) 394-4101

“He who Harms a Life, it is as if he has Harmed ALL Mankind, and He who has saved a Life, it is as if he has Saved ALL Mankind!” Who will you save?

AMWFT PayPal Flower DonateWe Need Mac Pro Tower, or MacBook Pro, and 3- iPads

We mounting an “Equipment Donation Drive” to obtain donations of a Mac Pro Tower (Quad-Core), 3.2GHz; 2-12 GB DDR2 SDRAM, an Apple MacBook Pro 17″ – Quad Core i7, 2.2 GHz,  an Apple MacBook Pro – 15.4″ – Core i7, 2.6 GHz, or a Apple MacBook Pro 13.3″ – Dual Core i5,  2.4 GHz – MacOS X 10.8 Mountain Lion for a group that serves under privileged, disadvantaged and disabled persons. We are also interested in three iPads for children with Autism. Your donation is taxdeductible to the full extent allowable under the law. We will accept any monetary donations toward this end for the purchase of the equipment.

Sista’s Charity Group Need Two Cargo Vans

The Sista’s Charity group is interested in obtaining two cargo vans or passenger vans with removable seats, an SUV with removable seats or large pick up truck with a camper shell for pickup and delivery of FREE food, clothing and supplies to the communities that they serve of under privileged, disadvantaged and disabled persons. Can you help them, insha’Allah? Your donation is tax deductible to the full extent allowable under the law. You donate via Paypal withemail address to Sis. Nanita Strong, N. Strong Harmony, (510) 394-5701, nanitastrong@yahoo.com. Again, they will accept any monetary donations toward this end for the purchase of the vehicles.
The Aaron & Margaret Wallace Food Program (AMWF) has helped the less fortunate for over 55 years continuously and are now serving over 30,000 per month from 19 Northern California locations!
You can listen to or download Part 1 of 2 Interviews of Abdul-Jalil on AmericanMuslim360 (AM360) by Niamat Shaheed.
http://superstarmanagement.podomatic.com/entry/2013-01-16T18_20_23-08_00
https://www.box.com/s/zbt1c2j96h1agxx96wiw

Part 2 of 2 Interviews of Abdul-Jalil, Nanita Strong and Imam Wali Mohammed on AmericanMuslim360 (AM360) by Niamat Shaheed.
http://superstarmanagement.podomatic.com/entry/2013-01-16T18_45_13-08_00
https://www.box.com/s/wlj5filuyybr533hziqg
After witnessing my mother and father give freely to others since I was a child from the 1950’s until their death, charity struck a cord with me. I often thought, “how and in what way I could contribute anything close to the enormous good they had done so often for so many?”. My parents purchased land and built a church for their personal pastor and to accompany that, they also built him and his family a home as well.     As I grew and matured, became more knowledgeable, sophisticated, and worldly, and as my faith and religious acumen blossomed, I realized the prodigious importance of building a house of worship and the infinite blessings that flow from such an achievement. I had to find a way to fulfill that AMWFT PayPal Donatepotential within me as my parents had set the bar very, very high!

I knew that I didn’t have to re-invent the wheel as there was an incredible model  for success that I could really make a difference and give back to my community by continuing the programs that my parents had forged when I was a child! So the A MWF began with the support of friends, neighbors, acquaintances, religious leaders, community members, and businesses dedicated to helping others.     The Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation (A&MWF) is a non-denominational, multi-cultural,100% volunteer financed and operated relief organization that provides FREE food, medicine, clothing, educational and employment opportunities, mental and physical health referrals, legal aid, shelter and other necessities to individuals, children, families, and organizations who lack these essentials for any reason. We provide private school and college admissions educational opportunities; assists with referrals for job training and placement; rental assistance; social services assistance; homelessness assistance; mental and physical health assistance; medical assistance and legal aid assistance referrals FREE for ANYONE whom has the need at the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation website.

Providing The Necessities For Success In Life
A&MWF, a public services organization based on GIVING AND SHARING, has created a 100% volunteer self-operated, self-supported, self financed model defined by developing the marketplace of a network that features high-performing results in the invaluable areas of: youth development; elementary, secondary and college education; poverty alleviation; mental and physical health medical services; social services, as well as other economic-empowerment programs for individuals, families; and small businesses.     A&MWF is pioneering a new trend, as government and community funds grapple with the recession and the challenges of raising funds, WE have forged an awareness and sustained an effort to connect those in dire need with service providers, donors, volunteers and nonprofit groups with these causes. We have taken community foundations and moved into social networking, reaching beyond static “bricks and mortar” to interactive Web sites to serve as a “dynamic virtual clearinghouses or town square” that holds conversations between those in NEED and their local charities, citizens, donors, and volunteers.     Every month thousands of San Francisco/ Oakland Bay Area residents rely on the AMWF Community Food Program for nutritious food and social service resources. As a local entity providing free food to those in need, we are seeing a significant increase in the percentage of children we serves, as county food banks see a spike in pleas for help. “51 percent of individuals served … are infants, children and teenagers. In the past, the percentage of people under 18 was 40 percent.”     The change is attributed to an increase in the number of families seeking emergency food aid. “Traditionally we’ve seen more demand for services from the western end of the city, but we are seeing an increase in need in the central part, and we even have people from the Hills and the affluent parts of town”.     The Aaron & Margaret Wallace Community Food Programs (AMWF), a multi-ethnic, multi-issue community-based organization, continues to carry out its mission of a society in which all persons flourish as it provides and refers comprehensive services — in collaboration with other hunger, health care, housing, violence, abuse, counseling, senior, youth, women, children, civil rights, employment, and education response agencies — to thousands of men, women and children living in San Francisco/ Oakland Bay Area in California to help transform the lives of people in need.     AMWF extends these various services and programs to the economically, mentally, and physically challenged; the poor and homeless; the undereducated and undeserved; people living with symptomatic HIV and AIDS; substance abuse; seniors 55 years and older; prenatal women; at risk youth; and homebound people living with serious illness. 
AMWFT PayPal Donate
   Our members, and the people we serve are of different race, faith, culture, age, gender, sexual orientation and income levels. AMWF by providing direct services, including providing nutritious food; edvocating for and participating in many relevant social service programs that promote the self-sufficiency of people in need; educating the general public about these issues, their causes and this partial solution while inspiring a consummate social conscience and honoring the dignity of every person. As part of that principal mission, AMWF works for basic economic survival security for all and the elimination of poverty by providing these services thus effecting societal and governmental policies that regulate the less fortunate to the bottom of the economic, social, health, and opportunity pyramid, with full understanding that any policy which affects the poorest of us affects all of us.     By catering to everyone we have built many allies with statewide and national anti-hunger organizations to support legislation addressing low-income people’s food needs. In doing so, we help build power in our communities and win institutional changes on the issues that affect our lives as we provide fresh, hot, nutritious meals and bags of groceries with healthy meat, fish, breads, perishable and nonperishable food, such as canned vegetables and fruits, tuna fish, peanut butter, rice, dry beans and pasta, at a location near their home that are served to anyone without restriction.     A&MWF has made it easy and effortless for service providers, donors, volunteers and nonprofit groups to connect with those in NEED, as we have received more individuals needs profiles submitted on this site. The profiles include their contact information, information about their needs, desired solutions, pleas for their need satisfaction, and a listing of opportunities to achieve their solution. We also have profiles submitted of individuals as prospective donors or volunteers, include information about the causes that interest them.     We look forward to our being able to do business together helping those most in need while providing you with incredible branding opportunities with maximum media exposure for the greatest community relations benefit and increased business development. There is no better branding than to be perceived as a company that cares for the less fortunate, the working man, and the environment while presenting a quality product at a great price and being socially conscious. Your customer feels that they are contributing to your good efforts as if they are doing it themselves!     If you or someone that you know needs Quality of Life Aid, PLEASE fill out the form below so that we can determine the best way to assist them.    Anyone can register at http://AMWFTRUST.ORG by submitting an online request form in a strictly confidential submission and they can also feel free to call the number (510) 394-4101 as well.     WE are trying to end this travesty by helping and giving for their change of life circumstances! Can YOU help Us help THEM? Make you tax deductible donation here! Thank you,

Abdul-Jalil
510.394-4101

Donate_Banner(2)

” The Man Who Turn$ Hit$ Into Million$”