To: Chief Toney Chaplin Yesenia Sanchez
% Acting Chief Brian Matthews Alameda County Sheriff
Hayward Police Department 1401 Lakeside Drive, 12th Floor
300 W. Winton Ave. Oakland, CA 94612-4305
Hayward, CA 94544 Fax: (510) 272-6811
Fax: 510-293-7183
Ismail J. Ramsey-Director Rob Bonta
U. S. Attorney’s Office Attorney General of California
Federal Courthouse 1300 I Street, Suite 125
450 Golden Gate Avenue P.O. Box 944255
San Francisco, CA 94102 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Fax No.: 415-436-7234 Fax: 916-324-8835
Robert Tripp, FBI Director Casey Hallinan
Northern District of California Attorney General of California
San Francisco Field Office Attn: Public Inquiry Unit
450 Golden Gate Avenue, 13th Floor P.O. Box 944255
San Francisco, CA 94102-9523 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Fax: (916) 323-5341
Senator Aisha Wahab (SD-10) Pamela Price
California State Senate District Attorney
39510 Paseo Padre Pkwy, Ste 280 René C. Davidson Courthouse
Fremont, CA 94538 1225 Fallon Street, Room 900
Fax: 916-319-2125 Oakland CA 94612
Fax: 510-452-5625, 510-271-5157
Steve Gordon- Director Kenneth J. Pogue- Director
Department of Motor Vehicles Office of Administrative Law
2415 1st Ave., Mail Station F101 300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1250
Sacramento, CA 95818-2606 Sacramento, CA 95814-4339
Fax: Fax: 916-323-6826
Steve.Gordon@dmv.ca.gov Kenneth.Pogue@oai.ca.gov
Kimberly Kirchmeyer- Director Patrick Dorais- Bureau Chief
Department of Consumer Affairs Bureau of Automotive Repair
1625 North Market Blvd., Suite N 112 Complaint Intake Unit
Sacramento, CA 95834 10949 N. Mather Blvd.
Fax: (916) 574-8623 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Kimberly.Kirchmeyer@dca.ca.gov Fax: (916) 464-3405
Patrick_Dorais@dca.ca.gov
Ricardo Lara- Commissioner Alex Anneker
Department of Insurance State Farm Insurance Agent
300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1700 5301 Claremont Ave
Sacramento, CA 95814 Oakland, CA 94618
Fax: 916-445-5276 alex.anneker.vadygn@statefarm.com, Ricardo.Lara@insurance.ca.gov EastBayAuto6@gmail.com
Custodian of Records
State Farm Claims
PO Box 52250
Phoenix, AZ 85072-2250
Alacrity Fax: 985-345-4400, 800-952-5371
sent via: U. S. Mail, Fax, and email
FROM: Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation
DATE: December 4, 2024
NO. PAGES: 6
RE: State Farm inquiry into moving Truck, VIDEO ADMISSIONS, PROOF Sheriff’s Deputy MARKITA SAYLES COMMITTED FRAUD, FIXING THE CASE; ADMITTED SHE WAS INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES; PERJURY; FILING AN ENTIRE “FALSE POLICE REPORT”; WILLFULLY FABRICATED EVIDENCE; COMMITTED MISCONDUCT; CONCEALMENT; to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto.
Dear Sheriff Sanchez, Chief Chaplin, A. G. Ramsey, A. G. Bonta, Director Tripp, Steve Gordon- DMV, Ricardo Lara- DOI, Kimberly Kirchmeyer- DCA , Patrick Dorais- BAR, Kenneth J. Pogue- OAL, A. G. Hallinan, Senator Wahab, D. A. Price, State Farm Claims, East Bay Auto Center, et. al.,
DMV Director Steve Gordon, we are in receipt of a one page letter dated December 4, 2024 from your legal department that states:
The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) will not comply with the subpoena listed above for the objection reason listed below. DMV does not accept subpoenas to be served via email, fax or at field offices.SERVICE/DESCRIPTION OBJECTIONS
1. Service was improper. Pursuant to Vehicle Code §24.5, subpoenas for the production of records must be served at the department’s headquarters at the following address:
Department of Motor Vehicles
Legal Affairs Division
Legal Office, MS C-128
2415 First Avenue Sacramento, CA 95818
Director Gordon, YOU WERE IN POSSESSION OF THE SUBPOENA BEFORE YOU SENT THE FALLACIOUS letter and should have complied with the requests long before now but it is clear to ALL that YOU HAVE NO INTENTION OF DOING SO! You are proving to be SWORN to the illicit course of this continued targeted entrapment scheme and doing all you can to fulfill the mission.DMV Director Steve Gordon, attached hereto please find a CIVIL SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) Evidence Code sections 1560, 1561, 1562, and 1271 governing this SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) AND Code of Civil Procedure Section 2031 (CCP 2031) for Personal Appearance and Production of Documents, Electronically Stored Information, and Things in response to the court order (attached) for production of documents in the above referenced matter. You were served this subpoena weeks ago and should have been responded to by now.
SUBPOENA REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
Pursuant to Evidence Code sections 1560, 1561, 1562, and 1271 governing this SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) AND Code of Civil Procedure Section 2031 (CCP 2031) on Responding Party: Custodian of Records and Person Most Knowledgeable is used herein to refer to, and includes California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), Steve Gordon, Joseph Chapman, AND YOU are NOT required to appear in person if you produce (i) the Bates-stamped or otherwise numbered sequentially records described in the declaration on page two or the attached declaration or affidavit and (ii) a completed declaration of custodian of records in compliance with.
As might be YOUR custom, you may provide responsive records in electronic format (i.e., text files that can be opened with any word processing software such as Word or TextEdit) or a searchable portable document file (PDF).
If any DOCUMENT requested herein was, but no longer is, in YOUR possession, custody, or control, please state whether such DOCUMENT was lost, destroyed or otherwise disposed of, and describe the circumstances and date(s) of such disposition.
REQUESTS FOR DOCUMENTS
ALL the Defendants, Requestors and Propounders seek disclosure of any and all records created which were prepared, received, transmitted, collected and/or maintained by the Plaintiffs, Responding Parties, ALL Government Related Parties, and ALL Government Related Third Parties, including but not limited to those listed in those sections herein.
YOU are requested to produce for inspection and copying, pursuant to Evidence Code sections 1560, 1561, 1562, and 1271 governing this SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) AND Code of Civil Procedure Section 2031 (CCP 2031), the DOCUMENTS in the below-numbered categories. The production shall take place on December 18, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., at 4200 Park Blvd., Oakland, California, 94602.
This is a request for an opportunity to inspect and/or obtain copies of records of any and all documents, files, correspondence, audio and video files, or other records of yours and various National, State, County of Alameda and City of Oakland Offices under the provisions of CCP 2031 on behalf of the Defendant/Requestors and Propounders.
YOU are required to serve a written response, under oath, responding to each item or category as provided by Evidence Code sections 1560, 1561, 1562, and 1271 governing this SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) AND Code of Civil Procedure Section 2031 (CCP 2031).
The written response shall be served within seven (7) days of the service of this request.
If any DOCUMENT requested herein was, but no longer is, in YOUR possession, custody, or control, please state whether such DOCUMENT was lost, destroyed or otherwise disposed of, and describe the circumstances and date(s) of such disposition.
This is a request for an opportunity to inspect and/or obtain copies of records of any and all documents, files, correspondence, audio and video files, or other records of yours and various offices under the provisions of Evidence Code sections 1560, 1561, 1562, and 1271 governing this SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) AND Code of Civil Procedure Section 2031 (CCP 2031) on behalf of the Defendant/Requestors and Propounders, the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation, Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, family members Harun al-Hakim-Miller, Jalil Omar al-Hakim, Bari al-Hakim-Williams, and their siblings; and the entities Superstar Management, The Genius of Randy Wallace, Inc., Nowtruth.org, eX-whY Adventures, their real, personal and business property (all herein after referred to as “ALL the Defendant/Requestors and Propounders and/or Defendant/Requestors and Propounders”)
Please process this request for ALL SECTION Requests under ALL statutes herein to release the maximum number of documents and records in the interests of justice and achieving full compliance with Evidence Code sections 1560, 1561, 1562, and 1271 governing this SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) AND Code of Civil Procedure Section 2031 (CCP 2031). Please search ALL your automated indices to the Central Records System, the older general (manual) indices, all Field Offices, other facilities that are separate from the office processing the request, or with another agency or agencies having a substantial interest in the determination of the request, or among two or more components of the agency or agencies having substantial subject matter interest therein needed to coordinate the response with different sections in the department that have responsibility for the requested records. This search is essential to collect and appropriately examine the separate and distinct records which are demanded so that copies of the following documents containing the following information be provided to us by Responding Parties and ALL Related Parties seek disclosure of any records for the Plaintiff/Responding Party.
East Bay Auto filed a Small claims action to try to collect $3,400 in back storage fees BUT their status is not listed as a current Corporation with Secretary of State or State Franchise Tax Board authorized to do business in the State of California, they may never have legally existed, they may be suspended for some reason, or they may not legally exist any longer, there are multiple individual parties including East Bay Auto Center, their owners, and Asian investors, there is good cause and we are asking the court to ascertain the correct legal name and status of East Bay Auto Center, the owners and investors of East Bay Auto, the correct legal names of the plaintiff’s, and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s. CA Civ Pro Code § 116.560. (b) As the defendant, we filed a cross complaint and may request the court at any time, whether before or after judgment, to amend the defendant’s claim or judgment to include both the correct legal name and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s. Upon a showing of good cause, the court shall amend the claim or judgment to state the correct legal name of the plaintiff’s, and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s and investors.
We asked that the court award ALL costs, losses and damages from the un-inspected theft, burglary, vandalism, and damage to the truck we have yet to observe and document the losses and damages to the truck door locks, ignition, exterior and interior cab, engine, parts, body, theft and damage of it’s contents, other losses and damages, and monetary sanctions in an amount according to proof. The costs are well over $20,000 at present.
As we have always maintained and is proven by their bad faith fact pattern, this was ALWAYS an entrapment scheme designed to take possession of the truck with it’s contents and trigger civil/criminal actions knowing that the courts are inapposite to our justice. They are not acting alone! These requests are deemed to be continuing insofar as if any of the above is secured subsequent to the date herein for the production of same, said documents are to be provided to Defendant’s consistent within the applicable Rule of Civil Procedure.
This subpoena is not intended as a full or complete statement of all relevant demands, claims, facts or applicable law, and nothing herein is intended as, nor should it be deemed to constitute, a waiver or relinquishment of any of my rights, remedies, claims or causes of action, all of which are hereby expressly reserved.
Please provide the records in an electronic format to: ajalil1234@gmail.com. Documents not in electronic format should be forwarded Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim below on or before the return date of this subpoena if you wish to comply voluntarily rather than appearing before the court.
Your FAILING AND REFUSING to provide ANY documents per YOUR alleged Defendants Public Records Act Request PRA-2024-00158 (CL), specifically Your denial in the comment “To the extent there are attorney-client communications or attorney work product, these records are exempt under the attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine,You have engaged Defendants requests for records with disingenuous, evasive FRAUD, obstruction, delay, outright misrepresentations and continues without lawful justification to withhold records that indisputably are subject to timely production under the California Public Records Act (“CPRA”). There are NO proper objections YOU can make to Defendants seeking their own records violates privacy or confidentiality as the material in the State Farm file was not prepared by an attorney and is not protected by work product because an attorney did not prepare it. Code of Civil Procedure § 2018 (c) states that any writing that reflects an attorneys’ impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal research or theories shall not be discoverable under any circumstances. A report which is not the product of an attorney or his agents or employees is not an attorney work product, and an attorney cannot, by retroactive adoption, convert the independent work of another, already performed, into his own. Bank of Orient v. Superior Court 67 CA3d 588, 136 CR 741. Knowledge possessed by a witness that is later communicated to an attorney is not protected. Cal. Evid. Benchbook, Jefferson § 3.56. Witnesses’ statements are not protected by work product. Moreno v. City of Los Angeles 21 CWCR 108.
You have objected on the ground that the file may contain lawyer-client privileged material and produced nothing, BUT have not served an affidavit stating that the file in fact contains privileged material or that the entire file consists of privileged materials.
An attorney-client privilege applies only to (1) communications (2) made in confidence (3) between an attorney and his or her client and (4) was made in the course of the attorney-client relationship. EC § 950 et seq., Cal. Evid. Benchbook by Jefferson § 40 et seq., Cal. Civil Discovery Practice CEB § 3 et seq.
An objection that the records “may” contain privileged information is not a valid objection. The objection must be based upon actual knowledge that the records do contain privileged materials. Civil Proc. Before Trial, Rutter Group § 8:202
Even if the records do contain privileged materials, it is not a legal ground to refuse to produce anything. The remaining materials must be produced. By not producing anything, You are stating that the entire file contains nothing but confidential communications from State Farm. This obviously is not true. If nothing is produced and the file contains non-privileged materials the attorney-client privilege is deemed waived as to the entire file. Mize v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe 40 CCC 905; Calif. Depo. And Discovery Practice, DeMeo Matthew-Bender § 51/33[2][a][i].
Statements by State Farm are those of witnesses, and as such, are not protected by attorney-client privilege. Also, simply because material has been sent to You does not make it privileged. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court 56 C2d 355, 15 CR 90; Martin v. WCAB 50 CA4th 333, 69 CR2d 138, 62 CCC 1500, 25 CWCR 332.
Materials found not to be protected are: (1) ALL documents to and from defendant and State Farm that comprises Your report, (2) ALL documents to and from State Farm and their adjusters, claim service companies, and Third Parties, (3) ALL summaries of any type from State Farm and their adjusters, claim service companies, and Third Parties, (4) ALL handwritten notes to and from State Farm and their adjusters, claim service companies, and Third Parties, (5) ALL collections of adjusters’ chronological claim history to and from State Farm and their adjusters, claim service companies, and Third Parties, (6) first report of claim to and from State Farm and their adjusters, claim service companies, and Third Parties. Winchell’s Donut Houses v. WCAB 62 CCC 1185 Statements by other employees who are not speaking as the employer are not privileged. Martin v. WCAB 62 CCC 1500.
You MUST identify and list any documents that are withheld on the basis of privilege. If further discovery of the withheld documents is warranted, Defendants can review the listed material in camera in accordance with the Civil Code procedures. You are an agency of the State of California, and as such, is governed by the public disclosure requirements of Article I, § 3, of the California Constitution and the CPRA, Cal. Gov’t Code § 6250 et seq. and designated this position as a responsible authority to receive and respond on behalf of the State of California to requests for public records under the California Public Records Act.
You are an agency of the State of California, and as such, is governed by the public disclosure requirements of Article I, § 3, of the California Constitution and the CPRA, Cal. Gov’t Code § 6250 et seq. and designated this position as a responsible authority to receive and respond on behalf of the State of California to requests for public records under the California Public Records Act. YOU have Failed and Refused to respond with the results of the review of Defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace.
This 2002 Ford E250 cargo extra long commercial van/vehicle had been in the repair shop of Midas/SpeeDee Oil Changers, at 6955 Village Pkwy, Dublin, CA 94568, from the beginning of the Covid-19 Pandemic since April, 2020. The van was originally brought into the shop at the end of January 2020 for a simple tune up prior to getting a smog test for registration where there were no “service engine” light on, no brake concern, no engine knocking, no oil leaking, no overheating, no misfiring/backfiring, NOTHING, just a simple tune up as we had done before. We were forced to return the van several times with a “check engine” light on as soon as they gave it back to us after EACH alleged repair, wherein the van stayed in their care for repair for several weeks at a time until in April 2020. The apparent repairs (some kind of engine stop leak/overheating additive) they performed, yet it was still getting hot and no one ever said that their efforts had resulted in a “blown engine” that would require a full engine replacement! Midas stated that there may be a problem with the radiator/thermostat ($600), but it was much greater when they presented the $3,263.66 invoice for repair payment to and payment was allegedly tendered by Bay Area Community Services (BACS) in our stead. Midas then came up with a repair proposal for an engine replacement of over $5,000 just days after they got the alleged $3,263 payment, wherein I refused their offer to replace the engine!
I demanded Midas return the $3,263 payment to BACS three days after it was made and the van remained there off the street, had not moved, and had been in their custody denying our use of it until such time as the repair was professionally made as we stated we WILL NOT pay to have the engine replaced by their shop! I also attached a copy of the May 6, 2020 bill of $3,263, that become $5,500 for a new engine for which the shop is responsible for!
On August 17, 2023 the 2002 Ford E250 cargo van that was stolen, Lic Plate#: 99302X; Hayward Police Department Case #: 23-46327; Alameda County Sheriff’s Office file #23-012664, event #0273: 8/28/23.
On the morning of August 17, 2023, I sent a two page fax and email to Senator Aisha Wahab, Hayward Police Chief Tony Chaplin, and Summerwood Apt regarding our van missing at 8:00 am and assumed was towed this morning from my residence.
I called and spoke with the Summerwood management before that time and they could NOT confirm nor deny that the van was in fact towed and said they would call me back in a few minutes.
Summerwood DID NOT return the call in a few minutes, it was returned OVER 24 HOURS LATER and only because they were responding to the fact that AMWF had sent an email to some other residents there alerting them of the theft of the van and a reward for it’s return. They also said they DID NOT receive the fax sent the day before! We have fax confirmations for ALL three faxes sent to Wahab, Chaplin and Summerwood.
In my 17 page email to Senator Wahab earlier that morning I told her that:
“I recently received communications from a person known to me to be a government informant alerting me to the mounting efforts for a Re-Call of Sen. Wahab and volunteering a community wide assessment of Bay Area Community Services (BACS) horrendous operations and services. I did not find the unsolicited information as “coincidental”.
To that incident, that we have notified the Senator “we were under attack” and the van has been illegally ticketed for towing while parked in our assigned stall!”
There is NO coincidence that the informant talked about Wahab and BACS as we have been working with Sen. Wahab since April 2023 on resolving the four year travesty of the DMV “alleged registration fees” due for the stolen van and UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL WE PAY FOR THE TWO YEARS IT WAS IN THE CUSTODY OF THE CRIMINALS- MIDAS! The email discussed her presentation of THE TRUTH, FACTS, EVIDENCE, TESTIMONY, THE LAW AND ALL THE IMPORTANT PUBLIC FACTORS THAT ESTABLISH THE ENTRAPMENT SCHEME INVOLVING MIDAS AND BACS, MIDAS WILLFULLY DISABLING THE VAN, and DMV FRAUD with the fact the van was in the custody of the Midas shop the entire time, was inoperable- thus not driven, and parked in their lot off the public streets- ALL IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE DMV CONDITIONS FOR A NON-OP.
When the van was recovered after being stolen, the officers of both Hayward Police Department and the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office NEVER processed the van as a crime scene leaving the evidence of a burglary tool and cell phone undiscovered in van, indicating that there was NO SEARCH OF VAN, NOR FINGER PRINTING OF VAN.
We have filed and served a complaint with Hayward Police Chief Chaplin, Alameda County Sheriff Sanchez, U. S. Attorney General Ramsey, California Attorney General Rob Bonta, FBI Director Robert Tripp, Attorney General Hallinan, California Senator Aisha Wahab, D. A. Price, et. al.
What really reveals the blatant intent of the fraud is the fact that someone took the time while it was at Midas to REMOVE FOUR YEARS of registration tags FROM the license plate so that it appears that the van HAS NOT BEEN REGISTERED SINCE 2017! This is a well known and established old law enforcement ploy “TRAP” for minorities to snare them in a “just cause traffic stop” for expired tags wherein the “stop and frisk/search goes wrong” are then harassed, assaulted or ending with the homicide/murder of the victimized driver! Black people are stopped five times more … for non-moving violations than their white counterparts! There are too many cases of Black people including Sandra Bland, Philando Castile and Tyre Nichols, who died after coming in contact with police after minor traffic stops. People are losing their lives unnecessarily just because of these minor infractions.
It also discussed the diabolical use of HATE inspired Crimes, Terror, Civil Conspiracy, Islamophobia, Xenophobia, Hate Induced Bigotry, Vindictive Retaliation, Oppression, Harassment, Racism, Bias, Prejudice, Unfairness, Persecution, AND GRAND CORRUPTION; the catastrophic irreparable Harm and Damage to ALL AMWF commercial spheres on the banking and hosting platforms; ALL the various intentional criminal and civil tortious acts revealed themselves and there is a clearly defined pattern that is an essential of a government engineered operation.
We examined where “Professional Responsibility and Sworn Oath” meets reality in the realm of WILLFUL AND INTENTIONAL MISREPRESENTATION, Concealment, Deception, Fraud, Deprivation of ones Civil Rights and the “Bilities”- Responsibility, Accountability, Liability.
The fax and other recent communications with Chief Chaplin also addressed the Hayward Police Department’s Willful and Intentional Dereliction of their Duties in Hate Crime and Processing Online Police Reports and the Continuing HATE inspired Crimes above.
August 18, 2023 after 8:00 AM AMWF van was confirmed stolen after I reported it missing to Summerwood, HPD, Wahab, Attorney General Bonta, and the FBI assumed ticketed and towed! I sent faxes to Summerwood, HPD, Wahab and emails to Summerwood, HPD, Wahab, Bonta, and the FBI, and phone call to Summerwood. Summerwood DID NOT return the call to notify me that the was in fact stolen for over 24 hours and claimed they NEVER received the fax. I have confirmation receipt that the faxes to Summerwood, HPD, and Wahab were ALL successfully transmitted!
DMV has Failed and Refused to respond with the results of the review of Defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace many request to waive the registration fees $960 from April, 2020 until July 2022 for defendants 2002 Ford E250 Cargo Van, license plate#: 99302X1. Defendants are Tax Exempt, Non-Profit status, wherein use tax is NOT applied and are unable to afford the registration fees ($960) for 2 years of non-use, nor a new van, and yet we need the van! We request that those fees be waived so that we can get the van repaired, insured and smog checked to pay the 1 year current registration fee.
Defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace have tried to get this matter resolved of YOU, DMV, of our being responsible and You charging us registration fees $960 from April, 2020 until July 2022 for defendants 2002 Ford E250 Cargo Van, license plate#: 99302X1 when we have proven that the van was intentionally disabled by Midas/SpeeDee Oil Changers repair shop, the 20 year old van was inoperable with a blown up the engine, requiring $5,500 for a new engine, had been off the street on the lot of the repair shop, and had not moved from the beginning of the Covid-19 Pandemic since April, 2020 until July 2022. It was then moved to a parking space in a private off the street lot.
The van still has to be repaired requiring $5,500 for a new engine and may NEVER be used again at all as filed the requested Statement of Facts. We are a poor, small, minority operated non-profit charitable organization that simply can not afford to pay 2 years of DMV van registration fees ($960) and for these reasons, we need some type of equity for the loss of the use of the van and it seems that the equity would be to waive those fees for the 2 years time that it was not in use. It is only fair that those fees be waived and we would like to file whatever documents necessary to accomplish that goal.
From our knowledge, history, multiple conversations and actions from Midas owner-Abdul Popal, employees and agents, the facts, information, and belief we thereupon contend this was their “entrapment scam/sting” attempt, along with unnamed Third Parties, to steal the van from us, to provoke and frame civil and criminal legal actions by alleging a disputed overpriced repair that they didn’t make, the fabricated cost of we would be liable for, and allege 18 months storage for abandonment when we refused to take the van back with the engine they blew up! IT IS TOTALLY INAPPROPRIATE AND ILLEGAL FOR GOVERNMENT TO USE PUBLIC FUNDS AND RESOURCES IN THIS TYPE OF CRIMINAL ENTRAPMENT SCAM!
We recently witnessed in April 20, 2023 where the DMV had to REFUND it’s charges for excessive fees and penalties of $34 (check # 045-7289568, should have been $36) from the 2022-23 registration of our 2000 GMC Savana Box Truck that for some unknown reason has had the fees MORE THAN DOUBLED this year! We are a Tax Exempt Non-Profit, use tax is NOT applied to us! We had 2020-22 Reg fees $150, BUT 2022-23 Reg fees $186, THEN SUDDENLY RAISED TO $302 for no reason! This truck is used for/with handicapped clients and drivers and has handicapped plates!
We tried to pay reg fees at DMV Safeway kiosk- we were denied to file them; we tried to pay at auto DMV services- again denied to file; we went to DMV-Hayward twice before they took the cashiers check and paid the 2022-23 Reg fees $186. BUT, DMV never sent tags. Instead they sent an additional bill for $122 (for RDF Reason:4) in Feb 2023 for a NEW total $308 while cashing the $186 check!
We questioned why DMV had NOT sent the tags after SIX (6) months and requested a review. They found that we had been DOUBLE over charged for excessive fees and penalties AND the actual fees should have been the normal $150!
NOW HERE AGAIN, we paid the 2023-24 fees of $192 on October 28, 2023, yet AGAIN have NEVER received the tags. But not only have we NOT received the tags for 2023-24, we have NOT received the 2024-25 REGISTRATION RENEWAL!
NOT so incidentally, just as with the van being at Midas for nearly 2 years, the truck has been at East Bay Auto Center repair for over a year, has remained there off the street, and has been in their custody denying our use of it as a result of their fraudulent attempt at a lien sale and now the losses and damages from the un-inspected theft, burglary, vandalism, and damage to the truck!
We filed our Cross Complaint against East Bay Auto Center for undetermined costs, losses and damages from the un-inspected theft, burglary, vandalism, and damage to the truck we have yet to observe and document the losses and damages to the truck door locks, ignition, exterior and interior cab, engine, parts, body, theft and damage of it’s contents, and other losses and damages, has cab damage that is 57 inches long stretching from the rear passenger side to start of the cab damage that is 6-8 inches wide through the corporate lettering, the truck is currently lodged 2 inches within and against the fence and CAN NOT be moved without causing MORE significant damage!
AMWF’s truck was “STOLEN” from East Bay Auto Center while there for the insurance repair estimate, BUT NOT stolen nor burglarized through entry from knocking out the passenger door lock! There is ONLY 16 inches from the passenger door lock to the metal fence and 24 inches from the passenger door lock to the outer metal fence. That makes it PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for someone to knock out the passenger door lock and a human body to open the door and enter the truck with less than 4 inches of clearance to enter given the design and build of the truck!! THE TRUCK WAS STOLEN THROUGH ENTRY FROM THE DRIVERS SIDE DOOR AND THERE IS NO SIGN OF ANY DAMAGE TO THE DRIVERS SIDE DOOR LOCK, THUS LEAVING THE ONLY POSSIBLE ENTRY THROUGH THAT DRIVERS SIDE DOOR WITH A KEY!!
The truck has undetermined losses and costs from the un-inspected theft, burglary, vandalism, and damage to the truck as East Bay has FAILED AND REFUSED to allow the Alameda County Sheriff’s nor us to inspect the truck in any capacity! We have yet to observe and document the losses and damages to the truck exterior cab, engine, parts, body, theft and damage of it’s contents, and other losses and damages, thus we have no projected total of the costs, losses and damages.
East Bay Auto Center is the ONLY suspects that could have stolen, burglarized, vandalized, and damaged the truck as it was not stolen by anyone else!
East Bay Auto Center FAILED AND REFUSED TO ALLOW THE COUNTY SHERIFF’S TO INSPECT THE TRUCK AFTER IT WAS STOLEN, BURGLARIZED, VANDALIZED AND DAMAGED AS PART OF COMPLETING A POLICE REPORT THAT IS ALSO REQUIRED BY THE INSURANCE COMPANIES!
As it is the RESPONSIBILITY of the COUNTY SHERIFFS to conduct a complete investigation, analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages IN THE LEGAL FORM OF A FILED POLICE REPORT, IT IS NOT WITHIN THE RIGHTS OF EAST BAY TO REFUSE THAT RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COUNTY SHERIFFS NOR FOR THEM TO COMPLY FOR THE PURPOSES OF DENYING OUR RIGHTS TO “COVER UP” FOR THEIR ASSET!!
We declared we will NOT move the truck unless and until East Bay allows the COUNTY SHERIFFS and us to inspect the truck for a complete investigation, analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages IN THE LEGAL FORM OF A FILED POLICE REPORT!!!
The COUNTY SHERIFFS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT have been IMPLICATED BY EAST BAY AUTO as an accessory and collaborator in this case, providing them protection and cover up for them, implying GROSS MISCONDUCT as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by the Sheriff’s deputy Markita Sayles whom ADMITS she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES TWICE and SHE LIED ABOUT THE ENTIRE “FALSE POLICE REPORT” and willfully committed PERJURY, FABRICATE EVIDENCE, MISCONDUCT, CONCEALMENT, COMMITTED FRAUD UPON THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN FIXING THE CASE. Video is available on Youtube at: https://youtu.be/ZEgZRhuYOMM.
On October 1, 2024 we discovered that our truck had been moved from the East Bay Auto Center’s shop on Mission Blvd. in Hayward. This was done WITHOUT OUR PERMISSION OR KNOWLEDGE! This was done to DESTROY the crime scene from the truck being stolen without being inspected nor investigated by law enforcement and destroy the chain of custody!
I called the County Sheriff’s and made arrangements to meet them there for a truck theft/missing report on October 2, 2024. Once we met there, Plaintiff’s FAILED AND REFUSED TO DISCLOSE TO THE COUNTY SHERIFF’S THE LOCATION OF THE TRUCK, OR WETHER IT WAS STOLEN, BURGLARIZED, VANDALIZED AND DAMAGED AGAIN AS PART OF COMPLETING A POLICE REPORT THAT IS ALSO REQUIRED BY THE INSURANCE COMPANIES!
AGAIN, this was done to DESTROY the crime scene from the truck being stolen without being inspected nor investigated by law enforcement and destroy the chain of custody!
There is a clear pattern of DMV fraud and contempt toward us and we have documented it for years! You even changed the address on the registration of one of our cars without my knowledge or permission! That’s something that I can’t even do without giving DNA!
WE STILL PATIENTLY AWAIT DMV GRANTING OUR REQUEST TO WAIVE THE VAN’S FEES SINCE THE VAN WAS/IS INOPERABLE, IS PARKED OFF STREET AND HAS BEEN SINCE JANUARY 2000, AND THE SAME FOR THE TRUCK SINCE THE TRUCK WAS/IS INOPERABLE, IS PARKED OFF STREET, AND HAD IT’S FEES UNJUSTLY RAISED AGAIN WITHOUT REASON.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim at:
Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation
4200 Park Blvd., Suite 116
Oakland, CA 94602
Tel: 510-394-4501
Respectfully,
Abdul-Jalil
510-394-4501
*******
July 29, 2024
Today we received a voicemail for someone named Mary from State Farm claims inquiring into our moving the Truck from East Bay Auto Center.
As reported of this date, East Bay STILL has the truck and REFUSES to release it to us unless and until we indemnify them from ALL liability for their civil and criminal charges of larceny, fraud, theft, damage, if the vehicle is stolen from them, etc., so they may be able to do or have done anything they choose to the vehicle and it’s contents without any possible consequences!
The truck was supposed to have been returned to us by March 7, 2024, BUT that DID NOT HAPPEN.
Now, the truck has been STOLEN, was burglarized, vandalized, is damaged, and East Bay has refused to allow the COUNTY SHERIFFS nor us to inspect the truck for a complete analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages, UNLESS AND UNTIL WE SIGN A WAIVER OF THEIR LIABILITY FOR SAME! We will NOT ever do that.
As you ALL have been advised, East Bay Auto Center filed a Small Claims action against us for an additional $3,400 storage fees beyond the amount they settled with State Farm for. We have filed a Cross Complaint against them for undetermined costs, losses and damages from the un-inspected theft, burglary, vandalism, and damage to the truck we have yet to observe and document the losses and damages to the truck door locks, ignition, exterior and interior cab, engine, parts, body, theft and damage of it’s contents, and other losses and damages, has cab damage that is 57 inches long stretching from the rear passenger side to start of the cab damage that is 6-8 inches wide through the corporate lettering, the truck is currently lodged 2 inches within and against the fence and CAN NOT be moved without causing MORE significant damage!
The truck was NOT stolen nor burglarized through entry from knocking out the passenger door lock! There is ONLY 16 inches from the passenger door lock to the metal fence and 24 inches from the passenger door lock to the outer metal fence. That makes it PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for someone to knock out the passenger door lock and a human body to open the door and enter the truck with less than 4 inches of clearance to enter given the design and build of the truck!! THE TRUCK WAS STOLEN THROUGH ENTRY FROM THE DRIVERS SIDE DOOR AND THERE IS NO SIGN OF ANY DAMAGE TO THE DRIVERS SIDE DOOR LOCK, THUS LEAVING THE ONLY POSSIBLE ENTRY THROUGH THAT DRIVERS SIDE DOOR WITH A KEY!
East Bay Auto Center is Not currently registered with California Secretary of State nor the California Franchise Tax Board, thus they don’t have legal standing to file nor defend a law suit.
EBA status is not listed as a current Corporation with Secretary of State or State Franchise Tax Board authorized to do business in the State of California. They may never have legally existed, they may be suspended for some reason, or they may not legally exist any longer.
Given that EBA status is not listed as a current Corporation with Secretary of State or State Franchise Tax Board authorized to do business in the State of California, there are multiple individual parties including East Bay Auto, Muhammad Khan, Sani Khan, Tariq Khan, Numi Khan, and Asian investors, there is good cause and we are asking the court to ascertain the correct legal name and status of East Bay Auto, the owners and investors of East Bay Auto, the correct legal names of the plaintiff’s, and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s. CA Civ Pro Code § 116.560. (b) The defendant may request the court at any time, whether before or after judgment, to amend the defendant’s claim or judgment to include both the correct legal name and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s. Upon a showing of good cause, the court shall amend the claim or judgment to state the correct legal name of the plaintiff’s, and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s and investors.
East Bay Auto has suspensions with the Bureau of Automotive Repair (BAR).
We will ask the court to transfer the Small Claims action to Court of Competent Jurisdiction because we have no projected total of the costs, losses and damages. losses and damages to the truck that may exceed the jurisdictional limits stated in Sections 116.220, 116.221, and 116.231, and if so, request the small claims court to transfer the small claims action to a court of competent jurisdiction.
I base my request for the imposition of a sanction on the basis that it took me over 47 hours to research and locate the correct Plaintiff’s personnel, many phone calls, letters, emails and faxes in communication with the parties referenced herein, to research and prepare this motion, costs, and expenses according to proof. My discounted hourly wage is $350 per hour (from regular posted fee of $550/hour) for the 47 hours spent on this matter equals $16,450 alone.
As it is the RESPONSIBILITY of the COUNTY SHERIFFS to conduct a complete investigation, analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages IN THE LEGAL FORM OF A FILED POLICE REPORT, IT IS NOT WITHIN THE RIGHTS OF EAST BAY TO REFUSE THAT RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COUNTY SHERIFFS NOR FOR THEM TO COMPLY FOR THE PURPOSES OF DENYING OUR RIGHTS TO “COVER UP” FOR THEIR ASSET!!
We will NOT move the truck unless and until East Bay allows the COUNTY SHERIFFS and us to inspect the truck for a complete investigation, analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages IN THE LEGAL FORM OF A FILED POLICE REPORT!!!
The COUNTY SHERIFFS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT have been IMPLICATED BY EAST BAY AUTO as an accessory and collaborator in this case, providing them protection and cover up for them, implying GROSS MISCONDUCT as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by the Sheriff’s deputy Markita Sayles whom ADMITS she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES. Video is available on Youtube. See “ILLEGAL POLICE TARGETED ENTRAPMENT BACKFIRES! TRAPS POLICE, EXPOSES IMMORAL, UNETHICAL SCHEME!” at: https://youtu.be/kus80M56Vas.
A FORMAL COMPLAINT WILL FOLLOW UNDER SEPARATE COVER.
Here we have the County Sheriff covering for their “asset” East Bay Auto and co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, is proven in the video by THEIR AND POLICE ADMISSIONS and Bad Faith/Hate crime fact pattern, was ALWAYS a Scheme to take possession of the truck, provoke and frame civil/criminal legal actions by fabricating a disputed legal issue we would be subjected to knowing that the courts are inapposite to our justice.
IT IS CLEAR THAT ABDUL-JALIL, HIS FAMILY, THEIR BUSINESSES, AND NON-PROFIT, the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation, HAS BEEN TARGETED WITH SPECIOUS, TORTIOUS ILLEGAL CLANDESTINE ACTS ON THE PART OF LAW ENFORCEMENT WITH THE INTENT TO DESTROY THEIR LIVES!
However, co-conspirators East Bay Auto/State Farm are not acting alone as the ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF AND LAW ENFORCEMENT have been IMPLICATED BY EAST BAY as an accessory and collaborator in this case, providing them protection and cover implying GROSS MISCONDUCT as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by the Sheriff’s officers. See video at:
This video PROVIDES ADMISSIONS from Sheriff’s Deputy Markita Sayles that she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES is PROOF of how POLICE FILE FALSE REPORTS, FABRICATE EVIDENCE, FIX THE CASE, COMMIT FRAUD to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto AFTER she:
1) admitted she talked with Law Enforcement Special Services resources twice to ascertain that she was proceeding in the correct manner according to their plan and her instructions. WHY WOULD SHE NEED TO CONSULT WITH AND BE INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES TO TAKE AND FILE A SIMPLE, COMMON POLICE REPORT?,
2) East Bay Auto incriminated police admitting that they worked with police, are accomplishes, collaborators, were under the protection of law enforcement covering for their asset and would NOT do anything to assist AMWF and Abdul-Jalil,
3) The vehicle was ADMITTED stolen, burglarized, vandalized, fraud, larceny and damaged, BUT, BOTH policemen said “this is NOT a criminal matter, truck was not stolen”,
4) Dep. Sayles said she can’t inspect/process nor document the truck as a crime scene for evidence, damage, theft, vandalism, missing/stolen business and personal property, nor can Jalil without the approval of their asset East Bay Auto,
5) Jalil requested a Police Report OVER 21 times,
6) Dep. Sayles said she would conduct a thorough investigation, interview shop owner, personnel and neighbors, check local cameras,
7) Dep. Sayles said Jalil didn’t answers her questions, BUT she NEVER asked basic questions as: Name, Address, City, State, Zip Code, Telephone, nothing on damage, suspects, the truck registration or VIN,
Dep. Sayles said Jalil needed to go to court in order to get a police report, REFUSING TO TAKE A REPORT!, and
9) Dep. Sayles said it’s a civil matter 8 Times! NOT a criminal matter.
THIS VIDEO PROVIDES PROOF THAT SHERIFF’S DEPT. MARKITA SAYLES LIED ABOUT
THE ENTIRE “POLICE REPORT”! Sayles “event/police report” states:
“RP (Reporting Party, Abdul-Jalil) UPSET THAT HIS VEHICLE THAT UNDER THE AUTO REPAIR SHOP HAS DAMAGE. THE AUTO BODY SHOP STILL HAS CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE AND THE VEHILCE HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED TO THE RP. THE RP WAS ADVISED THE MATTER WAS CIVIL. THE RP WAS ADAMENT THE THERE IS A CRIME EVEN THOUGH DEPS TOLD HIM IT WAS CIVIL. THE RP WAS UPSET AND DEMANDED A REPORT. WHEN ASKED WHAT WE WERE INVESTIGATING THE RP SAID THAT WOULD BE UP TO US. NO REPORT TAKEN”
Abdul-Jalil requested a Police Report OVER 21 times, AND Dep. Sayles said she would conduct a thorough investigation, interview shop owner, personnel and neighbors, check local cameras! SAYLES LIED ABOUT THE ENTIRE “FALSE POLICE REPORT” and willfully committed PERJURY, FABRICATE EVIDENCE, MISCONDUCT, CONCEALMENT, COMMITTED FRAUD UPON THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN FIXING THE CASE!
This video PROVIDES ADMISSIONS from Markita Sayles she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES TWICE is PROOF there is a continuing Targeted Entrapment Scam/Sting/Scheme and Hate Crimes. The Sheriff’s office trapped themselves in CORRUPTION and SUBORNED PERJURIOUS TESTIMONY, in this State sponsored terror; with vindictive retaliation against AMWF and al-Hakim family while defending, concealing and thereby being further complicit in committing THE ADMITTED willful and intentional extrinsic fraud upon the people of the great State of California and the Court; fraud; prosecutorial misconduct; willful and malicious prosecution; willful misconduct; conflict of interest; obstruction of justice; denial of due process under the law; willful and intentional fabrication and authoring false evidence; misstating and mischaracterizing evidence; misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court’s act or reliance; harassment; intimidation on behalf of the County Sheriffs; abuse of discretion, misconduct, conduct prejudicial, illegal ex-parte communications and bias designed to result in fixing the case against AMWF and al-Hakim; appointing themselves a Real Primary Party of Interest to the litigation with their OWN agenda; weaponizing the police report and investigative process in furtherance of their agenda; engaging in the defense of opposing parties; provocation, bias, prejudice, Islamophobia, Xenophobia, hate, bigotry and racism!
The Entrapment Strategy is to disable, destroy, and eliminate the TARGET- AMWF and Abdul-Jalil, the al-Hakim family, their businesses and business property, their real and personal property, their charities, their communities, and the communities they serve- personally, professionally, morally, ethically, and financially with the courts system to deny and exhaust any and all notions of civil rights, civil liberties, human rights without the God given right to undertake unbiased litigation without the deciding and controlling actions and influence of corrupt unscrupulous judicial, law enforcement, governmental and legal entities, agencies and operatives.
We have PREPARED SUBPOENAS TO BE SERVED THIS WEEK ON ALL THE PARTIES REFERRENCED HEREIN that we have documented AND filed SEVERAL Federal and State complaints of being complicit in the illegal TARGETED ENTRAPMENT activities WITH AND AGAINST Police Chiefs Tony Chaplin/Brian Matthew; Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez; Police Chief Abdul Pridgen; U. S. Attorney Ismail Ramsey; Attorney General Rob Bonta; F.B.I. Director Robert Tripp; Governor Gavin Newsom; Casey Hallinan; Ricardo Lara- DOI; Steve Gordon- DMV; Patrick Dorais- BAR; Kimberly Kirchmeyer- DCA; Grant Parks- State Auditor; Selvi Stanislaus- FTB; Senator Aisha Wahab; District Attorney Pam Price; HUD; et. al., against co-conspirators East Bay Auto/State Farm for their active, continuing role in this Targeted Entrapment Scheme and “Bad Faith” by them, their agents, contractors, and ALL known and unknown, announced and unannounced Third Parties, the threats/demands for Payment of Storage, refusal to pay for a Rental vehicle, mitigating the continuing Loss of Use and Damages, and their illegal clandestine efforts to gain ownership of our truck WITHOUT PAYING FOR THE REPAIR NOR COMPENSATING US with the FRAUDULENT attempted East Bay Auto Lien Sale and REFUSAL to release our truck to AMWF.
AMWF is going forward with Civil and Criminal Charges/Claims for Grand Larceny, Grand Theft Auto, Fraud, Property Theft, Burglary, Vandalism, Extortion, Phone (Terrorist) Threats, Deception, attempted Grand Theft, Costs, Damages, Mitigating the Continuing Loss of Use, and Monetary Sanctions, among others with Federal and State Complaints filed against East Bay Auto and State Farm Insurance and served them both with Preservation-of-Evidence Demand Letter.
Additionally, with respect to any and all business operation regarding the AMWF insurance policy and claim, and THE FACT that State Farm, their employees, their referenced agents, sub-agents, contractors, State Farm Claims, State Farm Appraisal Team, Alacrity Solutions, LLC, Snapsheet, Up North Towing, Blue Star Towing, and ALL known and unknown Third Parties have clearly “targeted” AMWF and using recognizable government entrapment tactics the latest of which was the refusal to release the truck and “lien sale” to gain ownership of their truck WITHOUT PAYING FOR THE REPAIR NOR COMPENSATING US! As a direct and proximate result of State Farm and their co-conspirators East Bay’s continuing actions, AMWF is FORCED to make long term arrangements for the storage of the truck UNTIL STATE FARM PAYS FOR THE REPAIR AS AMWF PURSUES ALL OTHER REMEDIES!
ALL THE PARTIES HEREIN ARE DEMANDED TO LODGE AND FILE THE REQUISITE COMPLAINT AND BEGAN THE MANDATORY INVESTIGATION PROCESS!
Respectfully,
Abdul-Jalil
510-394-4501
—
Creating and Edvocating Relevant Social Service Programs
I checked with the Save Alameda For Everyone (SAFE) organization behind the Recall effort and they did not list the Trader Joe’s location as one of their official signature gathering locations.
You must be logged in to post a comment.