To: Chief Toney Chaplin Yesenia Sanchez
% Acting Chief Brian Matthews Alameda County Sheriff
Hayward Police Department 1401 Lakeside Drive, 12th Floor
300 W. Winton Ave. Oakland, CA 94612-4305
Hayward, CA 94544 Fax: (510) 272-6811
Fax: 510-293-7183
Ismail J. Ramsey-Director Rob Bonta
U. S. Attorney’s Office Attorney General of California
Federal Courthouse 1300 I Street, Suite 125
450 Golden Gate Avenue P.O. Box 944255
San Francisco, CA 94102 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Fax No.: 415-436-7234 Fax: 916-324-8835
Robert Tripp, FBI Director Casey Hallinan
Northern District of California Attorney General of California
San Francisco Field Office Attn: Public Inquiry Unit
450 Golden Gate Avenue, 13th Floor P.O. Box 944255
San Francisco, CA 94102-9523 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Fax: (916) 323-5341
Senator Aisha Wahab (SD-10) Pamela Price
California State Senate District Attorney
39510 Paseo Padre Pkwy, Ste 280 René C. Davidson Courthouse
Fremont, CA 94538 1225 Fallon Street, Room 900
Fax: 916-319-2125 Oakland CA 94612
Fax: 510-452-5625, 510-271-5157
Steve Gordon- Director Kenneth J. Pogue- Director
Department of Motor Vehicles Office of Administrative Law
2415 1st Ave., Mail Station F101 300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1250
Sacramento, CA 95818-2606 Sacramento, CA 95814-4339
Fax: Fax: 916-323-6826
Steve.Gordon@dmv.ca.gov Kenneth.Pogue@oai.ca.gov
Kimberly Kirchmeyer- Director Patrick Dorais- Bureau Chief
Department of Consumer Affairs Bureau of Automotive Repair
1625 North Market Blvd., Suite N 112 Complaint Intake Unit
Sacramento, CA 95834 10949 N. Mather Blvd.
Fax: (916) 574-8623 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Kimberly.Kirchmeyer@dca.ca.gov Fax: (916) 464-3405
Patrick_Dorais@dca.ca.gov
Ricardo Lara- Commissioner Alex Anneker
Department of Insurance State Farm Insurance Agent
300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1700 5301 Claremont Ave
Sacramento, CA 95814 Oakland, CA 94618
Fax: 916-445-5276 alex.anneker.vadygn@statefarm.com, Ricardo.Lara@insurance.ca.gov EastBayAuto6@gmail.com
Custodian of Records
State Farm Claims
PO Box 52250
Phoenix, AZ 85072-2250
Alacrity Fax: 985-345-4400, 800-952-5371
sent via: U. S. Mail, Fax, and email
FROM: Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation
DATE: December 4, 2024
NO. PAGES: 6
RE: State Farm inquiry into moving Truck, VIDEO ADMISSIONS, PROOF Sheriff’s Deputy MARKITA SAYLES COMMITTED FRAUD, FIXING THE CASE; ADMITTED SHE WAS INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES; PERJURY; FILING AN ENTIRE “FALSE POLICE REPORT”; WILLFULLY FABRICATED EVIDENCE; COMMITTED MISCONDUCT; CONCEALMENT; to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto.
Dear Sheriff Sanchez, Chief Chaplin, A. G. Ramsey, A. G. Bonta, Director Tripp, Steve Gordon- DMV, Ricardo Lara- DOI, Kimberly Kirchmeyer- DCA , Patrick Dorais- BAR, Kenneth J. Pogue- OAL, A. G. Hallinan, Senator Wahab, D. A. Price, State Farm Claims, East Bay Auto Center, et. al.,
Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez, attached hereto please find a CIVIL SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) Evidence Code sections 1560, 1561, 1562, and 1271 governing this SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) AND Code of Civil Procedure Section 2031 (CCP 2031) for Personal Appearance and Production of Documents, Electronically Stored Information, and Things in response to the court order (attached) for production of documents in the above referenced matter. You were served this subpoena for the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office, Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez and Deputy Markita Sayles today, December 11, 2024 and should respond immediately.
SUBPOENA REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
Pursuant to Evidence Code sections 1560, 1561, 1562, and 1271 governing this SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) AND Code of Civil Procedure Section 2031 (CCP 2031) on Responding Party: Custodian of Records and Person Most Knowledgeable is used herein to refer to, and includes Alameda County Sheriff’s Office, Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez and Deputy Markita Sayles, AND YOU are NOT required to appear in person if you produce (i) the Bates-stamped or otherwise numbered sequentially records described in the declaration on page two or the attached declaration or affidavit and (ii) a completed declaration of custodian of records in compliance with..
As might be YOUR custom, you may provide responsive records in electronic format (i.e., text files that can be opened with any word processing software such as Word or TextEdit) or a searchable portable document file (PDF).
If any DOCUMENT requested herein was, but no longer is, in YOUR possession, custody, or control, please state whether such DOCUMENT was lost, destroyed or otherwise disposed of, and describe the circumstances and date(s) of such disposition.
REQUESTS FOR DOCUMENTS
ALL the Defendants, Requestors and Propounders seek disclosure of any and all records created which were prepared, received, transmitted, collected and/or maintained by the Plaintiffs, Responding Parties, ALL Government Related Parties, and ALL Government Related Third Parties, including but not limited to those listed in those sections herein.
YOU are requested to produce for inspection and copying, pursuant to Evidence Code sections 1560, 1561, 1562, and 1271 governing this SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) AND Code of Civil Procedure Section 2031 (CCP 2031), the DOCUMENTS in the below-numbered categories. The production shall take place on December 16, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., at 4200 Park Blvd., Oakland, California, 94602.
This is a request for an opportunity to inspect and/or obtain copies of records of any and all documents, files, correspondence, audio and video files, or other records of yours and various National, State, County of Alameda and City of Oakland Offices under the provisions of CCP 2031 on behalf of the Defendant/Requestors and Propounders.
YOU are required to serve a written response, under oath, responding to each item or category as provided by Evidence Code sections 1560, 1561, 1562, and 1271 governing this SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) AND Code of Civil Procedure Section 2031 (CCP 2031).
The written response shall be served within seven (7) days of the service of this request.
If any DOCUMENT requested herein was, but no longer is, in YOUR possession, custody, or control, please state whether such DOCUMENT was lost, destroyed or otherwise disposed of, and describe the circumstances and date(s) of such disposition.
This is a request for an opportunity to inspect and/or obtain copies of records of any and all documents, files, correspondence, audio and video files, or other records of yours and various offices under the provisions of Evidence Code sections 1560, 1561, 1562, and 1271 governing this SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) AND Code of Civil Procedure Section 2031 (CCP 2031) on behalf of the Defendant/Requestors and Propounders, the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation, Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, family members Harun al-Hakim-Miller, Jalil Omar al-Hakim, Bari al-Hakim-Williams, and their siblings; and the entities Superstar Management, The Genius of Randy Wallace, Inc., Nowtruth.org, eX-whY Adventures, their real, personal and business property (all herein after referred to as “ALL the Defendant/Requestors and Propounders and/or Defendant/Requestors and Propounders”)
Please process this request for ALL SECTION Requests under ALL statutes herein to release the maximum number of documents and records in the interests of justice and achieving full compliance with Evidence Code sections 1560, 1561, 1562, and 1271 governing this SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) AND Code of Civil Procedure Section 2031 (CCP 2031). Please search ALL your automated indices to the Central Records System, the older general (manual) indices, all Field Offices, other facilities that are separate from the office processing the request, or with another agency or agencies having a substantial interest in the determination of the request, or among two or more components of the agency or agencies having substantial subject matter interest therein needed to coordinate the response with different sections in the department that have responsibility for the requested records. This search is essential to collect and appropriately examine the separate and distinct records which are demanded so that copies of the following documents containing the following information be provided to us by Responding Parties and ALL Related Parties seek disclosure of any records for the Plaintiff/Responding Party.
East Bay Auto filed a Small claims action to try to collect $3,400 in back storage fees BUT their status is not listed as a current Corporation with Secretary of State or State Franchise Tax Board authorized to do business in the State of California, they may never have legally existed, they may be suspended for some reason, or they may not legally exist any longer, there are multiple individual parties including East Bay Auto Center, their owners, and Asian investors, there is good cause and we are asking the court to ascertain the correct legal name and status of East Bay Auto Center, the owners and investors of East Bay Auto, the correct legal names of the plaintiff’s, and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s. CA Civ Pro Code § 116.560. (b) As the defendant, we filed a cross complaint and may request the court at any time, whether before or after judgment, to amend the defendant’s claim or judgment to include both the correct legal name and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s. Upon a showing of good cause, the court shall amend the claim or judgment to state the correct legal name of the plaintiff’s, and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s and investors.
We asked that the court award ALL costs, losses and damages from the un-inspected theft, burglary, vandalism, and damage to the truck we have yet to observe and document the losses and damages to the truck door locks, ignition, exterior and interior cab, engine, parts, body, theft and damage of it’s contents, other losses and damages, and monetary sanctions in an amount according to proof. The costs are well over $20,000 at present.
As we have always maintained and is proven by their bad faith fact pattern, this was ALWAYS an entrapment scheme designed to take possession of the truck with it’s contents and trigger civil/criminal actions knowing that the courts are inapposite to our justice. They are not acting alone! These requests are deemed to be continuing insofar as if any of the above is secured subsequent to the date herein for the production of same, said documents are to be provided to Defendant’s consistent within the applicable Rule of Civil Procedure.
This subpoena is not intended as a full or complete statement of all relevant demands, claims, facts or applicable law, and nothing herein is intended as, nor should it be deemed to constitute, a waiver or relinquishment of any of my rights, remedies, claims or causes of action, all of which are hereby expressly reserved.
Please provide the records in an electronic format to: ajalil1234@gmail.com. Documents not in electronic format should be forwarded Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim below on or before the return date of this subpoena if you wish to comply voluntarily rather than appearing before the court.
Here we have the County Sheriff covering for their “asset” East Bay Auto and co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, is proven in the video by THEIR AND POLICE ADMISSIONS and Bad Faith/Hate crime fact pattern, was ALWAYS a Scheme to take possession of the truck, provoke and frame civil/criminal legal actions by fabricating a disputed legal issue we would be subjected to knowing that the courts are inapposite to our justice.
IT IS CLEAR THAT ABDUL-JALIL, HIS FAMILY, THEIR BUSINESSES, AND NON-PROFIT, the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation, HAS BEEN TARGETED WITH SPECIOUS, TORTIOUS ILLEGAL CLANDESTINE ACTS ON THE PART OF LAW ENFORCEMENT WITH THE INTENT TO DESTROY THEIR LIVES!
On January 30, 2024, at 3:25 pm I went to East Bay Auto at 21099 Mission Blvd., Hayward, CA 94541 for a Alameda County Sheriff’s Civil Stand By observed by Deputies Joshua Chavez #2287 and Collin Lenahan #2453 to pick up our truck and East Bay Auto Center REFUSED to release it claiming they are owed storage.
East Bay admitted in the presence of the two (2) Deputies, whom are percipient eye witnesses, 1) that they DO NOT have a contract with us in any capacity, 2) that they were paid $1,050 by the insurance company for storage, 3) that East Bay has had many other communications and agreements with the insurance company and their agents, 4) they have had communications and agreements which we were NOT privy to and do not have copies of, 5) East Bay had previously told me that they had an agreement with the insurance company for the storage, BUT revealed that they actually have a check and displayed it before the deputies, 6) they referred to their hand written policy posted on the wall that they charge storage 2 days AFTER the completion of any work performed.
They have NOT and will NOT perform any work on the truck and I will never sign any work order for same nor have we singed a release for them to be paid!
I am the person for the Service Process in this Plaintiff’s fraudulent claim and named as the Person of Interest in this fraudulent alleged Lien Sale denied on February 7, 2024 by the Department of Motor Vehicle filed by these same Plaintiff East Bay Auto Center.
Plaintiff East Bay Auto Center filed this claim March 13, 2024, and allegedly served it via U. S. postal mail from Hayward, California with postage meter dated Monday, May 20, 2024.
We received the mailed letter claim on Friday, May 31, 2024. Yet only FIVE (5) DAYS LATER, on March 19, 2024, plaintiff’s contacted AMWF and Abdul-Jalil by phone and reply email dated March 25, 2024 with invoice dated March 19, 2024 DISAVOWING AND REJECTING their claim and REQUESTING that we come and retrieve the truck AT NO COSTS!
On April 22, 2024 Plaintiff’s FAILED AND REFUSED TO ALLOW THE COUNTY SHERIFF’S TO INSPECT THE TRUCK AFTER IT WAS STOLEN, BURGLARIZED, VANDALIZED AND DAMAGED AS PART OF COMPLETING A POLICE REPORT THAT IS ALSO REQUIRED BY THE INSURANCE COMPANIES! As a result, we do not have a total value of the scope of loss and damage to the truck therefrom. The truck has over $200,000 in valuable items in the cargo payload bay since it has been in the possession and custody of the Plaintiffs a year ago! As it is the RESPONSIBILITY of the COUNTY SHERIFFS to conduct a complete investigation, analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages IN THE LEGAL FORM OF A FILED POLICE REPORT, IT IS NOT WITHIN THE RIGHTS OF EAST BAY TO REFUSE THAT RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COUNTY SHERIFFS NOR FOR THEM TO COMPLY FOR THE PURPOSES OF DENYING OUR RIGHTS TO “COVER UP” FOR THEIR ASSET!! We declared we will NOT move the truck unless and until East Bay allows the COUNTY SHERIFFS and us to inspect the truck for a complete investigation, analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages IN THE LEGAL FORM OF A FILED POLICE REPORT!!!
On October 1, 2024 we discovered that our truck had been moved from the Plaintiff’s shop on Mission Blvd. in Hayward. This was done WITHOUT OUR PERMISSION OR KNOWLEDGE! This was done to DESTROY the crime scene from the truck being stolen without being inspected nor investigated by law enforcement and destroy the chain of custody! We called the County Sheriff’s and made arrangements to meet them there for a truck theft/missing report on October 2, 2024. Once we met there, Plaintiff’s FAILED AND REFUSED TO DISCLOSE TO THE COUNTY SHERIFF’S THE LOCATION OF THE TRUCK, OR WETHER IT WAS STOLEN, BURGLARIZED, VANDALIZED AND DAMAGED AGAIN AS PART OF COMPLETING A POLICE REPORT THAT IS ALSO REQUIRED BY THE INSURANCE COMPANIES!
On Friday, October 4, 2024, East Bay ADMITTED and CONFESSED in several unsolicited emails to the court and Judges Thomas Nixon, Brian Caruth, Stuart Hing, Michael Gaffey; Clerks of Dept. 1, 105, 605, 711; and court administrator Chad Finke that they have willfully and intentionally absconded with our truck and transferred the possession and control to a Third Party without our knowledge or consent!
These admissions and confessions are evidence that they willfully and intentionally improperly altered, concealed, suppression and destroyed evidence wherein the egregiousness of this spoliation, the strength and nature of their actions is untenable with any JUSTICE! Plaintiffs and Sheriffs have NO REGARD FOR THE LAW NOR JUSTICE witnessed by this inference arising from the spoliation.
Now they attempt to EXTORT monies from us by holding the truck HOSTAGE and DEMANDING an unknown amount of towing and storage fees for payment to an unknown third party to be paid TO THEM in advance of any delivery of the truck, AS WELL AS payment of towing and storage fees to THEM to be paid TO THEM in advance of any delivery of the truck!
On November 2, 2024 we discovered that our truck had been returned to Plaintiff’s shop on Mission Blvd. in Hayward with additional damage. Upon investigation, the truck has been further BURGLARIZED by the breach of the lock on the roll up door and the roll up door itself! THE DAMAGES ARE UNKOWN AND YET TO BE INVESTIGATED!
IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THESE UNSOLICITED ADMISSIONS and CONFESSIONS to the court and Judges makes them ALL PERCIPIENT EYE WITNESSES AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR DISQUALIFICATION.
As reported of this date, East Bay STILL has the truck and REFUSES to release it to us unless and until we indemnify them from ALL liability for their civil and criminal charges of larceny, fraud, theft, damage, if the vehicle is stolen from them, etc., so they may be able to do or have done anything they choose to the vehicle and it’s contents without any possible consequences!
The truck was supposed to have been returned to defendants by March 7, 2024, BUT that DID NOT HAPPEN.
Now, the truck has been STOLEN, was burglarized, vandalized, is damaged, and East Bay has refused to allow the COUNTY SHERIFFS nor us to inspect the truck for a complete analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages, UNLESS AND UNTIL WE SIGN A WAIVER OF THEIR LIABILITY FOR SAME! We will NOT ever do that.
As you have been advised, East Bay Auto Center filed a Small Claims action against us for an additional $3,400 storage fees beyond the amount they settled with State Farm for. We have filed a Cross Complaint against them for undetermined costs, losses and damages from the un-inspected theft, burglary, vandalism, and damage to the truck we have yet to observe and document the losses and damages to the truck door locks, ignition, exterior and interior cab, engine, parts, body, theft and damage of it’s contents, and other losses and damages, has cab damage that is 57 inches long stretching from the rear passenger side to start of the cab damage that is 6-8 inches wide through the corporate lettering, the truck is currently lodged 2 inches within and against the fence and CAN NOT be moved without causing MORE significant damage!
The truck was NOT stolen nor burglarized through entry from knocking out the passenger door lock! There is ONLY 16 inches from the passenger door lock to the metal fence and 24 inches from the passenger door lock to the outer metal fence. That makes it PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for someone to knock out the passenger door lock and a human body to open the door and enter the truck with less than 4 inches of clearance to enter given the design and build of the truck!! THE TRUCK WAS STOLEN THROUGH ENTRY FROM THE DRIVERS SIDE DOOR AND THERE IS NO SIGN OF ANY DAMAGE TO THE DRIVERS SIDE DOOR LOCK, THUS LEAVING THE ONLY POSSIBLE ENTRY THROUGH THAT DRIVERS SIDE DOOR WITH A KEY!
East Bay Auto Center is NOT currently registered with California Secretary of State nor the California Franchise Tax Board, California Board of Equalization, California Bureau of Automotive Repair nor the Alameda County Business License AS A LEGAL BUSINESS ENTITY, thus they are NOT authorized to do business in the State of California and don’t have legal standing to file nor defend a law suit. They, East Bay Auto Center, may never have legally existed, they may be suspended for some reason, or they may not legally exist any longer.
We discovered that the Bureau of Automotive Repair (BAR) has Shah Sons LLC, listed as the “owner” of East Bay Auto Center. That is also true for the Alameda County Business License although their license is invalid for failure to file and pay taxes and comply with a mandatory audit.
HOWEVER, Shah Sons LLC, HAS NOT REGISTERED NOR ARE THEY USING A DBA (DOING BUSINESS AS) for East Bay Auto Center with any Federal, State, or County governmental agency, NOT the IRS, California Secretary of State State, California Franchise Tax Board, California Board of Equalization, California Bureau of Automotive Repair nor the Alameda County Business License.
In order for East Bay Auto Center to legally exist AS A LEGAL BUSINESS ENTITY, they would have to file the proper documents with the IRS, California Secretary of State State, California Franchise Tax Board, California Board of Equalization, California Bureau of Automotive Repair and the Alameda County Business License, establishing Shah Sons LLC, DOING BUSINESS AS (DBA) East Bay Auto Center. They have NOT done that even though they filed a Fictitious Business Name Statement with Alameda County.
Additionally, there are NO other REQUIRED means, NO INVOICES, NO ADVERTISEMENTS, NOTHING ON THEIR WEBSITE, that they comply with for the use of the legal name of the LLC- Shah Sons LLC, followed by the DBA- doing business as East Bay Auto Center. This practice clarifies the legal entity involved and maintain the LLC’s limited liability status. This ensures that the contracts are enforceable and that the LLC is recognized as the party to these endeavors.
If an LLC does not properly use its DBA, it operates under a DBA without using its legal name, it intentionally breaches the line between personal and business activities and loses the limited liability protection typically afforded to LLC members.This leads to “piercing the corporate veil,” where courts hold members personally liable for business debts and obligations, negating the primary benefit of forming an LLC. Courts have determined that the LLC is not a separate entity if it does not clearly identify itself, leading to personal liability for members.
Contracts should include clear liability clauses that outline the responsibilities and limitations of liability for the LLC. This can help protect the LLC from claims that may arise from business activities conducted under the DBA.
To maintain the limited liability protection of SHAH SONS LLC, it is crucial to keep personal and business finances separate. This includes using a dedicated business bank account and credit cards for all transactions related to the DBA- “Shah Sons LLC, doing business as East Bay Auto Center”. Open a dedicated business bank account for the LLC- Shah Sons LLC, that uses the legal name- “Shah Sons LLC, doing business as East Bay Auto Center”. This separation helps maintain the SHAH SONS LLC’s limited liability protection and simplifies financial management.
Given that EBA status is not listed as a current Corporation with Secretary of State or State Franchise Tax Board authorized to do business in the State of California, there are multiple individual parties including East Bay Auto, Muhammad Khan, Sani Khan, Tariq Khan, Numi Khan, and Asian investors, there is good cause and we are asking the court to ascertain the correct legal name and status of East Bay Auto, the owners and investors of East Bay Auto, the correct legal names of the plaintiff’s, and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s. CA Civ Pro Code § 116.560. (b) The defendant may request the court at any time, whether before or after judgment, to amend the defendant’s claim or judgment to include both the correct legal name and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s. Upon a showing of good cause, the court shall amend the claim or judgment to state the correct legal name of the plaintiff’s, and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s and investors.
East Bay Auto has suspensions with the Bureau of Automotive Repair (BAR).
We will ask the court to transfer the Small Claims action to Court of Competent Jurisdiction because we have no projected total of the costs, losses and damages to the truck that exceed the jurisdictional limits stated in Sections 116.220, 116.221, and 116.231, and request the small claims court to transfer the small claims action to a court of competent jurisdiction.
As it is the RESPONSIBILITY of the COUNTY SHERIFFS to conduct a complete investigation, analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages IN THE LEGAL FORM OF A FILED POLICE REPORT, IT IS NOT WITHIN THE RIGHTS OF EAST BAY TO REFUSE THAT RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COUNTY SHERIFFS NOR FOR THEM TO COMPLY FOR THE PURPOSES OF DENYING OUR RIGHTS TO “COVER UP” FOR THEIR ASSET!!
We will NOT move the truck unless and until East Bay allows the COUNTY SHERIFFS and us to inspect the truck for a complete investigation, analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages IN THE LEGAL FORM OF A FILED POLICE REPORT!!!
The COUNTY SHERIFFS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT have been IMPLICATED BY EAST BAY AUTO as an accessory and collaborator in this case, providing them protection and cover up for them, implying GROSS MISCONDUCT as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by the Sheriff’s deputy Markita Sayles whom ADMITS she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES. Video is available on Youtube. See “ILLEGAL POLICE TARGETED ENTRAPMENT BACKFIRES! TRAPS POLICE, EXPOSES IMMORAL, UNETHICAL SCHEME!” at: https://youtu.be/kus80M56Vas.
Here we have the County Sheriff covering for their “asset” East Bay Auto and co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, is proven in the video by THEIR AND POLICE ADMISSIONS and Bad Faith/Hate crime fact pattern, was ALWAYS a Scheme to take possession of the truck, provoke and frame civil/criminal legal actions by fabricating a disputed legal issue we would be subjected to knowing that the courts are inapposite to our justice.
IT IS CLEAR THAT ABDUL-JALIL, HIS FAMILY, THEIR BUSINESSES, AND NON-PROFIT, the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation, HAS BEEN TARGETED WITH SPECIOUS, TORTIOUS ILLEGAL CLANDESTINE ACTS ON THE PART OF LAW ENFORCEMENT WITH THE INTENT TO DESTROY THEIR LIVES!
However, co-conspirators East Bay Auto/State Farm are not acting alone as the ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF AND LAW ENFORCEMENT have been IMPLICATED BY EAST BAY as an accessory and collaborator in this case, providing them protection and cover implying GROSS MISCONDUCT as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by the Sheriff’s officers. Video is available on Youtube. See “ILLEGAL POLICE TARGETED ENTRAPMENT BACKFIRES! TRAPS POLICE, EXPOSES IMMORAL, UNETHICAL SCHEME!” at: https://youtu.be/kus80M56Vas.
This video PROVIDES ADMISSIONS from Sheriff’s Deputy Markita Sayles that she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES is PROOF of how POLICE FILE FALSE REPORTS, FABRICATE EVIDENCE, FIX THE CASE, COMMIT FRAUD to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto AFTER she:
1) admitted she talked with Law Enforcement Special Services resources twice to ascertain that she was proceeding in the correct manner according to their plan and her instructions. WHY WOULD SHE NEED TO CONSULT WITH AND BE INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES TO TAKE AND FILE A SIMPLE, COMMON POLICE REPORT?,
2) East Bay Auto incriminated police admitting that they worked with police, are accomplishes, collaborators, were under the protection of law enforcement covering for their asset and would NOT do anything to assist defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation or Abdul-Jalil,
3) The vehicle was ADMITTED stolen, burglarized, vandalized, fraud, larceny and damaged, BUT, BOTH policemen said “this is NOT a criminal matter, truck was not stolen”,
4) Dep. Sayles said she can’t inspect/process nor document the truck as a crime scene for evidence, damage, theft, vandalism, missing/stolen business and personal property, nor can Abdul-Jalil without the approval of their asset East Bay Auto,
5) Abdul-Jalil requested a Police Report OVER 21 times,
6) Dep. Sayles said she would conduct a thorough investigation, interview shop owner, personnel and neighbors, check local cameras,
7) Dep. Sayles said Abdul-Jalil didn’t answers her questions, BUT she NEVER asked basic questions as: Name, Address, City, State, Zip Code, Telephone, nothing on damage, suspects, the truck registration or VIN,
Dep. Sayles said Abdul-Jalil needed to go to court in order to get a police report, REFUSING TO TAKE A REPORT!, and
9) Dep. Sayles said it’s a civil matter 8 Times! NOT a criminal matter.
THIS VIDEO PROVIDES PROOF THAT SHERIFF’S DEPT. MARKITA SAYLES LIED ABOUT THE ENTIRE “POLICE REPORT”! Sayles “event/police report” states:
“RP (Reporting Party, Abdul-Jalil) UPSET THAT HIS VEHICLE THAT UNDER THE AUTO REPAIR SHOP HAS DAMAGE. THE AUTO BODY SHOP STILL HAS CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE AND THE VEHILCE HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED TO THE RP. THE RP WAS ADVISED THE MATTER WAS CIVIL. THE RP WAS ADAMENT THE THERE IS A CRIME EVEN THOUGH DEPS TOLD HIM IT WAS CIVIL. THE RP WAS UPSET AND DEMANDED A REPORT. WHEN ASKED WHAT WE WERE INVESTIGATING THE RP SAID THAT WOULD BE UP TO US. NO REPORT TAKEN”
Abdul-Jalil requested a Police Report OVER 21 times, AND Dep. Sayles said she would conduct a thorough investigation, interview shop owner, personnel and neighbors, check local cameras! SAYLES LIED ABOUT THE ENTIRE “FALSE POLICE REPORT” and willfully committed PERJURY, FABRICATE EVIDENCE, MISCONDUCT, CONCEALMENT, COMMITTED FRAUD UPON THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN FIXING THE CASE!
This video PROVIDES ADMISSIONS from Markita Sayles she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES TWICE is PROOF there is a continuing Targeted Entrapment Scam/Sting/Scheme and Hate Crimes. The Sheriff’s office trapped themselves in CORRUPTION and SUBORNED PERJURIOUS TESTIMONY, in this State sponsored terror; with vindictive retaliation against AMWF and al-Hakim family while defending, concealing and thereby being further complicit in committing THE ADMITTED willful and intentional extrinsic fraud upon the people of the great State of California and the Court; fraud; prosecutorial misconduct; willful and malicious prosecution; willful misconduct; conflict of interest; obstruction of justice; denial of due process under the law; willful and intentional fabrication and authoring false evidence; misstating and mischaracterizing evidence; misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court’s act or reliance; harassment; intimidation on behalf of the County Sheriffs; abuse of discretion, misconduct, conduct prejudicial, illegal ex-parte communications and bias designed to result in fixing the case against defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation and al-Hakim; appointing themselves a Real Primary Party of Interest to the litigation with their OWN agenda; weaponizing the police report and investigative process in furtherance of their agenda; engaging in the defense of opposing parties; provocation, bias, prejudice, Islamophobia, Xenophobia, hate, bigotry and racism!
The Entrapment Strategy is disable, destroy, and eliminate the TARGET- defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation and Abdul-Jalil, the al-Hakim family, their businesses and business property, their real and personal property, their charities, their communities, and the communities they serve- personally, professionally, morally, ethically, and financially with the courts system to deny and exhaust any and all notions of civil rights, civil liberties, human rights without the God given right to undertake unbiased litigation without the deciding and controlling actions and influence of corrupt unscrupulous judicial, law enforcement, governmental and legal entities, agencies and operatives.
We have documented AND filed SEVERAL Federal and State complaints of being complicit in the illegal TARGETED ENTRAPMENT activities WITH AND AGAINST Police Chiefs Tony Chaplin/Brian Matthew; Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez; Police Chief Abdul Pridgen; U. S. Attorney Ismail Ramsey; Attorney General Rob Bonta; F.B.I. Director Robert Tripp; Governor Gavin Newsom; Casey Hallinan; Ricardo Lara- DOI; Steve Gordon- DMV; Patrick Dorais- BAR; Kimberly Kirchmeyer- DCA; Grant Parks- State Auditor; Selvi Stanislaus- FTB; Senator Aisha Wahab; District Attorney Pam Price; HUD; et. al., against co-conspirators East Bay Auto/State Farm for their active, continuing role in this Targeted Entrapment Scheme and “Bad Faith” by them, their agents, contractors, and ALL known and unknown, announced and unannounced Third Parties, the threats/demands for Payment of Storage, refusal to pay for a Rental vehicle, mitigating the continuing Loss of Use and Damages, and their illegal clandestine efforts to gain ownership of our truck WITHOUT PAYING FOR THE REPAIR NOR COMPENSATING US with the FRAUDULENT attempted East Bay Auto Lien Sale and REFUSAL to release our truck to defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation.
Defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation is going forward with Civil and Criminal Charges/Claims for Grand Larceny, Grand Theft Auto, Fraud, Property Theft, Burglary, Vandalism, Extortion, Phone (Terrorist) Threats, Deception, attempted Grand Theft, Costs, Damages, Mitigating the Continuing Loss of Use, and Monetary Sanctions, among others with Federal and State Complaints filed against East Bay Auto and State Farm Insurance and served them both with Preservation-of-Evidence Demand Letter.
Additionally, with respect to any and all business operation regarding the defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation insurance policy and claim, and THE FACT that State Farm, their employees, their referenced agents, sub-agents, contractors, State Farm Claims, State Farm Appraisal Team, Alacrity Solutions, LLC, Snapsheet, Up North Towing, Blue Star Towing, and ALL known and unknown Third Parties have clearly “targeted” defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation and using recognizable government entrapment tactics the latest of which was the refusal to release the truck and “lien sale” to gain ownership of their truck WITHOUT PAYING FOR THE REPAIR NOR COMPENSATING US! As a direct and proximate result of State Farm and their co-conspirators East Bay’s continuing actions, defendants Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation is FORCED to make long term arrangements for the storage of the truck UNTIL STATE FARM PAYS FOR THE REPAIR AS AMWF PURSUES ALL OTHER REMEDIES!
include ALL legal requirements, legal statutes, legal theory supported with law and case citations, review, analysis, evaluation, handling, adjustment, report, agreement, policy, guide lines, and regulations applicable in your argument denying YOU and Deputy Markita Sayles committed fraud upon the people of the State of California in fixing the case; admitted she was instructed by special services resources; perjury; fraud; subornation and solicitation of perjurious testimony; prejudicial misconduct; corrupt misconduct; illegal ex parte communications; grand larceny; tortious interference; intentional spoliation of evidence; fraudulent misrepresentation; intentional misrepresentation; property damage; filing an entire “false police report”; willfully fabricated evidence; committed misconduct; concealment; to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto; engaging in this Continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme, “Bad Faith” Fact Pattern and Hate Crimes.
62. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references which YOU contend support any position YOU have taken at any time with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by Markita Sayles PROVIDES ADMISSIONS from deputies Markita Sayles and Collin Lenahan is proof of MARKITA SAYLES LIED ABOUT THE ENTIRE “POLICE REPORT”! as Sayles her “event/police report” states “ RP (Reporting Party, Abdul-Jalil) UPSET THAT HIS VEHICLE THAT UNDER THE AUTO REPAIR SHOP HAS DAMAGE. THE AUTO BODY SHOP STILL HAS CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE AND THE VEHILCE HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED TO THE RP. THE RP WAS ADVISED THE MATTER WAS CIVIL. THE RP WAS ADAMENT THE THERE IS A CRIME EVEN THOUGH DEPS TOLD HIM IT WAS CIVIL. THE RP WAS UPSET AND DEMANDED A REPORT. WHEN ASKED WHAT WE WERE INVESTIGATING THE RP SAID THAT WOULD BE UP TO US. NO REPORT TAKEN”, include ALL legal requirements, legal statutes, legal theory supported with law and case citations, review, analysis, evaluation, handling, adjustment, report, agreement, policy, guide lines, and regulations applicable in your argument denying YOU and Deputy Markita Sayles committed fraud upon the people of the State of California in fixing the case; admitted she was instructed by special services resources; perjury; fraud; subornation and solicitation of perjurious testimony; prejudicial misconduct; corrupt misconduct; illegal ex parte communications; grand larceny; tortious interference; intentional spoliation of evidence; fraudulent misrepresentation; intentional misrepresentation; property damage; filing an entire “false police report”; willfully fabricated evidence; committed misconduct; concealment; to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto; engaging in this Continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme, “Bad Faith” Fact Pattern and Hate Crimes.
63. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references which YOU contend support any position YOU have taken at any time with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by Markita Sayles PROVIDES ADMISSIONS from deputies Markita Sayles and Collin Lenahan is proof that Abdul-Jalil requested a Police Report OVER 21 times, include ALL legal requirements, legal statutes, legal theory supported with law and case citations, review, analysis, evaluation, handling, adjustment, report, agreement, policy, guide lines, and regulations applicable in your argument denying YOU and Deputy Markita Sayles committed fraud upon the people of the State of California in fixing the case; admitted she was instructed by special services resources; perjury; fraud; subornation and solicitation of perjurious testimony; prejudicial misconduct; corrupt misconduct; illegal ex parte communications; grand larceny; tortious interference; intentional spoliation of evidence; fraudulent misrepresentation; intentional misrepresentation; property damage; filing an entire “false police report”; willfully fabricated evidence; committed misconduct; concealment; to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto; engaging in this Continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme, “Bad Faith” Fact Pattern and Hate Crimes.
64. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references which YOU contend support any position YOU have taken at any time with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by Markita Sayles PROVIDES ADMISSIONS from deputies Markita Sayles and Collin Lenahan is proof that Sayles said she would conduct a thorough investigation, interview shop owner, personnel and neighbors, check local cameras, include ALL legal requirements, legal statutes, legal theory supported with law and case citations, review, analysis, evaluation, handling, adjustment, report, agreement, policy, guide lines, and regulations applicable in your argument denying YOU and Deputy Markita Sayles committed fraud upon the people of the State of California in fixing the case; admitted she was instructed by special services resources; perjury; fraud; subornation and solicitation of perjurious testimony; prejudicial misconduct; corrupt misconduct; illegal ex parte communications; grand larceny; tortious interference; intentional spoliation of evidence; fraudulent misrepresentation; intentional misrepresentation; property damage; filing an entire “false police report”; willfully fabricated evidence; committed misconduct; concealment; to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto; engaging in this Continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme, “Bad Faith” Fact Pattern and Hate Crimes.
101. INVESTIGATE, PRODUCE AND Identify in detail all persons who may have knowledge of facts with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that “IN AN UNSOLICITED, UNWANTED PHONE CALL TO DEFENDANTS, SAYLES ADMITS SHE LIED ABOUT THE ENTIRE “FALSE POLICE REPORT” and willfully committed PERJURY, FABRICATE EVIDENCE, MISCONDUCT, CONCEALMENT, COMMITTED FRAUD UPON THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN FIXING THE CASE! See video at: https://youtu.be/ZEgZRhuYOMM”.
In that detail describe the actions of such individuals, those communications, identify all persons, and produce ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references to and concerning the communications described in this action, any investigation, and identify the author of each such document. State the persons, business, employee or employees, agents, etc., who were aware of such facts, the source of their knowledge, the facts of which each such persons, business, agents, employee or employees was aware, and Defendant’s response to such facts, if any.
102. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references which YOU contend support any position YOU have taken at any time with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that “Sheriff failure and refusal to investigate and file a report established a legal relationship between the Sheriffs and defendants that lead to liability based on the Sheriffs inducing reliance by the defendants, resulting in a greater risk of harm due to Sheriffs negligence than what the defendants already faced, then the Sheriffs fail to respond to requests for assistance or investigate when they promised to do so”, include ALL legal requirements, legal statutes, legal theory supported with law and case citations, review, analysis, evaluation, handling, adjustment, report, agreement, policy, guide lines, and regulations applicable in your argument denying YOU and Deputy Markita Sayles committed fraud upon the people of the State of California in fixing the case; admitted she was instructed by special services resources; perjury; fraud; subornation and solicitation of perjurious testimony; prejudicial misconduct; corrupt misconduct; illegal ex parte communications; grand larceny; tortious interference; intentional spoliation of evidence; fraudulent misrepresentation; intentional misrepresentation; property damage; filing an entire “false police report”; willfully fabricated evidence; committed misconduct; concealment; to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto; engaging in this Continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme, “Bad Faith” Fact Pattern and Hate Crimes.
103. INVESTIGATE, PRODUCE AND Identify in detail all persons who may have knowledge of facts with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that “Sheriff failure and refusal to investigate and file a report established a legal relationship between the Sheriffs and defendants that lead to liability based on the Sheriffs inducing reliance by the defendants, resulting in a greater risk of harm due to Sheriffs negligence than what the defendants already faced, then the Sheriffs fail to respond to requests for assistance or investigate when they promised to do so”. In that detail describe the actions of such individuals, those communications, identify all persons, and produce ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references to and concerning the communications described in this action, any investigation, and identify the author of each such document. State the persons, business, employee or employees, agents, etc., who were aware of such facts, the source of their knowledge, the facts of which each such persons, business, agents, employee or employees was aware, and Defendant’s response to such facts, if any.
104. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references which YOU contend support any position YOU have taken at any time with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that “Plaintiffs and the Sheriffs facing claims of intentional spoliation of evidence have several irrefutable facts they can not overcome: Plaintiffs and the Sheriffs facing claims at all times of their duty to preserve the evidence, 2) they were fully aware at all times there was NO accidental destruction, this was willful and intentional; 3) they were aware at all times of the relevance of the evidence, 4) they were fully aware at all times of their intent and motive in the spoliation of evidence and this provided them the opportunity, 5) they were fully aware at all times of the willful and intentional causation of the spoliation of evidence, 6) they were fully aware at all times of the damages for the spoliation of evidence, and 7) they were fully aware at all times of their need for compliance with legal obligations regarding the spoliation of evidence”, include ALL legal requirements, legal statutes, legal theory supported with law and case citations, review, analysis, evaluation, handling, adjustment, report, agreement, policy, guide lines, and regulations applicable in your argument denying YOU and Deputy Markita Sayles committed fraud upon the people of the State of California in fixing the case; admitted she was instructed by special services resources; perjury; fraud; subornation and solicitation of perjurious testimony; prejudicial misconduct; corrupt misconduct; illegal ex parte communications; grand larceny; tortious interference; intentional spoliation of evidence; fraudulent misrepresentation; intentional misrepresentation; property damage; filing an entire “false police report”; willfully fabricated evidence; committed misconduct; concealment; to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto; engaging in this Continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme, “Bad Faith” Fact Pattern and Hate Crimes.
105. INVESTIGATE, PRODUCE AND Identify in detail all persons who may have knowledge of facts with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that “Plaintiffs and the Sheriffs facing claims of intentional spoliation of evidence have several irrefutable facts they can not overcome: Plaintiffs and the Sheriffs facing claims at all times of their duty to preserve the evidence, 2) they were fully aware at all times there was NO accidental destruction, this was willful and intentional; 3) they were aware at all times of the relevance of the evidence, 4) they were fully aware at all times of their intent and motive in the spoliation of evidence and this provided them the opportunity, 5) they were fully aware at all times of the willful and intentional causation of the spoliation of evidence, 6) they were fully aware at all times of the damages for the spoliation of evidence, and 7) they were fully aware at all times of their need for compliance with legal obligations regarding the spoliation of evidence”. In that detail describe the actions of such individuals, those communications, identify all persons, and produce ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references to and concerning the communications described in this action, any investigation, and identify the author of each such document. State the persons, business, employee or employees, agents, etc., who were aware of such facts, the source of their knowledge, the facts of which each such persons, business, agents, employee or employees was aware, and Defendant’s response to such facts, if any.
110. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references which YOU contend support any position YOU have taken at any time with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that “Defendant argues that Plaintiffs and Sheriffs actions were NOT justified, that the interference was not justified, acted with the intent to interfere, was conducted with malice and this wrongful conduct lead to their liability. The evidence shows that Plaintiffs and Sheriff’s acted with the intent to deny, disrupt and intentional interfer with Defendants Constitutional and legal rights, that such interference was executed through threats, intimidation, or coercion, with their unreasonable seizure and deprivation of life, liberty, and property without due process; and to deny and impede access to court and insurance companies with ALL the evidence that should have been readily available. Plaintiffs and Sheriffs actions of interference with Defendants rights protected by state or federal laws, specifically noting that Civil Code § 52.1 emphasizes the element of fear for safety associated with hate violence, particularly focusing on threats, intimidation, or coercion was deliberate and spiteful, serves to undermine the public trust and allowing such conduct to go unchecked sets a dangerous precedent.”, include ALL legal requirements, legal statutes, legal theory supported with law and case citations, review, analysis, evaluation, handling, adjustment, report, agreement, policy, guide lines, and regulations applicable in your argument denying YOU and Deputy Markita Sayles committed fraud upon the people of the State of California in fixing the case; admitted she was instructed by special services resources; perjury; fraud; subornation and solicitation of perjurious testimony; prejudicial misconduct; corrupt misconduct; illegal ex parte communications; grand larceny; tortious interference; intentional spoliation of evidence; fraudulent misrepresentation; intentional misrepresentation; property damage; filing an entire “false police report”; willfully fabricated evidence; committed misconduct; concealment; to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto; engaging in this Continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme, “Bad Faith” Fact Pattern and Hate Crimes.
111. INVESTIGATE, PRODUCE AND Identify in detail all persons who may have knowledge of facts with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that “Defendant argues that Plaintiffs and Sheriffs actions were NOT justified, that the interference was not justified, acted with the intent to interfere, was conducted with malice and this wrongful conduct lead to their liability. The evidence shows that Plaintiffs and Sheriff’s acted with the intent to deny, disrupt and intentional interfer with Defendants Constitutional and legal rights, that such interference was executed through threats, intimidation, or coercion, with their unreasonable seizure and deprivation of life, liberty, and property without due process; and to deny and impede access to court and insurance companies with ALL the evidence that should have been readily available. Plaintiffs and Sheriffs actions of interference with Defendants rights protected by state or federal laws, specifically noting that Civil Code § 52.1 emphasizes the element of fear for safety associated with hate violence, particularly focusing on threats, intimidation, or coercion was deliberate and spiteful, serves to undermine the public trust and allowing such conduct to go unchecked sets a dangerous precedent”. In that detail describe the actions of such individuals, those communications, identify all persons, and produce ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references to and concerning the communications described in this action, any investigation, and identify the author of each such document. State the persons, business, employee or employees, agents, etc., who were aware of such facts, the source of their knowledge, the facts of which each such persons, business, agents, employee or employees was aware, and Defendant’s response to such facts, if any.
273. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references to June 26, 2012, 50 page complaint regarding al-Hakim being accosted by the Sheriffs deputy stating “I have recently called and left messages as well as speaking to your clerk Elaine just last week regarding my desire to file several law suits as well as answering other matters that require the ability to file those required documents without the fear of being ambushed by the District Attorney’s office enforcers or the County Sheriff’s Department acting in their place and stead for other judicial entities. I have been precluded from any legal rights by virtue of this illegal, repressive censorship enacted by the DA’s office. This has gone on far too long and the legal consequences continue to mount as I am forbidden to pursue my civil rights in court without the oppression of the system by those in control of it. I want to and will file my law suits and go forward to resolution of these unprecedented matters in this public forum.” filed against Alameda County Superior Court Judge C. Don Clay.
274. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references to January 7, 2014, 11 page letter, fax and email complaint in (ACDCSS) case number #0010274454-01 (previously listed as FSD #274454A) regarding “Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim being profiled, surveilled, identified, and targeted by the District Attorney and Sheriff’s Deputy, al-Hakim being accosted by Sheriffs Deputies and prevented from entering the Alameda Family Law Courthouse by County Sheriff’s who informed defendant that he must go to Judge Pulido’s courtroom to file the letter, that he would be handling this matter in Probate Court and defendants requesting security” filed with Winifred Smith- Presiding Judge, Superior Court of California; C. Don Clay- Supervising Judge, Superior Court of California; Stephen Pulido- Presiding Judge Family Law Court, Superior Court of California; and Judge Sandra Bean- Alameda Family Law Court, Superior Court of California.
289. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references which YOU contend support any position YOU have taken at any time with respect to plaintiffs July 11, 2018 hearing in the matters of al-Hakim v. Interserver, Case No.: RG18888371 and resultant complaint filed against Alameda County Superior Court Judge C. Don Clay with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that is evidenced in RE: “al-Hakim states “I have been in your courtroom over 20 times and I have never seen a deputy standing right behind the party during a hearing.” and you have THREE deputies in the courtroom right now!”, include ALL legal requirements, legal statutes, legal theory supported with law and case citations, review, analysis, evaluation, handling, adjustment, report, agreement, policy, guide lines, and regulations applicable in your argument denying YOU and Deputy Markita Sayles committed fraud upon the people of the State of California in fixing the case; admitted she was instructed by special services resources; perjury; fraud; subornation and solicitation of perjurious testimony; prejudicial misconduct; corrupt misconduct; illegal ex parte communications; grand larceny; tortious interference; intentional spoliation of evidence; fraudulent misrepresentation; intentional misrepresentation; property damage; filing an entire “false police report”; willfully fabricated evidence; committed misconduct; concealment; to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto; engaging in this Continuing Targeted Entrapment Scheme, “Bad Faith” Fact Pattern and Hate Crimes.
290. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references to the October 3, 2018 hearing, the resultant letter, fax and email Complaint filed against Alameda County Superior Court Judge C. Don Clay with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that is evidenced in RE: “Clay says “that’s normal, I may even have more!” al-Hakim says “for a civil ex-parte motion at 3:00 p.m.? I don’t believe that! Clay says ” It’s true”
297. ANY and ALL Documents, records, letters, tangible evidence, telephone records, law enforcement (including ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES- DOJ, FBI, Attorney General, District Attorney, Local Sheriffs and Police) reports, detective reports, photographs, insurance company documents and reports, video tape recordings or voice recordings, video files, film, photos, multimedia presentations, White Boards, DVD’s, CD’s, audio disc/tapes, MP3‘s, audio files, communications and/or other instruments of any nature mentioning, concerning, relating, referring or containing cross-references to the April 14, 2008 Complaint with respect to defendants EXPRESSED CLAIM that is evidenced therein the request for security against Alameda County Superior Court Judge Jon Tigar RE: “when al-Hakim entered the courthouse building, the deputy at the metal detector called upstairs to the courtroom, Department 21 to inform them of his arrival in the building” filed with Victoria B. Henley, Director-Chief Counsel of the Sate of California Commission on Judicial Performance, Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye- Supreme Court of California and Chair, Judicial Council of California, and Commission Judicial Appointments; Judge Phyllis Hamilton- Chief District Judge, U. S. District Court- No. Division; Alex Tse- Director, U. S. Attorney’s Office; Xavier Becerra- Attorney General of California; Victoria Henley-Director-Chief Counsel, Commission on Judicial Performance; Martin Hoshino- Director, Judicial Council of California, Alameda County Presiding Court Judge Yolanda Northridge, former Presiding Court Judge George Hernandez and Alameda County Superior Court Administration.
Responding Parties engaging in the herein referenced Targeted Entrapment Scheme and “Bad Faith” persecution to the detriment and oppression of Defendants, the al-Hakim family, their businesses and business property, their real and personal property, their charities, their communities, the communities they serve, and those they serve was both covert and overt, consisting of both actions and inactions of subterfuges and evasions that violated the obligation of good faith in performance with their continuing evasion of the spirit of the bargain, lack of diligence and slacking off, willful rendering of imperfect performance, abuse of a power to specify terms, and interference with or failure to cooperate in the other party’s performance.” (R. J. Kuhl Corp. v. Sullivan (1993) 13 Cal.App.4th 1589, 1602 [17 Cal.Rptr.2d 425].)
As a direct and proximate result of Responding Parties actions, Defendant’s has suffered losses and damages, including but not limited to: 1) repair of their vehicle, 2) loss of use of the vehicle during the repair period, measured by the rental value of a similar vehicle, 3) loss of income due to the inability to use the vehicle for business purposes, 4) additional expenses incurred due to the inability to use the vehicle for personal and business purposes, emotional distress and inconvenience caused by the loss of use. As this matter is part of an ongoing action, defendants also has claims for 1) general and special damages in an amount to be proven at trial; 2) for costs of suit incurred herein; and 3) for any other relief the Court deems just and proper.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim at:
Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation
4200 Park Blvd., Suite 116
Oakland, CA 94602
Tel: 510-394-4501
Respectfully,
Abdul-Jalil
510-394-4501
*******
July 29, 2024
Today we received a voicemail for someone named Mary from State Farm claims inquiring into our moving the Truck from East Bay Auto Center.
As reported of this date, East Bay STILL has the truck and REFUSES to release it to us unless and until we indemnify them from ALL liability for their civil and criminal charges of larceny, fraud, theft, damage, if the vehicle is stolen from them, etc., so they may be able to do or have done anything they choose to the vehicle and it’s contents without any possible consequences!
The truck was supposed to have been returned to us by March 7, 2024, BUT that DID NOT HAPPEN.
Now, the truck has been STOLEN, was burglarized, vandalized, is damaged, and East Bay has refused to allow the COUNTY SHERIFFS nor us to inspect the truck for a complete analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages, UNLESS AND UNTIL WE SIGN A WAIVER OF THEIR LIABILITY FOR SAME! We will NOT ever do that.
As you ALL have been advised, East Bay Auto Center filed a Small Claims action against us for an additional $3,400 storage fees beyond the amount they settled with State Farm for. We have filed a Cross Complaint against them for undetermined costs, losses and damages from the un-inspected theft, burglary, vandalism, and damage to the truck we have yet to observe and document the losses and damages to the truck door locks, ignition, exterior and interior cab, engine, parts, body, theft and damage of it’s contents, and other losses and damages, has cab damage that is 57 inches long stretching from the rear passenger side to start of the cab damage that is 6-8 inches wide through the corporate lettering, the truck is currently lodged 2 inches within and against the fence and CAN NOT be moved without causing MORE significant damage!
The truck was NOT stolen nor burglarized through entry from knocking out the passenger door lock! There is ONLY 16 inches from the passenger door lock to the metal fence and 24 inches from the passenger door lock to the outer metal fence. That makes it PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for someone to knock out the passenger door lock and a human body to open the door and enter the truck with less than 4 inches of clearance to enter given the design and build of the truck!! THE TRUCK WAS STOLEN THROUGH ENTRY FROM THE DRIVERS SIDE DOOR AND THERE IS NO SIGN OF ANY DAMAGE TO THE DRIVERS SIDE DOOR LOCK, THUS LEAVING THE ONLY POSSIBLE ENTRY THROUGH THAT DRIVERS SIDE DOOR WITH A KEY!
East Bay Auto Center is Not currently registered with California Secretary of State nor the California Franchise Tax Board, thus they don’t have legal standing to file nor defend a law suit.
EBA status is not listed as a current Corporation with Secretary of State or State Franchise Tax Board authorized to do business in the State of California. They may never have legally existed, they may be suspended for some reason, or they may not legally exist any longer.
Given that EBA status is not listed as a current Corporation with Secretary of State or State Franchise Tax Board authorized to do business in the State of California, there are multiple individual parties including East Bay Auto, Muhammad Khan, Sani Khan, Tariq Khan, Numi Khan, and Asian investors, there is good cause and we are asking the court to ascertain the correct legal name and status of East Bay Auto, the owners and investors of East Bay Auto, the correct legal names of the plaintiff’s, and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s. CA Civ Pro Code § 116.560. (b) The defendant may request the court at any time, whether before or after judgment, to amend the defendant’s claim or judgment to include both the correct legal name and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s. Upon a showing of good cause, the court shall amend the claim or judgment to state the correct legal name of the plaintiff’s, and the name or names actually used by the plaintiff’s and investors.
East Bay Auto has suspensions with the Bureau of Automotive Repair (BAR).
We will ask the court to transfer the Small Claims action to Court of Competent Jurisdiction because we have no projected total of the costs, losses and damages. losses and damages to the truck that may exceed the jurisdictional limits stated in Sections 116.220, 116.221, and 116.231, and if so, request the small claims court to transfer the small claims action to a court of competent jurisdiction.
I base my request for the imposition of a sanction on the basis that it took me over 47 hours to research and locate the correct Plaintiff’s personnel, many phone calls, letters, emails and faxes in communication with the parties referenced herein, to research and prepare this motion, costs, and expenses according to proof. My discounted hourly wage is $350 per hour (from regular posted fee of $550/hour) for the 47 hours spent on this matter equals $16,450 alone.
As it is the RESPONSIBILITY of the COUNTY SHERIFFS to conduct a complete investigation, analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages IN THE LEGAL FORM OF A FILED POLICE REPORT, IT IS NOT WITHIN THE RIGHTS OF EAST BAY TO REFUSE THAT RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COUNTY SHERIFFS NOR FOR THEM TO COMPLY FOR THE PURPOSES OF DENYING OUR RIGHTS TO “COVER UP” FOR THEIR ASSET!!
We will NOT move the truck unless and until East Bay allows the COUNTY SHERIFFS and us to inspect the truck for a complete investigation, analysis and documentation of the total theft loss and damages IN THE LEGAL FORM OF A FILED POLICE REPORT!!!
The COUNTY SHERIFFS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT have been IMPLICATED BY EAST BAY AUTO as an accessory and collaborator in this case, providing them protection and cover up for them, implying GROSS MISCONDUCT as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by the Sheriff’s deputy Markita Sayles whom ADMITS she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES. Video is available on Youtube. See “ILLEGAL POLICE TARGETED ENTRAPMENT BACKFIRES! TRAPS POLICE, EXPOSES IMMORAL, UNETHICAL SCHEME!” at: https://youtu.be/kus80M56Vas.
A FORMAL COMPLAINT WILL FOLLOW UNDER SEPARATE COVER.
Here we have the County Sheriff covering for their “asset” East Bay Auto and co-conspirator State Farm insurance company, is proven in the video by THEIR AND POLICE ADMISSIONS and Bad Faith/Hate crime fact pattern, was ALWAYS a Scheme to take possession of the truck, provoke and frame civil/criminal legal actions by fabricating a disputed legal issue we would be subjected to knowing that the courts are inapposite to our justice.
IT IS CLEAR THAT ABDUL-JALIL, HIS FAMILY, THEIR BUSINESSES, AND NON-PROFIT, the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation, HAS BEEN TARGETED WITH SPECIOUS, TORTIOUS ILLEGAL CLANDESTINE ACTS ON THE PART OF LAW ENFORCEMENT WITH THE INTENT TO DESTROY THEIR LIVES!
However, co-conspirators East Bay Auto/State Farm are not acting alone as the ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF AND LAW ENFORCEMENT have been IMPLICATED BY EAST BAY as an accessory and collaborator in this case, providing them protection and cover implying GROSS MISCONDUCT as evidenced in the video of and the “event report” from April 22, 2024 filed by the Sheriff’s officers.
This video PROVIDES ADMISSIONS from Sheriff’s Deputy Markita Sayles that she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES is PROOF of how POLICE FILE FALSE REPORTS, FABRICATE EVIDENCE, FIX THE CASE, COMMIT FRAUD to cover for their “asset” East Bay Auto AFTER she:
1) admitted she talked with Law Enforcement Special Services resources twice to ascertain that she was proceeding in the correct manner according to their plan and her instructions. WHY WOULD SHE NEED TO CONSULT WITH AND BE INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES TO TAKE AND FILE A SIMPLE, COMMON POLICE REPORT?,
2) East Bay Auto incriminated police admitting that they worked with police, are accomplishes, collaborators, were under the protection of law enforcement covering for their asset and would NOT do anything to assist AMWF and Abdul-Jalil,
3) The vehicle was ADMITTED stolen, burglarized, vandalized, fraud, larceny and damaged, BUT, BOTH policemen said “this is NOT a criminal matter, truck was not stolen”,
4) Dep. Sayles said she can’t inspect/process nor document the truck as a crime scene for evidence, damage, theft, vandalism, missing/stolen business and personal property, nor can Jalil without the approval of their asset East Bay Auto,
5) Jalil requested a Police Report OVER 21 times,
6) Dep. Sayles said she would conduct a thorough investigation, interview shop owner, personnel and neighbors, check local cameras,
7) Dep. Sayles said Jalil didn’t answers her questions, BUT she NEVER asked basic questions as: Name, Address, City, State, Zip Code, Telephone, nothing on damage, suspects, the truck registration or VIN,
Dep. Sayles said Jalil needed to go to court in order to get a police report, REFUSING TO TAKE A REPORT!, and
9) Dep. Sayles said it’s a civil matter 8 Times! NOT a criminal matter.
THIS VIDEO PROVIDES PROOF THAT SHERIFF’S DEPT. MARKITA SAYLES LIED ABOUT
THE ENTIRE “POLICE REPORT”! Sayles “event/police report” states:
“RP (Reporting Party, Abdul-Jalil) UPSET THAT HIS VEHICLE THAT UNDER THE AUTO REPAIR SHOP HAS DAMAGE. THE AUTO BODY SHOP STILL HAS CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE AND THE VEHILCE HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED TO THE RP. THE RP WAS ADVISED THE MATTER WAS CIVIL. THE RP WAS ADAMENT THE THERE IS A CRIME EVEN THOUGH DEPS TOLD HIM IT WAS CIVIL. THE RP WAS UPSET AND DEMANDED A REPORT. WHEN ASKED WHAT WE WERE INVESTIGATING THE RP SAID THAT WOULD BE UP TO US. NO REPORT TAKEN”
Abdul-Jalil requested a Police Report OVER 21 times, AND Dep. Sayles said she would conduct a thorough investigation, interview shop owner, personnel and neighbors, check local cameras! SAYLES LIED ABOUT THE ENTIRE “FALSE POLICE REPORT” and willfully committed PERJURY, FABRICATE EVIDENCE, MISCONDUCT, CONCEALMENT, COMMITTED FRAUD UPON THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN FIXING THE CASE!
This video PROVIDES ADMISSIONS from Markita Sayles she was INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES RESOURCES TWICE is PROOF there is a continuing Targeted Entrapment Scam/Sting/Scheme and Hate Crimes. The Sheriff’s office trapped themselves in CORRUPTION and SUBORNED PERJURIOUS TESTIMONY, in this State sponsored terror; with vindictive retaliation against AMWF and al-Hakim family while defending, concealing and thereby being further complicit in committing THE ADMITTED willful and intentional extrinsic fraud upon the people of the great State of California and the Court; fraud; prosecutorial misconduct; willful and malicious prosecution; willful misconduct; conflict of interest; obstruction of justice; denial of due process under the law; willful and intentional fabrication and authoring false evidence; misstating and mischaracterizing evidence; misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court’s act or reliance; harassment; intimidation on behalf of the County Sheriffs; abuse of discretion, misconduct, conduct prejudicial, illegal ex-parte communications and bias designed to result in fixing the case against AMWF and al-Hakim; appointing themselves a Real Primary Party of Interest to the litigation with their OWN agenda; weaponizing the police report and investigative process in furtherance of their agenda; engaging in the defense of opposing parties; provocation, bias, prejudice, Islamophobia, Xenophobia, hate, bigotry and racism!
The Entrapment Strategy is to disable, destroy, and eliminate the TARGET- AMWF and Abdul-Jalil, the al-Hakim family, their businesses and business property, their real and personal property, their charities, their communities, and the communities they serve- personally, professionally, morally, ethically, and financially with the courts system to deny and exhaust any and all notions of civil rights, civil liberties, human rights without the God given right to undertake unbiased litigation without the deciding and controlling actions and influence of corrupt unscrupulous judicial, law enforcement, governmental and legal entities, agencies and operatives.
We have PREPARED SUBPOENAS TO BE SERVED THIS WEEK ON ALL THE PARTIES REFERRENCED HEREIN that we have documented AND filed SEVERAL Federal and State complaints of being complicit in the illegal TARGETED ENTRAPMENT activities WITH AND AGAINST Police Chiefs Tony Chaplin/Brian Matthew; Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez; Police Chief Abdul Pridgen; U. S. Attorney Ismail Ramsey; Attorney General Rob Bonta; F.B.I. Director Robert Tripp; Governor Gavin Newsom; Casey Hallinan; Ricardo Lara- DOI; Steve Gordon- DMV; Patrick Dorais- BAR; Kimberly Kirchmeyer- DCA; Grant Parks- State Auditor; Selvi Stanislaus- FTB; Senator Aisha Wahab; District Attorney Pam Price; HUD; et. al., against co-conspirators East Bay Auto/State Farm for their active, continuing role in this Targeted Entrapment Scheme and “Bad Faith” by them, their agents, contractors, and ALL known and unknown, announced and unannounced Third Parties, the threats/demands for Payment of Storage, refusal to pay for a Rental vehicle, mitigating the continuing Loss of Use and Damages, and their illegal clandestine efforts to gain ownership of our truck WITHOUT PAYING FOR THE REPAIR NOR COMPENSATING US with the FRAUDULENT attempted East Bay Auto Lien Sale and REFUSAL to release our truck to AMWF.
AMWF is going forward with Civil and Criminal Charges/Claims for Grand Larceny, Grand Theft Auto, Fraud, Property Theft, Burglary, Vandalism, Extortion, Phone (Terrorist) Threats, Deception, attempted Grand Theft, Costs, Damages, Mitigating the Continuing Loss of Use, and Monetary Sanctions, among others with Federal and State Complaints filed against East Bay Auto and State Farm Insurance and served them both with Preservation-of-Evidence Demand Letter.
Additionally, with respect to any and all business operation regarding the AMWF insurance policy and claim, and THE FACT that State Farm, their employees, their referenced agents, sub-agents, contractors, State Farm Claims, State Farm Appraisal Team, Alacrity Solutions, LLC, Snapsheet, Up North Towing, Blue Star Towing, and ALL known and unknown Third Parties have clearly “targeted” AMWF and using recognizable government entrapment tactics the latest of which was the refusal to release the truck and “lien sale” to gain ownership of their truck WITHOUT PAYING FOR THE REPAIR NOR COMPENSATING US! As a direct and proximate result of State Farm and their co-conspirators East Bay’s continuing actions, AMWF is FORCED to make long term arrangements for the storage of the truck UNTIL STATE FARM PAYS FOR THE REPAIR AS AMWF PURSUES ALL OTHER REMEDIES!
ALL THE PARTIES HEREIN ARE DEMANDED TO LODGE AND FILE THE REQUISITE COMPLAINT AND BEGAN THE MANDATORY INVESTIGATION PROCESS!
Respectfully,
Abdul-Jalil
510-394-4501
—
Creating and Edvocating Relevant Social Service Programs