7633 Sunkist Drive
Oakland, CA 94605
Tel: (510) 394-4501
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, Plaintiff,
East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD)
Plaintiff’s Opposition to Tentative Ruling Issued July 11, 2016 by Judge Robert B. Freedman and ALL RULINGS, ORDERS, NOTES AND COMMENTS MADE BY FREEDMAN IN ALL MATTERS
Hearing: CMC and Demurrer Hearing Date: February 2, 2017 Continued from July 14, 2016,February 5, 2016, and December 11, 2015
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Location: Administration Bldg., 1221 Oak St., Oakland, CA 9460712
Plaintiff’s Opposition to Reissued Tentative Ruling and Tentative Ruling Issued July 11, 2016 by Judge Robert B. Freedman On Case Management Conference and Demurrer Hearing set for July 14, 2016, 2:00 p.m., in Department 20.
I, ABDUL-JALIL al- HAKIM, hereby declare as follows:
1. I am the Plaintiff in the above-entitled action and this notice is submitted in opposition the tentative ruling referenced above. I have personal knowledge of the contents of this notice and, if called as a witness, could and would testify competently to them.
2. This Reissued Tentative Ruling is the Tentative Ruling made on July 11, 2016 by Judge Robert B. Freedman On the Demurrer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), filed by Defendants East Bay Municipal Utility District (“EBMUD”) et al. (collectively “Defendants”) on December 23, 2014, and continued for hearing in the court’s orders of January 30, 2015, March 5, 2015, December 11, 2015 and February 5, 2016. It further states the above tentative ruling will be issued as the court’s order, and no hearing will be held, unless the contesting party contacts the opposing party or parties and the Clerk of Department 20 by 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing to state an intent to appear at the hearing to contest the tentative ruling. The Clerk of Department 20 may be contacted by email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
3. On July 13, 2016 at 10:28 am and I sent a letter and email opposing the tentative ruling and further reiterate that I oppose any and every ruling issued by this tainted judge and have a standing objection to his continued obstruction of justice by remaining in this case prohibiting justice as “Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied!”.
4. In compliance with the courts order I have sent this notice via email to the following parties: email@example.com, MJacobson@alameda.courts.ca.gov, JRolefson@alameda.courts.ca.gov, RMishra@alameda.courts.ca.gov, firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct, based on my direct first hand personal knowledge.
Date: January 31, 2017 and July 13, 2016