Skip to content
NOWTRUTH! is THE platform to organize, strategize, advocate and work for the END of the Grand Systemic and Endemic Corruption, which includes Judicial/Legal Systemic Racism as a subset!

NOWTRUTH! is THE platform to organize, strategize, advocate and work for the END of the Grand Systemic and Endemic Corruption, which includes Judicial/Legal Systemic Racism as a subset!

NOWTRUTH!!! BECAUSE WE NEED TRUTH AND JUSTICE FROM THE COURTS MORE NOW THAN EVER, NOT HYPERPOLITICIZED, NUANCED LAW COMPLETE WITH THE REQUISITE NARRATIVE!! (LAW= Politically manufactured, orchestrated, strategic opinions, rulings, and orders for injustice to hide behind!)

Bonta CointelPro 2K22 Part4
Posted on July 19, 2022April 28, 2025 by Now Truth!

COINTELPRO 2K22 Part 5: Legally Setting Aside Every Case

Then-FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover describes the goal of one arm of COINTELPRO—against the Black liberation movement—in a now-declassified 1967 document:

“The purpose of this new counterintelligence endeavor is to expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize the activities of black nationalist, hate-type organizations and groupings, their leadership, spokesmen, membership, and supporters, and to counter their propensity for violence and civil disorder.”

COINTELPRO 2K22 Part 5: Legally Setting Aside Every Case

There is PROOF that CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL ROB BONTA has EXPANDED THE NEW

Bonta CointelPro 2K22 Part 5-Legally Setting Aside Every Case
Bonta CointelPro 2K22 Part 5-Legally Setting Aside Every Case


COINTELPRO OPERATION 2K22 STRATEGY
, further engaging in Grand, Systemic and Endemic Corruption; Abuse of Power, office, and resources with Judicial, Political, Law Enforcement, Governmental, Legal Entities and Officials for organizational and personal gain, while INCREASING TARGETED ENTRAPMENT ATTACKS, STING/SCAMS ON INNOCENT CITIZENS WHOM EXPOSE THIS CORRUPTION!! His carrying out this WHITE PRIVILEGE ENTITLEMENT agenda that includes Political Vendetta’s and Personal/Professional Revenge that landed his Attorney General position!

Then-FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover describes the goal of one arm of COINTELPRO—against the Black liberation movement—in a now-declassified 1967 document:

“The purpose of this new counterintelligence endeavor is to expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize the activities of black nationalist, hate-type organizations and groupings, their leadership, spokesmen, membership, and supporters, and to counter their propensity for violence and civil disorder.”

The plan to “neutralize” Black activists included legal harassment, intimidation, wiretapping, infiltration, smear campaigns, and blackmail, and resulted in countless prison sentences and, in the case of Black Panther Fred Hampton and others, murder!


The Rob Bonta COINTELPRO 2K22
parties advancing a Campaign of Calumny Deceit against the TARGETED PARTY are engaged in corruption, have conspired, consorted, colluded, conceived and enacting this Deep State sponsored Criminal Entrapment Sting and Litigation Strategy- actively employ the Federal/State/County/Local/ Law Enforcement and Judicial Court systems with the FULL FORCE OF THE LAW to destroy the TARGETED PARTY!

This COINTELPRO Mob-Clique, includes Bonta, the DOJ-FBI, Governors, Attorney Generals, the Judges, Court Administrations, District Attorneys, City Attorneys, Law Enforcement at ALL levels, the TARGETED PARTY’s litigation opponents and their contractors and agents (including their attorneys), and others, with unscrupulous judicial, law enforcement, governmental and legal entities to act out their VENDETTA, CREATING CRIME, FIXING CASES in furtherance of their Corruption Agenda.

This IS PURE HATE and RETALIATION, in an aggressive Campaign of Calumny Deceit, to facilitate and encouraged the TARGETED PARTY’S allies and opposing parties to do all that they can to cause the fatality of the TARGETED PARTY, their family, their businesses, their business, real and personal property, their community and the clients they serve.

In doing so, the Mob-Clique actions preclude the TARGETED PARTY from ever having a fair opportunity in any of their cases, and makes it explicitly clear that they are anything but a fair litigant with court orders replete with perjurious, incriminating statements that are not only false but obtained through criminal conduct. In short the Mob-Clique instigated and committed criminal acts with these entire “illegal proceedings” solely for the purpose of illegally utilizing the full force and resources of the government in a covert criminal undercover sting operation by fostering, fabricating and manipulating any filing, pleading, argument, facts, truth, faxes, emails, phone calls, voicemail messages, letters, hearings, request, reservation numbers, motion practice, motion titles, ex-parte applications, hearings, parties, appearances, continuances, schedules, proceedings, register of actions, Court Domainweb, statements, evidence, testimony, documents, word, inference, vague reference, or gesture that they can remotely interpret as evidence of any remote action they seek to advocate to incriminate, charge, try, convict, incarcerate and eliminate the TARGETED PARTY, that DESTROYED their legitimate suits, grant fraudulent judgments, enforce collection of the corrupt judgments essentially bankrupting the TARGETED PARTY and then ultimately seek to have the TARGETED PARTY charged based on the Mob-Clique’s criminal and civil violations of the law!

The Mob-Clique controls the Criminal Justices, Police, District Attorneys/Prosecutors, Public Defenders and this Grand and Endemic Judicial/Legal Systemic Racism portrays the single most important reason why this “COURTEL” has been able to THRIVE, why the Federal, State, County and Local Governments Judicial and Law Enforcement Agencies, the Judicial Councils, the Commissions on Judicial Performance, and the heads of the Judicial Disciplinary bodies responsible for taking corrective action in these matters, has been so derelict in doing so, is because they are ALL PARTNERS, inextricably placed in the legal paradox where every Government Judicial and Law Enforcement Agency, Judge, Court Administrator, attorney, law firm, litigant and their agents having been involved in committing these crimes, opens the way to legally setting aside every case they were ever involved with and potentially being reversed at an untold cost of money, integrity and irreparable loss of public confidence in the legal system!

TO:  Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye          Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye
Chair, Judicial Council of California               Supreme Court of California
Comm. Judicial Appointments                       350 McAllister Street, Room 1295
455 Golden Gate Ave.                                     San Francisco, CA 94102-4797
San Francisco, CA 94102                                Fax: (415) 865-7181
Fax: 415-865-4200,415-865-4205             Tani.Cantil-Sakauye@jud.ca.gov
Presiding Judge Wynne Carville                  Chad Finke
Supervising Judge Michael Markman         Executive Officer
Judge Stephen Kaus                                    Superior Court of Alameda County
Judge Kevin R. Murphy                                1225 Fallon Street Room 209
Judge C. Don Clay                                        Oakland, CA 94612
Judge Jeff Brand                                          Fax: 510-891-6276
Judge Kim Colwell                                        cfinke@alameda.courts.ca.gov
Judge Morris Jacobson
Judge Winifred Smith                                 Charles Johnson
Judge Jon Rolefsen                                     Beth Robbins
Judge Yolanda Northridge                          Deputy Clerk
Judge Dennis Hayashi                                 First District Court of Appeal
Judge Jo-Lynne Q. Lee                               350 McAllister Street
Superior Court of Alameda County            San Francisco CA 94102
Departments 1, 6, 511, and 518                   Fax: 415-865-7309, 415-865-7209
René C. Davidson Courthouse                    Beth.Robbins@jud.ca.gov,
1225 Fallon Street                                        Charles.Johnson@jud.ca.gov
Oakland CA 94612
FAX #: 510-891-5304, 510-891-6276, 510-267-1567
dept.1@alameda.courts.ca.gov,WCarville@alameda.courts.ca.gov, MMarkman@alameda.courts.ca.gov, JRolefsen@alameda.courts.ca.gov, EGrillo@alameda.courts.ca.gov,MJacobson@alameda.courts.ca.gov, JBrand@alameda.courts.ca.gov,CClay@alameda.courts.ca.gov,WSmith@alameda.courts.ca.gov,dept.6@alameda.courts.ca.gov,KColwell@alameda.courts.ca.gov, dept.511@alameda.courts.ca.gov, dept.518@alameda.courts.ca.gov, SKaus@alameda.courts.ca.gov,KMurphy@alameda.courts.ca.gov,JLee@alameda.courts.ca.gov,YNorthridge@alameda.courts.ca.gov, DHayashi@alameda.courts.ca.gov, dept.19@alameda.courts.ca.gov,RFreedman@alameda.courts.ca.gov
Martin Hoshino                                      Victoria B. Henley
Director                                                  Director-Chief Counsel
Judicial Council of California               Commission on Judicial Performance
455 Golden Gate Avenue                    455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 14400
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688         San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
FAX NO. 415-865-4586                     FAX NO. (415) 557-1266
Martin.Hoshino@jud.ca.gov               Victoria.Henley@jud.ca.gov
John.Wordlaw@jud.ca.gov
Alex Tse                                                  Phyllis J. Hamilton
Director- No. District                            Chief District Judge
U. S. Attorney’s Office                          U. S. District Court- No. Division
Federal Courthouse                              6th Floor Oakland Courthouse- 2
450 Golden Gate Avenue                     1301 Clay Street
San Francisco, CA 94102                     Oakland, CA 94612
Fax No.: (415) 436-7234                      Fax No.: 415 522-3605
charles.oconnor@usdoj.gov                Phyllis_Hamilton@cand.uscourts.gov
stacey.geis@usdoj.gov                         Richard_Wieking@cand.uscourts.gov
alex.Tse@usdoj.gov                              Joseph_Spero@cand.uscourts.gov
joshua.Eaton@usdoj.gov
Barbara.Valliere@usdoj.gov
sara.Winslow@usdoj.gov
Attorney General of California
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
FAX No.: 916-324-8835
Xavier.Becerra@doj.ca.gov
Sean.McCluskie@doj.ca.gov
Robert.Wilson@doj.ca.gov
Laura.Stuber@doj.ca.gov
Kelli.Evans@doj.ca.gov
Marina.Soto@doj.ca.gov
Fax No.: 916-322-4532, 916-323-5341, 916-324-5567, 916-319-9421cc: ; bcc ACLU, LCCR, East Bay Community Law Center, Bay Area Legal Aid, USC Gould School Of Law, Western Center On Law & Poverty, Electronic Frontier Foundation, National Coalition to Protect Civil Freedoms, Equal Justice Society, Center for Constitutional Rights, Southern Poverty Law Center,
Faxed and Emailed
FROM:     Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim
DATE:     September 24, 2018
NO PAGES: 14
RE:        Clay’s State Sponsored Atmosphere of TERROR, Oppression, Persecution and Unfairness; and Judicial and Superior Court Administration Corruption, Collusion, and Conspiracy in al-Hakim v. Interserver, Case No.: RG18888371; al-Hakim vs. EBMUD, Alameda County Case No. RG 14-740943; Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim VS. AT&T Corporation, RG17-788130
“JUDGE NOT LEAST YE BE JUDGED!!”
“Judge not, that ye be not judged.
For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?”
Matthew 7:1-3 “The Mote and the Beam is a parable of Jesus given in the Sermon on the Mount in the Gospel of Matthew”
Dear Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye, Judges Phyllis Hamilton, Jacobson, Rolefson, Carvill, Kaus, Colwell, Krashna, Clay, Lee, Murphy, Smith, Patton, Freedman, Grillo, Markman and Carvill; Alex Tse, Xavier Becerra, Ms. Henley, Mr. Finke, Mr. Hoshino and OTHERS:
I have previously sent you ALL a 117 page Judicial and Superior Court Administration Corruption Complaint that was already outdated before I could file it!
This Complaint concerns, exposes and underscores the Judicial and Superior Court Administration Corruption, Collusion, and Conspiracy in the cases of Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim involving Judges C. Don Clay, Stephen Kaus, Robert Freedman, Morris Jacobson, Jon Rolefson, Evelio Grillo, Ioana Petrou, Wynne Carvill, Frank Roesch, Jo-Lynne Lee, Paul Herbert, Kim Colwell, Kevin Murphy, and Michael Markman with Chad Finke,among others with the Manipulation of the record and Register of Actions; Obstruction of Justice, Conduct To Pervert or Obstruct Justice, or the Due Administration of the Laws (Pen.Code, §§ 182, subd. (a)(1), 4570) 1 and Conspiracy to Pervert or Obstruct Justice (§ 182, subd. (a)(5)); the continued Fraud Upon The Court by Judges C. Don Clay and Wynne Carvill with Criminal Conduct In Violation of The Law!

Clay’s State Sponsored Atmosphere of TERROR, Oppression, Persecution and Unfairness is Contempt
But first I MUST address the reign of State sponsored TERROR I was entrapped in and FORCED to endure by Clay in his own personal torture chambers, HIS COURTROOM!
The July 11, 2018, Hearing
At the recent July 11, 2018, hearing in the matters of al-Hakim v. Interserver, Case No.: RG18888371, al-Hakim entered the alcove leading into the courtroom and was stopped by the Sheriffs deputy and asked “who are you and where are  you going?”. al-Hakim responded with his name and that he was there for a 3:00 p.m. hearing, and asked “aren’t you expecting us?”. The deputy responded “yeah, and inspecting you too!”al-Hakim thought that he had misheard him and asked “I didn’t hear you, what did you say?”, The deputy repeated “yeah, and inspecting you too!”. Still not understanding the need for such response, al-Hakim said “I’m sorry, could you repeat that?”The deputy again repeated “yeah, and inspecting you too!” in a very brash and challenging manner.
al-Hakim entered the courtroom and took a seat in the front row behind the railing of the court as there was already someone sitting at the defendants place at the hearing table, the clerk at her desk and the deputy sat at his desk near the front row of seats in the courtroom.
The deputy informs al-Hakim “you can’t sit in the first row, you have to move!”where upon al-Hakim moves across the courtroom to the second row of seats.
Judge Clay comes out of chambers and asks if they are ready to proceed, returns and takes the bench.
He calls for appearances of the parties and upon calling al-Hakim, while still standing, al-Hakim announces that“I have a challenge for you (Clay).”
Clay responds that he wants to go on with the matters, and asks if al-Hakim wants to be heard on the matters. al-Hakim, still standing holding the document in his hand extended toward Clay, responds that“you have been served a challenge and you must respond to it.”
The deputy blurts out “sit down and don’t interrupt the judge”, as if al-Hakim’s serving the challenge was somehow interrupting Clay and al-Hakim had NO RIGHT to do so.
Clay says “we have already started”
al-Hakim, while still standing holding the document in his hand extended toward Clay, reiterates that “there’s is no reporter so you can make the record anyway you choose, we haven’t done anything yet and I have challenged you (Clay) and you must answer it before you can proceed.”
Clay again responds that he wants to go on with the matters, and asks if al-Hakim wants to be heard on the matter of the subpoena and the vexatious litigant motion. al-Hakim, now sitting still holding the document in his hand extended toward the clerk, responds that “you have been served a challenge are you refusing to accept it?”
Clay angrily responds “I will deal with it later!” and nods approval to the deputy. al-Hakim handed the document to the deputy whom gave it to the clerk.
Clay asks al-Hakim how he viewed “the motion to compel the subpoena with the stay pending vexatious litigant motion?”
al-Hakim again stated that “you have been challenged you, you can only perform administrative duties and you must answer it before you can proceed in this case. I am NOT waiving any rights and insist that since I was NEVER served the motion by defendants, I have been prejudiced by appearing here and will NOT waive that prejudice”
Further, al-Hakim answered that “the Subpoena and Request for Production of Documents where supposed to have been answered by the defendants before February 12, 2018 and they failed and refused to do so, have defaulted by failing and refusing to answer the summons and complaint, and our motion to compel was unopposed.”
al-Hakim noticed a horrendous odor from behind him and turned is his seat to find the deputy standing over his left shoulder two feet away!
Clay asks if al-Hakim agreed that the vexatious motion stay the proceedings?” wherein al-Hakim answers that the motion was allegedly filed on February 16, 2018, and still has NEVER been served despite numerous requests for it and the the answers were due before February 12, 2018. They were in default already and you do not have the authority to retroactively grant them a stay after the fact”
With the unmerciful stench emanating from his vaginal region and his sweat seemingly dropping on al-Hakim’s back, al-Hakim turned is his seat facing the deputy standing over his left shoulder two feet away whom appeared to be trying to read al-Hakim’s documents at the table. al-Hakim asked the deputy “would you like a seat”as he pulled out the seat next to him and offered it to the deputy. Clay makes the comment “you don’t want to do that!”, where upon the deputy is now standing over al-Hakim where he can’t move at all!
al-Hakim responded “do what, what are you thinking I want to do? I want to know why he has to stand over me behind my back. I don’t believe that that is normal in any courtroom”Clay responds “well, yes it is”.al-Hakim states “you are saying that he stands in this same position, two feet behind the plaintiff, in every case that you have?”
Clay says “well”
The odor now is at “hold your breath level!!” and al-Hakim doesn’t want to say that.
al-Hakim says “I don’t believe that, I have been in your courtroom over 20 times, I am familiar with the courts attempts at intimidation and this most certainly is one!”
Again Clay nods to the deputy and he retreats a few steps but stays in striking range of al-Hakim who is seated 40 feet away and 3 feet below Clay sitting on the bench.
This was clearly planned prior to al-Hakim appearing in court and was choreographed by Clay to provoke and instill terror and fear in al-Hakim during the hearing!!
Clay’s actions in this manner along with the deputy’s deadly pungent mix from his crotch-rot on that hot day, left more than a lingering quality, impression, and feeling of stench warfare attaching to Clay an odor of terror and suspicion.
This use of these heinous tactics to incite violence that apparently already in the forefront of Clay’s mind with the comment “you don’t want to do that!”, with the highly offensive odors to sicken, immobilize, and drive al-Hakim away from the courtroom as an enemy of the State was in and of itself utterly odious and wicked.
The deputy took his seat, wrote a note to Clay and delivered it to him.
Clay then announces that “I am going to deny the motion to compel”.
Clay’s own extraordinary, forced rendition, his own government-sponsored abduction and extrajudicial holding of al-Hakim as a foreign criminal or terrorist suspect covertly being interrogated UNDER DURESS carried out by the sheriffs, government with the consent of the court!
al-Hakim felt the threat of being hit in the back of the head at all times, for any comment or slight movement, or signal from Clay, to provoke violence to result with injury or death to al-Hakim! The expected harm was made to compel al-Hakim to do something against his will or to be considered wrong in Clay’s sole judgment to “sic his attack dog” on al-Hakim; especially this wrongful threat made by Clay and his deputy to compel a manifestation of seeming assent by al-Hakim to Clay’s mercy without real volition. With this oppression and persecution indelibly etched in his mind, heart and soul, al-Hakim now KNOWS the smell of TERROR!!
Clay’s State Sponsored Atmosphere of TERROR, Oppression, Persecution and Unfairness is Contempt
It must be stipulated that Judge Clay’s actions fraud violated canons 1, 2A, and 2B(2), and constituted prejudicial misconduct at the very least and treated al-Hakim in a manner in violation of canons 1, 2A, and 3B(4) and reflected a prejudgment of him and a lack of impartiality, contrary to canon 3B(5).  Judges Clay’s abusive conduct must draw harsh criticism from the Judicial Regulators in a decision arising out of these charges of the “atmosphere of unfairness” created by the judge’s denial of plaintiff’s civil rights, right to due process, biased administration of justice, erroneous rulings, lies, deception, threats, retaliation, and caustic, condescending remarks of the plaintiff. (People v. Urias (July 31, 2006, G035179 [2006 WL 2128631] [nonpub. opn.]).)
Judge Clay purported to exercise his authority at that hearing in which he violated al-Hakim’s civil rights, has admittedly acting with personal interest in the outcome under the color of law 18 USC §242. The Judges willful misconduct, bad faith, mistreatment, retaliation and “atmosphere of unfairness” determines that there is a high probability she would continue her unethical behavior if she were to continue in a judicial capacity in the future. That judge Clay, before whom the hearing aforesaid action was pending is prejudiced against al-Hakim or the interest of the party so that affiant cannot or believes that he cannot have a fair and impartial hearing or trial before this judge. al-Hakim request and have a standing objection to ANY involvement of Judge Clay in this and ANY other matter.
Given the FABRICATED PRIOR VEXATIOUS LITIGANT ORDER in the Denial of the Request Fee Waiver dated March 5, 2018 that does NOT exist, AND the TWO FABRICATED VEXATIOUS LITIGANT ORDERSof July 23, 2018, and August 3, 2018, Clay issued proclaiming that the EBMUD action was dismissed for al-Hakim filing Challenges against the judges, YET THAT HAD NOT HAPPENED, is irrefutable evidence of the continued Fraud Upon The Court by Judges C. Don Clay and Wynne Carvill with Criminal Conduct In Violation of The Law!
The Judicial and Superior Court Administration Corruption, Collusion, and Conspiracy
At a recent July 18, 2018, hearing in the matters of al-Hakim v. EBMUD, al-Hakim v. AT&T, judge Grillo revealed the obvious conspiracy of Carvill, Markman, Kaus and himself in the very first minute of the hearing stating he had read in al-Hakim’s opposition to his OSC that he was dismissed for failure to answer the challenge within 10 days.That issues was NOT in al-Hakim’s opposition and was the nexus for Grillo’s fabricating his story for recusal which was intended to be an ambush of al-Hakim.
Perhaps more astonishing, within days of that hearing, on July 23, 2018, Clay issues TWO ORDERS proclaiming that the EBMUD action was dismissed for al-Hakim filing Challenges against the judges, YET THAT HAD NOT HAPPENED!!
This is at least the FOURTH time Clay has engineered, authored and endorsed fabricated orders as evidence of his fraud on the court and unbridled disregard and disrespect for the Rule of Law!
Grillo’s July 18, 2018 Filed Answer Adventure a Complete Fabrication!”
Prior to the cases being called, Grillo consulted with the court reporter regarding her services and she confirmed that she was there to transcribe the “al-Hakim criminal case”. Grillo suggested again that the case she was there for included three parties and he would give her notice when to go on the record, wherein again she stated that she was there for the “al-Hakim criminal case”.
Grillo called both cases, and upon announcing my appearance, I announced I was serving a challenge on Grillo wherein he announced “I know what you are going to do, but I have something that will make it unnecessary. I noticed in your opposition somewhere that you had raised the fact that I had failed to file and serve an answer striking your challenge for cause within the 10 day limit, I am accepting the dismissal and al-Hakim is right, all my orders and rulings are voided.. I did file an answer but somehow it was not posted or served, there was no proof of service”.
al-Hakim stated that “I am serving this challenge”, Grillo stated “I know that, but it will not be necessary, I am accepting (170.3 non-answer) dismissal”. He says “I checked the register of actions and didn’t see your challenge posted”, al-Hakim answered “neither is your answer striking it”.
Grillo claims his non answer and 170.3 dismissal is based on the fact he read that in al-Hakim’s opposition to the Order to Show Cause and realized he had NOT filed and served a timely answer striking the challenge, and was accepting the dismissal and al-Hakim is right wherein all his orders and rulings are voided.
Grillo says “I know that, that’s why I’m asking if you have a filed copy of the challenge?” al- Hakim said “I do”. Grillo asks “can I see it?” al-Hakim responded “I don’t have it with me”.
Grillo asks “can you get a copy of it?”, I responded “I would have to go get it”. Grillo asks “when can you get it?”
al-Hakim responded “I can get it and be back in an hour, before noon”. Grillo said “I did file an answer on July 9, 2018” and al-Hakim said “it would not be timely as it would have to be filed by July 6, 2018”.
Grillo insisted and required that al-Hakim provide a filed stamped copy of the challenge of June 27, 2018 stating that “I don’t want this to happen again and I don’t have a filed copy.”
al-Hakim said that “I’ve filled challenges in the courtroom and received a copy filed stamped by the clerk, all I have to do is serve it” “you aren’t denying being served the challenge, you got your copy?” Grillo admits “No, I did get it”.
al-Hakim returned to the court wherein Grillo announced that he had received the filed copy of the challenge from al-Hakim filed via email and it was filed in the AT&T case. Grillo admitted he concluded AT&T matter with defendants in al-Hakim’s absence, recounted the preposterous story of his answer being filed in the AT&T case but not in the EBMUD case. Clearly he had second thoughts about leaving the AT&T case and contrived a means to stay in it by filing an alleged answer in that case while I was away getting the filed copy of the challenge.
Grillo then claimed that there was clerical error in filing the challenge in the AT&T case not EBMUD, so by law he can correct the error and continue in AT&T case because he only needs to file the answer striking order by July 9, 2018, not serve it. al-Hakim corrected him that in fact if he filed the answer July 9, 2018, it would not be timely as it would have to be filed by July 6, 2018, and it MUST be served or al-Hakim wouldn’t know about it. al-Hakim reiterates that once he was served the new challenge it was inappropriate to proceed in any capacity beyond administrative duties and he was served the challenge.
Grillo says “I did file an answer but somehow it was not posted or served, there was no proof of service”. He asks his clerk to check the court register of actions for the pdf of the answer and she responded that there was an answer filed but no proof of service- just filed blank pages beyond his alleged answer. al-Hakim requested to see and get a copy of the alleged answer, Grillo did not respond. al-Hakim reminded Grillo that “you have been served a new challenge” and Grillo tried to evade service by accepting non-answer dismissal, then tried to change to acceptance in only the EBMUD case. Grillo continued the case to later at 1:30 p.m.
Where upon return al-Hakim appeared and Grillo informs him that he is going to recuse himself in both cases and has been in contact with Presiding Judge Carvill and Supervising Judge Markman all morning regarding transferring this case to Judge Kaus and he was going to file a complaint regarding the clerks office not properly filing or serving the challenge and answer striking challenge.
al-Hakim asked him “whom are you going to file the complaint with” he responded “judge Markman, and if you want to file a complaint you can do so as well” I asked whom should I file a complaint with and he said “Markman”. al-Hakim stated “this story is a complete fabrication!”
al-Hakim stated that his complaint wasn’t just going to be against the clerks office as as he stated to Grillo “you noticed in my opposition somewhere that I had raised the fact that you had failed to file and serve an answer striking your challenge for cause within the 10 day limit.” Grillo said yes, I did, that’s what prompted this dismissal”.
al-Hakim stated “there is no reference to the dismissal for not timely filing an answer in the opposition!” This is a complete fabrication!
Grillo said that “well that’s not what we are talking about, I have accepted the recusal, the issue is moot and all the confusion regarding the answer and service, I will address it with judge Markman”. al-Hakim again stated that “the entire reason that prompted this dismissal was because you noticed in my opposition somewhere that I had raised the fact that you had failed to file and serve an answer striking your challenge for cause within the 10 day limit but there is no reference to the dismissal for non answer in the opposition!”
al-Hakim reminded Grillo that “you have been served a new challenge” and Grillo tried to evade service by accepting non-answer dismissal, stating it was moot” and al-Hakim said the issues addressed in this challenge will endure far beyond today and I’ve served you”.
We have witnessed at least five times where the register of actions and record were altered even after the fact by the judges and clerks in al-Hakim’s cases.
His entire sham of filing an answer and 170.3 dismissal was a fabrication based on the fact he read that in opposition and realized he had NOT filed and served a timely answer striking the challenge, that was NOT in the opposition!
Grillo admitted that he had spoken with both Judges Carvill and Markman regarding his “Adventure” with the answer and it begs the answers to how were they involved in this matter, from it’s inception to it’s assignment to Kaus; to the alleged complaint against the clerks office that Grillo said he was going to file to asking al-Hakim to file his complaint, that al-Hakim will file against them ALL. There is clearly a case of fraud on the court, fabricating what is now evidence given the time and IP of the device that uploaded the alleged answer, fabricating the record and register of actions, and conspiracy, among others!
Carvill has been uniquely involved in this and other matters of al-Hakim’s and is still subject to the ongoing appeal and investigation of the criminal activities of him, judges Freedman, Petrou, Jacobson, Rolefson, Colwell, Markman, Grillo, Clay, Finke and Superior Court Clerks and Administration among others. As it regards the ongoing appeal, the underlying case that rendered the appeal was decided in al-Hakim’s favor after 22 years of litigation and found to declare Carvill and the other five judges that sat in the case without knowing anything about it while ruling in it solely on the script prepared by law clerk Phil Abar, ALL TO HAVE BEEN ENGAGED IN FRAUD ON THE COURT AND OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE!!! SINCE THIS SCRIPT WAS TRANSFERRED FROM ONE JUDGE TO ANOTHER THERE WAS OBVIOUS COLLUSION, ILLEGAL EX-PARTE COMMUNICATIONS, CORRUPTION, CONSPIRACY, AMONG OTHERS, and grounds for disqualification under CALIFORNIA CCP §170.6, CCP §§170.1-5 et. seq.; CCP §170.1(6)(A)(iii)), (CCP § 170.3 (c) (1)), the Canons of the Code of Judicial Conduct 1, 2, 2A, 2B(2), 3B(2), 3B(4), 3B(5), 3B(8), 3C, 3D(1), 3E, 3E(1), 3E(2), 4, 4D(1) and 4(E); DUE TO CRIMINAL CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. §242; Corruption; Manipulation; Obstruction of Justice in Motions for Peremptory Challenge; Conduct To Pervert or Obstruct Justice, or the Due Administration of the Laws (Pen.Code, §§ 182, subd. (a)(1), 4570) 1 Conspiracy to Pervert or Obstruct Justice (§182, subd. (a)(5); Fraud On The Court- Federal Code 60; Code of Civil Procedure §§ 60, § 47, § 4541, § 425.16, § 355, 356, 473, 475, § 3523, § 3528 Cal. R. Prof. Conduct 5-200 and Local Rule 180; First, Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment U. S. Constitution; California Constitution by the first clause of Article I, section 13;  Article VI, section 4 1/2; Article VI, section 13, as a “miscarriage of justice.”; Article VI, section 18, subd. (d)(3)
Kaus Discrepancies Clearly Indicate He was Being Untruthful
In my effort to “trust, but verify!”, I have established above some startling revelations regarding what Kaus knew or should have known that disprove his many “I don’t know anything about that” comments to the questions al-Hakim put to him at the August 29, 2018 hearing.
With ALL the communications wherein EACH one discussed Judge Grillo’s July 18, 2018 “Filed Answer Adventure was a Complete Fabrication!”, he could NOT be unaware of what happened and he had to read the many documents because they also addressed the fact al-Hakim would be unavailable for two scheduled hearings due to Eid al-Adha. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM NOT TO KNOW THESE THINGS!
His being told he was being assigned the case in the afternoon when Grillo said it at the 9:00am hearing is very shocking as well and smacks of the same corruption, collusion, and conspiracy al-Hakim has referenced for years and makes the afternoon assignment hearing appear to be an ambush! This has happened with Carvill in the past.
Most recently in the al-Hakim v. Interserver Equinix, Case: #RG18888371 matter that was initially assigned on January 11, 2018 to Judge Stephen Kaus yet without any notice, appearances, rulings, or recusals, it was reassigned to judge Clay, he issued an vexatious litigant order on July 23, 2018 and again on August 3, 2018, that orders: “However, given the order dismissing the case in Alameda County Case No. RG 14-740943” and “as well as the recent and numerous challenges filed in this case at issue, the court continues the hearing on this motion for the parties to address the import of these decisions and to explain (with evidence and/or request for judicial notice in support) whether plaintiff should be declared vexatious given the circumstances.”
The order was with an extended 60 day briefing schedule when the vexatious litigant motion was to be heard. The scheduling was the product of judge Clay trying to extend the motion practice to allow for the verification of his information in his order includes “secret evidence” of the dismissal of the al-Hakim vs. EBMUD action, Alameda County Case No. RG 14-740943. This matter has NOT been dismissed so it begs the question “what does Clay know?, how he knows it?, when did he find this out?, who he discussed this with?”
Further it underscores the corruption, collusion, and conspiracy of in the case of al-Hakim involving Judges Clay, Stephen Kaus, Robert Freedman, Morris Jacobson, Jon Rolefson, Evelio Grillo, Ioana Petrou, Wynne Carvill, Frank Roesch, Jo-Lynne Lee, Paul Herbert, Kim Colwell, Kevin Murphy, Michael Markman, among others and their “handling of the EBMUD matter that has NOT been dismissed!
In further defiance of Clay’s orders regarding the dismissal of the EBMUD action, the Tentative Ruling made September 11, 2018 by Judge Stephen Kaus, he states that “Plaintiff Abdul-Jalil Al-Hakim has engaged in a practice of filing peremptory challenges and challenges for cause to the case’s judicial assignment on the day of a hearing. In response, the judicial officers have had to postpone the hearing in order to address Al-Hakim’s objections first. EBMUD’s demurrer and this motion have been set and re-set for hearing as a result of Al-Hakim’s judicial challenges. Judicial challenges themselves are not, however, evidence a want or delay of prosecution. A party is entitled to challenge a judicial officer for cause or bias. Nor has EBMUD has not offered evidence that Al-Hakim’s peremptory challenges were offered in bad faith. The challenges appear to be filed in an earnest belief that the judges of this Court ought to be disqualified from deciding this case and that each successive challenge will overcome the prior’s shortcomings. The result of this may be considered “delay” under CCP section 583.410 and Rule of Court 3.1342. EBMUD has offered no evidence that this delay has resulted in significant or material prejudice. On the other hand, the Court hopes and encourages both parties to take this new judicial assignment as a good time to wipe the slate clean, forgive any earlier acrimony, and proceed to resolve and adjudicate the claims raised by the Complaint in normal order and good faith. Al-Hakim deserves a chance to have his claims adjudicated. EBMUD deserves a chance to develop and present its defense. Both parties deserve the rights to fair procedure and due process guaranteed to them by law. In short, this case deserves a chance to proceed on its merits, and now is an opportune time as any to do so.”
Judge Kaus admits to the courts acrimony and animus toward al-Hakim, and asks to wipe the slate clean and move forward in good faith as al-Hakim deserves a chance to have his claims adjudicated with the rights to fair procedure and due process guaranteed to them by law!
Clay’s Own Alleged Vexatious Litigant Proceeding
Clay’s July 23, 2018 and August 3, 2018, vexatious litigant order is an unlawful attempt to force al-Hakim to endure a SECOND motion and hearing, now CLAY’S OWN MOTION, yet the same defendants motion, by adding Clay’s OWN information gained through his investigation, corruption, collusion, and conspiracy with other judicial, governmental, and legal entities sources. It is established law that a litigant can NOT be forced to undertake more than one vexatious litigant proceeding in any 12 month period.
Clay has independently taken it upon himself to grant defendants a “do over” with his August 3, 2018 vexatious litigant order “continuing the matter”, the second motion on the matter, is now a second bite at the apple for CLAY and CARVILL, when the original motion was DENIED JULY 11, 2018, NOT CONTINUED!!
The illegal order issued 23 DAYS LATER, subjects al-Hakim to double jeopardy in this matter being tried again, now CLAY’S OWN MOTION, yet the same defendants motion, by adding Clay’s OWN information gained through his investigation, corruption, collusion, and conspiracy with other judicial, governmental, and legal entities sources at Clay’s direction, Clay’s instruction, and before Clay again as the trier of fact, that is alleged “fact” solely in his opinion, fact that he has personally provided defendants! The law is established and clear in that a litigant CAN NOT be forced to endure more than one vexatious litigant motion in a 12 month period and this is the COURTS motion now, NOT the defendants.
Now Clay is representing Carvill’s and his own interests in this matter BEFORE HIMSELF as judge makes Clay a litigant, and his asking defendants to defend his being challenged as part of their do over, at his direction and instruction is specious, larcenous!
The most important result of that hearing is that Clay has officially made himself a defendant and fourth element in this case. Though currently sitting as the judge in this matter he is now a witness, defendant, co-defense counsel and deputy defense judge ruling in matters that he has lied, committed several instances of fraud on the court and has been deceitful about and is personally involved in with Carvill, in this action that was brought by the defendants BEFORE HIM and now has appointed defendants counsel as his own counsel to defend his Challenges for Peremptory and Cause with Striking Orders to establish HIS right to sit and rule in the same matters that HE and Carvill are personally involved in and HE sits in judgment of HIMSELF and Carvill BEFORE HIMSELF against his challenges for removal that HE WILL RULE ON! His actions has the unfortunate consequence of making the judge a litigant, obliged to the defense counsel providing this opportunity to defend himself as the sitting judge of the litigants appearing before him in the case. ( Kerr v. United States District Court, supra, 426 U.S. at pp. 402-403 [48 L.Ed.2d at p. 732].) Judges should be umpires rather than players. This is a travesty and a mockery of justice with clear conflict while it wreaks of corruption and collusion!
Clay does NOT employ nor enforce the Interest of Justice, but the Interest of Judges!
Clay does NOT employ the rule of law, rather his law of the ruler!
Clay thinks he IS the RULER OF LAW!
Further, this brings under scrutiny what else Clay knew or should have known, what he did that he should not have done, what he didn’t do that he should have done.
Given the corruption, collusion, and conspiracy of in these cases of al-Hakim involving Judges Clay, Stephen Kaus, Robert Freedman, Morris Jacobson, Jon Rolefson, Evelio Grillo, Ioana Petrou, Wynne Carvill, Frank Roesch, Jo-Lynne Lee, Paul Herbert, Kim Colwell, Kevin Murphy, Michael Markman, among others and their “handling of the EBMUD matter that has NOT been dismissed and Judge Grillo’s July 18, 2018 “Filed Answer Adventure was a Complete Fabrication!” and al-Hakim’s complaint against the superior court and clerks offices for their continuing fraud on the court, was one of the reasons for this assignment to Kaus entails a dramatic sequence of events and ex-parte communications that are not and have not been made public that have an immeasurable impact on these and other cases that now involve the on going actions of Judges Robert Freedman, Ioana Petrou, Morris Jacobson, Jon Rolefson, Wynne Carvill, Kim Colwell, Mark Markman, Evelio Grillo, C. Don Clay, Chad Finke and Superior Court Clerks and administration among others.
Alleged Prior Vexatious Litigant Order and Proceeding
a) On March 3, 2018, al-Hakim filed a form FW-003, Request Fee Waiver for Additional Superior Court Fees and Costs for a peace officer to testify in court, Court-appointed interpreter fees for a witness, jury fees and expenses, fees for court-appointed experts, and Other fees per (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.56.)
b) al-Hakim received a denial of the FW-003, Request Fee Waiver for Additional Superior Court Fees and Costs dated March 5, 2018, with reason given as follows:
“(2) The court denies your request because the information you provided on the request shows that you are not eligible for the fee waiver you requested (spec reasons):
Other (specify reasons): Plaintiff has been deemed a vexatious litigant. The Court has a motion set to address this issue pursuant prior Orders issued related to this litigation. The request is denied without prejudice.”
At the July 11, 2018, hearing Clay denied he issued the Fee Waiver denial order including the clause: “Plaintiff has been deemed a vexatious litigant. The Court has a motion set to address this issue pursuant prior Orders issued related to this litigation”as he stated at the hearing as follows:
al-Hakim says “and I want to know where is this prior order of the court finding me as a vexatious litigant, I don’t know if it came from them (defendants) or you (Clay)”. Clay shakes his head and says“I don’t know anything about it”,wherein al-Hakim says “it needs to be produced or this court is engaged in Fraud on the Court”, Clay again shakes his head and says “I don’t know anything about it”, wherein al-Hakim says “it’s yours, or Carvill or Finke’s signed order, I have presented that fact too many times for you NOT to know anything about it. Who issued the order if you didn’t?”. Clay again shakes his head and says “It’s not mine”. The order clearly bears his signature!!
Clay and Administrative staff Fraud on the Court
a) Clay, judges Carville and Markman and his administrative staff has committed Fraud on the Court in violation of Federal Code 60 and Code of Civil Procedure § 60, § 47, § 4541 § 425.16, Cal. R. Prof. Conduct 5-200 and Local Rule 180.
Fraud on the Court, or Fraud upon the Court, is where a material misrepresentation has been made to the court, or by the court itself. The main requirement is that the impartiality of the court has been so disrupted that it can’t perform its tasks without bias or prejudice.
Some examples of fraud on the court include:
•    Fraud in the service of court summons (such as withholding a court summons from a party)
•    Corruption or influence of a court member or official
•    Judicial fraud
•    Intentionally failing to inform the parties of necessary appointments or requirements, in efforts to obstruct the judicial process
•    “Unconscionable” schemes to deceive or make misrepresentations through the court system
It’s important to note that fraud on the court only involves court officials or officers of the court, such as judges or court-appointed attorneys. The fraud must be directed at the “judicial machinery” itself. Fraud on the court generally does NOT mean:
•    Fraud between the two opposing parties
•    Submission of fraudulent documents
•    Perjury or false statements by witnesses
Fraud on the court is one of the most serious violations that can occur in a court of law. If fraud on the court occurs, the effect is that the entire case is voided or cancelled. Any ruling or judgment that the court has issued will be void. The case will usually need to be retried with different court officials, often in an entirely different venue.
For the official who acted in fraud upon the court, they may very well be required to step down from their position and may even be subjected to criminal consequences like a fine or a jail sentence. It could also result in other serious consequences, such as an attorney being disbarred, or a judge being removed from service.
If a court official is found to be biased or prejudiced even before fraud occurs, they are required to excuse themselves from the case, and a different official must be appointed. In some jurisidictions, a trial tainted by fraud on the court will be vacated or set aside for a certain time period (such as two years), to be “reopened” at a later date.
Given the FABRICATED PRIOR VEXATIOUS LITIGANT ORDER in the Denial of the Request Fee Waiver dated March 5, 2018 that does NOT exist, AND the TWO FABRICATED VEXATIOUS LITIGANT ORDERSof July 23, 2018, and August 3, 2018, Clay issued proclaiming that the EBMUD action was dismissed for al-Hakim filing Challenges against the judges, YET THAT HAD NOT HAPPENED, is irrefutable evidence ofthe continued Fraud Upon The Court by Judges C. Don Clay and Wynne Carvill with Criminal Conduct In Violation of The Law! Again, this is at least the FOURTH time Clay has engineered, authored and endorsed fabricated orders as evidence of his fraud on the court and unbridled disregard and disrespect for the Rule of Law!
Clay’s Total Disregard for The Rule of Law in Challenges
In Total Disregard for The Rule of Law, On Two Occasions Clay Failed and Refused to Timely File an Answer Striking both Challenges on Peremptory Bias Grounds Pursuant to California Civil Code §170.6 and otherwise “For Cause” Pursuant to California Civil Code §§170.1-170.5 Before Ruling on The Matters.
At the July 11, 2018, hearing, I filed a Challenge for Cause against Judge Clay while on the bench and he tried to evade the service and move into the case. I insisted that upon being served the challenge, he could only perform administrative duties relative to the case, that he could not hear anything regarding the case as he was challenged and had to answer first. He ignored that discussion of whether he could only perform administrative duties or he could even hear any matters and again tried to proceeded into the case. al-Hakim remained resolute and insisted that he accept service unless he was refusing service, wherein he acknowledged the Challenges, and still moved into decided crucial matters WITHOUT referring the case answering.
Judge Clay’s Conduct and Actions
A. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 170-170.4
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 170-170.4 reads as follows:
170.1.  (a) A judge shall be disqualified if any one or more of the following is true:
(1) (A) The judge has personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding.
(6) (A) For any reason:
(i) The judge believes his or her recusal would further the interests of justice.
(ii) The judge believes there is a substantial doubt as to his or her capacity to be impartial.
(iii) A person aware of the facts might reasonably entertain a doubt that the judge would be able to be impartial.
(B) Bias or prejudice toward a lawyer in the proceeding may be grounds for disqualification.
170.3.  (a) (1) If a judge determines himself or herself to be disqualified, the judge shall notify the presiding judge of the court of his or her recusal and shall not further participate in the proceeding, except as provided in Section 170.4, unless his or her disqualification is waived by the parties as provided in subdivision (b).
(2) There shall be no waiver of disqualification if the basis therefor is either of the following:
(A) The judge has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party.
(4) If grounds for disqualification are first learned of or arise after the judge has made one or more rulings in a proceeding, but before the judge has completed judicial action in a proceeding, the judge shall, unless the disqualification be waived, disqualify himself or herself, but in the absence of good cause the rulings he or she has made up to that time shall not be set aside by the judge who replaces the disqualified judge.
(c) (1) If a judge who should disqualify himself or herself refuses or fails to do so, any party may file with the clerk a written verified statement objecting to the hearing or trial before the judge and setting forth the facts constituting the grounds for disqualification of the judge. The statement shall be presented at the earliest practicable opportunity after discovery of the facts constituting the ground for disqualification. Copies of the statement shall be served on each party or his or her attorney who has appeared and shall be personally served on the judge alleged to be disqualified, or on his or her clerk, provided that the judge is present in the courthouse or in chambers.
(5) A judge who refuses to recuse himself or herself shall not pass upon his or her own disqualification or upon the sufficiency in law, fact, or otherwise, of the statement of disqualification filed by a party. In that case, the question of disqualification shall be heard and determined by another judge agreed upon by all the parties who have appeared or, in the event they are unable to agree within five days of notification of the judge’s answer, by a judge selected by the chairperson of the Judicial Council, or if the chairperson is unable to act, the vice chairperson. The clerk shall notify the executive officer of the Judicial Council of the need for a selection. The selection shall be made as expeditiously as possible. No challenge pursuant to this subdivision or Section 170.6 may be made against the judge selected to decide the question of disqualification.
170.4.  (a) A disqualified judge, notwithstanding his or her disqualification may do any of the following:
(3) A party may file no more than one statement of disqualification against a judge unless facts suggesting new grounds for disqualification are first learned of or arise after the first statement of disqualification was filed.  Repetitive statements of disqualification not alleging facts suggesting new grounds for disqualification shall be stricken by the judge against whom they are filed.
This petition convincingly presents the case for all and judicial recusal under Code of Civil Procedure sections 170.1- 170.4 above, specifically 170.1, subdivision (a)(6)(C). n1 (Stats. 1984, ch. 1555.) This proceeding touches upon the core of the judicial process — the appearance of objectivity of the decision maker — requiring a careful balancing of the affected interests. The court must consider both the public’s right to be assured of the fair, but yet efficient, resolution of disputes and the parties’ right to a decision based upon the court’s objective evaluation of the facts and law. (See In re United States (1st Cir. 1981) 666 F.2d 690, 694.) The tension between the appearance of fairness and efficiency should be self-evident. The difference between the appearance of fairness generally and the perception of fairness as seen by a party or his or her counsel should also be self-evident. With ever mounting litigation, judicial disqualification has and will undoubtedly continue to increase as will those of judicial disqualification during trial. This case is ripe for such ruling as you must understand judge Clay has repeatedly avoided, failed and refused to file and serve a written answer striking to the Challenges before he ruled on the matters heard that day and remained in the case over al-Hakim’s objections; continued to make critical rulings that negatively impacted al-Hakim’s case causing irreparable harm, far beyond simple administrative duties; he admitted striking the Second Challenge filed and served on July 11, 2018; he avoided, failed and refused to abide by the law wherein he did NOT recuse himself from hearing the motions that day; he avoided, failed and refused to abide by the law established that he could ONLY perform basic administrative duties until the challenge was heard by a judge; and this resulted in the granting of al-Hakim’s Motion to Compel . Judge Clay did not review the issues as plead by al-Hakim in those motions nor the Challenges as required by law or he would have discovered both legal authority and supporting evidence for the court to rule in plaintiff’s favor and such conduct, actions and personality “make a world of difference when it comes to rulings on evidence, the temper of the courtroom, the tolerance for a proffered defense, and the like.” ( Chandler v. Judicial Council (1970) 398 U.S. 74, 137 [26 L.Ed.2d 100, 137-138, 90 S.Ct. 1648] (dis. opn. of Douglas, J.).) Nonetheless the proper performance of judicial duties does require a judge to withdraw from a matter every time an advocate positively asserts the objective and fair judge appears to be biased. The duty of a judge to sit where not disqualified is equally as strong as the duty not to sit when disqualified. (See Laird v. Tatum (1972) 409 U.S. 824 [34 L.Ed.2d 50, 93 S.Ct. 7] On the facts of this case, you must grant this writ.
Prejudicial Misconduct in continuing to Preside over the Case
Clay committed prejudicial misconduct in continuing to preside over the case, conduct hearings,conducted his own investigation; colluded, conspired and issued an order  and make substantive rulings, not just administrative rulings, without having filed a written verified answer to al-Hakim’s challenge despite her personal knowledge of the relevant facts, evidence, testimony and circumstances for his disqualification and recusal that he failed and refused to answer.
al-Hakim had contested his continued sitting in the case and indicated his intent to file an appeal for same. These facts indicate that Clay’s purported concern about his failure to file a response and al-Hakim’s intent to file an appeal for Clay’s many failures was merely a pretext for his decision to independently take it upon himself to grant his own vexatious litigant order “continuing the matter”, the second motion on the matter, is now a second bite at the apple for CLAY and CARVILL, when the original motion was DENIED JULY 11, 2018, NOT CONTINUED!!
The illegal order issued 20 DAYS LATER, subjects al-Hakim to double jeopardy in this matter being tried again, now CLAY’S OWN MOTION, yet the same defendants motion, by adding Clay’s OWN information gained through his investigation, corruption, collusion, and conspiracy with other judicial, governmental, and legal entities sources at Clay’s direction, Clay’s instruction, continue in the case to frustrate al-Hakim’s attempt to disqualify him. In so retaliating against al-Hakim, Colwell committed prejudicial misconduct. (See In re Rasmussen (1987) 43 Cal. 3d 536, 538 [236 Cal. Rptr. 152, 734 P.2d 988] [judge committed misconduct in “displaying a lack of impartiality to, and petty harassment of attorneys who filed affidavits of prejudice against him,” and in “discouraging the exercise of peremptory disqualification rights by inappropriate means”].)
The courts have generally held that a judgment or order rendered by a disqualified judge is void whenever brought into question. (See Giometti v. Etienne (1934) 219 Cal. 687, 689 [28 P.2d 913] [justice related to petitioner’s counsel]; Cadenasso v. Bank of Italy (1932) 214 Cal. 562, 567 [6 P.2d 944] [judge owned stock in bank]; Lindsay-Strathmore I. Dist. v. Superior Court (1920) 182 Cal. 315, 333 [187 P. 1056] [judge had remote interest in subject matter]; T.P.B. v. Superior Court (1977) 66 Cal. App. 3d 881, 885-886 [136 Cal. Rptr. 311].)
Clay abused and misused the judicial process unlawfully in violation of [section 170.4, subdivision (d)].
Section 170.4, subdivision (d) provides that “[e]xcept as provided in this section, a disqualified judge shall have no power to act in any proceeding after his or her disqualification or after the filing of a statement of disqualification until the question of his or her disqualification has been determined.”
Section 170.4, subdivision (a) provides as follows: “A disqualified judge, notwithstanding his or her disqualification may do any of the following: [P] (1) Take any action or issue any order necessary to maintain the jurisdiction of the court pending the assignment of a judge not disqualified. [P] (2) Request any other judge agreed upon by the parties to sit and act in his or her place. [P] (3) Hear and determine purely default matters. [P] (4) Issue an order for possession prior to judgment in eminent domain proceedings. [P] (5) Set proceedings for trial or hearing. [P] (6) Conduct settlement conferences.”
Clay was disqualified to preside at any further proceedings because he failed and refused to file a written order striking the challenge for cause while knowing that he is prohibited from hearing such motions and had no jurisdiction to enter the orders at and after the hearing.”
Clay Did Not Answer Second Challenge BEFORE Ruling on Matters Passed upon His own Disqualification
Clay never had standing in this case to rule by virtue of not having timely answered, filed and served properly any acceptable answer to the Second Challenge BEFORE he ruled on the matters at the hearing July 11, 2018.
His actions proved every point al-Hakim has made in every one of the documents, motions, answers, replies, correspondence, and challenges filed with, for, and against Clay over the years, that he can not afford to answer any of the charges leveled against him because it will incriminate him and establish that Clay IS GUILTY OF ALL THE CHARGES al-Hakim has made.
al-Hakim immediately realized that under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. §§170.1(a)(4), 170.1(a)(8)(b)(ii) Judge Clay had a conflict of interest and was disqualified from acting, has a direct and unwaivable conflict of interest.
Judge Clay then proceeded to hear, took under submission, and decided the matters before the Court, those rulings could be dispositive of the entire case, which he apparently intends to preside in spite of his disqualification.
Judge Clay therefore “pass[ed] upon his or her own disqualification or upon the sufficiency in law, fact, or otherwise, of the statement of disqualification filed by a party” violating CCP 170.3(c)(5). “A judge may not pass on his own disqualification”, Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Lavoie 475 U.S. 813 (1986), Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp. 108 S.Ct. 2194 (1988).
Clay Did NOT Timely Answer the Challenge, Consenting to the Challenge
On July 11, 2018, Clay was challenged pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6 and for cause pursuant to sections 170.1 and 170.3. Upon being issued the Challenges Clay could only preform administrative duties yet, Clay did NOT refer the case out to another judge as required nor timely answer the Challenge at all, thereby consenting to the Challenge per CCP §170.3(c)(4) for failure to file an order striking the Challenge within 10 days.
Judge Clay Disqualified Per CCP §170.3(c)(4) for NOT Answering nor Striking Challenge and Statement of Disqualification Within Ten-Day Time Limit
Clay failed to answer or strike the July 11, 2018, Challenges wherein if the judge whose disqualification has been sought has made no answer within ten days, he or she is considered to have consented to the disqualification. CCP §170.3(c)(4); People v Superior Court (Mudge) (1997) 54 CA4th 407, 411, 62 CR2d 721.
A judge who does not strike the statement of disqualification within this ten-day time limit is deemed disqualified. Lewis v Superior Court (1988) 198 CA3d 1101, 1104, 244 CR 328. Once a judge strikes a statement of disqualification, the aggrieved party may seek a writ immediately without waiting for the ten-day period to elapse. Hollingsworth v Superior Court (1987) 191 CA3d 22, 26, 236 CR 193.
In the Dred Scott decision Chief Justice Taney wrote, blacks had been “regarded as beings of an inferior order” with “no rights which the white man was bound to respect.”This fact is live and well in this complaint as practiced by those who’s conduct demonstrate it unmercifully!
Unless and until these issues can be fairly resolved BEFORE the hearing scheduled on SEPTEMBER 26, 2018, AT 3:00 P.M. IN DEPARTMENT 6, BEFORE JUDGE CLAY, I CAN NOT in good conscience OUT OF FEAR agree to APPEAR with ANY of the continuing outstanding conditions referenced in this complaint regrading Clay’s State sponsored TERROR I was entrapped in and FORCED to endure by Clay in his own personal torture chambers, HIS COURTROOM!
I am and will be subject to the continued fraud, corruption and collusion complained of in ALL the aforementioned herein and further, I request an OPEN hearing on these matters before an impartial judge.
This matter may need to be transferred to another county venue on fair trial grounds as provided by CCP §397(b) where the influence of the Judges, district attorney, city attorney and opposing litigants is not so inextricably intertwined with judicial interests.
Respectfully,
ABDUL-JALIL al-HAKIM
510-394-4501
Categoriescivil rights Tags Hampton Dellinger, @nowtruth, #ally, #Alton Sterling, #antiracism, #Atatiana Jefferson, #bethechange, #Bettie Jones, #blm, #Botham Jean, #civilrights, #climatechange, #climatejustice, #coronavirus, #COURTEL, #covid, #criminaljustice, #criminaljusticereform, #Dominique White, #Elijah McClain, #equality, #equalrights, #equity, #feminist, #Freddie Gray, #George Floyd, #humanity, #humanrights, #JUDICIALEQUITYandREFORMINITIATIVE, #justiceforgeorgefloyd, #KamalaisaPoliticalPornStar, #Laquan McDonald, #lgbtq, #mentalhealth, #mentalhealthawareness, #nojusticenopeace, #nonprofit, #Philando Castile, #policebrutality, #PoliticalPornStar, #protest, #proudboys, #qanon, #racialjustice, #SayHerName, #SayHisName, #SayTheirNames, #selfcare, #socialactivism, #socialchange, #socialjustice, #socialjusticewarrior, #socialwork, #solidarity, #Terence Crutcher, $22 million, 2007, 2015, 2022, 2024, 2025, a collection of conservative and right-wing policy proposals, a female host, a man confessed to, a respectful, a Visual Learner, A weekly podcast, A&MWF, Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation, abdul-jalil, Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, about REAL people, ACCOUNT, Accountability, acting, Acting Deputy Inspector General, activism, Activist, activists, add your Podcast RSS feed, adding, adds your podcast to Amazon Alexa, advisor, affirmative action, After you create an account, Again, al-Hakim, al-Hakim v CSAA, al-Hakim v. Rescue Industries, Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O'Malley, Alameda County Presiding Court Judge, Alameda County Sheriff GREGORY J. AHERN, Alameda County Superior Court, Alameda County Supervisor Kieth Carson, Alameda Superior Court, Alex Padilla, Alex Stuart, Alex Tse, Alfredo Gonzalez, Alicia Garza, ALL Committee members, all podcast directories, all the talking and thoughts, all walks of life, almost about anything, Amadou Diallo, america, AMWFTrust.org, Amy Keating, and civil liberties, and deportation of undocumented immigrants living in the U.S. by using the military to capture and place them in internment camps, and inclusion (DEI) programs, and murder, Andre Scott, Ann Deim, Anna Itoi, Annabelle Danielvarda, Anthony Batts, Anthony Noto, any episodes, AnyPod, anywhere else podcasts are distributed, Appellate Judge, Appellate Judge Barbara Jones, apple, Apple ID, apple podcast logo, Apple Podcasts, April 2024, Article II of the U.S. Constitution, Ashoka Fellow, Ashoka Foundation:Innovators for the Public, ask for, Assistance Commission, Assistant Director, associated with your podcast, At the risk of sounding like a broken record, Athletes Human Rights, Attorney Edward C. Bell, Attorney Eugene Schneider, Attorney General of the United States, Attorney John F. Bradley Jr., Attorney Lewis Nelson, Attorney Richard D. Bridgman, Audible, Audioburst, awareness, awe inspiring tales, Ballen Studios, Bane Act, Bankruptcy Trustee, BANNING, Barbara Parker, Barbara Valliere, Bari al-Hakim-Williams, Barry Barkan, Basic Needs, Bay Area Carpet Cleaning, Bbskm Family LLC, beacon of free speech, Before submitting, below, Benjamin Lee, Bernadette Torivio, Beth Robbins, beyond, BeyondPod, Black Lives Matter, BlackLivesMatter, Bob Conner, body wire recorders, Boydine Hall, Bradley Bening, Bradley Schlozman, Brandi Morandi, Breanna Taylor, Brent Hanson, Brian Jack, Brooke Hammett, Brown Act, Bruce Brock, Budget, Bullhorn, Bureau of Investigation, Burnham Brown, Business and Professions Code, buy/bust techniques, California Attorney General, California Bureau of Automotive Affairs, California Cannons, California Commission on Judicial Performance, California Constitution, California Department of Child Support Services, California Department of Consumer Affairs, California Department of Corporations, California Department of Corrections, California Department of Insurance, California Department of Justice, California Department of Motor Vehicles, California Judges Association, California Judicial Council, California Land Title Association, California Public Records Act, California Secretary of State, California State Appeals Court, California State Assembly, California State Automobile Association (CSAA), California State Bar Association, California State Board of Equalization, California State Franchise Tax Board, California State Judicial Council, California State Senate, California Supreme Court, calumny deceit, Cameron Hammett, campaign, candid way, Cardell K. Richardson, career, Carlson, Carol Roth, Carolyn M. Young Fiduciary Services, Castbox, Categories, category, Catherine S. Bruno, CCTV, Cdm Holdings LLC, Censorship, Central Intelligence Agency, Chad Finke, chairman, change, Charles Johnson, charles o’connor, Charles Rangel, chart, Check out the video, Chief, Chief Bankruptcy Judge, Chief Counsel, Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, Chief of the Civil Rights Division, Chris LaCivita, Chris Noma, Chris Wray, Christian nationalist plan to steer the U.S. toward autocracy, Christine Gula, Christopher Leung, CIA, CIA Contractor, Cisco, Civil Law and Motion, Clark J. Burnham, Claudia J. Gorham, Claudia Leed, click Get Started, Click image, click the NEXT button, click the Submit Your Podcast button, click the Suggest a Podcast, Climate Justice Reform, closed circuit television, CLTA, Co-campaign, Co-campaign manager, Colin Hammett, comedian Joe Rogan, comedy, Commentators, Commissioner Boydine Hall, Commissioner Glenn Oleon, Commissioner Sue Alexander, Commissioner Taylor Culver, Commissioner Thomas Nixon, Committee Vice-Chairperson, Communications director, community, Concealment, confidential human sources, confirm your show, conflict of interest, Congressmen John Conyers, Congresswoman Barbara Lee, Conservatism portal, conservative, consolidate executive power, conspiracy, copy, Corey Amundson, Corruption, Corruptocrats, Councilman Larry Reid, country, court authorized T-III intercepts, COVID-19 & Our Communities, Craig Page, create a free account, Create an account, Creek, Criminal Justice Reform, Critics have characterized Project 2025 as an authoritarian, Culture, D.C., Dan Lindhiem, Dan Scavino, dark, Darry Chiang, David Drummond, David Stein, Deanna J. Santana, Deanna Montgomery, Deborah Fox, deezer, Defense Intelligence Agency, Defense Security Service, DELETING, Dennis Lanni, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, described what happened to Justin, description, detention, DHS, DIA, Dianne Feinstein, Dick Durbin, digs into this story to find out what really happened, director, Directory, DISABLING, disappearance, discontinued, dismantling the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), District Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton, diversity, Do You Have, dominated by misinformation, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Dreamers, Drowning, Drowning Creek, DSS, due process under the law, Duke Buchan, each directory, each individual RSS Feed, each of your RSS Feeds, early morning hours, EDIT, Edmund G. “Jerry” Brown Jr., Education, Education Justice, Edward L. Kreisberg, Eileen Sobjack, Eleanor Holmes Norton, election, electronic surveillance, Elizabeth Berke-Dreyfuss, email address, Embezellment, ending the propaganda spiral, enforce the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills nationwide, england, Enter your podcast’s RSS Feed, Equinix, Eric Firstman, Eric Garner, Eric Haas, Eric Trump, Ersie Joyner III, Eskanos and Adler, established, Ethnic Studies, Eurisko Development Solutions L.L.C., Evan Westrep, Every day. No matter what, every Monday, eX-whY AdVentures, experience, export them, EXPOSING IT, Extrinsic Fraud, fabricating evidence, facebook, FACT CHECKERS, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, False Imprisonment, FALSELY LABELING, fanbase, fans, fbi, February, federal, Federal Appeals Court, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Election Commission, Federal indictment, Federation, feminism, fill it out, Fill out the form, finance Chairman, financial investigations, find, finds himself in an underworld of drugs, first, five days, flag, FOIA, Food Insecurity, foreign trade, Founder of Vigilance Elite REAL stories, Francis McKeown, Frank Morrow Jr., fraud upon the State, fraudulent, Freddie Gray Jr., freedom, Freedom of Information Act, from A to Z, from Deezer, From here, from the menu, Funding for climate research would be cut and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) would be reformed according to conservative principles, gain, Gaines, Gary Halpin, Gavin Newsom, Genelle Ng, General, George Philips, Georgia, gets deeper, Gnanendra Kumar, go to Podcasters.Amazon.com, Go to their email submission form, Google, Google Podcasts, Google Podcasts app, Government, Government Accountability Office, GPS information, Grand Endemic Corruption, Grand Systemic Corruption, Grant Leichter, great, Great Again, Green Key Investments, guide, Gun Violence, Harrassment, has a story, has announced, have a female co-host to be accepted, have that ready, have your show included, having the DOJ prosecute anti-white racism, Head on over, healing, Healthcare, Here’s a full list of other popular directories you can submit your podcast to, his friends, History, hit SEND EMAIL, hit the Publish My Podcast button, Holly Saydah, home, Homelessness, honest reporting, hope, Hope you enjoy it, hosting your show with RSS.com, Housing Group Fund, how to migrate, Howard Jordan, Huberman, Huberman Lab, Hunger, If you don’t have an account, iheartradio, iHeartRadio.com, illegal, Image, Immigration, IMPORTANT, Important Update, in addition to trying to undo most everything implemented during the Biden administration, in front, in here, Inc., Income Gap, Independent Women’s Forum and Independent Women’s Voice, info@wartimestories.com, Inspector, Inspector General, Inspiration, inspirational ideas, intellectuals, Intelligence Community Inspector General, interaction with Federal Agents, interrogating, Interserver, investigation, Irwin J. Eskanos, is hosted, It promotes capital punishment and the speedy "finality" of those sentences, It proposes criminalizing pornography, It proposes reclassifying tens of thousands of federal civil service workers, it will show up here automatically, J.C. Watts, Jack Dorsey, Janie Wong, Jason Miller, Jayne Williams, Jeffery Heileson, Joe Biden, Joe Rogan, John Keker, John Price, John Quaglieri, John Russo, John Wordlaw, Johnna Watson, Join, Jon Streeter, Joseph Berlin, Joseph Spero, joshua Eaton, Joy Scharton, Judge Barbara J. Miller, Judge C. Don Clay, Judge Claudia Wilken, Judge David C. Lee, Judge Dennis Hayashi, Judge Elizabeth Hendrickson, Judge Ellen Hendrickson, Judge Frank Roesch, Judge George Hernandez, Judge Henry Needham, Judge Jacqueline Tabor, Judge James Richman, Judge Jeff Brand, Judge Jenifer Madden, Judge Jo-Lynne Q. Lee, Judge Jon Rolefsen, Judge Jon Tigar, Judge Judith Ford, Judge Kevin R. Murphy, Judge Kim Colwell, Judge Leo Dorado, Judge Melinda Haag, Judge Michael Ballachey, Judge Michael Markman, Judge Morris Jacobson, Judge Paul Herbert, Judge Randall Newsome, Judge Richard Hodge, Judge Robert Freedman, Judge Sandra Bean, Judge Scott Patton, Judge Stephen Kaus, Judge Stephen Pulido, Judge Sue Alexander, Judge THOMAS NIXON, Judge Winifred Smith, Judge Wynne Carville, Judge Yolanda Northridge, Judicial Council, JUDICIAL EQUITY AND REFORM INITIATIVE Group, Judicial/Legal Systemic Racism, Jugde Ronald M. George, Julie Harris, july, Jurists, justice, Justin Gaines, Kamala Harris, Karoline Leavitt, Keker & Van Nest, Kelli Evans, Ken Madhvani, Kendra James, Kevin Dunleavy, Kevin McLaughlin, keys, Kim Drake, Kingdom Builders Christian Fellowship, Kleptocrats, Kris Ferre, Kristine Mostofizadeh, Krysten Hicks, L. Nancy Birnbaum, Lab, Lanette Hammett, Lanny Hammett, Lara Trump, Laura Stuber, Law firm of Bridgman & Bridgman, Law firm of Wendel Rosen Black Dean LLP, Law Offices of Anthony S. Leung, Law Offices of Michael C. Cohen, Learn Out Loud, Legal Services Corporation, legistlators, Leslie Berland, Let’s dive in, lifestyle, like to talk, Link, link your RSS feed, List, Listen Notes, listeners, literature, Live Oak, Location, log in and submit your podcast, logo, LOL, LOL The Podcast, longest to be approved, Luke Lamana, Lynne Patton, M C Hammer, Main organ, major directories, Make, Make America, Make America Great Again, Make America Great Again Inc., make sure, Manager, Managing Director, Mandate for Leadership, Manuel Loggins Jr., Many legal experts have said it would undermine the rule of law, Marco Marquez, Marilee Bass, Marina Soto, Marine Corp Reconnaissance veteran, Martha G. Bronitsky, Martin Hoshino, Matthew Brega, Matthew Golde, Maureen K. Lenahan, McKeown and Price, media, media landscape, meets the battlefield, Merrick B. Garland, Merrily Friedlander, Meyers Nave, Michael Brown, Michael Cooper, Michael DeCesare, Michael E. Horowitz, Michael Mitchell, Michael Nave, Michael O’Connor, Michael Tigar, Michael Whatley, migration tool, Mike Lavrik, millions of new listeners, Miro, misrepresentation, mix of horror, Mma, mobile device, money, more, more likely, more places, More Podcast Directories To List Your Show, Most Popular Podcast Directories, mostly liberal government bureaucracy, motivation, Movements, Multiple Podcasts, multiple shows, mysterious, mystery, Nancy Pelosi, National, National Committee, National Federation of Republican Women, National Security Agency, need to log in, New episodes, new listeners, new RSS podcast hosting account, News, no arrest has ever been made, Northern District of California, Northern Division, Note, Notepad, November, NowTruth.Org, NSA, Oakland City Administrator Sabrina Landreth, Oakland City Attorney Barbara Parker, Oakland City Council Rules of Procedure/Code of Ethics, Oakland Open Government, Oakland Police Chief Anne E. Kirkpatrick, Oakland Police Chief George Hart, Oakland Police Chief Richard Word, Oakland Sunshine Ordinance, Obesity, observing, obstruction of justice, of those categories, Office of Government Ethics, Office of Integrity and Compliance, Office of Public Affairs, one episode, only solution, Oscar Grant, Oscar Grant III, Other critics believe Project 2025 is rhetorical window-dressing for what would be four years of personal vengeance at any cost, Other organizations, other people, others, others may require you have separate accounts, Otolum, Otolum Corporation, outside, Overcast, Oxford University, PAC, Pandora, Pandora account, Pandora For Podcasters, Parent organization, part of a series on Conservatism in the United States, particularly economic and social policies, Parties, passionate community, Pastor L. J. Jennings, Paul Dans, peace, People, PLANTING FABRICATED EVIDENCE, platform, Player FM, Plazoo, PocketCasts, podcast, Podcast Charts, Podcast Directory, podcast listeners, podcaster.deezer.com, Podcasts, Podchaser, Podchaser Logo, Podknife, political appointees in order to replace them with loyalists more willing to enable the next Republican president's policies, politicians, Politics, popular nightclub, pour, poverty, President, President Barack Obama, President elect, press secretary, presumably, Principles, Professor Adeel Malik, Program Counsel, project, Project 2025, Project 2025 envisions widespread changes to the government, Project 2025 recommends abolishing the Department of Education, project recommends the arrest, project's authors acknowledge that most of the proposals would require the Republican Party to control both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate, proponents argue that the change would dismantle what they view as a vast, provides an easy way, Public Ethics, Public Integrity Section, published, Purpose, questioning, quickly create, quickly went cold, Racial Injustice, Racial Justice, racism, Radio.com, RadioPublic, Ralph Civil Rights Act, Randy Willoughby, Rank, Rankings, react to unhinged, Reads, Ready for more opportunities to get discovered, Real Oakland Administrative Reform, recommend, Reddit, Reddit Stories, Refugee Crisis, Register.com, RELATED, relationship, released, remained so, removing legal protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, Renee DuPree, Representative James Comer, Representative Jim Jordan, Representative Mike Turner, Representative Tom Rust, Republican, Republican National Committee, Republican Women, Republicans have criticized the plan for its stance on climate change, request, Rescue Rooter, Reshape the U.S. federal government, reshape the United States federal government, RETALIATION, Ricca Alcantara, Richard Wieking, ROAR, Robert Kaiden, Robert Van Nest, Robert Wilson, Ron Dellums, Ron Lighten, Ronald G. Overholt, Ronald J. Cook, Ronald Madison, Ronald P. Kaminski, Ropers Majeski Kohn Bentley, RSS feed, RSS.com, Rules of Court 10.500 et. seq., Ruthann Ziegler, Ryan, Samsung Bixby, Samsung Podcast app, Samsung Podcasts, Sandra Bland, Sandre Swanson, sara Winslow, Sarah Dreyer, Sarah Hanson, Sarah Kaczmarek, Save America Leadership, Save America Leadership PAC, School Safe Zones, School-to-Prison Pipeline, Schools, Sean Bell, Sean Kipe, Sean McCluskie, Select Chart, Selvi Stanislaus, Senator Chris Coons, senior, Senior advisor, set up for multiple podcast submissions, Share your stories, sharply reducing environmental and climate change regulations to favor fossil fuel production, Shawn, Shawn Ryan, Shawn Ryan Show, Shayne Topp, Shelley K. Finlayson, show, Sibin Ibrahim, Sign in with your Amazon account, SiriusXM app, Smoking, Smosh, Smosh Reads Reddit Stories, Society, Society Culture, Society Culture Philosophy, soldier, Some aspects of the plan have recently been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, Some conservatives, Some directories, Something that terrified them, Something they cannot explain, SpamCop, Special Counsel, SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE, Sport Justice, Sports, Spotify, stacey geis, Stacey Talieres, staff, staffers, State Police Officers, step-by-step instructions, Stephan Barber, Stephon Clark, Steve Winkler, Steven Cheung, Steven Mattras, still ongoing investigation, Stitcher has been discontinued, stitcher logo, Stories, stories that no one else would believe happened, Students Civil Rights; Hate and Bias at School, submission, Submission Guide, Submit Your Podcast, submit your podcast for inclusion in the app, submit your podcast for review, Submit your podcast to iTunes, submit your show to Amazon Music, submitting, SUBORNATION AND SOLICITATION OF PERJURIOUS TESTIMONY, Subscribers can listen to podcasts, subscriptions, successes and struggles, Sue Eadie, superstar management, Superstarmanagement.com, Superstars, support the agenda of next Republican president, Susie Wiles, Systemic Corruption, Systemic Racism, taking part in his murder, talk about many things, Tamir Rice, tampering, Taras Tyulyakov, TARGETED, Taylor Budowich, Teen Abuse, Teen Depression, Teen Suicide, Teen Violence, TEENS OF THE 60s, telling the truth, terminating diversity, Terrance Stinnette, Terry Simmons- Booker, than entertainment, That's our job, The blueprint seeks to institute tax cuts, the Department of Commerce, the entire executive branch is under the direct control of the president, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the free encyclopedia, The Genius of Randy Wallace Inc., the good and bad, The Heritage Foundation, The investigation, The Joe Rogan Experience, The official podcast, the outskirts of Atlanta, The plan proposes taking partisan control of the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Podcasters page, The Project asserts, The Project proposes deploying the military for domestic law enforcement, The project seeks to cut funding for Medicare and Medicaid, The project seeks to eliminate coverage of emergency contraception under the Affordable Care Act, The Project seeks to infuse the government and society with Christian values, the Republican nominee, the role of the federal government and its agencies, the Rules of Professional Conduct, the separation of church and state, the separation of powers, the strange, The Tucker Carlson Show, their current list of categories, their subscriptions, then we thought, they can’t stop thinking about, they try to forget, Think tanks, This article, this detailed confession, this directory, This directory features female podcasters, Thomas A. Monheim, though its writers disagree on the wisdom of protectionism, Tina Chia-Chi Hwang, Tips for Podcasters, To help, to learn how to automatically submit your show to the major podcast directories, to migrate, to share, Tom Orloff, Tom Yatsco, Top Podcasts, transition, Trayvon Martin, tries to make sense, true crime, Trump, Trump campaign, Trustors Security Deed Service, TRUTHFUL POSTS, Tucker, Tucker Carlson, TuneIn, Twitter, Two girls, typically rejected, U. S. Federal District Court, U.S., U.S. Attorney's Office, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Administrator, U.S. Committee On Oversight and Accountability, U.S. Customs Service, U.S. Department of Consumer Affairs, U.S. Department of Corrections, U.S. Department of Insurance, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, U.S. Election, U.S. House Committee on Ethics, U.S. House Judiciary Committee, U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, U.S. Marshals Service, U.S. Navy SEAL, U.S. Office, U.S. Office of Inspector General, U.S. Office of Special Counsel, U.S. Secret Service, U.S. Senate Committee on Ethics, U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, U.S. Senator Dick Durbin, unaccountable, undercover employee of the FBI, unitary executive theory, united states, United States Attorney General, United States Attorney's Office, United States Constitution Amendments, United States portal, United States Senator, Unruh Rights Act, Until you do so, Update, upload your podcast to spotify and apple podcasts, uploaded, uploaded weekly, urges the government to explicitly reject abortion as health care, US Representative Adam Schiff, US Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, US Representative Ayanna Pressley, US Representative Bennie Thompson, US Representative Byron Donalds, US Representative Cori Bush, US Representative Dan Meuser, US Representative Eleanor Holmes Norton, US Representative Elise Stefanik, US Representative Eric Swalwell, US Representative Gregory Meeks, US Representative Hakeem Jeffries, US Representative Ilhan Omar, US Representative James Clyburn, US Representative James Comer, US Representative Jamie Raskin, US Representative Jasmine Crockett, US Representative Jim Jordan, US Representative Joaquin Castro, US Representative Katie Porter, US Representative Kweisi Mfume, US Representative Lauren Boebert, US Representative Lisa McClain, US Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, US Representative Matt Gaetz, US Representative Mike Johnson, US Representative Mike Turner, US Representative Nancy Pelos, US Representative Pramila Jayapal, US Representative Rashida Tlaib, US Representative Ro Khanna, US Representative Sheila Jackson Lee, US Representative Shontel Brow, US Representative Tom Rust, US Representative Zoe Lofgren, US Senator  Josh Hawley, US Senator Alex Padilla, US Senator Amy Jean Klobuchar, US Senator Charles E. Schumer, US Senator Charles Grassley, US Senator Chris Coons, US Senator Cory Booker, US Senator Elizabeth Warren, US Senator John Cornyn, US Senator John Neely Kennedy, US Senator Laphonza Butler, US Senator Lindsey Graham, US Senator Marco Rubio, US Senator Marsha Blackburn, US Senator Mitch McConnell, US Senator Richard Blumenthal, US Senator Ted Cruz, US Senator Tim Scott, use in other listening apps, USMS, V.P. HARRIS, Valgeria Harvey, validate, Victoria Henley, Vijaya Gadde, visibility, voting rights, wait for approval, walked out, Walter Scott, Wartime, Wartime Stories, was never seen again, Washington, We discuss the ups and downs, We're better, we're the REAL thing. Please enjoy the show, Wealth Inequality, Website www.project2025.org, Welcome, Wellpoint Asset Recovery LLC, West Borneo, WFG TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, where his body was placed, while others are norm-breaking proposals that might survive court challenges, Whistleblower, who was involved, whose programs would be either transferred to other agencies or terminated, why not, Wikidata, wikipedia, will not be able to find, will reject your feed, Willful Criminal Deception, Willoughby Stuart & Bening, win the 2024 presidential election, wins and losses, with a verification code, with our guest, Women in Podcasting, Word, world-wide podcasters, would face court challenges, Xavier Becerra, Yolanda Smith, you can register for free, you will need to add, you will receive a confirmation email, you’ll need to, you’ll need to be, your clipboard, your podcast fits, your podcast host, your podcast’s RSS feed, your show, your show title, YouTube Music, Yvette Trevino, Zachary Young

Post navigation

Previous PostPrevious COINTELPRO 2K22 Part 4: Campaign of Calumny Deceit
Next PostNext COINTELPRO 2K22 Part 6: Politicians Jayapal and Warren ANTI-JUDICIAL CORRUPTION ACT

“In another religion they honor people who serve like you with Sainthood!”” – Economics Professor Adeel Malik,Oxford University, England and World Renowned News Expert Commentator, speaking about Abdul-Jalil and the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation.

“GOD sent me an ANGEL!”” – Hammer, speaking about Abdul-Jalil.

“Jalil, YOU ARE A TZADIK (SAINT)!”– Barry Barkan, Live Oak Institute and
  Ashoka Fellow at Ashoka Foundation:Innovators for the Public

“I thank God for you and for bringing you into my life and for the ministry you have been given to help the people of God!”– Pastor L. J. Jennings, Kingdom Builders Christian Fellowship, speaking about Abdul-Jalil and AMWF

Abdul-Jalil: A Child Prodigy- GENIUS!
ABDUL-JALIL RECEIVES 2021-22 "Certificate of Recognition" from the CALIFORNIA SATE ASSEMBLY for HUMANITARIAN, CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS ACHIEVEMENTS!
1994-96 National Football League Super Bowl and “NFL Experience” Awarded Abdul-Jalil Cross Pen and Pencil Set for “Distinguished Marketing and Promotional Services” by NFL Properties
Framed Belal AMWF logo ALBANY Proc
AMWF and Belal Esa Honored with City of ALBANY Proclamation
Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, c.1971

In 1971 Abdul-Jalil had the HONOR of having his portrait painted by Beauford Delaney, hailed as the most important African-American artists of the 20th century, whose life appeared to symbolize the mythical artistic existence of privation and relative obscurity, that show a retrospective of “uninhibited colorist (though never an unintelligent one)” that is “apotheosized” and whose talent and “free, open and outgoing nature” engendered admiration from everyone whom was fortunate enough to encounter him as he was THE darling of the international culture scene in New York and Paris. James Baldwin called him his “spiritual father.”

Beauford Delaney is ranked among the Top 10 globally, and in United States. Delaney’s best rank was in 1944, the artist’s rank has improved over the last 5 years, with the most dramatic change in 1992.

His list of friends and acquaintances including artists, World Leaders, politicians, activist, authors/poets/writers, intellectuals, filmmakers, promoted by numerous patrons of the arts, world Cultural Ambassadors, art gallery owners, befriended by notable figures, and musicians Stuart Davis — his closest painter compatriot — W.E.B. Du Bois (whose portrait he painted), Salvadore Dalí (whose portrait he painted), Countee Cullen, Louis Armstrong (whose portrait he painted), Duke Ellington (whose portrait he painted), Ethel Waters (whose portraits he painted), W.C. Handy (whose portrait he painted), Henry Miller (who wrote a tribute to him), John F. Kennedy (whose portraits he painted), Robert Kennedy (whose portraits he painted), Jean-Claude Killy (whose portraits he painted), Herb Gentry, Alain Locke, Cy Twombly, Sterling Brown,  Langston Hughes, Georgia O’Keeffe (who drew charcoal and pastel portraits of Delaney in 1943), Augusta Savage, Stuart Davis, John Marin, Pablo Picasso (whose portrait he painted), Richard A. Long (whose portrait he painted), John Koenig (whose portrait he painted), and Claude McKay were connected to Paris in various ways. 

Josephine Baker

Luminaries Josephine Baker, Bob Blackburn, Ed Clark, Bob Thompson, Marian Anderson (whose portrait he painted), Jacob Lawrence, Ella Fitzgerald (whose portrait he painted), Zora Neale Hurston, Alfred Stieglitz, Carl Van Vechten, Edward Steichen, Dorothy Norman, Anaïs Nin, art studio owner Charles Alston, Jackson Pollock, Vassili Pikoula, Henri Chahine (whose portrait he painted), Charlie Parker (whose portrait and music he painted.), James Jones, Jean Genet, Lawrence Calcagno, Cab Calloway, Elaine DeKooning, Palmer C. Hayden (whose portrait he painted), art dealer Darthea Speyer (whose portrait he painted) who had exhibitions of Delaney's art at Paris' Galerie Lambert in 1964. Others include artists Charles Boggs, Al Hirschfeld, John Franklin Koenig, Harold Cousins, Herbert Gentry (whose portrait he painted), Ed Clark, and Ellis Wilson, authors James Jones and Henry Miller (who was also a water colorist), Writers Richard Wright, Surrealist poet Stanislas Rodanski, Chester Himes, Ralph Ellison, William Gardner Smith, Richard Gibson, Lorraine Hansberry, Ted Joans, art historian Richard A. Long, and his friend Lynn Stone.

* * TESTIMONIALS ON ABDUL-JALIL * *

Emanuel Steward on Jalil Emanuel Steward, Evander Holyfield, and Hammer in ring with Heavyweight Title Belts Emanuel Steward, Evander Holyfield, and Hammer in ring with Heavyweight Title Belts

“The Man who turns hits into MILLION$.” – The Tribune.
“You really are the BEST.” – L. BOSTOCK, California Angels.
“GOD sent me an Angel” – M.C. HAMMER.
“Smart Youth, most intriguing, has the Baseball world at his feet.” – N.Y. POST .

“Thanks for getting the Deal DONE Jalil!”- Evander “Real Deal” Holyfield, the only boxer in history to win the undisputed championship in two weight classes (cruiserweight in the late 1980s and at heavyweight in the early 1990s).

Reggie's Prayer Reggie's Prayer

“Jalil, I told everybody that you guys are representing me!”- Reggie "the Minister of Defense" White, two-time NFL Defensive Player of the Year, Super Bowl XXXI champion, 13-time Pro Bowl, holds second place all-time among NFL career sack leaders with 198 (behind Bruce Smith's 200 career sacks). He was selected to the NFL 75th Anniversary All-Time Team, NFL 100th Anniversary All-Time Team, NFL 1990s All-Decade Team, and the NFL 1980s All-Decade Team. White is a member of the College Football Hall of Fame and the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

Deion "Prime Time" Sanders playing with Atlanta Braves and Atlanta Falcons at the same time! Deion "Prime Time" Sanders playing with Atlanta Braves and Atlanta Falcons at the same time!

“You are going to have to deal with him (Jalil) now!”- Deion “Prime Time” Sanders to Atlanta Braves and Atlanta Hawks former President and General Manager Stan Kasten and Atlanta Braves General Manager John Schuerholz

“I don’t know what I would have done without you!.” – J.C. WATTS, U.S. HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES.
“Thanks for directing me to the Sonics.” – GUS WILLIAMS, NBA.
“Imaginative, foresighted, some pretty impressive credentials. His I.Q. QUALIFIES HIM AS A GENIUS.” – UPI .
“That’s the finest promotion job for an unknown athlete that I have ever seen.” – N.Y. JETS.
“I’m so happy!! I’m full of money!!” – C. ROBINSON, NBA.
“He is personable, unafraid, confident. and athletes are attracted to him” – D. MAGGARD, U.S. Olympic Committee.
“You have never been wrong” – EMANUEL STEWARD, Boxing
“He told me what he wanted, we shook hands. We made the deal in 5 minutes.” – B. BAVASI, California Angels

Jalil’s Lectures/Presentations

Superstar Management’s Podcast
Superstar Management’s Podcast

For the BEST in Pro Sports and Entertainment

Part 2 of 2 Interviews of Abdul-Jalil, Nanita Strong and Imam Wali Mohammed on AmericanMuslim360 (AM360)
byAbdul Jalil

Part 2 of 2 Interviews of Abdul-Jalil, Nanita Strong and Imam Wali Mohammed on AmericanMuslim360 (AM360)
Abdul-Jalil, Nanita Strong and Imam Wali Mohammed discuss Feeding the needy on AmericanMuslim360 (AM360)in Part 2 of 2 Interviews by Niamat Shaheed.
AmericanMuslim360 (AM360)
AmericanMuslim360 Premium Channel is about Islam and being Muslim in American. AmericanMuslim360 has programing space available for Muslims who wish to host their own show. AM360 goal is to become a Network Channel in 2013, creating the AmericanMuslim360 Network Channel broadcasting an Islamic focused, 24/7 Muslim hosted Internet radio. If you wish to be a part of this progressive Community Life building effort, then host or move your show to AM360 Premium Channel. Connect Thomas Abdul-Salaam at www.AmericnMuslim360.com for details. Programing needs : Muslimah2Muslimah, Finance, Education, Economic Development, Brother2Brother, Youth, Music/Hip-Hop, Sports, News, Entertainment, Weather, Fashion, Business2Business, Social Issues, Politics, Movie Reviews, Arts, Stock Market, Islamic History, Hadith, Quran, Prophet Muhammad, Imam Warith Deen Mohammed, Jumah, Arabic, Taleem, How-to shows, and more.

Part 2 of 2 Interviews of Abdul-Jalil, Nanita Strong and Imam Wali Mohammed on AmericanMuslim360 (AM360)
Part 2 of 2 Interviews of Abdul-Jalil, Nanita Strong and Imam Wali Mohammed on AmericanMuslim360 (AM360)
January 17, 2013
Abdul Jalil
Part 1 of 2 Interviews of Abdul-Jalil on AmericanMuslim360 (AM360)
January 17, 2013
Abdul Jalil
KNBR Law of Sports broadcast on “Bounce, The Don Barksdale Story”
December 13, 2010
Abdul Jalil
Law of Sports w-AJ, Doug, Ivan 12-4-10
December 5, 2010
Abdul Jalil
KGO Radio’s broadcast discussion of “Out. The Glenn Burke Story”
November 22, 2010
Abdul Jalil
Hip Hop and The Spread of Islam Part 1 of 2
June 19, 2009
Abdul Jalil
National Balsa Law Conference Part 2 of 2
June 19, 2009
Abdul Jalil
National Balsa Law Conference Part 1 of 2
June 19, 2009
Abdul Jalil
Search Results placeholder

California Appeals and Superior Court Corruption

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-DZTATaUPQ
ABDUL-JALIL- the First SUPER AGENT
ABDUL-JALIL-Sports and Entertainment Law Courses in All Major Law and MBA Programs
ABDUL-JALIL-Lecturor, Presenter, Sports and Entertainment Law, Marketing, Branding
MC Hammer's Dedication to Jalil
Kobe Celebration of Life AMWF
Kobe Celebration of Life
The MAN who turns Hit$ into Million$ Agent Abdul Jalil, and one of the benefits that goes with negotiating RICHEST contract in Professional Sports and Baseball History
The MAN who turns Hit$ into Million$ Agent Abdul Jalil, and one of the benefits that goes with negotiating RICHEST contract in Professional Sports and Baseball History. Tribune photo BY ROY WILLIAMS
Lyman Bostock signs RICHEST contract in Professional Sports and Baseball History with Angles owner Gene Autry Lyman Bostock signs RICHEST contract in Professional Sports and Baseball History with Angles owner Gene Autry

Harris: I Won, I’M PRESIDENT!!

Pages

  • “Huge Victory”: Black Farmers Hail $5B in New COVID Relief Law to Redress Generations of Racism
  • #BLACKLIVESMATTER CLAPS BACK!! TWITTER, GOOGLE MUST Appear in Court! SUBPOENAED In Criminal Corruption with “COURTEL”!
  • #BlackLivesMatter? HELL No! Dirty District Attorney NAZI NAnZI Oink’Malley!!!
  • 290 Page Subpeona Request for Production of Documents and Depositions for Kamala Harris
  • A G Jerry Brown, D A Tom Orloff and City Attorney John Russo's Failed Campaign Promises; Brokers For White Collar Crime; Advocates of Racism, Selective Prosecution, White Class Priviledge!
  • Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim Exemplifies Beauford Delaney’s Masterful Portraits
  • ABDUL-JALIL FILES FEDERAL DOJ/FBI Complaint with USAG Garland for FACEBOOK ILLEGAL TARGETING AND BAN!
  • ABDUL-JALIL RECEIVES “Certificate of Recognition” from CALIFORNIA SATE ASSEMBLY for 2021 HUMANITARIAN, CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS ACHIEVEMENTS!
  • Abdul-Jalil's Profile
  • al-HAKIM has Seventeen (17) Successful Recusals from Judicial Challenges
  • al-Hakim Predicted Judge Frank Roesch Patterned, Willful Corruption
  • Alameda County District Attorney, NAZI NAnZI Oink’Malley 286 Page Subpoena to Produce Documents and Depositions
  • ALL Matters on THIS WEBSITE ARE TRUE AND FACTUAL
  • ANITA HILL FOR SUPREME COURT! THIS IS WHY!
  • Attorney General Jerry Brown Defending and Covering Up DA Tom Orloff and Criminals Supposed To Investigate and Prosecute!
  • Attorney General, Superior Court Judges, District Attorney and Child Support Services Caught in Fraud of Minor Children
  • Belal Esa and AMWF receive Posthumous Congressional Proclamation for his work with the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation
  • Belal Esa and AMWF receive Posthumous State Proclamation/Resolution from The California Governor and State Legislature
  • Biden Harris Epic Fail of Black Voters
  • CAECAY Igniting Change through Charity Support
  • CAECAY, a Predictive Strategy Company
  • CAECAY’S ICONS CHARITY REGISTRAR
  • CAECAY’S Significance, Highlights and Benefits of Partnerships
  • California Superior and Appeals Court Fraud in Motion to Dismiss
  • Charges Against Miscreant Judge Jon Tigar
  • Charges Against Oakland City Attorney John Russo and The City Attorneys Office
  • COURTEL “WRIT RACKET”
  • Defendants and Defense Counsels Fraud
  • Demanding Investigation of Judge Kim Colwell and Department 511
  • Demodaries- ALL Y’all Get Nutn!
  • Demodaries- Biden Dropp’n U.S. Food and BOMBS on Gaza, Gotta Stop NetenHitler
  • Demodaries- Da Devil You know, Lesser of Evils
  • Demodaries- JEWDICIAL PROCESS: PALESCIDE, GAZACAUST
  • Demodaries- Sleep’n wid da Devil
  • Demodaries- Tricknology ain’t Work’n!
  • District Attorney Grants New Trials to 22 Defendants, Reversing Legacy of a Brutal Judge
  • Empowering Underserved Youth through CAECAY
  • Entire al-HAKIM “Illegal” Proceedings are Grand, Systemic and Endemic Corruption
  • Everything You Need to Know About NIL
  • Evidentiary Documents and Previous Media Advisories
  • FACEBOOK ILLEGAL TARGETED AND BANS ABDUL-JALIL, HE FILES FEDERAL DOJ/FBI Complaint!
  • FACEBOOK ILLEGAL, TARGETED CENSORSHIP FOR V.P. HARRIS USING FRAUDULENT FACT CHECKERS FALSELY LABELING AND DELETING TRUTHFUL POSTS
  • FACEBOOK MUST STOP THIS TROLLING,  SURVEILLING, CORRUPTION, CONSPIRING AND CENSORSHIP FOR KAMALA HARRIS AND THE COURTEL IMMEDIATELY
  • Food Shortages? Nope, Too Much Food In The Wrong Places
  • Frederick Douglass On How Slave Owners Used Food As A Weapon Of Control
  • Free Base Ain’t Free
  • GOVERNMENT TARGETED al-HAKIM “CAMPAIGN OF CALUMNY DECEIT”
  • Harlem Renaissance Modernist Beauford Delaney, GREATEST Artist in African-American Art History
  • How Abdul-Jalil and  MC Hammer HISTORIC “Rap-The-Vote Concert Series” Campaign Strategy Spawned Rise of Vladamir Putin to Power AND Secured Re-Election of Russian President Boris Yeltsin
  • How the Clintons Robbed and Destroyed Haiti
  • Impact of CAECAY Empowering Underserved Youth Worldwide
  • Inequality & Structural Racism in the Food System
  • Jayne Williams, Law Firm Meyers Nave, Oakland City Attorney, Judicial Corruption to Set Aside ALL Cases
  • Jesse Jackson for President Campaign Committee
  • Judge Blocks Rule That Would Have Kicked 700,000 People Off SNAP
  • Judge orders L.A. City and County to offer Shelter to Everyone on Skid Row by Fall
  • Judge Tigar Rewards his Attorney's in al-Hakim v. CSAA Case
  • JUDICIAL EQUITY AND REFORM INITIATIVE
  • Judicial, Government, Attorney, and Corporate Corruption in al-Hakim v. CSAA and Rescue Matters
  • Kamala Harris Exploiting, Commodifying, BLM Movement for Personal, Political Gain- Earned $1.9 million Last Year
  • Kamala Harris, Government Stole Server, “scrubbed” internet, shut down al-Hakim’s Social Media to Silence Voice Exposing Criminal Activity!
  • Kamala Harris's father slams her as a Race-Grifter for making a 'travesty' of her Jamaican heritage
  • KPFA Show Host Combats Censorship By Oakland City Attorney John Russo
  • LEGAL AID INTAKE REFERRAL FORM
  • Leveraging 50 Years of Experience for Athletes, Entertainers, Celebrities, and Influencers in the NIL Era
  • Matching Charitable Philanthropic Organizations with ICONS
  • Matching ICONS with Charitable Philanthropic Organizations
  • Mayor Lionel Wilson’s City of Oakland 1983 Statewide “Conference On Urban Economic Development”
  • Newsnow!
  • Oakland City Attorney John Russo's Political Suicide
  • Occupiers Redeem Kings Dream While Keith Carson and His Poverty Pimps are Killers of Kings Dream- Sell It Out
  • Order to Declare al-HAKIM Vexatious Litigant is PURELY RETALIATORY
  • Requesting Results of Supreme Court Investigation of California Appeals Court Action
  • Ron Cook's Condemning and Convicting Trial Testimony
  • Subpoena for Google To Produce Documents, Meet and Confer, Motion to Compel, and Reply Motion to Compel
  • Subpoena for Twitter To Produce Documents, Meet and Confer, Motion to Compel, Twitter Response, Reply Motion to Compel
  • SUPERSTAR Sports, Entertainment, Celebrity and Influencer Charities: Good for Image, But What About Good Works?
  • Tara Reade says Harris "turned a blind eye to sex assault victims"
  • TARGETED al-HAKIM by ”FIXING CASES” in Furtherance of Corruption Agenda
  • Ten Lessons for Talking About Race, Racism, and Racial Justice
  • The 1999 City File Note Refutes Recission Claim
  • The COURTEL Corruptocrats and Kleptocrats
  • THE COURTEL, THE COURT CORRUPTION CARTEL
  • The Top Five Mistakes that Non-Profits Make when Attempting to Engage Superstars
  • Tigar Aborted Witness Testimony of The Honorable Judge Leo Dorado
  • Tigar Employed The Judicial Council, Alameda County Superior Court and County Sherriffs To Investigate al-Hakim
  • Tigar’s Appropriate Disciplinary Sanctions-Removal, Disbarment
  • Tigar’s Mental Meltdown On Bench When Served Scathing 750 Page Indictment For Cause!
  • Tigar's Fraudulent Bereavement And Trial Ending Orders
  • TO LEARN WHO RULES OVER YOU, SIMPLY FIND OUT WHO YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO CRITICIZE!
  • Twitter Engages in Censorship, Protects A G Jerry Brown, City Attorney John Russo, D.A. Tom Orloff’s Corruption
  • VENDETTA- TARGETED al-HAKIM aware of Court Entrapment Litigation Strategy
  • VENDETTA- TARGETED al-HAKIM by ”FIXING CASES” in Furtherance of Corruption Agenda
  • VENDETTA- TARGETED al-HAKIM PERSECUTION
  • VIDEO ADMISSIONS, PROOF Sheriff’s Deputy MARKITA SAYLES FIXING THE CASE, COMMITTED FRAUD UPON THE PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA; INSTRUCTED BY SPECIAL SERVICES
  • VP Kamala "Kriminal Harass" Harris Embezzled Child Support from FaceBook Legal Counsel and Fundraiser! Extorts Parents, Targets and Threatens Father!
  • WHAT DID YOU GET FOR YOUR BIDEN/HARRIS VOTE?!

Recent Posts

  • DMV Gordon’s SPECIOUS DECEPTION, SPURIOUS EVASION OF DMV CIVIL SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) in East Bay Auto Center vs. AMWF
  • County Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez/Markita Sayles CIVIL SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) in East Bay Auto Center in East Bay Auto Center vs. AMWF
  • DMV CIVIL SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) in East Bay Auto Center vs. AMWF
  • DOI CIVIL SUBPOENA (DUCES TECUM) in East Bay Auto Center vs. AMWF
  • FACEBOOK ILLEGAL TARGETED AND BANS ABDUL-JALIL, HE FILES FEDERAL DOJ/FBI Complaint!

Archives

  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • March 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • February 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • February 2016
  • May 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009

Contact US

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
Who We Serve

We provide FREE groceries, clothing, shoes, hygiene kits, sleeping bags, blankets, medicine, and hot chef’s prepared gourmet meals to the homeless and homeless encampments and habitations of ALL kinds, from the streets to parks, from trees and bushes to alleys, from corners to ditches, from hand built shanties to tents under freeway overpasses!

Homeless encampment under the freeway on Peralta and 35th streets in Oakland, Calif.

We provide FREE groceries, bagged and hot chef’s prepared gourmet meals, plus the above, to the Oakland Safe Parking Program and the CAREavan Safe Parking Programs, among others, at local senior and community centers, and faith based organizations in an effort to provide families and/or individuals who have been displaced and are temporarily homeless, living in their vehicles and need a safe place to park and sleep overnight, with restrooms and an attendant present throughout the night at all of the locations.

We also provide food to those that had previously obtained necessary items at their Senior Center. But now that they’re closed are vital to the wellness of the community and senior population with our Food Bank program and Free Farmers Market Food Give-Aways.

Our HISTORIC Hammer “Rap-The-Vote Concert Series” Secured Re-Election of Russian President Boris Yeltsin AND Spawned Rise of Vladamir Putin to Power!

Our HISTORIC Hammer “Rap-The-Vote Concert Series” Secured Re-Election of Russian President Boris Yeltsin AND Spawned Rise of Vladamir Putin to Power!

“As long as there are reformers in the Russian Federation and the other states leading the journey toward democracy's horizon, our strategy must be to support them. And our place must be at their side.” -President Bill Clinton on the re-election of Russian President Boris Yeltsin in 1995- 

This 1995 event is a WORLD HISTORIC perspective about how our “WORLD ALTERING” Urban-American, western style, political campaign strategy utilizing M. C. Hammer in a “Rap-The-Vote Concert Series” secured the 18-45 voter turnout and the re-election of Russian President Boris Yeltsin in 1995 with the “Our Home Is Russia” (NDR), a Russian liberal political party. Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim devised a strategic plan, executive produced, produced, filmed and broadcast on Russian National TV a series of concerts in St. Petersburg, Moscow, and the WORLD. This campaign tactic was their most effective strategy, greatest strength- uniquely different and vastly superior to anything Russia had ever witnessed. This comprehensive, targeted attack with our expertise well grounded in modern focused campaigning strategy, advertising, marketing, and promotions was trumpeted for saving Russian democracy with Yeltsin’s re-election ensuring continuity in the Democratic evolution of Russia and securing world peace. The television programming was so successful that it has regularly run on air since 1995!

At the time we began our concerts and campaign events over the weeks in St. Petersburg, Vladimir Putin was then Deputy mayor of St. Petersburg, organized the St. Petersburg branch of the Party Our Home Is Russia, was it’s Chairman, and led the campaign issue of the party in the elections to the Duma that led to his rise to power and being named President of Russia by Boris Yeltsin. 

This strategy was trumpeted for saving Russian democracy with Yeltsin’s re-election ensuring continuity in the Democratic evolution of Russia and securing world peace!

This strategy was heralded world wide by political pundits as “incredibly brilliant”, a “triumph for democratic reform” and “universally invaluable” in it’s effect of having “saved” Russian democracy, as Yeltsin was the only alternative in ensuring continuity in the evolution of Russia and securing world peace.

This coup, a miraculous event in history, was depicted and canonized in the 2004 film “Spinning Boris” starring Jeff Goldblum, Anthony LaPaglia and Liev Schreiber.

“Spinning Boris” The Best President of Russia America Ever Had   ..L. A. Times Review

Jeff Goldblum, Anthony LaPaglia and Liev Schreiber star as a trio of elite American political campaign operatives who were hired in secret to manage Russian President Boris Yeltsin’s election campaign in 1996. He’s polling at 6 percent with the election a few months away. First, they must get someone’s attention; they succeed finally with Yeltsin’s daughter, then it’s polling, focus groups, messages and spin. Even as Yeltsin’s numbers go up, they are unsure who hired them and if Yeltsin’s allies have a different plan in mind than victory. When the going gets toughest, they put a spin on their stake: democracy and capitalism must win. They orchestrate the most spectacular political comeback of the twentieth century – as they “sold” Boris Yeltsin to the Russian public gaining Yeltsin’s successful re-election.

Excerpts of the Re-election of Russian President Boris Yeltsin in “Clinton Secrets”, a book by JOHN DIAMOND, Associated Press Writer

The campaign tactic was their most effective strategy, greatest strength- uniquely different and vastly superior to anything Russia had ever witnessed. This strategic plan with our expertise well grounded in modern American campaigning got Yeltsin re-elected. This was simply a matter of fact that he was the best the modern world could get compared to the alternative communist and he was fully supported by the U.S.

A State Department memorandum, marked “confidential,’’ summarized then President Bill Clinton’s meeting with Yeltsin at a summit in Egypt, where Clinton told Yeltsin he ”wanted to make sure that everything the United States did would have a positive impact and nothing should have a negative impact’’ on Yeltsin’s re-election. The memo added the U. S. wanted an upcoming summit with the Russian leader to be successful to “reinforce everything that Yeltsin had done.’’

THIS BLACK HISTORY IS WORLD HISTORY!

Abdul-Jalil was honored in Miami, Florida and Haiti—
Haiti Unite- sm World Conference of Mayors World Conference of Mayors 2010- Abdul-Jalil was honored in Miami, Florida and Haiti, for the Relief Missions to Arch Bishop Joel Jeune of Grace Village in Haiti National Conference Black Mayors they received from the Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation, Stepping Together and Superstar Management with recognition of The World Conference of Mayors (WCM) and The National Conference of Black Mayors (NCBM). This is a tangible reality of SUCCESS in Haiti for ALL the members of the organizations world-wide rather than the many idle cocktail party rants and raves of projects that exist without any substance behind them!
Page One of Letter
Oaklanders Honored for Work In Haiti, Free Logo Design and Business Strategic Plan; YOUR Free Food Program; Entertainment Jobs Feb. 2012- March 2012
Page Two of Letter
About Abdul-Jalil
2005- Federal Complaint with United States Attorney General, Department of Justice, of Hate Crime of Islamophobia and Xenophobia
In 2005 he filed a federal complaint with the United States Attorney General, Department of Justice, of a hate crime of Islamophobia and Xenophobia committed against him by Judge David C. Lee during a trial in Superior Court of Alameda County, California, that is moving forward with the investigation and charges of criminal extrinsic fraud upon the court of the State of California, spoliation of evidence, and the doctrine “unclean hands” against defendants/hostile intervener AAA Insurance; Ron Cook and the law firm of WILLOUGHBY, STUART & BENING; defense counsel Steve Barber and the law firm of Ropers Majeski; and others. The complaint, drafted and filed by al-Hakim in pro per, has broad based support from Democrats and Republicans, was submitted by Congresswoman Barbara Lee with the offices of Congressmen John Conyers, and Charles Rangel, has been review by several legal experts, with advocacy by former Republican Senator J. C. Watts, a client of al-Hakim’s.
The complaint addresses the concern that a Superior Court Judges’ conduct rose to the level of consideration for a Federal Crime and a Civil Rights violation because the bench upon which the judge rules is “under the color of law” and certainly the violation of anyone’s civil rights is a federal crime. “Muslims, just as any other group, can not be afraid to speak up when their rights have been abridged. If one does not speak up, then the transgressions goes unreported and the perpetrator goes on to harm again unchecked, it does not matter whom the transgressor is” said al-Hakim. The complaint, perhaps even more importantly, not only requested Merrily Friedlander, Chief of the Civil Rights Division, to make an investigation of a judicial hate crime, but also the many other civil rights and due process violations of judicial misconduct, and attorney extrinsic fraud upon the court and law that are themselves directly the matters complained. J. C. Watts in asking “What does a supposed terrorist act in Russia have to do with the negligent contamination of a home in America?” posed the argument that there must be consideration of and a response to the many issues in the complaint.
2003- al-Hakim Prevails in Motion to Vacate the Appraisal Awards Against CSAA
In February 2003 after 3 years of defendants legal delays with ten motions for terminating sanctions to prevent the motion from being heard, al-Hakim prevailed in his Motion to Vacate the Appraisal awards against CSAA. (View or download Order here http://www.box.net/shared/n10p7erncv)
The courts found that the awards had to be vacated if, among other grounds, “the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or other undue means”; or the appraisers(A. Michael  DeCeasare, Ruben Estrada, Ron Magin and Gene Roberts) “exceeded their powers and the award cannot be corrected without affecting the merits of the decision upon the controversy submitted”. The order further cited the improper use of “cash value” as replacement cost, use of erroneous “used cost” figures, denial of coverage, injection of fraud, concealment, breach of contract, and coverage issues without any reason or evidence, CSAA could not defend their actions nor those of their own appraiser. What the court did not address in the motion to vacate was the actual collusion and fraud again perpetrated upon the court by the defendant Ron Cook and the hostile intervener when they provided to and the appraisal panel adopted the improper “cash values” used in the vacated award and the exhibits to support them came directly from the presentation of CSAA’s expert Gary Halpin at the vacated appraisal, and that the fraudulent award itself was further prepared, written, submitted and distributed by defendant Cook and the hostile intervener. This victory locks CSAA in on the Bad Faith actions we submitted to the courts and are subject to summary judgment.
Clay al-Hakim Good Litigator

Abdul-Jalil negotiated a series of contracts that included many unprecedented benefits to the individual clients, one of which was interest-free loans that could be forgiven. Upon review by the Internal Revenue Service, the contracts and  returns where thrown out and challenged by the IRS as the IRS filed suit. After an 8 year legal battle, he prevailed in Federal Tax Court and established that Interest free Loans where in fact legal. This unprecedented legal ruling was established as a standard in the Tax Laws and was written in several National Law Journals. Cite:  “IRS vs Al-Hakim” published by Commerce Clearing House(CCH) Tax Court Memorandum Cases editions KF 6234A 505 and Maxwell McMillian (Prentice Hall) Federal Tax Cases edition KF 6234A 512 Tax Court Memorandum Decisions. Articles and citations available upon request….
The Historic “al-Hakim” Tax Code §7872 [692] Ruling
After al-Hakim’s victory in the Federal Tax Courts against the Tax Commissioner, in

Abdul-Jalil
Abdul-Jalil

December 2000 the IRS moved to change the Tax Codes with the historic “al-Hakim” Tax Code §7872 [692] Ruling. The IRS changed the Federal Tax Codes such that it now “prevents no-interest loans” and was instituted to eliminate and close the Federal Income Tax loop-hole created with al-Hakim’s use of interest free loans in sports and entertainment financial transactions.
CITE: Tax Notes, Dec. 4, 2000, p. 1311; 89 Tax Notes 1311 (Dec. 4, 2000) “al-Hakim Tax Code” Ruling
al-Hakim’s victory in the Federal Tax Court over the U. S. Tax Commissioner has the nations foremost academic institutions and academians in the study of Law and Business teaching al-Hakim’s use of interest free loans in Tax Free financial transactions as part of the Law and Business curriculum in such hallowed halls as Harvard University, Yale University,Washington University, Stanford University, University of Virginia, and Wake Forest University Schools of Law Federal Tax Courses, among others.

Abdul-Jalil negotiated a series of contracts that included many unprecedented benefits to the individual clients, one of which was interest-free loans that could be forgiven. Upon review by the Internal Revenue Service, the contracts and  returns where thrown out and challenged by the IRS as the IRS filed suit. After an 8 year legal battle, he prevailed in Federal Tax Court and established that Interest free Loans where in fact legal. This unprecedented legal ruling was established as a standard in the Tax Laws and was written in several National Law Journals. Cite: 
“IRS vs Al-Hakim” published by Commerce Clearing House(CCH) Tax Court Memorandum Cases editions KF 6234A 505 and Maxwell McMillian (Prentice Hall) Federal Tax Cases edition KF 6234A 512 Tax Court Memorandum Decisions. Articles and citations available upon request….

The Historic “al-Hakim” Tax Code §7872 [692] Ruling
After al-Hakim’s victory in the Federal Tax Courts against the Tax Commissioner, in

Abdul-Jalil
Abdul-Jalil

December 2000 the IRS moved to change the Tax Codes with the historic “al-Hakim” Tax Code §7872 [692] Ruling. The IRS changed the Federal Tax Codes such that it now “prevents no-interest loans” and was instituted to eliminate and close the Federal Income Tax loop-hole created with al-Hakim’s use of interest free loans in sports and entertainment financial transactions.
CITE: Tax Notes, Dec. 4, 2000, p. 1311; 89 Tax Notes 1311 (Dec. 4, 2000) “al-Hakim Tax Code” Ruling
al-Hakim’s victory in the Federal Tax Court over the U. S. Tax Commissioner has the nations foremost academic institutions and academians in the study of Law and Business teaching al-Hakim’s use of interest free loans in Tax Free financial transactions as part of the Law and Business curriculum in such hallowed halls as Harvard University, Yale University,Washington University, Stanford University, University of Virginia, and Wake Forest University Schools of Law Federal Tax Courses, among others.

Judge ADMITS Court Corruption against al-Hakim

Judge ADMITS to Court Criminalty against al-Hakim

  • Nowtruth FaceBook
  • Nowtruth Instagram
  • Nowtruth Tumblr
Proudly powered by WordPress
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.